AzTrials
AzTrials

Central Venous Catheter PlacementNCT05452590

Wire-in-needle vs. Traditional Technique for Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Placement

A study testing Ultrasound-guided wire-in-needle technique for central venous catheter placement in people with Central Venous Catheter Placement, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Central venous catheters (CVC) are commonly inserted in surgical or critically ill patients. However, CVC placement can cause severe complications. To reduce the incidence of complications and increase procedural safety and quality, ultrasound (US)-guided CVC insertion is recommended by various scientific societies… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Central Venous Catheter Placement
What is being tested?
Ultrasound-guided wire-in-needle technique for central venous catheter placement
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
250 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
6 Jul 2022to 25 Sep 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery at the University Heart Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in whom CVC placement and sheath introducer central line placement in the internal jugular vein is indicated for clinical reasons unrelated to the study
  • age > 18 years
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • longitudinal (long axis) view cannot be performed because of anatomical reasons (e.g., short neck).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf

    Hamburg, 20251

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Wire-in-needle vs. Traditional Technique for Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Placement - a Randomized Controlled Trial (The WIN-Study)

Central venous catheters (CVC) are commonly inserted in surgical or critically ill patients. However, CVC placement can cause severe complications. To reduce the incidence of complications and increase procedural safety and quality, ultrasound (US)-guided CVC insertion is recommended by various scientific societies, including the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

During conventional US-guided CVC placement, the correct position of the needle tip in the venous vessel is confirmed by direct US visualization and aspiration of blood using a syringe connected to the needle. After blood aspiration, the operator must discontinue US-guidance to disconnect the syringe and the needle and to pass the guidewire through the needle (without direct US visualization). This step bears the risks of dislocating the needle tip and puncturing the posterior wall of the target vein or an adjacent artery.

Some authors thus propose an US-guided wire-in-needle technique - in which the guidewire is directly adapted to the needle (without a syringe) from the beginning of the procedure and the guidewire is advanced under direct US visualization. Whether the wire-in-needle technique decreases the procedure time, the number of needle passes, and complications compared to conventional US-guided CVC remains scarcely investigated. We thus propose a randomized controlled trial to investigate whether the US-guided wire-in-needle technique for CVC placement in the internal jugular vein (IJV) is faster and safer than the conventional US-guided technique in patients having cardiac surgery.

Read the detailed description

Patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery receive a CVC and sheath introducer central line in the same internal jugular vein. Both catheters require the insertion of a guidewire into the vein to insert the catheter (seldinger technique). The anesthesiologist is going to place both guidewires before advancing the catheters over the guidewires.

The IJV will be examined before catheter placement to confirm that a long-axis view is possible. The right IJV will be chosen for CVC and sheath introducer central line placement. Patients will be then randomized to the US-guided wire-in-needle technique or the conventional US-guided technique just before catheter placement. Randomization will thus be concealed until the last practical moment. The patients will be randomized by a computer algorithm. Patients will be blinded to group allocation.

Anesthesiologists inserting the catheters will have at least 2-month experience in both US-guided wire-in-needle technique or the conventional US-guided technique. Patients will be equipped with basic anesthetic monitoring (electrocardiogram, pulse oximetry, upper-arm cuff oscillometry) and an arterial catheter. All patients will be intubated and mechanically ventilated during the procedure. The patient will be placed in a 15° Trendelenburg position. Catheter placement will be performed under sterile conditions with the US probe covered with a sterile cover.

US-guided wire-in-needle technique The guidewire will be connected to the needle. The IJV will be punctured in a long-axis in-plane approach. When the needle tip enters the IJV, the guidewire will be advanced through the needle into the IJV under continuous ultrasound visualization. The needle will then be removed. The correct guidewire position in the IJV will be confirmed in the long-axis and short-axis view. Afterwards, the second guidewire will be placed in the same IJV approximately 1-2 centimeters distal to the fist guidewire using the same technique. The correct guidewire position in the IJV will be confirmed in the long-axis and short-axis view again.

