AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyLateralinirsNCT05428917

Evaluation of the Impact of Laterality on Cerebral Activation During a Motor Task of the Upper Limb in Healthy Subjects

A study testing Simple task and complex task in people with Healthy, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in brain activation in healthy subjects during motor tasks, depending on the laterality of the subject, the laterality of the task and the complexity of the task. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Simple task and complex task
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
59 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
8 Apr 2022to 6 May 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject from 18 to 60 years old
  • Sufficient command of the French language to understand the instructions
  • No known neurological medical history
  • Benefiting from social security coverage
  • For right-handed subjects: Edinburgh laterality test QL> 40
  • For left-handed subjects: Edinburgh laterality test QL< -40

Who cannot join

  • Known allergy to components of the fNIRS device : neoprene

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Regional Hospital Center of ORLEANS

    Orléans, 45067

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Impact of Laterality on Cerebral Activation During a Motor Task of the Upper Limb Using fNIRS Technology in Healthy Subjects

The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in brain activation in healthy subjects during motor tasks, depending on the laterality of the subject, the laterality of the task and the complexity of the task. It seems that the laterality of activation is less marked in left-handed people, when using the non-dominant hand and when performing a complex task. The objective of this study is to highlight profiles of subject and modality of use of the hand with a specific lateralization of cerebral activation.

Read the detailed description

Stroke frequently leads to upper limb deficit. The recovery of motor skills depends on many factors including laterality. The literature shows that cerebral activation during motor tasks differs depending on whether one is right-handed or left-handed and whether one uses the dominant hand or not. These differences probably lead to different recovery mechanisms depending on the side of the lesion and the laterality. An imaging technique is particularly suitable for exploring these different mechanisms: fNIRS (Functional Near Infra Red Spectroscopy). This method allows (like fMRI) to study cerebral neurovascular coupling. It is based on the fact that an activated brain region increases its local blood flow. Oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (HbR) hemoglobin absorb infrared light and it is then possible to identify the cerebral cortical regions involved in a given task. This technique therefore makes it possible to study cerebral activation under more ecological conditions than fMRI and is thus particularly suitable for exploring rehabilitation techniques.

This research aims to study and compare in healthy subjects, using an fNIRS apparatus, the brain regions involved in the performance of different motor tasks according to the laterality of the task and the subject.

The investigations will be carried out by the principal investigator or by specialized technicians from the neurology functional exploration department.

Stroke frequently leads to upper limb deficit. The recovery of motor skills depends on many factors including laterality. The literature shows that cerebral activation during motor tasks differs depending on whether one is right-handed or left-handed and whether one uses the dominant hand or not. These differences probably lead to different recovery mechanisms depending on the side of the lesion and the laterality. An imaging technique is particularly suitable for exploring these different mechanisms: fNIRS (Functional Near Infra Red Spectroscopy). This method allows (like fMRI) to study cerebral neurovascular coupling. It is based on the fact that an activated brain region increases its local blood flow. Oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (HbR) hemoglobin absorb infrared light and it is then possible to identify the cerebral cortical regions involved in a given task. This technique therefore makes it possible to study cerebral activation under more ecological conditions than fMRI and is thus particularly suitable for exploring rehabilitation techniques.

This research aims to study and compare in healthy subjects, using an fNIRS apparatus, the brain regions involved in the performance of different motor tasks according to the laterality of the task and the subject.

The investigations will be carried out by the principal investigator or by specialized technicians from the neurology functional exploration department.

The acquisition has a duration of 25 minutes, it begins with a rest period of 120 seconds, which corresponds to the baseline. Four different tasks are performed during the acquisition for each subject:

  • Simple task right hand (SD)
  • Simple task left hand (SG)
  • Complex task right hand (CD)
  • Complex stain left hand (CG)

The design is a block design, each task, which has a duration of 20 seconds, is carried out 8 times per acquisition. There is therefore a total of 32 tasks whose order will be randomized.

For simple tasks, movements are performed at a frequency of 0.5 Hz which appears to be the optimal frequency for observing cortical activation using a metronome.

Between periods of movement, the subject is in a rest position for a period from 15 to 25 seconds.

Instructions are given verbally at the start of each phase. After recruiting the subjects, the study investigator will check the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

If the subject can integrate the protocol, the acquisition will then be planned.

On the day of the acquisition, the fNIRS acquisition helmet (Brite MKII) will be installed by a specialist technician and instructions will be given. The recording is then made.

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Simple task, complex task
Keywords
Laterality, motor task, cerebral activation, near infrared spectroscopy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Simple taskBehavioural

    The subject is seated on a chair facing a table, both hands resting on the table.

