Parkinson DiseaseNCT05439967
The Effects of Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait Training on Patients With Parkinson's Disease
A study testing Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait and balanceTraining and Conventional Training in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Gazi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
In Parkinson's Disease (PD) rehabilitation, the treadmill is used both in aerobic training and in gait training, as it provides more walking distance and can include body weight supported systems. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait and balanceTraining and Conventional Training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2021to 1 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- being diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease by a specialist physician
- being grade 1-3 on the Hoehn and Yahr Staging Scale
- being 40 years or older; and
- individuals agreed to be included in the study after adequate information was given about the study
Who cannot join
- People who standardised Mini-Mental State Examination score < 24
- Having any cardiovascular, vestibular, musculoskeletal, or additional neurological disease.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Gazi University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
Ankara
About this study
Official title: Investigation of The Effects of Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait Training on Balance and Walking in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
In Parkinson's Disease (PD) rehabilitation, the treadmill is used both in aerobic training and in gait training, as it provides more walking distance and can include body weight supported systems. It has been reported that the C-Mill VR+ device, which is a treadmill system with augmented and virtual reality (VR) technology, improves gait adaptation and reduces the risk of falling in individuals with early to mid-stage PD. Several publications augmented reality (AR) and VR applications in PD was focused on balance activities that do not include ambulation. In other studies in the literature, it was stated that further research are needed to better understand the effects of VR gait training on gait and balance in PD. It was also stated in these studies that the effects of VR gait training should be examined with more objective measurement methods. As a result, it is seen that there is a need for studies examining the effects of augmented and virtual reality trainings in PD with objective measurement methods. Therefore, our study aimed to examine the effects of AR and VR gait training on gait and balance in individuals with early to mid-stage PD.
Read the detailed description
Participants included in the study will randomly divide were randomly divided into 2 groups as intervention (IG, n=15) and control (CG, n=15). IG was given augmented and virtual reality gait training together with conventional training (CT). CG was given CT only. The training was applied 3 days per week for 6 weeks in both groups. All evaluations will be made by the same physiotherapist by meeting with participants face to face. Inclusion in the research will be on a voluntary basis. As outcome measures, motor symptoms, balance, balance confidence and gait analyses were performed before and after intervention.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait and balanceTraining, Conventional Training
- Keywords
- Parkinson's Disease, Exercise, Virtual Reality, Balance, Gait
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait and balanceTrainingOther
C-Mill VR+ device used for training. The training was carried out 3 days a week for 6 weeks, with each exercise session lasting approximately 1.5 hours, accompanied by a physiotherapist. Training started with conventional exercises, continued with C-Mill VR+ training, and ended with stretching and relaxation exercises. The patients in the intervention group were applied the exercises with the same principles with conventional training, except the exercises performed in standing and walking. Patients performed 10 exercises in AR and VR gait training for 4 minutes and resting the individuals by sitting for 1 minute between exercises.
Conventional TrainingOther
Conventional training was applied to the patients in the control group. Conventional training was planned taking into account the following goals: increasing mobility by improving the impaired kinesthetic sensation; improving axial rotation, coordination, flexibility of soft tissues, mobility in and out of bed; increasing body image perception by improving upright and proper posture; and improving balance and gait. The training was applied 3 days a week for 6 weeks, with each exercise session lasting 40-50 minutes, accompanied by a physiotherapist. Each of the exercises was done in 2 sets of 10 repetitions. In gait training, each exercise was performed for 4 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait and balanceTraining |
| Conventional Training | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Conventional Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III)-Baseline
The severity of motor symptoms is evaluated with 13 items in UPDRS-III. Items are scored between 0 and 4; 0 = no impairment, 4 = severe impairment. Higher scores indicate more serious impairment
Measured: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III)-Post Intervention
The severity of motor symptoms is evaluated with 13 items in UPDRS-III. Items are scored between 0 and 4; 0 = no impairment, 4 = severe impairment. Higher scores indicate more serious impairment
Measured: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
Hoehn and Yahr Staging Scale -Baseline
H\&Y defines individuals with PD in 5 different clinical stages according to their functional disability status and clinical findings. As the stage of H\&Y increases, the functional disability status of patients also increases
Measured: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
Hoehn and Yahr Staging Scale -Post Intervention
H\&Y defines individuals with PD in 5 different clinical stages according to their functional disability status and clinical findings. As the stage of H\&Y increases, the functional disability status of patients also increases
Measured: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
Huber 360° Evolution System-baseline
Static and dynamic standing balance was evaluated with the Huber 360° Evolution System(LPG Systems, Valence, France), which objectively evaluated postural sway and limits of stability. Stability test and stability limit test were performed with the system. The stability test was performed by recording the amount of sway of the center of pressure (CoP) under standing on double-leg and standing on single-leg conditions. The test was performed under eyes open and eyes closed conditions. The lower values obtained as a result of the test means that the amount of sway is low and the postural stability is better. In the limits of stability test, while on standing and with fixed feet position patients are asked to shift their weight in a total of eight directions according to the trigonometric coordinate system. The high values obtained as a result of the test means that the amount of CoP sway is high and the stability limits of the patient is good.
