Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNCT05421637
Discrepancy Between Perception and Objective Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice Among Latin American Psychologists: A Cross-Sectional E-Survey Study
An observational study of Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice and Evidence Based Measurement, run by Universidad Westhill, Facultad de Psicología at 1 site in Mexico.
Trial summary
This was a non-experimental, descriptive, prospective and cross-sectional study, for which the CHERRIES checklist was used to report the study in order to improve the quality of the report of such designs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Evidence Based Measurement, Evidence-Based Practice
- How many people
- 1,506 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMexico
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2020to 15 May 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Latin American psychologists of all specialties and degrees of studies.
Who may be able to join
- Be an active psychology student at any university in Latin America.
- To have completed at least one semester of the psychology degree program
- Be between 18 and 65 years of age
- Be able to read and write
- Be a native Spanish speaker
- Agree to participate voluntarily in the study.
- Sign the informed consent form
Who cannot join
- Not currently residing in any Latin American country.
- Those persons who have not studied psychology and are performing related activities.
- Repeated IP (Internet Protocol)
- Marginal frequencies in the sociodemographic data.
- Participants who do not answer the complete scales.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This was a non-experimental, descriptive, prospective and cross-sectional study, for which the CHERRIES checklist was used to report the study in order to improve the quality of the report of such designs. The open-ended survey was voluntary, consisted of 18 items and four sections, the items were not randomized and the survey was estimated to last approximately five minutes.
Read the detailed description
Sampling:
A non-experimental sampling is carried out by voluntary subjects, since the subjects will come to the study by a call for applications.
Sample size
The formula of infinite population of qualitative variables will be used, because we will work with ordinal variables and because the total number of observation units that integrate it is unknown or when its population is greater than 100,000 and the formula is the following:
The sample size for 100,000 people should be 384 people, so that 95% of the time the data you want to measure is in the interval ±5% with respect to the data observed in the evaluation.
Data management plan:
Data dictionary design
Training will be provided and data dictionary will be developed describing the properties of variables such as data type (e.g. string and number), variable size, data encoding, and constraints and validations attached to a given variable (Annex).
Data collection
The research data will be obtained through the Google forms, which has "SOC 2" accreditation that meet best practices and security, as they are transmitted over a secure HTTPS connection and that user logins were protected through TLS. Furthermore, data is encrypted using industry and research standard encryption algorithms.
Data Retention
The database will be generated in Excel for further analysis in R studio, which will be kept at the University on an encrypted USB stick for data security and the password to this stick will only be held by the project manager.
Standards that provide data integrity, accuracy and coherence
The International Classification of Diseases (ICD- 11) will be used to present data consistency, accuracy and completeness through the optimal definition of mental health entities. On the other hand, the standards for data use recommended by The Global Health Training Centre will be used:
(a) The column heading (variable) is not changed between data. b) The same terminology is maintained for all variables. c) There is a consistent format and standard definition for subject identification.
- The name of the datasets is always the same. e) Name of the form / CRF section, e.g., demographic data f) A list of data objects (names and definitions) g) Description of the data element in natural language h) Detailed properties of the data elements (data type, size, nullability, optionality, indexes) i) Response options, e.g., check box, radio button, text j) Validation rule(s), e.g., required field, range checking k) Relationship of data elements to other data elements. l) Details about the privacy and security restrictions that should be associated with the element, e.g., Protected Health Information status.
Methodological guidelines for reporting the study:
The guide to improve the quality of methodological reporting of cross-sectional online studies called CHERRIE will be used.
Data analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the central tendency frequencies of the participants' characteristics. Non-parametric analyses will be applied because the data do not meet the criteria of normality in the analysis of their distribution, the type of variable and the number of participants; therefore, Spearman correlations will be used to contrast ordinal data. On the other hand, we plan to use odds ratio analysis to determine the possibility that knowledge of evidence-based psychology is present in one population group with more studies than in another.
- Conditions
- Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Evidence Based Measurement, Evidence-Based Practice, Evidence-Based Practices
- Medical subject headings
- Behavior
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Knowledge of evidence-based practice
To explore knowledge in evidence-based practice, the studies conducted by the American Psychological Association (2005) and the studies conducted by Gaxiola-Pérez et al. (2019) were used as a basis, so that the components, phases that compose it, tools for critical reading and levels of evidence were questioned, in order to create a questionnaire of four items for the evaluation of knowledge, where the maximum score was four and the minimum value was zero.
Measured: 1 month
Perception of Evidence-based Practice
The perception was assessed using a visual analog scale, according to the methodological recommendations for instruments that assess online perception and considered: a) Degree of familiarity, b) Importance attached to it, and c) Frequency with which it is applied.
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2022
- Study start15 Nov 2020
- Primary completion15 Feb 2021
- Study completion15 May 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,506 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Westhill, Facultad de Psicología
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alejandro Hernández Posadas, University of Americas - Chili
- Investigators
- Alejandro Hernández-Posadas, M.A., Principal investigator, University of Americas - ChiliLegna Alejandra Lazo-Sánchez, B.A., Study chair, Laboratorio de Enseñanza Virtual y Ciberpsicología. Facultad de Psicología. UNAMAlejandro de Jesús Domínguez-López, M.A., Study chair, Laboratorio de Enseñanza Virtual y Ciberpsicología. Facultad de Psicología. UNAMAdrián Olea-Hernández, B.A., Study chair, University of GuadalajaraJesús Emanuel Espinosa-Posadas, M.A., Study chair, Universidad Autónoma de TamaulipasSergio Elorriaga-Santiago, PhD., Study chair, Westhill UniversityGabriel de la Rosa Ruiz, M.A., Study chair, Westhill UnivesityBairon Manuel Argote-Delgado, M.A., Study chair, Universidad de Nariño
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05421637
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UW/FP/IC/PSICOLOGIA/2021/003
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Discrepancy Between Perception and Objective Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice Among Latin American Psychologists: A Cross-Sectional E-Survey Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05421637
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UW/FP/IC/PSICOLOGIA/2021/003
- Conditions
- Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Evidence Based Measurement, Evidence-Based Practice, Evidence-Based Practices
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,506 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Westhill, Facultad de PsicologíaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a non-experimental, descriptive, prospective and cross-sectional study, for which the CHERRIES checklist was used to report the study in order to improve the quality of the report of such designs. The open-ended survey was voluntary, consisted of 18 items and four sections, the items were not randomized and the survey was estimated to last approximately five minutes.