    The subject is asked, for each block of 20 seconds, to perform flexion / extension movements of the fingers of the left hand at 0.5 Hz.

  • complex taskBehavioural

    The subject is seated on a chair facing a table, both hands resting on the table.

    The subject is asked, for each block of 20 seconds, to perform an exercise based on the nine hole peg test

Study groups in NCT05428917
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Near infrared spectroscopyExperimentalThis method allows (like fMRI) to study cerebral neurovascular coupling. It is based on the fact that an activated brain region increases its local blood flow. Oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (HbR) hemoglobin absorb infrared light and it is then possible to identify the cerebral cortical regions involved in a given task. This technique therefore makes it possible to study cerebral activation under more ecological conditions than fMRI and is thus particularly suitable for exploring rehabilitation techniques.
Receives: Behavioral: Simple task; Behavioral: complex task

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Laterality index using t values

    Compare the asymmetry of activation of the sensorimotor cortex during a complex motor task on the dominant side between right-handers and left-handers.

    Measured: Minutes 25

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. concentration of oxyhemoglobin measured with fnirs device

    Assess the effect of task complexity and the effect of using the dominant or non-dominant side

    Measured: Minutes 25

  2. concentration of deoxyhemoglobin measured with fnirs device

    Assess the effect of task complexity and the effect of using the dominant or non-dominant side

    Measured: minutes 25

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jun 2022
  2. Study start8 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion6 May 2022
  4. Study completion6 May 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
60 healthy subjects (30 left handed and 30 right handed) will be recruited and will carry out the acquisition.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
59 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05428917
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHRO-2021-13
Acronym
Lateralinirs
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
17 Jun 2022
Last updated
28 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Bartur G, Pratt H, Dickstein R, Frenkel-Toledo S, Geva A, Soroker N. Electrophysiological manifestations of mirror visual feedback during manual movement. Brain Res. 2015 May 5;1606:113-24. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

    PubMed 25721791
  • Bondi D, Prete G, Malatesta G, Robazza C. Laterality in Children: Evidence for Task-Dependent Lateralization of Motor Functions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;17(18):6705. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186705.

    PubMed 32942557
  • Harris JE, Eng JJ. Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 Sep;20(3):380-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968305284528.

    PubMed 16885424
  • Ludemann-Podubecka J, Bosl K, Theilig S, Wiederer R, Nowak DA. The Effectiveness of 1 Hz rTMS Over the Primary Motor Area of the Unaffected Hemisphere to Improve Hand Function After Stroke Depends on Hemispheric Dominance. Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):823-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Mar 16.

    PubMed 25828427
  • Duboc V, Dufourcq P, Blader P, Roussigne M. Asymmetry of the Brain: Development and Implications. Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:647-72. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-055322. Epub 2015 Oct 6.

    PubMed 26442849
  • Grabowska A, Gut M, Binder M, Forsberg L, Rymarczyk K, Urbanik A. Switching handedness: fMRI study of hand motor control in right-handers, left-handers and converted left-handers. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2012;72(4):439-51. doi: 10.55782/ane-2012-1914.

    PubMed 23377273
  • Jin SH, Lee SH, Yang ST, An J. Hemispheric asymmetry in hand preference of right-handers for passive vibrotactile perception: an fNIRS study. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 7;10(1):13423. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70496-y.

    PubMed 32770115
  • Kim SG, Ashe J, Hendrich K, Ellermann JM, Merkle H, Ugurbil K, Georgopoulos AP. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex: hemispheric asymmetry and handedness. Science. 1993 Jul 30;261(5121):615-7. doi: 10.1126/science.8342027.

    PubMed 8342027
  • Lee SH, Jin SH, An J. The difference in cortical activation pattern for complex motor skills: A functional near- infrared spectroscopy study. Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 1;9(1):14066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50644-9.

    PubMed 31575954
  • Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5146491
  • O'Regan L, Serrien DJ. Individual Differences and Hemispheric Asymmetries for Language and Spatial Attention. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Oct 4;12:380. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00380. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30337864
  • Solodkin A, Hlustik P, Noll DC, Small SL. Lateralization of motor circuits and handedness during finger movements. Eur J Neurol. 2001 Sep;8(5):425-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2001.00242.x.

    PubMed 11554905
  • Vingerhoets G, Acke F, Alderweireldt AS, Nys J, Vandemaele P, Achten E. Cerebral lateralization of praxis in right- and left-handedness: same pattern, different strength. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Apr;33(4):763-77. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21247. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

    PubMed 21500314

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Simple task and complex task in people with Healthy, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Laterality index using t values (time frame: Minutes 25). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05428917, which also lists 13 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in