COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNCT05450120
Rehabilitation of Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Variants in ICU With Limited Resources
A study testing Functional Rehabilitation and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in people with COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Acute rehabilitation in critically ill patients can improve post-intensive care unit (post-ICU) physical function. Scientific evidence has considered neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a promising approach for the early rehabilitation of patients during and/or after ICU. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Functional Rehabilitation and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 88 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 1 May 2020to 1 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects admitted in ICU for >72hs, undergoing orotracheal intubation and on mechanical ventilation for >48hs, with a diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) according to Berlin definition secondary to COVID-19, with shock or organ failure, according to the Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (7th Interim Edition) Guideline, and clinical stability:
- mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg;
- heart rate >60 and <120 beats/minute;
- respiratory rate <30 breaths/minute;
- oxygen saturation ≥ 92%;
- fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤0.6;
Show all 11Show fewer
- absence of vasopressor dose increase
- absence of dysrhythmia (except for chronic atrial fibrillation);
- controlled sepsis;
- hemoglobin (Hb) > 8g m/d, plaquettes >20.000, Glucemia >70 e <180;
- without NMBs
Who cannot join
- Patients with movement resistance
- Walking without assistance before the ICU (except using a cane)
- Cognitive impairment before acute illness
- Signs of intracranial hypertension, neuromuscular disease (myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barré) and stroke; hip fracture, unstable cervical spine, or pathological fracture
- Prior hospitalization (30 days before ICU)
- Readmission to the ICU, within the current hospitalization
- Presence of an implanted cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, pregnancy, acute myocardial infarction and, for the experimental group (EG), against indications for NMES (deep vein thrombosis, skin lesions, rhabdomyolysis).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Functional Rehabilitation Protocol in Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Variants in ICUs With Limited Resources: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Acute rehabilitation in critically ill patients can improve post-intensive care unit (post-ICU) physical function. Scientific evidence has considered neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a promising approach for the early rehabilitation of patients during and/or after ICU.
Neuromuscular electrostimulation can be an alternative form of muscle exercise that helps to gain strength in critically ill patients with COVID -19, due to the severe weakness that patients experience due to longer MV, analgesia and NMB duration. Thus, the general objective of evaluating the effects of an early rehabilitation protocol on the strength and functionality of patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 variants and specifically compare the effectiveness of NMES associated with the functional rehabilitation protocol(FR). Also, describe demographics, clinical status, ICU therapies, mortality estimates and Hospital outcomes, of every patients admitted in ICU during the observation periods.
Read the detailed description
Patients in both groups received the functional rehabilitation protocol adapted from the precoce mobilization protocol of Morris et al, 2008. The protocol was defined in 5 stages, with a period between the application of the stages according to the clinical conditions of the patient, in an interval maximum of 24 hours from the beginning of the application of the first stage. The steps included active assisted mobilization exercises, active with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) method diagonals for upper limbs and bridge exercises, bedside sitting, balance reactions, weight bearing, transfer to an armchair, passive and active orthostatism, static gait and ambulation. The experimental group also received a protocol of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), applied bilaterally for 30 minutes, using an electrical stimulator with rectangular pulse waves, symmetrical biphasic, applied to the quadriceps femoris and tibialis anterior muscle at the best motor point, activating fast fibers with a pulse time of less than 300 ms and slow pulses with a pulse time of more than 300 ms, with intensity adjusted to obtain visible muscle contraction and/or according to the patient's tolerance.
- Being tested
- Functional Rehabilitation, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
- Keywords
- COVID-19, intensive care unit, early mobilization, rehabilitation, electrical stimulation, muscle weakness
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19, Muscle Weakness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Functional RehabilitationOther
Functional rehabilitation protocol
Neuromuscular Electrical StimulationOther
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation protocol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Rehabilitation | Active comparator | Functional rehabilitation protocol Receives: Other: Functional Rehabilitation |
| NMES + Functional Rehabilitation | Experimental | Functional rehabilitation protocol associated with neuromuscular electrical stimulation Receives: Other: Functional Rehabilitation; Other: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Skeletal muscle strength
Improved skeletal muscle strength by modified Medical Research Council (mMRC)
Measured: 5 months
Functional independence
Improved level of functional independence by ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) and Functional Status Score for the ICU (FSS-ICU)
Measured: 5 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Mechanical ventilation and hospitalization
Mechanical ventilation time, ICU and hospital stay.
Measured: 5 months
Survived and discharged
Proportion of patients who survived and were discharged.
Measured: 5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2022
- Study start1 May 2020
- Primary completion1 Oct 2020
- Study completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (24)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jacqueline R F Vianna, Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos
- Investigators
- Jacqueline Vianna, Phd, Principal investigator, UFSCARJamami, Phd, Study director, UFSCAR
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05450120
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 07351119.2.0000.5381
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 5 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 8 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Dhand UK. Clinical approach to the weak patient in the intensive care unit. Respir Care. 2006 Sep;51(9):1024-40; discussion 1040-1.
