Hot FlashesPhase 2NCT05419908
Trial to Investigate the Effect of ESN364 in Early Postmenopausal Women Suffering From Hot Flashes
A Phase 2 study testing Fezolinetant in people with Hot Flashes, run by Ogeda S.A. at 8 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ESN364 on the severity and frequency of hot flashes in early postmenopausal women suffering from hot flashes, in terms of changes in weekly Hot Flash Score from baseline to Week 12. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 65 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Hot Flashes
- What is being tested?
- Fezolinetant
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 87 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 21 Sep 2015to 6 Oct 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 65 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 12 consecutive months; or spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 6 months with biochemical criteria of menopause (FSH >40 IU/L); or spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 3 months with biochemical/physical criteria of menopause (FSH >40 IU/L and E2 <0.21 nmol/); or having had bilateral oophorectomy at least 6 weeks prior to screening (with or without hysterectomy);
- At least 49 moderate or severe hot flashes or night sweats over a period of 7 consecutive days, as recorded in the daily diary during the screening period, with at least 4 of those days with 7 or more moderate or severe hot flashes per day;
- In good general health as determined on the basis of medical history and general physical examination performed at screening; hematology and chemistry parameters, pulse rate and/or blood pressure, and ECG within the reference range for the population studied, or showing no clinically relevant deviations;
- Negative urine test for selected drugs of abuse (amphetamines, tricyclic antidepressants, cannabinoids, cocaine, tetrahydrocannabinol, or opiates) at screening;
- Negative serology panel (including hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg], antihepatitis C virus [HCV] and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody screens);
- Negative urine pregnancy test at screening;
Who cannot join
- Use of a prohibited therapy or not willing to wash-out drugs considered prohibited therapies;
- History (in the past year) or presence of drug or alcohol abuse;
- Suicide attempt in the past 3 years;
- Previous or current history of a malignant tumor (except basal cell carcinoma);
- Active liver disease or jaundice, or out-of-range values of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST); or total bilirubin >1.3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN); or creatinine >1.5 times the ULN; or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at screening;
- Medical condition or chronic disease (including history of neurological [including cognitive], hepatic, renal, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, pulmonary [e.g., moderate asthma], or endocrine disease) or malignancy that could confound interpretation of the study outcome;
Show all 14Show fewer
- Any psychological disorder according to the criteria indicated in the Diagnostics and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM, 4th edition) within one year prior to screening. Such disorders include but are not limited to current major depression, alcohol (more than 3 glasses of wine, beer, or equivalent/day) or substance abuse/dependence;
- Unsuited to participate in the study, based on findings observed during physical examination, vital sign assessment, or 12-lead ECG;
- History of severe allergy, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to drugs in general, including the study drug and any of its excipients;
- Presence or sequellae of gastrointestinal, liver, kidney or other conditions known to interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion (ADME) mechanisms of drugs;
- Concurrent participation in another interventional study (or participation within 3 months prior to screening in this study);
- History of poor compliance in clinical studies;
- Unable or unwilling to complete the study procedures;
- Subject is the Investigator or any sub-investigator, research assistant, pharmacist, study coordinator, or other staff or relative thereof who is directly involved in the conduct of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
Belgium8 sites
Site BE32004
Brussels, 1000
Site BE32003
Genk, 3600
Site BE32001
Ghent, 9000
Site BE32006
Jette, 1090
Site BE32005
Kraainem, 1950
Site BE32007
Leuven
Site BE32008
Mons, 7000
Site BE32009
Tienen, 3300
About this study
Official title: Pilot/Phase IIa Trial to Investigate the Effect of ESN364 in Early Postmenopausal Women Suffering From Hot Flashes
The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ESN364 on the severity and frequency of hot flashes in early postmenopausal women suffering from hot flashes, in terms of changes in weekly Hot Flash Score from baseline to Week 12.
This study also evaluated the effect of ESN364 on the severity and frequency of hot flashes at additional timepoints; hot flash interference on daily life, in terms of changes from baseline over time in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS); the effect of ESN364 on climacteric symptoms, in terms of changes from baseline over time in Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ), Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS); pharmacodynamic (PD) effect; and safety and tolerability.