Measured: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
Huber 360° Evolution System-Post Intervention
Static and dynamic standing balance was evaluated with the Huber 360° Evolution System(LPG Systems, Valence, France), which objectively evaluated postural sway and limits of stability. Stability test and stability limit test were performed with the system. The stability test was performed by recording the amount of sway of the center of pressure (CoP) under standing on double-leg and standing on single-leg conditions. The test was performed under eyes open and eyes closed conditions. The lower values obtained as a result of the test means that the amount of sway is low and the postural stability is better. In the limits of stability test, while on standing and with fixed feet position patients are asked to shift their weight in a total of eight directions according to the trigonometric coordinate system. The high values obtained as a result of the test means that the amount of CoP sway is high and the stability limits of the patient is good.
Measured: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)-Baseline
Functional balance was evaluated with BBS . It consists of 14 functional activities that evaluate the static and proactive balance, in which the individual is observed directly by the evaluator in terms of desired performance. Each item is scored between 0 (inability to perform the activity) and 4 (doing the activity completely independently) according to the performance of the individual to perform the desired functional activity according to the time and distance conditions of the test. BBS is scored between 0 and 56, and higher test scores mean that the individual's balance is better
Measured: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
Berg Balance Scale-Post Intervention
Functional balance was evaluated with BBS . It consists of 14 functional activities that evaluate the static and proactive balance, in which the individual is observed directly by the evaluator in terms of desired performance. Each item is scored between 0 (inability to perform the activity) and 4 (doing the activity completely independently) according to the performance of the individual to perform the desired functional activity according to the time and distance conditions of the test. BBS is scored between 0 and 56, and higher test scores mean that the individual's balance is better
Measured: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) -Baseline
The level of confidence that an individual feels during activities of daily living related to balance was evaluated with ABC. With 16 questions asked directly to the individual by the evaluator, the level of confidence ranged from 0% (totally unsafe) to 100% (totally safe). The total score is determined by summing the values of 16 items and dividing by 16, which is the total number of question items. A total score between 0 and 49 indicates a low functional level, between 50 and 80 indicates a moderate functional level, and between 81 and 100 indicates a high functional level.
Measured: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) -Post Intervention
The level of confidence that an individual feels during activities of daily living related to balance was evaluated with ABC. With 16 questions asked directly to the individual by the evaluator, the level of confidence ranged from 0% (totally unsafe) to 100% (totally safe). The total score is determined by summing the values of 16 items and dividing by 16, which is the total number of question items. A total score between 0 and 49 indicates a low functional level, between 50 and 80 indicates a moderate functional level, and between 81 and 100 indicates a high functional level.
Measured: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
Spatio-temporal gait analysis -Baseline
In the evaluation of spatio-temporal parameters of gait, patients were asked to walk on the platform of the C-Mill VR+ device for 3 minutes at the highest confident speed they felt safe. Right-left step lengths, stride length, and step width were recorded in meters from the spatial parameters, while the right-left stance phase duration, right-left swing phase duration and total double support phase duration were recorded in seconds for the evaluation of temporal parameters. Additionally, walking speed and distance were recorded during these analyses.
Measured: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
Spatio-temporal gait analysis -Post Intervention
In the evaluation of spatio-temporal parameters of gait, patients were asked to walk on the platform of the C-Mill VR+ device for 3 minutes at the highest confident speed they felt safe. Right-left step lengths, stride length, and step width were recorded in meters from the spatial parameters, while the right-left stance phase duration, right-left swing phase duration and total double support phase duration were recorded in seconds for the evaluation of temporal parameters. Additionally, walking speed and distance were recorded during these analyses.
Measured: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)- Baseline
Functional mobility was assessed with TUG. The patient was asked to stand up from the chair with the "walk" command, walk 3 m, turn around and sit back on the chair. The test was carried out on a flat 3 meter surface. In addition, TUG has been shown to be highly reliable in PD.
Measured: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)- Post Intervention
Functional mobility was assessed with TUG. The patient was asked to stand up from the chair with the "walk" command, walk 3 m, turn around and sit back on the chair. The test was carried out on a flat 3 meter surface. In addition, TUG has been shown to be highly reliable in PD.
