Cervix CancerNCT05448586
Opioid Free Anaesthesia in Oncologic Gynaecological Surgery: Is There Any Benefit?
An observational study of Cervix Cancer and Endometrial Cancer, run by Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Opioid Free Anesthesia (OFA) is a multimodal anesthesia and emerging technique that spares the use of opioids and involve other adjuvant anesthetics, which have demonstrated in vitro influence on immunologic and inflammatory response, as well as in metastatic progression. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 91 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervix Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Opioid
- How many people
- 132 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 2 Feb 2019to 30 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 91 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: 132 women, aged 20-91 years old and ASA I-IV, who had Major Surgery for gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrial, ovarian, vaginal, vulvar and breast cancer) under OFA and balanced anesthesia with opioids, both combined with regional anesthesia. They had surgery between February 2019 and February 2020 in Hospital La Paz de Madrid.
Who may be able to join
- Patients who had Major Surgery for gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrial, ovarian, vaginal, vulvar and breast cancer) under OFA and balanced anesthesia with opioids, both combined with regional anesthesia.
Who cannot join
- Patients who had Major Surgery for gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrial, ovarian, vaginal, vulvar and breast cancer) under OFA and balanced anesthesia with opioids, but had later surgery with a different to previous anesthesia technique.
- Patients who had no later follow up during 12 months in the same Hospital, so we cannot register recurrence.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Opioid Free Anaesthesia in Oncologic Gynaecological Surgery: Is There Any Benefit? Retrospective Observational Study
Opioid Free Anesthesia (OFA) is a multimodal anesthesia and emerging technique that spares the use of opioids and involve other adjuvant anesthetics, which have demonstrated in vitro influence on immunologic and inflammatory response, as well as in metastatic progression. For these reasons we believe that OFA may positively influence in oncologic patients postoperative recovery and in its disease progression.
Read the detailed description
After Local Ethics Committee approval, consecutive consenting patients scheduled for major gynecologic oncologic surgery were included between February 2019 and January 2020 in this observational retrospective study. We Compared OFA to standard technique used in our institution and assessed its effect on Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response (SIRS), hospital stay, postoperative complications in the following 2 months, cancer progression and mortality 6 months and 12 months after surgery. OFA protocol consisted of a Total IntraVenous Anaesthesia of Propofol, a Dexmedetomidine infusion of 0,8-1,0 mcg/kg/h, together with 0,2-0,3 mg/kg ketamine and lidocaine 1,5 mg/kg in the first hour of surgery. The standard anaesthetic protocol included opioids (Fentanyl 2mcg/kg at induction, and remifentanyl infusion 0,1-0,2 mcg/kg/min) and volatile agents (sevoflurane or desflurane). Patients in both groups received a regional block when possible, dexamethasone 8 mg at induction and paracetamol 1g plus dexketoprofen 50mg at the end of surgery. Continuous variables were compared using unpaired t-test (or Mann-Whitney U test) and categorical variables by Chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05
- Conditions
- Cervix Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Opioid
- Keywords
- Opioid, Opioid Free Anesthesia, SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response), Postoperative infection
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Endometrial Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OpioidDrug
Also called Opioid Free Anesthesia
Use of balanced anesthesia including opioids during anesthesia for gynecologic cancer surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Balanced anesthesia with opioids | Patients who had Major Surgery for gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrium, ovarian and breast cancer) under balanced anesthesia including opioids between February 2019 and 2020 in Hospital La Paz. Receives: Drug: Opioid | |
| Opioid Free Anesthesia (OFA) | Patients who had Major Surgery for gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrium, ovarian and breast cancer) under Opioid Free anesthesia between February 2019 and 2020 in Hospital La Paz. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response (C-Reactive Protein)
To compare postoperative SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response) with C-Reactive Protein plasmatic level
Measured: 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response (Leucocytes Ratio)
To compare postoperative SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response) with Leucocytes Ratio
Measured: 48 hours after surgery
Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response (Platelet Level)
To compare postoperative SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response) with Platelet Level
Measured: 48 hours after surgery
Secondary outcomes (5)
Time spent in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
To compare recovery time between groups
Measured: 30 days after surgery
Hospital stay
To compare hospital stay in both groups
Measured: 30 days after surgery
Rate of later postoperative complications
Complications due to surgery which required hospitalization
Measured: 3 months after surgery
Number of Participants with Cancer recurrence after surgery
To compare cancer recurrence (local and/or metastatic) 12 months after surgical treatment between groups.
Measured: 12 months after surgery
Number of patients who Survive 12 months after surgery
To compare cancer survival 12 months after surgical treatment between groups
Measured: 12 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jul 2022
- Study start2 Feb 2019
- Primary completion30 Jan 2021
- Study completion30 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervix CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nicolas Brogly, PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital Universitario La Paz
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05448586
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PI-3958
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Dubowitz JA, Sloan EK, Riedel BJ. Implicating anaesthesia and the perioperative period in cancer recurrence and metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2018 Apr;35(4):347-358. doi: 10.1007/s10585-017-9862-x. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
PubMed 28894976Malo-Manso A, Raigon-Ponferrada A, Diaz-Crespo J, Escalona-Belmonte JJ, Cruz-Manas J, Guerrero-Orriach JL. Opioid Free Anaesthesia and Cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(28):3011-3019. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190705183754.
PubMed 31298153Rossaint J, Zarbock A. Perioperative Inflammation and Its Modulation by Anesthetics. Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):1058-1067. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002484.
PubMed 28922235Byrne K, Levins KJ, Buggy DJ. Can anesthetic-analgesic technique during primary cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Can J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;63(2):184-92. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0523-8.
