Prostate CancerNCT05438524
The Performance of MRI Prostate in Men With Different Prostate Health Index (Phi) Values
An observational study of Prostate Cancer, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
This study is to investigate, in a larger cohort of consecutive men, the proportion of abnormal MRI prostate in different phi ranges, and the cancer detected in Chinese men with abnormal MRI. This study aims to evaluate whether MRI prostate can be omitted in men with lower suspicion of prostate cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- How many people
- 159 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- 11 Nov 2021to 1 Feb 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Men with elevated PSA of 4-10 ng/mL who were referred to the Urology clinic without prior prostate biopsy, will be included.
Who may be able to join
- Ethnically Chinese Men ≥18 years of age
- Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and indicated for prostate biopsy
- Serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 4-10 ng/mL
- Serum Prostate health index (phi) result available
- Normal Digital rectal examination
- Able to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Past or current history of prostate cancer
- On 5-alpha reductase inhibitor in the past 6 months (e.g. Finasteride, Dutasteride)
- MRI prostate performed in past 5 years
- Contraindicated to undergo MRI scan (e.g. pacemaker in-situ, claustrophobia, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 50ml/min in serum renal function test within 3 months)
- Contraindicated for prostate biopsy (e.g. uncorrectable coagulopathy, active infection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Hong Kong1 site
Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong
About this study
Official title: The Performance of MRI Prostate in Men With Different Prostate Health Index (Phi) Values: Can we Save Some MRI Scans?
This study is to investigate, in a larger cohort of consecutive men, the proportion of abnormal MRI prostate in different phi ranges, and the cancer detected in Chinese men with abnormal MRI. This study aims to evaluate whether MRI prostate can be omitted in men with lower suspicion of prostate cancer.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective cohort study recruiting consecutive men with elevated blood test PSA 4-10 ng/mL, normal prostate on digital rectal examination, and result for blood Prostate Health Index (phi) known. A multi-parametric MRI prostate with contrast will be performed in all subjects. MRI prostate will be reported according to PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data Systems) v2.1 recommendations[10] and scored from 1 to 5. A PI-RADS score of 3-5 is considered abnormal. The proportion of abnormal MRI in different phi ranges (primary outcome) will be compared.
The subjects will be offered a prostate biopsy according to usual clinical indications in our hospital: In men with phi >35 (higher risk of significant prostate cancer), prostate biopsy (systematic biopsy, plus MRI-guided if abnormal MRI) will be offered. In men with phi < 35 (lower risk of prostate cancer), prostate biopsy (systematic plus MRI-guided) will be offered only if MRI is abnormal.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
In men with higher risk of significant prostate cancer, proportion of men with abnormal MRI at different Prostate Health Index (phi) ranges
In men with higher risk (phi>35) of significant prostate cancer), proportion of men with abnormal MRI.
Measured: Baseline (only one-time point)
In men with lower risk of significant prostate cancer, proportion of men with abnormal MRI at different Prostate Health Index (phi) ranges
In men with lower risk (phi<35) of significant prostate cancer), proportion of men with abnormal MRI.
Measured: Baseline (only one-time point)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Sensitivity of various phi cutoffs to predict PI-RADS score ≥3 in MRI prostate
Assessed by phi values and PI-RADS score in MRI prostate
Measured: Baseline (only one-time point)
Sensitivity of various phi cutoffs to predict PI-RADS score ≥4 in MRI prostate
Assessed by phi values and PI-RADS score in MRI prostate
Measured: Baseline (only one-time point)
Proportion of low risk group diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer with abnormal MRI
Diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason 3+4 or above) in men with abnormal MRI and phi <35
Measured: Baseline (only one-time point)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jun 2022
- Study start11 Nov 2021
- Primary completion27 Dec 2023
- Study completion1 Feb 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chinese University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 159 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, CHIU Ka Fung Peter, Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Peter Ka-Fung CHIU, FRCS, PhD, Principal investigator, Chinese University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05438524
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRE 2021.256
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
PubMed 31493960Chan SY, Ng CF, Lee KW, Yee CH, Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Hou SS. Differences in cancer characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer who present with different symptoms. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164875. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
PubMed 27932742Wong HF, Yee CH, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chiu PK, Cheung HY, Hou SS, Ng CF. Time trend and characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in Hong Kong (China) in the past two decades. Asian J Androl. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):104-106. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_75_18. No abstract available.
PubMed 30178778Presti JC Jr, O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):125-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64051-7.
PubMed 12478119Carter HB, Hamper UM, Sheth S, Sanders RC, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. J Urol. 1989 Oct;142(4):1008-10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38971-1.
PubMed 2677409Chiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
PubMed 28498624Chiu PK, Ng CF, Semjonow A, Zhu Y, Vincendeau S, Houlgatte A, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G, Stephan C, Haese A, Bruijne I, Teoh JY, Leung CH, Casale P, Chiang CH, Tan LG, Chiong E, Huang CY, Wu HC, Nieboer D, Ye DW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):558-561. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.047. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
PubMed 30396635Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Teoh JY, Yuen SK, Hou SM, Yiu MK, Ng CF. Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):99-104. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.57. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
PubMed 27897172Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PubMed 30898406Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
PubMed 30082150Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
PubMed 31022301Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PubMed 28110982Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
PubMed 29552975Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Teoh JY, Lee WM, Yip SY, Hou SM, Bangma CH, Ng CF. Prostate health index (PHI) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) predictive models for prostate cancer in the Chinese population and the role of digital rectal examination-estimated prostate volume. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Oct;48(10):1631-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1350-8. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
PubMed 27349564Kim L, Boxall N, George A, Burling K, Acher P, Aning J, McCracken S, Page T, Gnanapragasam VJ. Clinical utility and cost modelling of the phi test to triage referrals into image-based diagnostic services for suspected prostate cancer: the PRIM (Phi to RefIne Mri) study. BMC Med. 2020 Apr 17;18(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01548-3.
