AzTrials
AzTrials

Hot FlashesPhase 2NCT05419908

Trial to Investigate the Effect of ESN364 in Early Postmenopausal Women Suffering From Hot Flashes

A Phase 2 study testing Fezolinetant in people with Hot Flashes, run by Ogeda S.A. at 8 sites in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ESN364 on the severity and frequency of hot flashes in early postmenopausal women suffering from hot flashes, in terms of changes in weekly Hot Flash Score from baseline to Week 12. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 65 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Hot Flashes
What is being tested?
Fezolinetant
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
87 participants
Where
8 sitesBelgium
Study dates
21 Sep 2015to 6 Oct 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 12 consecutive months; or spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 6 months with biochemical criteria of menopause (FSH >40 IU/L); or spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 3 months with biochemical/physical criteria of menopause (FSH >40 IU/L and E2 <0.21 nmol/); or having had bilateral oophorectomy at least 6 weeks prior to screening (with or without hysterectomy);
  • At least 49 moderate or severe hot flashes or night sweats over a period of 7 consecutive days, as recorded in the daily diary during the screening period, with at least 4 of those days with 7 or more moderate or severe hot flashes per day;
  • In good general health as determined on the basis of medical history and general physical examination performed at screening; hematology and chemistry parameters, pulse rate and/or blood pressure, and ECG within the reference range for the population studied, or showing no clinically relevant deviations;
  • Negative urine test for selected drugs of abuse (amphetamines, tricyclic antidepressants, cannabinoids, cocaine, tetrahydrocannabinol, or opiates) at screening;
  • Negative serology panel (including hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg], antihepatitis C virus [HCV] and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody screens);
  • Negative urine pregnancy test at screening;

Who cannot join

  • Use of a prohibited therapy or not willing to wash-out drugs considered prohibited therapies;
  • History (in the past year) or presence of drug or alcohol abuse;
  • Suicide attempt in the past 3 years;
  • Previous or current history of a malignant tumor (except basal cell carcinoma);
  • Active liver disease or jaundice, or out-of-range values of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST); or total bilirubin >1.3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN); or creatinine >1.5 times the ULN; or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at screening;
  • Medical condition or chronic disease (including history of neurological [including cognitive], hepatic, renal, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, pulmonary [e.g., moderate asthma], or endocrine disease) or malignancy that could confound interpretation of the study outcome;
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Any psychological disorder according to the criteria indicated in the Diagnostics and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM, 4th edition) within one year prior to screening. Such disorders include but are not limited to current major depression, alcohol (more than 3 glasses of wine, beer, or equivalent/day) or substance abuse/dependence;
  • Unsuited to participate in the study, based on findings observed during physical examination, vital sign assessment, or 12-lead ECG;
  • History of severe allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to drugs in general, including the study drug and any of its excipients;
  • Presence or sequellae of gastrointestinal, liver, kidney or other conditions known to interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion (ADME) mechanisms of drugs;
  • Concurrent participation in another interventional study (or participation within 3 months prior to screening in this study);
  • History of poor compliance in clinical studies;
  • Unable or unwilling to complete the study procedures;
  • Subject is the Investigator or any sub-investigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, or other staff or relative thereof who is directly involved in the conduct of the study.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

Belgium8 sites
  • Site BE32004

    Brussels, 1000

  • Site BE32003

    Genk, 3600

  • Site BE32001

    Ghent, 9000

  • Site BE32006

    Jette, 1090

  • Site BE32005

    Kraainem, 1950

  • Site BE32007

    Leuven

  • Site BE32008

    Mons, 7000

  • Site BE32009

    Tienen, 3300

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Pilot/Phase IIa Trial to Investigate the Effect of ESN364 in Early Postmenopausal Women Suffering From Hot Flashes

The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ESN364 on the severity and frequency of hot flashes in early postmenopausal women suffering from hot flashes, in terms of changes in weekly Hot Flash Score from baseline to Week 12.

This study also evaluated the effect of ESN364 on the severity and frequency of hot flashes at additional timepoints; hot flash interference on daily life, in terms of changes from baseline over time in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS); the effect of ESN364 on climacteric symptoms, in terms of changes from baseline over time in Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ), Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS); pharmacodynamic (PD) effect; and safety and tolerability.

