AzTrials
AzTrials

Intensive Care Unit SyndromeNCT05451186

The Eye Patch and Headset on Sleep Quality, Anxiety, Fear and Vital Signs

A study testing Eye patch and headphones in people with Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, run by Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was planned to investigate the effects of eye patch and headphones on sleep quality, anxiety, fear and vital signs in coronary intensive care unit patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Intensive Care Unit Syndrome
What is being tested?
Eye patch and headphones
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
20 Jun 2022to 15 Nov 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Being 18 years or older,
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II and III,
  • Not having received any general anaesthesia for the previous 24 hours,
  • Not having received any sedative medications or opioids for the past 24 hours,
  • Not having a verbal communication disability (hearing and speaking),
  • Absence of pain,
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Not having a previously diagnosed sleep disorder,
  • Not having psychiatric problems,
  • Not having a cognitive problem,
  • Being healthy enough to put on and take off earplugs independently, in addition to wearing an eye mask and removing it when necessary, and continuing to be hospitalized for at least three days.

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosed with delirium (Intensive care delirium screening checklist >=5),
  • Unconscious (Glasgow coma scale<13),
  • Presence of additional chronic diseases,
  • Having consumed coffee, alcohol and hypnotic drugs at least 12 hours before the study,
  • Patients whose condition suddenly worsened,
  • Those who cannot use earplugs and eye masks effectively at night,
  • Those who voluntarily withdrew from the study and were transferred from the intensive care unit.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Faculty of Health Sciences

    Istanbul, 34340

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Eye Patch and Headset on Sleep Quality, Anxiety, Fear and Vital Signs in Intensive Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study

This study was planned to investigate the effects of eye patch and headphones on sleep quality, anxiety, fear and vital signs in coronary intensive care unit patients.

Read the detailed description

In intensive care units, it can be much easier to change the environment perception of patients with simple tools such as headphones and sleep bands, rather than changing the environment of the patients. The use of sleep bands and headphones, which are non-pharmacological methods, can reduce sleep deprivation by changing the environmental perception of the patients.

Being tested
Eye patch and headphones
Keywords
Intensive Care Unit, Headphones, Sleep bands, Sleep

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Eye patch and headphonesOther

    Patients in the experimental group will be asked to use an eye mask and earplugs from 22:30 to 6:30 in the morning on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd nights.

Study groups in NCT05451186
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Eye patch and headphonesExperimentalEye patch and headphones
Receives: Other: Eye patch and headphones
Control groupNo interventionRoutine maintenance will be applied

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analog Scale (Fear)

    Patients are asked to show the severity of their fear on a 10 cm long vertical or horizontal line. In addition, there were forms which were numbered from 1-10 or from 1-100. The number 0 is found at the beginning of the line, and the number 10 is located at the end of the line. A value of 0 shows that there is no pain, and the value 10 expresses unendurable pain. GAS is a common scale in the assessment of pain level. A patient is asked to mark the perceived pain on this line, and the marked point is measured in cm.

    Measured: the first day after receiving randomisation

  2. Visual Analog Scale (Anxiety)

    Patients are asked to show the severity of their anxiety on a 10 cm long vertical or horizontal line. In addition, there were forms which were numbered from 1-10 or from 1-100. The number 0 is found at the beginning of the line, and the number 10 is located at the end of the line. A value of 0 shows that there is no pain, and the value 10 expresses unendurable pain. GAS is a common scale in the assessment of pain level. A patient is asked to mark the perceived pain on this line, and the marked point is measured in cm.

    Measured: the first day after receiving randomisation

  3. Vital Signs Follow-up Form

    This form was created by the researcher in order to record the systolic-diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate (pulse), values of the patient who was applied an eye patch or earphone at night.

    Measured: the first day after receiving randomisation

  4. The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire

    This brief five-item questionnaire was used to evaluate perceived sleep depth, sleep latency (time to fall asleep), number of awakenings, efficiency (percentage of time awake), and sleep quality. It also includes a sixth item evaluating perceived night-time noise. Each item is evaluated on a scale of 0-100 with a visual analogue scale technique. A score of 0-25 indicates very poor quality sleep, whereas a score of 76-100 indicates very good sleep quality.

    Measured: the first day after receiving randomisation

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Visual Analog Scale (Fear)

    Patients are asked to show the severity of their fear on a 10 cm long vertical or horizontal line. In addition, there were forms which were numbered from 1-10 or from 1-100. The number 0 is found at the beginning of the line, and the number 10 is located at the end of the line. A value of 0 shows that there is no pain, and the value 10 expresses unendurable pain. GAS is a common scale in the assessment of pain level. A patient is asked to mark the perceived pain on this line, and the marked point is measured in cm.

    Measured: 4. days

  2. Visual Analog Scale (Anxiety)

    Patients are asked to show the severity of their anxiety on a 10 cm long vertical or horizontal line. In addition, there were forms which were numbered from 1-10 or from 1-100. The number 0 is found at the beginning of the line, and the number 10 is located at the end of the line. A value of 0 shows that there is no pain, and the value 10 expresses unendurable pain. GAS is a common scale in the assessment of pain level. A patient is asked to mark the perceived pain on this line, and the marked point is measured in cm.

    Measured: 4. days

  3. Vital Signs Follow-up Form

    This form was created by the researcher in order to record the systolic-diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate (pulse), values of the patient who was applied an eye patch or earphone at night.

    Measured: 4. days

  4. The Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire

    This brief five-item questionnaire was used to evaluate perceived sleep depth, sleep latency (time to fall asleep), number of awakenings, efficiency (percentage of time awake), and sleep quality. It also includes a sixth item evaluating perceived night-time noise. Each item is evaluated on a scale of 0-100 with a visual analogue scale technique. A score of 0-25 indicates very poor quality sleep, whereas a score of 76-100 indicates very good sleep quality.

    Measured: 4. days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2022
  2. Study start20 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion15 Nov 2022
  4. Study completion15 Nov 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This research is a single-blind study with a pretest-posttest randomized control group.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05451186
Sponsor's protocol ID
8991
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
6 Jul 2022
Last updated
13 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kasapoglu ES, Enc N. Role of multicomponent non-pharmacological nursing interventions on delirium prevention: A randomized controlled study. Geriatr Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr;44:207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.02.015. Epub 2022 Feb 26.

    PubMed 35227973

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Eye patch and headphones in people with Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, run by Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analog Scale (Fear) (time frame: the first day after receiving randomisation). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05451186, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in