PubMed 16934166Latronico N, Peli E, Botteri M. Critical illness myopathy and neuropathy. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Apr;11(2):126-32. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000155357.24360.89.
PubMed 15758592Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, Cooper AB, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Barr A, Cook D, Slutsky AS; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):683-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022450.
PubMed 12594312Herridge MS. Legacy of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10 Suppl):S457-61. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6f35c.
PubMed 20046135De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Hopkinson N, Outin H. Paresis following mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004 Feb;10(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200402000-00008.
PubMed 15166849Ali NA, O'Brien JM Jr, Hoffmann SP, Phillips G, Garland A, Finley JC, Almoosa K, Hejal R, Wolf KM, Lemeshow S, Connors AF Jr, Marsh CB; Midwest Critical Care Consortium. Acquired weakness, handgrip strength, and mortality in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug 1;178(3):261-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200712-1829OC. Epub 2008 May 29.
PubMed 18511703Latronico N, Bolton CF. Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy: a major cause of muscle weakness and paralysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Oct;10(10):931-41. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70178-8.
PubMed 21939902Latronico N. Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy 20 years later. No man's land? No, it is our land! Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1790-1793. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4475-4. Epub 2016 Aug 8. No abstract available.
PubMed 27502507Bolton CF, Gilbert JJ, Hahn AF, Sibbald WJ. Polyneuropathy in critically ill patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;47(11):1223-31. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.11.1223.
PubMed 6094735Bonorino KC, Cani KC. Early mobilization in the time of COVID-19. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(4):484-486. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20200086. No abstract available.
PubMed 33470350Hodgson C, Needham D, Haines K, Bailey M, Ward A, Harrold M, Young P, Zanni J, Buhr H, Higgins A, Presneill J, Berney S. Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale. Heart Lung. 2014 Jan-Feb;43(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
PubMed 24373338Zanni JM, Korupolu R, Fan E, Pradhan P, Janjua K, Palmer JB, Brower RG, Needham DM. Rehabilitation therapy and outcomes in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot project. J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):254-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.10.010. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
PubMed 19942399Bailey PP, Miller RR 3rd, Clemmer TP. Culture of early mobility in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10 Suppl):S429-35. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6e227.
PubMed 20046131Thomas P, Baldwin C, Bissett B, Boden I, Gosselink R, Granger CL, Hodgson C, Jones AY, Kho ME, Moses R, Ntoumenopoulos G, Parry SM, Patman S, van der Lee L. Physiotherapy management for COVID-19 in the acute hospital setting: clinical practice recommendations. J Physiother. 2020 Apr;66(2):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
PubMed 32312646Stiller K. Physiotherapy in intensive care: towards an evidence-based practice. Chest. 2000 Dec;118(6):1801-13. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.6.1801. No abstract available.
PubMed 11115476
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Functional Rehabilitation Protocol in Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Variants in ICUs With Limited Resources: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05450120
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 07351119.2.0000.5381
- Keywords
- COVID-19, intensive care unit, early mobilization, rehabilitation, electrical stimulation, muscle weakness
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal de Sao CarlosUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute rehabilitation in critically ill patients can improve post-intensive care unit (post-ICU) physical function. Scientific evidence has considered neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a promising approach for the early rehabilitation of patients during and/or after ICU.
Neuromuscular electrostimulation can be an alternative form of muscle exercise that helps to gain strength in critically ill patients with COVID -19, due to the severe weakness that patients experience due to longer MV, analgesia and NMB duration. Thus, the general objective of evaluating the effects of an early rehabilitation protocol on the strength and functionality of patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 variants and specifically compare the effectiveness of NMES associated with the functional rehabilitation protocol(FR). Also, describe demographics, clinical status, ICU therapies, mortality estimates and Hospital outcomes, of every patients admitted in ICU during the observation periods.