Conditions
Hot Flashes
Being tested
Fezolinetant, Placebo
Keywords
Hot flashes, ESN364, ASP2693, fezolinetant, menopause, postmenopausal
Medical subject headings
Hot Flashes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FezolinetantDrug

    Also called ESN364, ASP2693

    Oral Capsule

  • PlaceboDrug

    Oral Capsule

Study groups in NCT05419908
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FezolinetantExperimentalParticipants received 90 milligrams (mg) fezolinetant capsules orally, twice daily (BID) for a period of 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: Fezolinetant
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received fezolinetant matching placebo capsules orally, BID for a period of 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in The Weekly General Hot Flash Score

    The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:

    (number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)

    The severity of HFs is clinically defined as follows:

    • Mild: sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant didn't wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing.
    • Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
    • Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

    Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant dependent for both number and severity.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

Secondary outcomes (25)
  1. Change From Baseline in The Weekly Hot Flash Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (Method 1)

    The HF Severity Score by method 1 takes into account the number and severity of moderate and severe HF occurred during a given time period and was calculated as follows HF Severity score = [(number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)]/(number of moderate HF + number of severe HF)

    The severity of HFs was clinically defined as follows:

    • Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
    • Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

    Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  2. Change From Baseline in The Weekly Hot Flash Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (Method 2)

    The HF Severity Score by method 2 takes into account moderate and severe HF during a given time period and was calculated as follows HF Severity score = [(number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)]

    The severity of HFs was clinically defined as follows:

    • Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
    • Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

    Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  3. Change From Baseline in The Weekly Mild, Moderate and Severe Hot Flash Frequency at Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The weekly HF frequency was calculated as number of mild, moderate and severe hot flashes over the week.

    • Mild: sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant didn't wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing.
    • Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
    • Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

    Higher number of hot flashes is worse.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  4. Percentage of Participants With >=70% Reduction in the Weekly Hot Flash Score From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:

    (number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)

    The severity of HFs is clinically defined as follows:

    • Mild: sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant didn't wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing.
    • Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
    • Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

    Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  5. Percentage of Participants With >=80% Reduction in the Weekly Hot Flash Score From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:

    (number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)

    The severity of HFs is clinically defined as follows:

    • Mild: sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant didn't wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing.
    • Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
    • Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

    Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  6. Percentage of Participants With >=90% Reduction in the Weekly Hot Flash Score From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:

    (number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)

    The severity of HF is clinically defined as follows:

    • Mild: sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant didn't wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing.
    • Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
    • Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

    Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  7. Percentage of Participants With >=50% Reduction in the Weekly Frequency of Moderate and Severe HF From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The weekly HF frequency of moderate and severe HF was calculated as number of moderate and severe HF over the week.

    • Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
    • Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

    Higher number of HF indicates worse symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  8. Percentage of Participants With >=70% Reduction in the Weekly Frequency of Moderate and Severe HF From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The weekly HF frequency of moderate and severe HF was calculated as number of moderate and severe HF over the week.

    • Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
    • Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

    Higher number of HF indicates worse symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  9. Percentage of Participants With >=90% Reduction in the Weekly Frequency of Moderate and Severe HF From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The weekly HF frequency of moderate and severe HF was calculated as number of moderate and severe HF over the week.

    • Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
    • Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).