PubMed 32299423
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Performance of MRI Prostate in Men With Different Prostate Health Index (Phi) Values: Can we Save Some MRI Scans?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05438524
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CRE 2021.256
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 159 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to investigate, in a larger cohort of consecutive men, the proportion of abnormal MRI prostate in different phi ranges, and the cancer detected in Chinese men with abnormal MRI. This study aims to evaluate whether MRI prostate can be omitted in men with lower suspicion of prostate cancer.
Detailed description
This is a prospective cohort study recruiting consecutive men with elevated blood test PSA 4-10 ng/mL, normal prostate on digital rectal examination, and result for blood Prostate Health Index (phi) known. A multi-parametric MRI prostate with contrast will be performed in all subjects. MRI prostate will be reported according to PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data Systems) v2.1 recommendations[10] and scored from 1 to 5. A PI-RADS score of 3-5 is considered abnormal. The proportion of abnormal MRI in different phi ranges (primary outcome) will be compared.
The subjects will be offered a prostate biopsy according to usual clinical indications in our hospital: In men with phi >35 (higher risk of significant prostate cancer), prostate biopsy (systematic biopsy, plus MRI-guided if abnormal MRI) will be offered. In men with phi < 35 (lower risk of prostate cancer), prostate biopsy (systematic plus MRI-guided) will be offered only if MRI is abnormal.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Men with elevated PSA of 4-10 ng/mL who were referred to the Urology clinic without prior prostate biopsy, will be included.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Ethnically Chinese Men ≥18 years of age
- Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and indicated for prostate biopsy
- Serum Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 4-10 ng/mL
- Serum Prostate health index (phi) result available
- Normal Digital rectal examination
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Past or current history of prostate cancer
- On 5-alpha reductase inhibitor in the past 6 months (e.g. Finasteride, Dutasteride)
- MRI prostate performed in past 5 years
- Contraindicated to undergo MRI scan (e.g. pacemaker in-situ, claustrophobia, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 50ml/min in serum renal function test within 3 months)
- Contraindicated for prostate biopsy (e.g. uncorrectable coagulopathy, active infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
In men with higher risk of significant prostate cancer, proportion of men with abnormal MRI at different Prostate Health Index (phi) ranges
Time frame: Baseline (only one-time point)
In men with higher risk (phi>35) of significant prostate cancer), proportion of men with abnormal MRI.
In men with lower risk of significant prostate cancer, proportion of men with abnormal MRI at different Prostate Health Index (phi) ranges
Time frame: Baseline (only one-time point)
In men with lower risk (phi<35) of significant prostate cancer), proportion of men with abnormal MRI.
3 secondary outcomes
Sensitivity of various phi cutoffs to predict PI-RADS score ≥3 in MRI prostate
Time frame: Baseline (only one-time point)
Sensitivity of various phi cutoffs to predict PI-RADS score ≥4 in MRI prostate
Time frame: Baseline (only one-time point)
Proportion of low risk group diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer with abnormal MRI
Time frame: Baseline (only one-time point)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2026.
- Background: PubMed 31493960Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
- Background: PubMed 27932742Chan SY, Ng CF, Lee KW, Yee CH, Chiu PK, Teoh JY, Hou SS. Differences in cancer characteristics of Chinese patients with prostate cancer who present with different symptoms. Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Feb;23(1):6-12. doi: 10.12809/hkmj164875. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
- Background: PubMed 30178778Wong HF, Yee CH, Teoh JY, Chan SY, Chiu PK, Cheung HY, Hou SS, Ng CF. Time trend and characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in Hong Kong (China) in the past two decades. Asian J Androl. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):104-106. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_75_18. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12478119Presti JC Jr, O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):125-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64051-7.
- Background: PubMed 2677409Carter HB, Hamper UM, Sheth S, Sanders RC, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Evaluation of transrectal ultrasound in the early detection of prostate cancer. J Urol. 1989 Oct;142(4):1008-10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38971-1.
- Background: PubMed 28498624Chiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
- Background: PubMed 30396635Chiu PK, Ng CF, Semjonow A, Zhu Y, Vincendeau S, Houlgatte A, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G, Stephan C, Haese A, Bruijne I, Teoh JY, Leung CH, Casale P, Chiang CH, Tan LG, Chiong E, Huang CY, Wu HC, Nieboer D, Ye DW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings. Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):558-561. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.047. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
- Background: PubMed 27897172Chiu PK, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Teoh JY, Yuen SK, Hou SM, Yiu MK, Ng CF. Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Mar;20(1):99-104. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.57. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
- Background: PubMed 30898406Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 30082150Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
- Background: PubMed 31022301Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 28110982Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter Ka-Fung CHIU, FRCS, PhD principal investigator
Chinese University of Hong Kong
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Prostate Cancer, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
In men with higher risk of significant prostate cancer, proportion of men with abnormal MRI at different Prostate Health Index (phi) ranges (time frame: Baseline (only one-time point)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05438524, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2026.