Detailed description
Sampling:
A non-experimental sampling is carried out by voluntary subjects, since the subjects will come to the study by a call for applications.
Sample size
The formula of infinite population of qualitative variables will be used, because we will work with ordinal variables and because the total number of observation units that integrate it is unknown or when its population is greater than 100,000 and the formula is the following:
The sample size for 100,000 people should be 384 people, so that 95% of the time the data you want to measure is in the interval ±5% with respect to the data observed in the evaluation.
Data management plan:
Data dictionary design
Training will be provided and data dictionary will be developed describing the properties of variables such as data type (e.g. string and number), variable size, data encoding, and constraints and validations attached to a given variable (Annex).
Data collection
The research data will be obtained through the Google forms, which has "SOC 2" accreditation that meet best practices and security, as they are transmitted over a secure HTTPS connection and that user logins were protected through TLS. Furthermore, data is encrypted using industry and research standard encryption algorithms.
Data Retention
The database will be generated in Excel for further analysis in R studio, which will be kept at the University on an encrypted USB stick for data security and the password to this stick will only be held by the project manager.
Standards that provide data integrity, accuracy and coherence
The International Classification of Diseases (ICD- 11) will be used to present data consistency, accuracy and completeness through the optimal definition of mental health entities. On the other hand, the standards for data use recommended by The Global Health Training Centre will be used:
(a) The column heading (variable) is not changed between data. b) The same terminology is maintained for all variables. c) There is a consistent format and standard definition for subject identification.
- The name of the datasets is always the same. e) Name of the form / CRF section, e.g., demographic data f) A list of data objects (names and definitions) g) Description of the data element in natural language h) Detailed properties of the data elements (data type, size, nullability, optionality, indexes) i) Response options, e.g., check box, radio button, text j) Validation rule(s), e.g., required field, range checking k) Relationship of data elements to other data elements. l) Details about the privacy and security restrictions that should be associated with the element, e.g., Protected Health Information status.
Methodological guidelines for reporting the study:
The guide to improve the quality of methodological reporting of cross-sectional online studies called CHERRIE will be used.
Data analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the central tendency frequencies of the participants' characteristics. Non-parametric analyses will be applied because the data do not meet the criteria of normality in the analysis of their distribution, the type of variable and the number of participants; therefore, Spearman correlations will be used to contrast ordinal data. On the other hand, we plan to use odds ratio analysis to determine the possibility that knowledge of evidence-based psychology is present in one population group with more studies than in another.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Latin American psychologists of all specialties and degrees of studies.
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Be an active psychology student at any university in Latin America.
- To have completed at least one semester of the psychology degree program
- Be between 18 and 65 years of age
- Be able to read and write
- Be a native Spanish speaker
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Not currently residing in any Latin American country.
- Those persons who have not studied psychology and are performing related activities.
- Repeated IP (Internet Protocol)
- Marginal frequencies in the sociodemographic data.
- Participants who do not answer the complete scales.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Knowledge of evidence-based practice
Time frame: 1 month
To explore knowledge in evidence-based practice, the studies conducted by the American Psychological Association (2005) and the studies conducted by Gaxiola-Pérez et al. (2019) were used as a basis, so that the components, phases that compose it, tools for critical reading and levels of evidence were questioned, in order to create a questionnaire of four items for the evaluation of knowledge, where the maximum score was four and the minimum value was zero.
Perception of Evidence-based Practice
Time frame: 1 month
The perception was assessed using a visual analog scale, according to the methodological recommendations for instruments that assess online perception and considered: a) Degree of familiarity, b) Importance attached to it, and c) Frequency with which it is applied.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Active, not recruiting
A Multilevel Intervention to Improve Adherence to Childhood Cancer Survivorship
Childhood Cancer, Survivorship
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study to Co-create and Implement a Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Mental Health Stigma in Primary Care
Mental Health, Stigma of Mental Illness
Recruiting
Frailty Training for Emergency Nurses: A Cluster RCT in Morocco
Frail Elderly, Frailty
Active, not recruiting
Engaging Adolescents in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results
Genetic Screening, Adolescent
Not yet recruiting
Simulation-Based Medical Waste Training for Palliative Caregivers
Medical Waste Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alejandro Hernández-Posadas, M.A. principal investigator
University of Americas - Chili
Legna Alejandra Lazo-Sánchez, B.A. study chair
Laboratorio de Enseñanza Virtual y Ciberpsicología. Facultad de Psicología. UNAM
Alejandro de Jesús Domínguez-López, M.A. study chair
Laboratorio de Enseñanza Virtual y Ciberpsicología. Facultad de Psicología. UNAM
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice and Evidence Based Measurement, run by Universidad Westhill, Facultad de Psicología at 1 site in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Knowledge of evidence-based practice (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2026.