Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryBRAINI2ELDERNCT05425251
BRAINI-2 Elderly Mild TBI European Study
An observational study of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre at 7 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is one of the most frequent emergencies in the elderly population. Despite most mTBI are managed with cranial computed tomography (CT), only 10% of CTs show lesions, determining CT overuse. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
- What is being tested?
- GFAP and UCH-L1
- How many people
- 2,297 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2022to 30 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Study population: 2370 participants suffering mild TBI; 480 non TBI participants.
Who may be able to join
- BRAINI2-ELDERLY DIAGNOSTIC \& PROGNOSTIC:
- Patients ≥65 years of age
- Mild TBI (GCS 13-15 on admission) with indication of brain CT scan in the 12 hours after injury ;
- Blood sample obtained ≤12 h after injury and CT scan preferably ≤6h from blood sample.
- BRAINI2-ELDERLY REFERENCE:
- Non TBI patients ≥65 years of age
Who cannot join
- BRAINI2-ELDERLY DIAGNOSTIC \& PROGNOSTIC:
- Age below 65 years.
- GCS 3-12 on admission
- Time of injury unknown
- Time to injury exceeding 12 hours
- Primary admission for non-traumatic neurological disorder (e.g., stroke, spontaneous, intracranial hematoma)
Show all 16Show fewer
- Penetrating head trauma
- Patient with mechanical ventilation from the trauma scene or prehospital management.
- Venipuncture not feasible
- No realization of brain CT-scan
- Subject under judiciary control
- Subject in inclusion period of a drug interventional study
- BRAINI2-ELDERLY REFERENCE:
- Subject in inclusion period of another drug interventional study
- Patients harboring a brain tumor
- Patients that have had a stroke or neurosurgical operation 1 month prior to the inclusion in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 3 countries.
7 sites in 3 countries
France4 sites
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand
CHU Grenoble-Alpes
Grenoble
Hôpital Edouard HERRIOT
Lyon
Hôpital Lyon Sud HCL
Lyon
Spain2 sites
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, Madrid, 28041
About this study
Official title: Blood Biomarkers to Improve Management of Mild Traumatic BRAIN Injury in the Elderly
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is one of the most frequent emergencies in the elderly population. Despite most mTBI are managed with cranial computed tomography (CT), only 10% of CTs show lesions, determining CT overuse. The use of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) have shown potential for ruling out the need for cranial CT. However evidence on biomarker use in mild TBI were not based on studies that included aged participants and patients with comorbidities for which biomarker levels could vary. This is why there is a need for a prospective study that assesses the predictive performance of these two biomarkers in the elderly population, both in elderly patients suffering mild TBI and in a reference population, including patients and participants with and without comorbidities.
- Conditions
- Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
- Being tested
- GFAP and UCH-L1
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Concussion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GFAP and UCH-L1Diagnostic test
2x5mL blood samples will be used to determine the performance of the automated VIDAS TBI platform in assessing serum concentrations of GFAP and UCH-L1 to rule out the need for a CT-scan after mTBI.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BRAINI2-ELDERLY DIAGNOSTIC & PROGNOSTIC | 2370 patients suffering mild Traumatic brain injury Receives: Diagnostic Test: GFAP and UCH-L1 | |
| BRAINI2-ELDERLY REFERENCE | 480 non-tbi elderly reference patients Receives: Diagnostic Test: GFAP and UCH-L1 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Biomarkers diagnostic performance
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of GFAP and UCHL-1 used separately and in combination to detect the presence or absence of intracranial lesions on CT scan
Measured: 12 hours after mild TBI
Secondary outcomes (7)
Determination of the potential of the two biomarkers in predicting neurological symptoms after TBI
Early and midterm biomarker predictive performance in terms of predicting neurological outcome. Neurological status at 1 week and 3 months after TBI and Rivermead post concussion questionnaire.
Measured: 1 week and 3 months
GFAP reference values
GFAP serum level distribution in the non-TBI reference population, considering age and comorbidities.
Measured: 1 Day, day of extraction of the sample
UCHL-1 reference values
UCHL-1 serum level distribution in the non-TBI reference population, considering age and comorbidities.
Measured: 1 Day, day of extraction of the sample
Determination of the potential of the two biomarkers in predicting neurological outcome assessed by the Extended Glasgow Outcome Score (GOSE) after TBI
Early and midterm biomarker predictive performance in terms of predicting neurological outcome. Extended Glasgow Outcome Score (GOSE)
Measured: 1 week and 3 months
Determination of the potential of the two biomarkers in predicting quality of life assessed by Qolibri-OS after TBI
Early and midterm biomarker predictive performance in terms of predicting quality of life after mild TBI assessed by Qolibri-OS
Measured: 1 week and 3 months
Determination of the potential of the two biomarkers in predicting quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L after TBI
Midterm biomarker predictive performance in terms of predicting quality of life after mild TBI assessed by EQ-5D-5L
Measured: 3 months
Determination of the potential of the two biomarkers in depression symptoms assessed by PHQ-9 after TBI
Midterm biomarker predictive performance in terms of predicting depression symptoms after mild TBI assessed by PHQ-9
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2022
- Study start1 Mar 2022
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024
- Study completion30 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,297 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Technical University of Munich, University Hospital, Grenoble, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, BioMérieux, EIT Health
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alfonso Lagares Gómez-Abascal, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
- Investigators
- Alfonso Lagares Gómez-Abascal, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05425251
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HU 12Octubre
- Other IDs
- EIT-HEALTH 220325
- Acronym
- BRAINI2ELDER
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 29 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lagares A, Payen JF, Biberthaler P, Poca MA, Mejan O, Pavlov V, Viglino D, Sapin V, Lassaletta A, de la Cruz J; Braini2_elderly_investigators Collaborative group. Study protocol for investigating the clinical performance of an automated blood test for glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 blood concentrations in elderly patients with mild traumatic BRAIN Injury and reference values (BRAINI-2 Elderly European study): a prospective multicentre observational study. BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 17;13(7):e071467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071467.