Measured: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jun 2022
- Study start1 Jul 2021
- Primary completion30 Oct 2021
- Study completion1 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Gazi UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gazi University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fettah Saygılı, Gazi University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05439967
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1-PD C-Mill
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 27 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 5 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of The Effects of Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait Training on Balance and Walking in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05439967
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1-PD C-Mill
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Keywords
- Parkinson's Disease, Exercise, Virtual Reality, Balance, Gait
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gazi UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In Parkinson's Disease (PD) rehabilitation, the treadmill is used both in aerobic training and in gait training, as it provides more walking distance and can include body weight supported systems. It has been reported that the C-Mill VR+ device, which is a treadmill system with augmented and virtual reality (VR) technology, improves gait adaptation and reduces the risk of falling in individuals with early to mid-stage PD. Several publications augmented reality (AR) and VR applications in PD was focused on balance activities that do not include ambulation. In other studies in the literature, it was stated that further research are needed to better understand the effects of VR gait training on gait and balance in PD. It was also stated in these studies that the effects of VR gait training should be examined with more objective measurement methods. As a result, it is seen that there is a need for studies examining the effects of augmented and virtual reality trainings in PD with objective measurement methods. Therefore, our study aimed to examine the effects of AR and VR gait training on gait and balance in individuals with early to mid-stage PD.
Detailed description
Participants included in the study will randomly divide were randomly divided into 2 groups as intervention (IG, n=15) and control (CG, n=15). IG was given augmented and virtual reality gait training together with conventional training (CT). CG was given CT only. The training was applied 3 days per week for 6 weeks in both groups. All evaluations will be made by the same physiotherapist by meeting with participants face to face. Inclusion in the research will be on a voluntary basis. As outcome measures, motor symptoms, balance, balance confidence and gait analyses were performed before and after intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Other: Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait and balanceTraining |
| Conventional Training | Active comparator | Other: Conventional Training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- being diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease by a specialist physician
- being grade 1-3 on the Hoehn and Yahr Staging Scale
- being 40 years or older; and
- individuals agreed to be included in the study after adequate information was given about the study
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- People who standardised Mini-Mental State Examination score < 24
- Having any cardiovascular, vestibular, musculoskeletal, or additional neurological disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait and balanceTrainingC-Mill VR+ device used for training. The training was carried out 3 days a week for 6 weeks, with each exercise session lasting approximately 1.5 hours, accompanied by a physiotherapist. Training started with conventional exercises, continued with C-Mill VR+ training, and ended with stretching and relaxation exercises. The patients in the intervention group were applied the exercises with the same principles with conventional training, except the exercises performed in standing and walking. Patients performed 10 exercises in AR and VR gait training for 4 minutes and resting the individuals by sitting for 1 minute between exercises. | Other | Intervention |
| Conventional TrainingConventional training was applied to the patients in the control group. Conventional training was planned taking into account the following goals: increasing mobility by improving the impaired kinesthetic sensation; improving axial rotation, coordination, flexibility of soft tissues, mobility in and out of bed; increasing body image perception by improving upright and proper posture; and improving balance and gait. The training was applied 3 days a week for 6 weeks, with each exercise session lasting 40-50 minutes, accompanied by a physiotherapist. Each of the exercises was done in 2 sets of 10 repetitions. In gait training, each exercise was performed for 4 minutes. | Other | Conventional Training |
Primary outcome
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III)-Baseline
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
The severity of motor symptoms is evaluated with 13 items in UPDRS-III. Items are scored between 0 and 4; 0 = no impairment, 4 = severe impairment. Higher scores indicate more serious impairment
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III)-Post Intervention
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
The severity of motor symptoms is evaluated with 13 items in UPDRS-III. Items are scored between 0 and 4; 0 = no impairment, 4 = severe impairment. Higher scores indicate more serious impairment
Hoehn and Yahr Staging Scale -Baseline
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
H\&Y defines individuals with PD in 5 different clinical stages according to their functional disability status and clinical findings. As the stage of H\&Y increases, the functional disability status of patients also increases
Hoehn and Yahr Staging Scale -Post Intervention
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
H\&Y defines individuals with PD in 5 different clinical stages according to their functional disability status and clinical findings. As the stage of H\&Y increases, the functional disability status of patients also increases
Huber 360° Evolution System-baseline
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
Static and dynamic standing balance was evaluated with the Huber 360° Evolution System(LPG Systems, Valence, France), which objectively evaluated postural sway and limits of stability. Stability test and stability limit test were performed with the system. The stability test was performed by recording the amount of sway of the center of pressure (CoP) under standing on double-leg and standing on single-leg conditions. The test was performed under eyes open and eyes closed conditions. The lower values obtained as a result of the test means that the amount of sway is low and the postural stability is better. In the limits of stability test, while on standing and with fixed feet position patients are asked to shift their weight in a total of eight directions according to the trigonometric coordinate system. The high values obtained as a result of the test means that the amount of CoP sway is high and the stability limits of the patient is good.