- Conditions
- Hot Flashes
- Being tested
- Fezolinetant, Placebo
- Keywords
- Hot flashes, ESN364, ASP2693, fezolinetant, menopause, postmenopausal
- Medical subject headings
- Hot Flashes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FezolinetantDrug
Also called ESN364, ASP2693
Oral Capsule
PlaceboDrug
Oral Capsule
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fezolinetant | Experimental | Participants received 90 milligrams (mg) fezolinetant capsules orally, twice daily (BID) for a period of 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Fezolinetant |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received fezolinetant matching placebo capsules orally, BID for a period of 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in The Weekly General Hot Flash Score
The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:
(number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)
The severity of HFs is clinically defined as follows:
- Mild: sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant didn't wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing.
- Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
- Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant dependent for both number and severity.
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Secondary outcomes (25)
Change From Baseline in The Weekly Hot Flash Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (Method 1)
The HF Severity Score by method 1 takes into account the number and severity of moderate and severe HF occurred during a given time period and was calculated as follows HF Severity score = [(number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)]/(number of moderate HF + number of severe HF)
The severity of HFs was clinically defined as follows:
- Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
- Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in The Weekly Hot Flash Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (Method 2)
The HF Severity Score by method 2 takes into account moderate and severe HF during a given time period and was calculated as follows HF Severity score = [(number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)]
The severity of HFs was clinically defined as follows:
- Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
- Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in The Weekly Mild, Moderate and Severe Hot Flash Frequency at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The weekly HF frequency was calculated as number of mild, moderate and severe hot flashes over the week.
- Mild: sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant didn't wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing.
- Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
- Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Higher number of hot flashes is worse.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=70% Reduction in the Weekly Hot Flash Score From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:
(number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)
The severity of HFs is clinically defined as follows:
- Mild: sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant didn't wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing.
- Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
- Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=80% Reduction in the Weekly Hot Flash Score From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:
(number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)
The severity of HFs is clinically defined as follows:
- Mild: sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant didn't wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing.
- Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
- Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=90% Reduction in the Weekly Hot Flash Score From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:
(number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)
The severity of HF is clinically defined as follows:
- Mild: sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant didn't wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing.
- Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
- Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=50% Reduction in the Weekly Frequency of Moderate and Severe HF From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The weekly HF frequency of moderate and severe HF was calculated as number of moderate and severe HF over the week.
- Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
- Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Higher number of HF indicates worse symptoms.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=70% Reduction in the Weekly Frequency of Moderate and Severe HF From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The weekly HF frequency of moderate and severe HF was calculated as number of moderate and severe HF over the week.
- Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
- Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Higher number of HF indicates worse symptoms.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=90% Reduction in the Weekly Frequency of Moderate and Severe HF From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The weekly HF frequency of moderate and severe HF was calculated as number of moderate and severe HF over the week.
- Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets.
- Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed).
Higher number of HF indicates worse symptoms.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The HFRDIS was a 10-item scale which measured a woman's perceptions of the degree to which HF interfere with 9 daily life activities (work, social activities, leisure, sleep, mood, concentration, relations with others, sexuality, enjoying life); the 10th item measures interference with overall quality of life. This scale was modeled after items on the Brief Pain Inventory and Brief Fatigue Inventory both of which assessed the extent to which pain or fatigue interfere with daily life. Participants were asked to rate the extent to which HF had interfered with each item during the previous 4-week time interval using a 0 (do not interfere) to 10 (completely interfere) scale. Overall mean score was calculated as sum of items/number of available items. Higher score indicate a higher interference.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The LSEQ was a 10-item self-rated questionnaire which assessed participants aspects of sleep and early morning behavior. The questions were grouped into 4 chronological areas: the ease of getting to sleep, the perceived quality of sleep, the ease of awaking from sleep, and the integrity of early morning behavior following wakefulness. The LSEQ was a visual analogue scale which requires respondents to place marks on a group of 10 cm lines. representing the changes they have experienced in a variety of symptoms since the beginning of treatment. Lines extends between extremes like "more difficult than usual" and "easier than usual". Responses are measured using a 100-mm scale and are averaged to provide a score for each domain.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The GCS was a 21-item scale which provides a brief but comprehensive and valid measure of climacteric symptomatology. Each item was rated by the participant according to its severity using a four-point rating scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The first 20 items of the scale combine into three main independent symptom measures: psychological symptoms (items 1 to 11; score 0 to 33), physical symptoms (items 12 to 18; score 0 to 21), and vasomotor symptoms (items 19 to 20; score 0 to 6), by summing up the individual item scores. Item 21 is a probe for sexual dysfunction (Loss of interest in sex). The total score ranges from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The SDS was a composite of 3 self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which 3 major sectors in a participant's life are impaired by panic, anxiety, phobic, or depressive symptoms. The participant rates the extent to which his/her 1- work/school, 2- social life, and 3- family life are impaired by his/her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. The 3 items could be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).Higher scores indicate significant functional impairment.
