Efficacy and Implementation of MINDxYOU Program for Reducing Stress and Promote Mental Health Among Healthcare Providers

It is a 9-item scale aimed at screening for depression in primary care and other medical settings. It assesses the frequency of depressive symptoms during the last 2 weeks using a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating higher severity of depression.

It is a 9-item scale aimed at screening for depression in primary care and other medical settings. It assesses the frequency of depressive symptoms during the last 2 weeks using a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating higher severity of depression.

It is a 9-item scale aimed at screening for depression in primary care and other medical settings. It assesses the frequency of depressive symptoms during the last 2 weeks using a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating higher severity of depression.

It is a 7-item self-reported measure to assess the intensity of anxiety symptoms. It refers to the period of the past 2 weeks; each item is scored in a 4-point Likert-type scale, resulting in a total score that can range from 0 to 21, with higher values reflecting more severe anxiety symptoms.

It is a 7-item self-reported measure to assess the intensity of anxiety symptoms. It refers to the period of the past 2 weeks; each item is scored in a 4-point Likert-type scale, resulting in a total score that can range from 0 to 21, with higher values reflecting more severe anxiety symptoms.

It is a 7-item self-reported measure to assess the intensity of anxiety symptoms. It refers to the period of the past 2 weeks; each item is scored in a 4-point Likert-type scale, resulting in a total score that can range from 0 to 21, with higher values reflecting more severe anxiety symptoms.

It is a 18-item self-reported questionnaire designed to offer a rapid screening of symptoms of psychological disorders. Each item is scored in a 5-point Likert-type scale, reflecting on the past 7 days.

It is a 18-item self-reported questionnaire designed to offer a rapid screening of symptoms of psychological disorders. Each item is scored in a 5-point Likert-type scale, reflecting on the past 7 days.

It is a 18-item self-reported questionnaire designed to offer a rapid screening of symptoms of psychological disorders. Each item is scored in a 5-point Likert-type scale, reflecting on the past 7 days.

It is a 10-item self-reported measure addressed at assessing resilience. Each item is scored in a 5-point Likert scale, and the total score, which ranges from 1 to 5, is calculated by averaging the scores of the items; higher scores indicate higher levels of resilience.

It is a 10-item self-reported measure addressed at assessing resilience. Each item is scored in a 5-point Likert scale, and the total score, which ranges from 1 to 5, is calculated by averaging the scores of the items; higher scores indicate higher levels of resilience.

It is a 10-item self-reported measure addressed at assessing resilience. Each item is scored in a 5-point Likert scale, and the total score, which ranges from 1 to 5, is calculated by averaging the scores of the items; higher scores indicate higher levels of resilience.

It is an adaptation of the original 39-item FFMQ, a questionnaire addressed at measuring the five facets of mindfulness. Each subscale of the FFMQ-15 includes 3 items, scored in a Likert-type scale (1-5). A score for each subscale, ranging from 5 to 15, can be computed by summing the items, where higher scores indicate higher levels of the mindfulness facet.

It is an adaptation of the original 39-item FFMQ, a questionnaire addressed at measuring the five facets of mindfulness. Each subscale of the FFMQ-15 includes 3 items, scored in a Likert-type scale (1-5). A score for each subscale, ranging from 5 to 15, can be computed by summing the items, where higher scores indicate higher levels of the mindfulness facet.

It is an adaptation of the original 39-item FFMQ, a questionnaire addressed at measuring the five facets of mindfulness. Each subscale of the FFMQ-15 includes 3 items, scored in a Likert-type scale (1-5). A score for each subscale, ranging from 5 to 15, can be computed by summing the items, where higher scores indicate higher levels of the mindfulness facet.

This scale is composed by two 20-item self-report scales measuring compassion. A total score, ranging from 20 to 100, is calculated for each scale, and higher total values indicate higher levels of compassion

This scale is composed by two 20-item self-report scales measuring compassion. A total score, ranging from 20 to 100, is calculated for each scale, and higher total values indicate higher levels of compassion

This scale is composed by two 20-item self-report scales measuring compassion. A total score, ranging from 20 to 100, is calculated for each scale, and higher total values indicate higher levels of compassion

It is a measure for assessing experiential avoidance, a key element of 'third wave' psychotherapies that refers to the tendency to avoid thoughts, feelings, memories, sensations and other internal experiences, and which is very commonly associated with worse mental health outcomes, as opposite to psychological flexibility. The scale presents 7 items scored in a 7-point Likert-type scale, and a total score is calculated by summing all the items. Higher scores mean higher experiential avoidance.

It is a measure for assessing experiential avoidance, a key element of 'third wave' psychotherapies that refers to the tendency to avoid thoughts, feelings, memories, sensations and other internal experiences, and which is very commonly associated with worse mental health outcomes, as opposite to psychological flexibility. The scale presents 7 items scored in a 7-point Likert-type scale, and a total score is calculated by summing all the items. Higher scores mean higher experiential avoidance.

It is a measure for assessing experiential avoidance, a key element of 'third wave' psychotherapies that refers to the tendency to avoid thoughts, feelings, memories, sensations and other internal experiences, and which is very commonly associated with worse mental health outcomes, as opposite to psychological flexibility. The scale presents 7 items scored in a 7-point Likert-type scale, and a total score is calculated by summing all the items. Higher scores mean higher experiential avoidance.

It is a widely used health-related quality of life measure. First, the participant is asked to report how severe (1= no problems, 2= mild, 3= moderate, 4= severe, 5= extreme) are the problems they may present in the day of reporting regarding each of the following five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, and anxiety/depression. The utility scores are obtained from the EQ-5D classification system and are used to rate patients' health-related quality of life, which normally range from 0 (although it is possible to present negative scores) to 1 (i.e., "perfect health").

It is a widely used health-related quality of life measure. First, the participant is asked to report how severe (1= no problems, 2= mild, 3= moderate, 4= severe, 5= extreme) are the problems they may present in the day of reporting regarding each of the following five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, and anxiety/depression. The utility scores are obtained from the EQ-5D classification system and are used to rate patients' health-related quality of life, which normally range from 0 (although it is possible to present negative scores) to 1 (i.e., "perfect health").

It is addressed at describe and measure service utilization patterns as a basis for estimating associated costs across healthcare, social care and community settings.

It is addressed at describe and measure service utilization patterns as a basis for estimating associated costs across healthcare, social care and community settings.

It is a 10-item questionnaire to measure the usability which qualitatively is related with the quality and acceptability of the intervention. The scale presents 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2 = often, 3 = sometimes and 4 = always). A total score, ranging from 0 to 40, is calculated by totalling the scores from all the items, and higher total values indicate higher level of acceptability of the intervention

It is an 8-item, 4-point Likert scale questionnaire that assesses the general satisfaction of the participants regarding the received intervention. The total score ranges from 8 to 32.

Includes 4 items designed to measure appropriateness of the intervention. The scale presents 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = completely disagree, 2 = in disagreement, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 4 = agree and 5 = completely agree). A total score, ranging from 0 to 20, is calculated by totalling the scores from all the items, and higher total values indicate higher level of appropriateness of the intervention

Includes 16 items to assess attitudes toward online interventions among people with depressive symptomatology. The APOI explores four dimensions; "Skepticism and Perception of Risks", "Confidence in Effectiveness", "Technologization Threat" and "Anonymity Benefits". Each factor is calculated from the sum of 4 specific items. The scale presents 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = totally agree, 2 = agree, 3 = I'm not sure, 4 = disagree and 5 = totally disagree). Each factor can get a score between 4-20 points, and the higher the score, the greater the sensation perceived by the participant in each of the factors.