AzTrials
AzTrials

COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNCT05450120

Rehabilitation of Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Variants in ICU With Limited Resources

A study testing Functional Rehabilitation and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in people with COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Acute rehabilitation in critically ill patients can improve post-intensive care unit (post-ICU) physical function. Scientific evidence has considered neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a promising approach for the early rehabilitation of patients during and/or after ICU. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Functional Rehabilitation and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
88 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
1 May 2020to 1 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects admitted in ICU for >72hs, undergoing orotracheal intubation and on mechanical ventilation for >48hs, with a diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) according to Berlin definition secondary to COVID-19, with shock or organ failure, according to the Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (7th Interim Edition) Guideline, and clinical stability:
  • mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg;
  • heart rate >60 and <120 beats/minute;
  • respiratory rate <30 breaths/minute;
  • oxygen saturation ≥ 92%;
  • fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤0.6;
Show all 11Show fewer
  • absence of vasopressor dose increase
  • absence of dysrhythmia (except for chronic atrial fibrillation);
  • controlled sepsis;
  • hemoglobin (Hb) > 8g m/d, plaquettes >20.000, Glucemia >70 e <180;
  • without NMBs

Who cannot join

  • Patients with movement resistance
  • Walking without assistance before the ICU (except using a cane)
  • Cognitive impairment before acute illness
  • Signs of intracranial hypertension, neuromuscular disease (myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barré) and stroke; hip fracture, unstable cervical spine, or pathological fracture
  • Prior hospitalization (30 days before ICU)
  • Readmission to the ICU, within the current hospitalization
  • Presence of an implanted cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, pregnancy, acute myocardial infarction and, for the experimental group (EG), against indications for NMES (deep vein thrombosis, skin lesions, rhabdomyolysis).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Santa Casa de Batatais

    Batatais, São Paulo, 14300-029

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Functional Rehabilitation Protocol in Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Variants in ICUs With Limited Resources: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Acute rehabilitation in critically ill patients can improve post-intensive care unit (post-ICU) physical function. Scientific evidence has considered neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a promising approach for the early rehabilitation of patients during and/or after ICU.

Neuromuscular electrostimulation can be an alternative form of muscle exercise that helps to gain strength in critically ill patients with COVID -19, due to the severe weakness that patients experience due to longer MV, analgesia and NMB duration. Thus, the general objective of evaluating the effects of an early rehabilitation protocol on the strength and functionality of patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 variants and specifically compare the effectiveness of NMES associated with the functional rehabilitation protocol(FR). Also, describe demographics, clinical status, ICU therapies, mortality estimates and Hospital outcomes, of every patients admitted in ICU during the observation periods.

Read the detailed description

Patients in both groups received the functional rehabilitation protocol adapted from the precoce mobilization protocol of Morris et al, 2008. The protocol was defined in 5 stages, with a period between the application of the stages according to the clinical conditions of the patient, in an interval maximum of 24 hours from the beginning of the application of the first stage. The steps included active assisted mobilization exercises, active with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) method diagonals for upper limbs and bridge exercises, bedside sitting, balance reactions, weight bearing, transfer to an armchair, passive and active orthostatism, static gait and ambulation. The experimental group also received a protocol of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), applied bilaterally for 30 minutes, using an electrical stimulator with rectangular pulse waves, symmetrical biphasic, applied to the quadriceps femoris and tibialis anterior muscle at the best motor point, activating fast fibers with a pulse time of less than 300 ms and slow pulses with a pulse time of more than 300 ms, with intensity adjusted to obtain visible muscle contraction and/or according to the patient's tolerance.