Huber 360° Evolution System-Post Intervention
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
Static and dynamic standing balance was evaluated with the Huber 360° Evolution System(LPG Systems, Valence, France), which objectively evaluated postural sway and limits of stability. Stability test and stability limit test were performed with the system. The stability test was performed by recording the amount of sway of the center of pressure (CoP) under standing on double-leg and standing on single-leg conditions. The test was performed under eyes open and eyes closed conditions. The lower values obtained as a result of the test means that the amount of sway is low and the postural stability is better. In the limits of stability test, while on standing and with fixed feet position patients are asked to shift their weight in a total of eight directions according to the trigonometric coordinate system. The high values obtained as a result of the test means that the amount of CoP sway is high and the stability limits of the patient is good.
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)-Baseline
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
Functional balance was evaluated with BBS . It consists of 14 functional activities that evaluate the static and proactive balance, in which the individual is observed directly by the evaluator in terms of desired performance. Each item is scored between 0 (inability to perform the activity) and 4 (doing the activity completely independently) according to the performance of the individual to perform the desired functional activity according to the time and distance conditions of the test. BBS is scored between 0 and 56, and higher test scores mean that the individual's balance is better
Berg Balance Scale-Post Intervention
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
Functional balance was evaluated with BBS . It consists of 14 functional activities that evaluate the static and proactive balance, in which the individual is observed directly by the evaluator in terms of desired performance. Each item is scored between 0 (inability to perform the activity) and 4 (doing the activity completely independently) according to the performance of the individual to perform the desired functional activity according to the time and distance conditions of the test. BBS is scored between 0 and 56, and higher test scores mean that the individual's balance is better
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) -Baseline
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
The level of confidence that an individual feels during activities of daily living related to balance was evaluated with ABC. With 16 questions asked directly to the individual by the evaluator, the level of confidence ranged from 0% (totally unsafe) to 100% (totally safe). The total score is determined by summing the values of 16 items and dividing by 16, which is the total number of question items. A total score between 0 and 49 indicates a low functional level, between 50 and 80 indicates a moderate functional level, and between 81 and 100 indicates a high functional level.
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) -Post Intervention
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
The level of confidence that an individual feels during activities of daily living related to balance was evaluated with ABC. With 16 questions asked directly to the individual by the evaluator, the level of confidence ranged from 0% (totally unsafe) to 100% (totally safe). The total score is determined by summing the values of 16 items and dividing by 16, which is the total number of question items. A total score between 0 and 49 indicates a low functional level, between 50 and 80 indicates a moderate functional level, and between 81 and 100 indicates a high functional level.
Spatio-temporal gait analysis -Baseline
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
In the evaluation of spatio-temporal parameters of gait, patients were asked to walk on the platform of the C-Mill VR+ device for 3 minutes at the highest confident speed they felt safe. Right-left step lengths, stride length, and step width were recorded in meters from the spatial parameters, while the right-left stance phase duration, right-left swing phase duration and total double support phase duration were recorded in seconds for the evaluation of temporal parameters. Additionally, walking speed and distance were recorded during these analyses.
Spatio-temporal gait analysis -Post Intervention
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
In the evaluation of spatio-temporal parameters of gait, patients were asked to walk on the platform of the C-Mill VR+ device for 3 minutes at the highest confident speed they felt safe. Right-left step lengths, stride length, and step width were recorded in meters from the spatial parameters, while the right-left stance phase duration, right-left swing phase duration and total double support phase duration were recorded in seconds for the evaluation of temporal parameters. Additionally, walking speed and distance were recorded during these analyses.
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)- Baseline
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted before intervention
Functional mobility was assessed with TUG. The patient was asked to stand up from the chair with the "walk" command, walk 3 m, turn around and sit back on the chair. The test was carried out on a flat 3 meter surface. In addition, TUG has been shown to be highly reliable in PD.
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)- Post Intervention
Time frame: Assessment will be conducted immediately after the intervention
Functional mobility was assessed with TUG. The patient was asked to stand up from the chair with the "walk" command, walk 3 m, turn around and sit back on the chair. The test was carried out on a flat 3 meter surface. In addition, TUG has been shown to be highly reliable in PD.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jul 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Augmented and Virtual Reality Gait and balanceTraining and Conventional Training in people with Parkinson Disease, run by Gazi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III)-Baseline (time frame: Assessment will be conducted before intervention). The study lists 14 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jul 2022.