PubMed 37460257
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Blood Biomarkers to Improve Management of Mild Traumatic BRAIN Injury in the Elderly
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05425251
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BRAINI2ELDER / HU 12Octubre
- Conditions
- Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,297 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario 12 de OctubreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Technical University of Munich, University Hospital, Grenoble, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, BioMérieux, EIT Health
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is one of the most frequent emergencies in the elderly population. Despite most mTBI are managed with cranial computed tomography (CT), only 10% of CTs show lesions, determining CT overuse. The use of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) have shown potential for ruling out the need for cranial CT. However evidence on biomarker use in mild TBI were not based on studies that included aged participants and patients with comorbidities for which biomarker levels could vary. This is why there is a need for a prospective study that assesses the predictive performance of these two biomarkers in the elderly population, both in elderly patients suffering mild TBI and in a reference population, including patients and participants with and without comorbidities.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BRAINI2-ELDERLY DIAGNOSTIC & PROGNOSTIC | – | Diagnostic Test: GFAP and UCH-L12370 patients suffering mild Traumatic brain injury |
| BRAINI2-ELDERLY REFERENCE | – | Diagnostic Test: GFAP and UCH-L1480 non-tbi elderly reference patients |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
- Study population
- 2370 participants suffering mild TBI; 480 non TBI participants.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- BRAINI2-ELDERLY DIAGNOSTIC \& PROGNOSTIC:
- BRAINI2-ELDERLY REFERENCE:
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- BRAINI2-ELDERLY DIAGNOSTIC \& PROGNOSTIC:
- BRAINI2-ELDERLY REFERENCE:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GFAP and UCH-L12x5mL blood samples will be used to determine the performance of the automated VIDAS TBI platform in assessing serum concentrations of GFAP and UCH-L1 to rule out the need for a CT-scan after mTBI. | Diagnostic test | BRAINI2-ELDERLY DIAGNOSTIC & PROGNOSTIC, BRAINI2-ELDERLY REFERENCE |
Primary outcome
Biomarkers diagnostic performance
Time frame: 12 hours after mild TBI
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of GFAP and UCHL-1 used separately and in combination to detect the presence or absence of intracranial lesions on CT scan
7 secondary outcomes
Determination of the potential of the two biomarkers in predicting neurological symptoms after TBI
Time frame: 1 week and 3 months
GFAP reference values
Time frame: 1 Day, day of extraction of the sample
UCHL-1 reference values
Time frame: 1 Day, day of extraction of the sample
Determination of the potential of the two biomarkers in predicting neurological outcome assessed by the Extended Glasgow Outcome Score (GOSE) after TBI
Time frame: 1 week and 3 months
Determination of the potential of the two biomarkers in predicting quality of life assessed by Qolibri-OS after TBI
Time frame: 1 week and 3 months
Determination of the potential of the two biomarkers in predicting quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L after TBI
Time frame: 3 months
Determination of the potential of the two biomarkers in depression symptoms assessed by PHQ-9 after TBI
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Dec 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37460257Lagares A, Payen JF, Biberthaler P, Poca MA, Mejan O, Pavlov V, Viglino D, Sapin V, Lassaletta A, de la Cruz J; Braini2_elderly_investigators Collaborative group. Study protocol for investigating the clinical performance of an automated blood test for glial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 blood concentrations in elderly patients with mild traumatic BRAIN Injury and reference values (BRAINI-2 Elderly European study): a prospective multicentre observational study. BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 17;13(7):e071467. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071467.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingPhase 1
Rehabilitation Through Virtual Immersion & Integrated Exposure for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (ReVIVE for mTBI)
Traumatic Brain Injuries, TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cognitive Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) After a Traumatic Brain Injury
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-Concussion Syndrome
Recruiting
Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) in Patients With Post Concussion Syndrome (PCS)
Post-Concussion Syndrome, COVID Long-Haul
Not yet recruiting
Sleep MAPP in the Polytrauma/TBI System of Care
Insomnia Disorder, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Recruiting
EXercise-induced PhysioLogical Adaptations In Neurological Disorders
Epilepsy, Functional Neurological Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alfonso Lagares Gómez-Abascal, MD, PhD principal investigator
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
7 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre at 7 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in France, Spain, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Biomarkers diagnostic performance (time frame: 12 hours after mild TBI). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05425251, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2025.