AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerNCT05453630

Colonoscopy Outreach for Rural Communities Aim 2

A study testing Patient Navigation in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to test the effectiveness of a remotely-delivered patient navigation program for increasing colonoscopy completion for colorectal cancer screening, among rural populations. The study will partner with geographically disparate primary care organizations to recruit patients aged 45-75 to the study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 years to 915 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
Patient Navigation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
527 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
16 Jun 2022to 15 Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 years to 915 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 45-76.25 on the date of their referral for colonoscopy
  • Referred for colonoscopy as part of colorectal cancer screening in the last 3 months. This includes patients referred for colonoscopy after an abnormal stool screening test (e.g., FIT/FOBT/Cologuard) and patients referred for colonoscopy as a primary screening test for colorectal cancer.

Who cannot join

  • Deceased
  • Colonoscopy procedure since colonoscopy referral
  • Colonoscopy procedure scheduled less than or equal to 7 days from study enrollment date
  • Colonoscopy procedure scheduled more than 9 months from colonoscopy referral date (if known at enrollment)
  • Have diagnosis or past history of total colectomy or colorectal cancer (malignant neoplasm) at any time
  • Has hospice
  • Aged 66 and older living long-term in an institution for more than 90 consecutive days during the year prior to the query

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Washington

    Seattle, Washington, 98195

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study aims to test the effectiveness of a remotely-delivered patient navigation program for increasing colonoscopy completion for colorectal cancer screening, among rural populations. The study will partner with geographically disparate primary care organizations to recruit patients aged 45-75 to the study. The patient navigation program will be delivered through a community organization. This project is critical in advancing our knowledge of the effectiveness of patient navigation for increasing colonoscopy in this patient population as well as for understanding factors that can support long term implementation and sustainability of effective interventions.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death in the United States and its burden is greater in rural and low-income communities. Failure to complete recommended colonoscopy contributes to later-stage CRC diagnosis and worse CRC outcomes, which means timely and successful colonoscopy is a key opportunity to reduce CRC mortality. Using a Type 1 Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness design, we will randomize 480-600 subjects from 6-8 primary care clinical organizations in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to accomplish the following:

  1. Test the effectiveness of a patient navigation program, remotely-delivered by a community-based organization, for increasing colonoscopy completion rates for colorectal cancer screening among rural patients.
  2. Assess implementation and sustainability of the patient navigation program from the perspectives of both community and clinical stakeholders.
Being tested
Patient Navigation, Usual Care Control
Keywords
colorectal cancer, patient navigation, colonoscopy, FIT, fecal immunochemical test, immunochemical fecal occult blood test, implementation effectiveness, colorectal cancer screening
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Patient NavigationBehavioural

    Patients will receive navigation from a trained lay navigator at a community-based nonprofit organization that supports access to high quality healthcare. The patient navigator will work with patients to schedule their colonoscopy and identify, explore, and overcome barriers. They will educate patients about the colonoscopy procedure and preparation, provide resources, and coach and motivate patients.

  • Usual Care ControlBehavioural

    Educational brochure about colonoscopy

Study groups in NCT05453630
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patient Navigation InterventionExperimentalPatients randomized to this arm will receive language-concordant patient navigation from a trained navigator, over the phone and via text and email, to assist patients to complete colonoscopy to screen for colorectal cancer.
Receives: Behavioral: Patient Navigation
Standard of Care ControlOtherParticipants randomized to this arm will receive an educational brochure about the importance of colonoscopy to screen for colorectal cancer.
Receives: Behavioral: Usual Care Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Who Complete Colonoscopy Within 1 Year of the Colonoscopy Referral

    Number of participants who received a colonoscopy within 12 months (365 days) of their referral for the procedure. Electronic health record documentation of the procedure (e.g., procedure report, pathology report, results letter) or self-report was used to determine whether the patient received the colonoscopy.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Number of Participants Who Complete Colonoscopy Within 9 Months of the Colonoscopy Referral

    Number of participants who received a colonoscopy within 9 months (274 days) of their referral for the procedure. Electronic health record documentation of the procedure (e.g., procedure report, pathology report, results letter) or self-report was used to determine whether the patient received the colonoscopy.

    Measured: 9 months

  2. Number of Participants Who Complete Colonoscopy Within 6 Months of the Colonoscopy Referral

    Number of participants who received a colonoscopy within 6 months (183 days) of their referral for the procedure. Electronic health record documentation of the procedure (e.g., procedure report, pathology report, results letter) or self-report was used to determine whether the patient received the colonoscopy.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Time to Completion of Colonoscopy or End of Follow-up After the Colonoscopy Referral

    Kaplan-Meier estimated median days to completion. Based on the number of days to colonoscopy completion or end of the 12 month (365 day) follow-up period, from the participant's referral for the procedure. Electronic health record documentation of the procedure (e.g., procedure report, pathology report, results letter) or self-report was used to determine whether the patient received the colonoscopy.

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Number of Participants Who Have Completed Colonoscopies With Adequate Preparation

    Number of participants who received a colonoscopy within 12 months of their referral who had documentation of adequate bowel preparation in their electronic health record. Adequate bowel preparation was defined as a subjective rating of fair, adequate, good, or excellent; or a Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) total of 6 or higher. The BBPS scale ranges from 0-9 with higher values indicating better preparation.

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Number of Participants Who Have Colonoscopies With Cecal Intubation

    Number of participants who received a colonoscopy within 12 months of their referral who had documentation of cecal intubation in their electronic health record. Cecal intubation was considered achieved if there was text documenting reaching the cecum or photographic documentation labeled with cecal landmarks in the procedure information.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jul 2022
  2. Study start16 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion15 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion15 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
527 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05453630
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00014807
Other IDs
1R01CA254515-01
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
6 Jul 2022
Last updated
15 Jul 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: A data dictionary and cleaned, de-identified, data used to conduct the final analyses may be made available to researchers who provide a reasonable proposal. Data will be limited to the scope of the proposal.

Publications

  • Ike B, Keppel GA, Cole A. Rural barriers to colonoscopy screening identified through patient navigation. PEC Innov. 2026 Apr 3;8:100475. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2026.100475. eCollection 2026 Jun.

    PubMed 42005421
  • Keppel GA, Ike B, Leroux BG, Ko LK, Osterhage KP, Jacobs JD, Cole AM. Colonoscopy Outreach for Rural Communities (CORC): A study protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a patient navigation program to improve colonoscopy completion for colorectal cancer screening. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;141:107539. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107539. Epub 2024 Apr 12.

    PubMed 38615750
  • Ike B, Keppel GA, Osterhage KP, Ko LK, Cole A. Adapting a Remotely Delivered Patient Navigation Program for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care: Important Considerations for Rural Contexts. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241288025. doi: 10.1177/21501319241288025.

    PubMed 39439281

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Patient Navigation in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jul 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Who Complete Colonoscopy Within 1 Year of the Colonoscopy Referral (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05453630, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in