Traditional technique A syringe will be connected to the needle. The IJV will be punctured in a long-axis in-plane or short-axis out-of-plane approach (as preferred by the anesthesiologist). When the needle tip enters the IJV, blood is aspirated using the syringe. The operator will then discontinue US-guidance, disconnect the syringe and advance the guidewire through the needle into the IJV. The needle will then be removed. The correct guidewire position in the IJV will be confirmed in the long-axis and short-axis view. Afterwards, the second guidewire will be placed in the same IJV approximately 1-2 centimeters distal to the fist guidewire using the same technique. The correct guidewire position in the IJV will be confirmed in the long-axis and short-axis view again.

Being tested
Ultrasound-guided wire-in-needle technique for central venous catheter placement

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound-guided wire-in-needle technique for central venous catheter placementProcedure or surgery

    The guidewire will be connected to the needle. The IJV will be punctured in a long-axis in-plane approach. When the needle tip enters the IJV, the guidewire will be advanced through the needle into the IJV under continuous ultrasound visualization. The needle will then be removed. The correct guidewire position in the IJV will be confirmed in the long-axis and short-axis view. Afterwards, the second guidewire will be placed in the same IJV approximately 1-2 centimeters distal to the fist guidewire using the same technique. The correct guidewire position in the IJV will be confirmed in the long-axis and short-axis view again.

Study groups in NCT05452590
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasound-guided wire-in-needle techniqueExperimentalThe guidewire will be connected to the needle. The IJV will be punctured in a long-axis in-plane approach. When the needle tip enters the IJV, the guidewire will be advanced through the needle into the IJV under continuous ultrasound visualization. The needle will then be removed. The correct guidewire position in the IJV will be confirmed in the long-axis and short-axis view. Afterwards, the second guidewire will be placed in the same IJV approximately 1-2 centimeters distal to the fist guidewire using the same technique. The correct guidewire position in the IJV will be confirmed in the long-axis and short-axis view again.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound-guided wire-in-needle technique for central venous catheter placement
Traditional techniqueNo interventionA syringe will be connected to the needle. The IJV will be punctured in a long-axis in-plane or short-axis out-of-plane approach (as preferred by the anesthesiologist). When the needle tip enters the IJV, blood is aspirated using the syringe. The operator will then discontinue US-guidance, disconnect the syringe and advance the guidewire through the needle into the IJV. The needle will then be removed. The correct guidewire position in the IJV will be confirmed in the long-axis and short-axis view. Afterwards, the second guidewire will be placed in the same IJV approximately 1-2 centimeters distal to the fist guidewire using the same technique. The correct guidewire position in the IJV will be confirmed in the long-axis and short-axis view again.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time between skin puncture and removal of the needle during placement of the first guidewire.

    Time between skin puncture and removal of the needle during placement of the first guidewire in seconds.

    Measured: From the beginning of central venous catheter placement till the end of central venous catheter placement.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Complications

    arterial puncture

    Measured: From the beginning of central venous catheter placement till the end of central venous catheter placement.

  2. Complications

    posterior wall puncture/hematoma

    Measured: From the beginning of central venous catheter placement till the end of central venous catheter placement.

  3. Complications

    cervical hematoma

    Measured: From the beginning of central venous catheter placement till the end of central venous catheter placement.

  4. Number of needle passes

    Number of needle passes required to place the wire in the vessel

    Measured: From the beginning of central venous catheter placement till the end of central venous catheter placement.

  5. Number of skin punctures

    Number of skin punctures required to place the wire in the vessel

    Measured: From the beginning of central venous catheter placement till the end of central venous catheter placement.

  6. First-pass success rate

    First-pass success rate for placing the wire in the vessel

    Measured: From the beginning of central venous catheter placement till the end of central venous catheter placement.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2022
  2. Study start6 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion13 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion25 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
250 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05452590
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022-100852-BO-ff
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
6 Jul 2022
Last updated
18 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Thomsen KK, Stekovic J, Koster F, Bergholz A, Kouz K, Flick M, Sessler DI, Zollner C, Saugel B, Schulte-Uentrop L. Wire-in-needle versus conventional syringe-on-needle technique for ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion in the internal jugular vein: the WIN randomized trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Oct;39(5):805-811. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01232-4. Epub 2024 Oct 14.

    PubMed 39400666

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound-guided wire-in-needle technique for central venous catheter placement in people with Central Venous Catheter Placement, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time between skin puncture and removal of the needle during placement of the first guidewire. (time frame: From the beginning of central venous catheter placement till the end of central venous catheter placement.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05452590, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in