Being tested
Functional Rehabilitation, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
Keywords
COVID-19, intensive care unit, early mobilization, rehabilitation, electrical stimulation, muscle weakness
Medical subject headings
COVID-19, Muscle Weakness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Functional RehabilitationOther

    Functional rehabilitation protocol

  • Neuromuscular Electrical StimulationOther

    Neuromuscular electrical stimulation protocol

Study groups in NCT05450120
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Functional RehabilitationActive comparatorFunctional rehabilitation protocol
Receives: Other: Functional Rehabilitation
NMES + Functional RehabilitationExperimentalFunctional rehabilitation protocol associated with neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Receives: Other: Functional Rehabilitation; Other: Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Skeletal muscle strength

    Improved skeletal muscle strength by modified Medical Research Council (mMRC)

    Measured: 5 months

  2. Functional independence

    Improved level of functional independence by ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) and Functional Status Score for the ICU (FSS-ICU)

    Measured: 5 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Mechanical ventilation and hospitalization

    Mechanical ventilation time, ICU and hospital stay.

    Measured: 5 months

  2. Survived and discharged

    Proportion of patients who survived and were discharged.

    Measured: 5 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jul 2022
  2. Study start1 May 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2020
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
88 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05450120
Sponsor's protocol ID
07351119.2.0000.5381
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
5 Jul 2022
Last updated
8 Aug 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Dhand UK. Clinical approach to the weak patient in the intensive care unit. Respir Care. 2006 Sep;51(9):1024-40; discussion 1040-1.

    PubMed 16934166
  • Latronico N, Peli E, Botteri M. Critical illness myopathy and neuropathy. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Apr;11(2):126-32. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000155357.24360.89.

    PubMed 15758592
  • Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, Cooper AB, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Barr A, Cook D, Slutsky AS; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):683-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022450.

    PubMed 12594312
  • Herridge MS. Legacy of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10 Suppl):S457-61. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6f35c.

    PubMed 20046135
  • De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Hopkinson N, Outin H. Paresis following mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004 Feb;10(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200402000-00008.

    PubMed 15166849
  • Ali NA, O'Brien JM Jr, Hoffmann SP, Phillips G, Garland A, Finley JC, Almoosa K, Hejal R, Wolf KM, Lemeshow S, Connors AF Jr, Marsh CB; Midwest Critical Care Consortium. Acquired weakness, handgrip strength, and mortality in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008 Aug 1;178(3):261-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200712-1829OC. Epub 2008 May 29.

    PubMed 18511703
  • Latronico N, Bolton CF. Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy: a major cause of muscle weakness and paralysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Oct;10(10):931-41. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70178-8.

    PubMed 21939902
  • Latronico N. Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy 20 years later. No man's land? No, it is our land! Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1790-1793. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4475-4. Epub 2016 Aug 8. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27502507
  • Bolton CF, Gilbert JJ, Hahn AF, Sibbald WJ. Polyneuropathy in critically ill patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;47(11):1223-31. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.11.1223.

    PubMed 6094735
  • Bonorino KC, Cani KC. Early mobilization in the time of COVID-19. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(4):484-486. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20200086. No abstract available.

    PubMed 33470350
  • Hodgson C, Needham D, Haines K, Bailey M, Ward A, Harrold M, Young P, Zanni J, Buhr H, Higgins A, Presneill J, Berney S. Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale. Heart Lung. 2014 Jan-Feb;43(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

    PubMed 24373338
  • Zanni JM, Korupolu R, Fan E, Pradhan P, Janjua K, Palmer JB, Brower RG, Needham DM. Rehabilitation therapy and outcomes in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot project. J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):254-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.10.010. Epub 2009 Nov 26.

    PubMed 19942399
  • Bailey PP, Miller RR 3rd, Clemmer TP. Culture of early mobility in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10 Suppl):S429-35. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6e227.

    PubMed 20046131
  • Thomas P, Baldwin C, Bissett B, Boden I, Gosselink R, Granger CL, Hodgson C, Jones AY, Kho ME, Moses R, Ntoumenopoulos G, Parry SM, Patman S, van der Lee L. Physiotherapy management for COVID-19 in the acute hospital setting: clinical practice recommendations. J Physiother. 2020 Apr;66(2):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

    PubMed 32312646
  • Stiller K. Physiotherapy in intensive care: towards an evidence-based practice. Chest. 2000 Dec;118(6):1801-13. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.6.1801. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11115476

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Functional Rehabilitation and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in people with COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, run by Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Skeletal muscle strength (time frame: 5 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05450120, which also lists 24 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in