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (Days Lost and Days Unproductive)
The SDS was a composite of 3 self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which 3 major sectors in a participant's life are impaired by panic, anxiety, phobic, or depressive symptoms. The participant rates the extent to which his/her 1- work/school, 2- social life, and 3- family life are impaired by his/her symptoms. In addition to the 3 items, the participants were asked two questions Days Lost: On how many days in the last week did your symptoms cause you to miss school or work or leave you unable to carry out your normal daily responsibilities? Day Unproductive: On how many days in the last week did you feel so impaired by your symptoms, that even though you went to school or work, your productivity was reduced?
Measured: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of LH was reported.
Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12: 3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of FSH was reported.
Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Estradiol (E2)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of E2 was reported.
Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of SHBG was reported.
Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Leptin
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of leptin was reported.
Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Insulin
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of insulin was reported.
Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of C-peptide
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of C-peptide was reported.
Measured: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Glycated Hemoglobin (HBA1c)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of HBA1C was reported.
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE's)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug, \& which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal product (mp) whether or not considered related to the mp. An AE is considered "serious" if it results in death, is life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, results in congenital anomaly or birth defect, requires inparticipant hospitalization or leads to prolongation of hospitalization, hospitalization for treatment/observation/examination caused by AE is to be considered as serious, discontinuation due to increases in liver enzymes, other medically important events. TEAE was defined as an AE observed from first dose date up to end of study.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until end of the study (Up to week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP) at Week 12
Change from baseline in plasma concentration of BALP was reported.
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Carboxy-terminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX) at Week 12
Change from baseline in plasma concentration of CTX was reported.
Measured: Baseline and week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2022
- Study start21 Sep 2015
- Primary completion21 Sep 2016
- Study completion6 Oct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hot FlashesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ogeda S.A.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Expert, Study director, Ogeda S.A.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05419908
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ESN364_HF_204
- Other IDs
- 2015-002578-20, 2015
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 27 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Publications
Depypere H, Timmerman D, Donders G, Sieprath P, Ramael S, Combalbert J, Hoveyda HR, Fraser GL. Treatment of Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms With Fezolinetant, a Neurokinin 3 Receptor Antagonist: A Phase 2a Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Dec 1;104(12):5893-5905. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00677.
PubMed 31415087
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot/Phase IIa Trial to Investigate the Effect of ESN364 in Early Postmenopausal Women Suffering From Hot Flashes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05419908
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ESN364_HF_204
- Conditions
- Hot Flashes
- Keywords
- Hot flashes, ESN364, ASP2693, fezolinetant, menopause, postmenopausal
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ogeda S.A.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jul 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ESN364 on the severity and frequency of hot flashes in early postmenopausal women suffering from hot flashes, in terms of changes in weekly Hot Flash Score from baseline to Week 12.