PubMed 26497721Brown EN, Pavone KJ, Naranjo M. Multimodal General Anesthesia: Theory and Practice. Anesth Analg. 2018 Nov;127(5):1246-1258. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003668.
PubMed 30252709
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Opioid Free Anaesthesia in Oncologic Gynaecological Surgery: Is There Any Benefit? Retrospective Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05448586
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PI-3958
- Conditions
- Cervix Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Opioid, Opioid Free Anesthesia, SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response), Postoperative infection
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La PazUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Opioid Free Anesthesia (OFA) is a multimodal anesthesia and emerging technique that spares the use of opioids and involve other adjuvant anesthetics, which have demonstrated in vitro influence on immunologic and inflammatory response, as well as in metastatic progression. For these reasons we believe that OFA may positively influence in oncologic patients postoperative recovery and in its disease progression.
Detailed description
After Local Ethics Committee approval, consecutive consenting patients scheduled for major gynecologic oncologic surgery were included between February 2019 and January 2020 in this observational retrospective study. We Compared OFA to standard technique used in our institution and assessed its effect on Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response (SIRS), hospital stay, postoperative complications in the following 2 months, cancer progression and mortality 6 months and 12 months after surgery. OFA protocol consisted of a Total IntraVenous Anaesthesia of Propofol, a Dexmedetomidine infusion of 0,8-1,0 mcg/kg/h, together with 0,2-0,3 mg/kg ketamine and lidocaine 1,5 mg/kg in the first hour of surgery. The standard anaesthetic protocol included opioids (Fentanyl 2mcg/kg at induction, and remifentanyl infusion 0,1-0,2 mcg/kg/min) and volatile agents (sevoflurane or desflurane). Patients in both groups received a regional block when possible, dexamethasone 8 mg at induction and paracetamol 1g plus dexketoprofen 50mg at the end of surgery. Continuous variables were compared using unpaired t-test (or Mann-Whitney U test) and categorical variables by Chi-square test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Balanced anesthesia with opioids | – | Drug: OpioidPatients who had Major Surgery for gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrium, ovarian and breast cancer) under balanced anesthesia including opioids between February 2019 and 2020 in Hospital La Paz. |
| Opioid Free Anesthesia (OFA) | – | –Patients who had Major Surgery for gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrium, ovarian and breast cancer) under Opioid Free anesthesia between February 2019 and 2020 in Hospital La Paz. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 91 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- 132 women, aged 20-91 years old and ASA I-IV, who had Major Surgery for gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrial, ovarian, vaginal, vulvar and breast cancer) under OFA and balanced anesthesia with opioids, both combined with regional anesthesia. They had surgery between February 2019 and February 2020 in Hospital La Paz de Madrid.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who had Major Surgery for gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrial, ovarian, vaginal, vulvar and breast cancer) under OFA and balanced anesthesia with opioids, both combined with regional anesthesia.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who had Major Surgery for gynecologic cancers (cervix, endometrial, ovarian, vaginal, vulvar and breast cancer) under OFA and balanced anesthesia with opioids, but had later surgery with a different to previous anesthesia technique.
- Patients who had no later follow up during 12 months in the same Hospital, so we cannot register recurrence.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OpioidAlso: Opioid Free AnesthesiaUse of balanced anesthesia including opioids during anesthesia for gynecologic cancer surgery | Drug | Balanced anesthesia with opioids |
Primary outcome
Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response (C-Reactive Protein)
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
To compare postoperative SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response) with C-Reactive Protein plasmatic level
Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response (Leucocytes Ratio)
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
To compare postoperative SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response) with Leucocytes Ratio
Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response (Platelet Level)
Time frame: 48 hours after surgery
To compare postoperative SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response) with Platelet Level
5 secondary outcomes
Time spent in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Hospital stay
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Rate of later postoperative complications
Time frame: 3 months after surgery
Number of Participants with Cancer recurrence after surgery
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
Number of patients who Survive 12 months after surgery
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2022.
- Background: PubMed 28894976Dubowitz JA, Sloan EK, Riedel BJ. Implicating anaesthesia and the perioperative period in cancer recurrence and metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2018 Apr;35(4):347-358. doi: 10.1007/s10585-017-9862-x. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 31298153Malo-Manso A, Raigon-Ponferrada A, Diaz-Crespo J, Escalona-Belmonte JJ, Cruz-Manas J, Guerrero-Orriach JL. Opioid Free Anaesthesia and Cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(28):3011-3019. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190705183754.
- Results publication: PubMed 28922235Rossaint J, Zarbock A. Perioperative Inflammation and Its Modulation by Anesthetics. Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):1058-1067. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002484.
- Results publication: PubMed 26497721Byrne K, Levins KJ, Buggy DJ. Can anesthetic-analgesic technique during primary cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Can J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;63(2):184-92. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0523-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 30252709Brown EN, Pavone KJ, Naranjo M. Multimodal General Anesthesia: Theory and Practice. Anesth Analg. 2018 Nov;127(5):1246-1258. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003668.
Related trials for Cervix Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Induction Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab Before Chemoradiation and Pembrolizumab Maintenance Compared to Standard Chemoradiation With Pembrolizumab Followed by Pembrolizumab Maintenance in High-Risk Cervical Cancer
Locally Advanced Cervical Adenocarcinoma, Locally Advanced Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Use of cfDNA in Monitoring and Guiding Treatment for Cervical Cancer
Cervical Cancer Screening
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nicolas Brogly, PhD principal investigator
Hospital Universitario La Paz
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cervix Cancer and Endometrial Cancer, run by Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative Systemic Inflammatory Response (C-Reactive Protein) (time frame: 48 hours after surgery). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05448586, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2022.