AzTrials
AzTrials

SegmentectomyIMPLANE-0529NCT05453721

Effect and Long-Term Outcomes of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging Method Versus Modified Inflation-Deflation Method in Identification of Intersegmental Plane(IMPLANE-0529)

A study testing Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method and Modified inflation-deflation method in people with Segmentectomy and Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. The purpose is to compare the difference of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method and modified inflation-deflation method in identifying intersegmental plane in segmentectomy, and provide high-level evidence for the selection of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method and Modified inflation-deflation method
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
272 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
4 Aug 2022to 20 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18 to 80 years old;
  • According to the surgical standards of the Eighth edition of People's Medical Publishing House, patients whose blood pressure was under 160/100mmHg and blood glucose was under 5.6-11.2mmol /L with normal functions of major organs such as heart, lung, liver and kidney before surgery are included. The main criteria are as follows:
  • Cardiac function examination indicated Goldman index grade 1-2; ii. Pulmonary function examination suggested postoperative predicted FEV1≥40% and DLCO≥40%; iii. Total bilirubin ≤1.5 times the upper limit of normal; iv. Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase ≤2.5 times the upper limit of normal value; v. Creatinine ≤1.25 times the upper limit of normal value and creatinine clearance ≥60ml/min;
  • The center of the lesion is located in the other lobes except the middle lobe, and in the middle and outer third of the lung;
  • The maximum diameter of the tumor was not more than 2cm on TLC(Thin layer CT) scan and the clinical stage was cT1a-1bN0M0(according to AJCC staging criteria, eighth edition);
  • Consolidation tumor rate <1;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • ECOG PSscore 0-1;
  • All relevant examinations should be completed within 28 days before surgery;
  • Patients who understand the study and have signed informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patient with a history of iodine or indocyanine green allergy;
  • Patient who had received antitumor therapy (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy) prior to surgery;
  • Patient with a history of other malignancies;
  • Patient with secondary primary cancer at enrollment;
  • Small cell lung cancer;
  • Prior history of unilateral thoracotomy;
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Woman in pregnant or breastfeeding period;
  • Patient with interstitial pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis or severe emphysema;
  • An active bacterial or fungal infection that is difficult to control;
  • Severe mental illness;
  • History of severe heart disease , heart failure , myocardial infarction or angina pectoris within the last 6 months;
  • patient that researcher considers inappropriate to participate in this study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

    Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effect and Long-Term Outcomes of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging Method Versus Modified Inflation-Deflation Method in Identification of Intersegmental Plane: A Multicenter、Prospective、Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is a multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. The purpose is to compare the difference of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method and modified inflation-deflation method in identifying intersegmental plane in segmentectomy, and provide high-level evidence for the selection of intersegmental plane identification method in early NSCLC segmental resection.

Read the detailed description

In patients with early-stage lung cancer, segmentectomy has comparable long-term survival results compared with conventional lobectomy, but patients have a higher postoperative quality of life because more lung tissue is preserved.

Segmentectomy is based on accurate anatomy, and the identification of intersegmental plane is one of the keys to accurate anatomy of segmentectomy.

At present, differential ventilation and differential colorimetry are clinically used to cause the difference between the target segment and the adjacent lung segment to identify intersegmental plane, which both have advantages and disadvantages. Clinical consensus on the best method for intersegmental plane identification has not been formed.

This study is a multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. The study plans to enroll 272 patients with peripheral stage I NSCLC with tumor diameter ≤2cm and consolidation tumor rate <1. Eligible patients will be randomly divided into the experimental group (indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method) or control group (modified inflation-deflation method) at a ratio of 1:1.

This study is expected to compare the difference of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method and modified inflation-deflation method in identifying intersegmental plane in segmentectomy, and provide high-level evidence for the selection of intersegmental plane identification method in early NSCLC segmentectomy.

Being tested
Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method, Modified inflation-deflation method
Keywords
Segmentectomy, Intersegmental plane identification, Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method, Modified inflation-deflation method
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging methodProcedure or surgery

    Using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method to identify intersegmental plane in segmentectomy

  • Modified inflation-deflation methodProcedure or surgery

    Using modified inflation-deflation method to identify intersegmental plane in segmentectomy

Study groups in NCT05453721
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method groupExperimentalUsing indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method to identify intersegmental plane in segmentectomy
Receives: Procedure: Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method
Modified inflation-deflation method groupActive comparatorUsing modified inflation-deflation method to identify intersegmental plane in segmentectomy
Receives: Procedure: Modified inflation-deflation method

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Success rate of intersegmental plane identification

    Successful intraoperative appearance of the intersegmental plane is considered a success

    Measured: During the operation

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Intersegment plane identification time

    Indocyanine green injection/start of ventilation to the first observed intersegment plane appearance

    Measured: During the surgery

  2. Surgery time

    Time from the beginning to the end of the surgery

    Measured: During the surgery

  3. Intraoperatve blood loss

    Blood loss during the surgery

    Measured: During the surgery

  4. Postoperative blood loss

    Blood loss after the surgery

    Measured: Postoperative in-hospital stay up to 30 days

  5. Postoperative air leakage rate

    Air leakage after the surgery

    Measured: Postoperative in-hospital stay up to 30 days

  6. Postoperative air leakage time

    time of air leakage after the surgery

    Measured: Postoperative in-hospital stay up to 30 days

  7. Preoperative pulmonary function

    FEV1.0(forced expiratory volume in 1.0 s)

    Measured: 1 week before the surgery

  8. Preoperative pulmonary function

    FVC(forced vital capacity)

    Measured: 1 week before the surgery

  9. Postoperative pulmonary function

    FEV1.0(forced expiratory volume in 1.0 s)

    Measured: 6/12 months after surgery

  10. Postoperative pulmonary function

    FVC(forced vital capacity)

    Measured: 6/12 months after surgery

  11. Quality of life(EORTCQLQ-C30)

    Quality of life Scale

    Measured: 6/12 months after surgery

  12. Adverse event rate

    According to CTCAE-V5.0

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  13. Adverse event level

    According to CTCAE-V5.0

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 2 year

  14. Surgical complication

    According to Clavien-Dindo grading system

    Measured: Postoperative in-hospital stay up to 30 days

  15. Postoperative 30-day mortality

    Deaths occurring within 30 days after surgery

    Measured: Within 30 days after surgery

  16. Postoperative 90-day mortality

    Deaths occurring within 90 days after surgery

    Measured: Within 90 days after surgery

  17. Reoperation rate

    The percentage of patients who need a second operation

    Measured: Within 30 days after surgery

  18. Number of stapler nail bin used for cutting

    Number of stapler nail bin used for cutting

    Measured: During the surgery

  19. R0 resection rate

    Negative surgical margin under the microscope

    Measured: Within 14 days after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jul 2022
  2. Study start4 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completion19 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion20 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study has two parallel arms, Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method (treatment arm) and Modified inflation-deflation method (control arm) are included in this study.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
272 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05453721
Sponsor's protocol ID
NFTS-1
Acronym
IMPLANE-0529
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
24 Jun 2022
Last updated
7 May 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging method and Modified inflation-deflation method in people with Segmentectomy and Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Success rate of intersegmental plane identification (time frame: During the operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in