    Higher number of HF indicates worse symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  10. Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The HFRDIS was a 10-item scale which measured a woman's perceptions of the degree to which HF interfere with 9 daily life activities (work, social activities, leisure, sleep, mood, concentration, relations with others, sexuality, enjoying life); the 10th item measures interference with overall quality of life. This scale was modeled after items on the Brief Pain Inventory and Brief Fatigue Inventory both of which assessed the extent to which pain or fatigue interfere with daily life. Participants were asked to rate the extent to which HF had interfered with each item during the previous 4-week time interval using a 0 (do not interfere) to 10 (completely interfere) scale. Overall mean score was calculated as sum of items/number of available items. Higher score indicate a higher interference.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  11. Change From Baseline in Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The LSEQ was a 10-item self-rated questionnaire which assessed participants aspects of sleep and early morning behavior. The questions were grouped into 4 chronological areas: the ease of getting to sleep, the perceived quality of sleep, the ease of awaking from sleep, and the integrity of early morning behavior following wakefulness. The LSEQ was a visual analogue scale which requires respondents to place marks on a group of 10 cm lines. representing the changes they have experienced in a variety of symptoms since the beginning of treatment. Lines extends between extremes like "more difficult than usual" and "easier than usual". Responses are measured using a 100-mm scale and are averaged to provide a score for each domain.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  12. Change From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The GCS was a 21-item scale which provides a brief but comprehensive and valid measure of climacteric symptomatology. Each item was rated by the participant according to its severity using a four-point rating scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The first 20 items of the scale combine into three main independent symptom measures: psychological symptoms (items 1 to 11; score 0 to 33), physical symptoms (items 12 to 18; score 0 to 21), and vasomotor symptoms (items 19 to 20; score 0 to 6), by summing up the individual item scores. Item 21 is a probe for sexual dysfunction (Loss of interest in sex). The total score ranges from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  13. Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12

    The SDS was a composite of 3 self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which 3 major sectors in a participant's life are impaired by panic, anxiety, phobic, or depressive symptoms. The participant rates the extent to which his/her 1- work/school, 2- social life, and 3- family life are impaired by his/her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. The 3 items could be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).Higher scores indicate significant functional impairment.

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  14. Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (Days Lost and Days Unproductive)

    The SDS was a composite of 3 self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which 3 major sectors in a participant's life are impaired by panic, anxiety, phobic, or depressive symptoms. The participant rates the extent to which his/her 1- work/school, 2- social life, and 3- family life are impaired by his/her symptoms. In addition to the 3 items, the participants were asked two questions Days Lost: On how many days in the last week did your symptoms cause you to miss school or work or leave you unable to carry out your normal daily responsibilities? Day Unproductive: On how many days in the last week did you feel so impaired by your symptoms, that even though you went to school or work, your productivity was reduced?

    Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12

  15. Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)

    Change From baseline in plasma concentration of LH was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12: 3h, follow-up (week 15)

  16. Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH)

    Change From baseline in plasma concentration of FSH was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)

  17. Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Estradiol (E2)

    Change From baseline in plasma concentration of E2 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)

  18. Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG)

    Change From baseline in plasma concentration of SHBG was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)

  19. Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Leptin

    Change From baseline in plasma concentration of leptin was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)

  20. Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Insulin

    Change From baseline in plasma concentration of insulin was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)

  21. Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of C-peptide

    Change From baseline in plasma concentration of C-peptide was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)

  22. Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Glycated Hemoglobin (HBA1c)

    Change From baseline in plasma concentration of HBA1C was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

  23. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE's)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug, \& which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal product (mp) whether or not considered related to the mp. An AE is considered "serious" if it results in death, is life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, results in congenital anomaly or birth defect, requires inparticipant hospitalization or leads to prolongation of hospitalization, hospitalization for treatment/observation/examination caused by AE is to be considered as serious, discontinuation due to increases in liver enzymes, other medically important events. TEAE was defined as an AE observed from first dose date up to end of study.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug until end of the study (Up to week 15)

  24. Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP) at Week 12

    Change from baseline in plasma concentration of BALP was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

  25. Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Carboxy-terminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX) at Week 12

    Change from baseline in plasma concentration of CTX was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2022
  2. Study start21 Sep 2015
  3. Primary completion21 Sep 2016
  4. Study completion6 Oct 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
87 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05419908
Sponsor's protocol ID
ESN364_HF_204
Other IDs
2015-002578-20, 2015
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
6 Jun 2022
Last updated
27 Nov 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Publications

  • Depypere H, Timmerman D, Donders G, Sieprath P, Ramael S, Combalbert J, Hoveyda HR, Fraser GL. Treatment of Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms With Fezolinetant, a Neurokinin 3 Receptor Antagonist: A Phase 2a Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Dec 1;104(12):5893-5905. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00677.

    PubMed 31415087

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Fezolinetant in people with Hot Flashes, run by Ogeda S.A. at 8 sites in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jul 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in The Weekly General Hot Flash Score (time frame: Baseline and week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05419908, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in