Detailed description
Patients in both groups received the functional rehabilitation protocol adapted from the precoce mobilization protocol of Morris et al, 2008. The protocol was defined in 5 stages, with a period between the application of the stages according to the clinical conditions of the patient, in an interval maximum of 24 hours from the beginning of the application of the first stage. The steps included active assisted mobilization exercises, active with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) method diagonals for upper limbs and bridge exercises, bedside sitting, balance reactions, weight bearing, transfer to an armchair, passive and active orthostatism, static gait and ambulation. The experimental group also received a protocol of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), applied bilaterally for 30 minutes, using an electrical stimulator with rectangular pulse waves, symmetrical biphasic, applied to the quadriceps femoris and tibialis anterior muscle at the best motor point, activating fast fibers with a pulse time of less than 300 ms and slow pulses with a pulse time of more than 300 ms, with intensity adjusted to obtain visible muscle contraction and/or according to the patient's tolerance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Rehabilitation | Active comparator | Other: Functional RehabilitationFunctional rehabilitation protocol |
| NMES + Functional Rehabilitation | Experimental | Other: Functional Rehabilitation, Other: Neuromuscular Electrical StimulationFunctional rehabilitation protocol associated with neuromuscular electrical stimulation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Subjects admitted in ICU for >72hs, undergoing orotracheal intubation and on mechanical ventilation for >48hs, with a diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) according to Berlin definition secondary to COVID-19, with shock or organ failure, according to the Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (7th Interim Edition) Guideline, and clinical stability:
- mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg;
- heart rate >60 and <120 beats/minute;
- respiratory rate <30 breaths/minute;
- oxygen saturation ≥ 92%;
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with movement resistance
- Walking without assistance before the ICU (except using a cane)
- Cognitive impairment before acute illness
- Signs of intracranial hypertension, neuromuscular disease (myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barré) and stroke; hip fracture, unstable cervical spine, or pathological fracture
- Prior hospitalization (30 days before ICU)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Functional RehabilitationFunctional rehabilitation protocol | Other | Functional Rehabilitation, NMES + Functional Rehabilitation |
| Neuromuscular Electrical StimulationNeuromuscular electrical stimulation protocol | Other | NMES + Functional Rehabilitation |
Primary outcome
Skeletal muscle strength
Time frame: 5 months
Improved skeletal muscle strength by modified Medical Research Council (mMRC)
Functional independence
Time frame: 5 months
Improved level of functional independence by ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) and Functional Status Score for the ICU (FSS-ICU)
2 secondary outcomes
Mechanical ventilation and hospitalization
Time frame: 5 months
Survived and discharged
Time frame: 5 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Aug 2022.
- Background: PubMed 16934166Dhand UK. Clinical approach to the weak patient in the intensive care unit. Respir Care. 2006 Sep;51(9):1024-40; discussion 1040-1.
- Background: PubMed 15758592Latronico N, Peli E, Botteri M. Critical illness myopathy and neuropathy. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Apr;11(2):126-32. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000155357.24360.89.
- Background: PubMed 12594312Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, Cooper AB, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Barr A, Cook D, Slutsky AS; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):683-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022450.
- Background: PubMed 20046135Herridge MS. Legacy of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10 Suppl):S457-61. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6f35c.
- Background: PubMed 15166849De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Hopkinson N, Outin H. Paresis following mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004 Feb;10(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200402000-00008.
- Background: PubMed 18511703Ali NA, O'Brien JM Jr, Hoffmann SP, Phillips G, Garland A, Finley JC, Almoosa K, Hejal R, Wolf KM, Lemeshow S, Connors AF Jr, Marsh CB; Midwest Critical Care Consortium. Acquired weakness, handgrip strength, and mortality in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug 1;178(3):261-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200712-1829OC. Epub 2008 May 29.
- Background: PubMed 21939902Latronico N, Bolton CF. Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy: a major cause of muscle weakness and paralysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Oct;10(10):931-41. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70178-8.
- Background: PubMed 27502507Latronico N. Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy 20 years later. No man's land? No, it is our land! Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1790-1793. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4475-4. Epub 2016 Aug 8. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 6094735Bolton CF, Gilbert JJ, Hahn AF, Sibbald WJ. Polyneuropathy in critically ill patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;47(11):1223-31. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.11.1223.
- Background: PubMed 33470350Bonorino KC, Cani KC. Early mobilization in the time of COVID-19. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(4):484-486. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20200086. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24373338Hodgson C, Needham D, Haines K, Bailey M, Ward A, Harrold M, Young P, Zanni J, Buhr H, Higgins A, Presneill J, Berney S. Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale. Heart Lung. 2014 Jan-Feb;43(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
- Background: PubMed 19942399Zanni JM, Korupolu R, Fan E, Pradhan P, Janjua K, Palmer JB, Brower RG, Needham DM. Rehabilitation therapy and outcomes in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot project. J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):254-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.10.010. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
Related trials for COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Evaluating AVM0703 for Treatment of COVID-19 or Influenza-mediated ARDS
ARDS, Covid19
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Tozorakimab in Patients Hospitalised for Viral Lung Infection Requiring Supplemental Oxygen
Viral Lung Infection and Acute Respiratory Failure
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Cord Blood Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treatment of Moderate, Severe or Critical Pneumonia
COVID-19 Infection, COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Phase 2a Multiple Ascending Dose Study in Hospitalized Patients With Pneumonia.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Viral or Bacterial Infections
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Cell Therapy With Treg Cells Obtained From Thymic Tissue (thyTreg) to Control the Immune Hyperactivation Associated With COVID-19 and/or Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (THYTECH2)
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jacqueline Vianna, Phd principal investigator
UFSCAR
Jamami, Phd study director
UFSCAR
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Functional Rehabilitation and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in people with COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Skeletal muscle strength (time frame: 5 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05450120, which also lists 24 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2022.