This study also evaluated the effect of ESN364 on the severity and frequency of hot flashes at additional timepoints; hot flash interference on daily life, in terms of changes from baseline over time in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS); the effect of ESN364 on climacteric symptoms, in terms of changes from baseline over time in Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ), Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS); pharmacodynamic (PD) effect; and safety and tolerability.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fezolinetant | Experimental | Drug: FezolinetantParticipants received 90 milligrams (mg) fezolinetant capsules orally, twice daily (BID) for a period of 12 weeks |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received fezolinetant matching placebo capsules orally, BID for a period of 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 65 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 12 consecutive months; or spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 6 months with biochemical criteria of menopause (FSH >40 IU/L); or spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 3 months with biochemical/physical criteria of menopause (FSH >40 IU/L and E2 <0.21 nmol/); or having had bilateral oophorectomy at least 6 weeks prior to screening (with or without hysterectomy);
- At least 49 moderate or severe hot flashes or night sweats over a period of 7 consecutive days, as recorded in the daily diary during the screening period, with at least 4 of those days with 7 or more moderate or severe hot flashes per day;
- In good general health as determined on the basis of medical history and general physical examination performed at screening; hematology and chemistry parameters, pulse rate and/or blood pressure, and ECG within the reference range for the population studied, or showing no clinically relevant deviations;
- Negative urine test for selected drugs of abuse (amphetamines, tricyclic antidepressants, cannabinoids, cocaine, tetrahydrocannabinol, or opiates) at screening;
- Negative serology panel (including hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg], antihepatitis C virus [HCV] and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody screens);
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Use of a prohibited therapy or not willing to wash-out drugs considered prohibited therapies;
- History (in the past year) or presence of drug or alcohol abuse;
- Suicide attempt in the past 3 years;
- Previous or current history of a malignant tumor (except basal cell carcinoma);
- Active liver disease or jaundice, or out-of-range values of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST); or total bilirubin >1.3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN); or creatinine >1.5 times the ULN; or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at screening;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FezolinetantAlso: ESN364, ASP2693Oral Capsule | Drug | Fezolinetant |
| PlaceboOral Capsule | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in The Weekly General Hot Flash Score
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as: (number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3) The severity of HFs is clinically defined as follows: * Mild: sensation of heat without sweating/dampness. If at night, participant didn't wake up but later notices damp sheets or clothing. * Moderate: Sensation of heat with sweating/dampness, but was able to continue activity. If at night, participant woke up because she was feeling hot and/or was sweating, but no action was necessary other than rearranging the bed sheets. * Severe: Sensation of intense heat with sweating, causing disruption of activity. If at night, participant woke up hot and was sweating and needed to take action (e.g., removing layers of clothes, open the window, or get out of bed). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant dependent for both number and severity.
25 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in The Weekly Hot Flash Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (Method 1)
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in The Weekly Hot Flash Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (Method 2)
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in The Weekly Mild, Moderate and Severe Hot Flash Frequency at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=70% Reduction in the Weekly Hot Flash Score From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=80% Reduction in the Weekly Hot Flash Score From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=90% Reduction in the Weekly Hot Flash Score From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=50% Reduction in the Weekly Frequency of Moderate and Severe HF From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=70% Reduction in the Weekly Frequency of Moderate and Severe HF From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=90% Reduction in the Weekly Frequency of Moderate and Severe HF From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 (Days Lost and Days Unproductive)
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12: 3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Estradiol (E2)
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin (SHBG)
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Leptin
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Insulin
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of C-peptide
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Glycated Hemoglobin (HBA1c)
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE's)
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until end of the study (Up to week 15)
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Bone Alkaline Phosphatase (BALP) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Change From Baseline in Plasma Concentration of Carboxy-terminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Nov 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 31415087Depypere H, Timmerman D, Donders G, Sieprath P, Ramael S, Combalbert J, Hoveyda HR, Fraser GL. Treatment of Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms With Fezolinetant, a Neurokinin 3 Receptor Antagonist: A Phase 2a Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Dec 1;104(12):5893-5905. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00677.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Related trials for Hot Flashes
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Focusing on the Menopausal Transition to Improve Mid-Life Women's Health
Menopause, Menopause Hot Flashes
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Confirm if Fezolinetant Helps to Reduce Hot Flashes in Indian Women Going Through Menopause
Hot Flashes
RecruitingObservational study
Lemborexant vs Clonidine vs Sedatives to Treat Insomnia in Chronic Pain Patients
Chronic Insomnia, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of A Supplement on Symptoms of Menopause and Overall Well-being
Menopause, Menopausal Symptoms
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Phase IIB Trial of Bazedoxifene Plus Conjugated Estrogens
Risk Reduction, Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Expert study director
Ogeda S.A.
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Fezolinetant in people with Hot Flashes, run by Ogeda S.A. at 8 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jul 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in The Weekly General Hot Flash Score (time frame: Baseline and week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05419908, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2024.