Advanced Malignant Solid NeoplasmNCT05455606
Does the Use of a Genomic Tumor Board Increase the Number of Patients Who Receive Genome-Informed Treatment
A study testing Best Practice, Chart Abstraction and Educational Intervention in people with Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm and Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm, run by SWOG Cancer Research Network at 72 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This clinical trial studies how well an educationally enhanced genomic tumor board (EGTB) intervention works to increase the number of patients with solid tumors that have come back (recurrent), do not respond to treatment (refractory), have spread to other parts of the body (metastatic), or are newly diagnosed and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Recurrent Malignant Solid Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- Best Practice, Chart Abstraction and Educational Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,284 participants
- Where
- 72 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 14 Oct 2022to 1 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- RECRUITMENT CENTERS INCLUSION
- A Recruitment Center is defined as an outpatient clinic, or group of clinics, belonging to the same National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) or minority/underserved (MU)-NCORP, who will be contributing physicians and patient participants to the study
- Recruitment Centers must be part of an NCORP or MU-NCORP site with Cancer Care Delivery Research (CCDR) funding as this study is supported by CCDR funding. Each clinic included in the Recruitment Center must be associated with Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) site identification (ID).
- Recruitment Centers must send large panel next generation sequencing genomic tests on at least 10 unique patients per month.
- Recruitment Centers must have at least 4 practicing oncologists (including medical, gynecologic, or neuro-oncologists) at the site willing to participate in the study and register within three months of study activation.
- Recruitment Centers must be willing to register a total of 66 patients (over 2 years) to the study.
Show all 25Show fewer
- Centers must be able to send at least one member of the study team to attend the Recruitment Center's cases presented to the S2108CD Genomic Tumor Board, should the Recruitment Center be randomized to the intervention arm.
- Recruitment Centers must be willing and able to document the number of unique patients on which GTT is ordered at the Recruitment Center and submit this monthly to the S2108CD Study Team.
- PHYSICIAN PARTICIPANT INCLUSION
- Physician participant must be a registering investigator of the Recruitment Center that is participating in the study. If the physician is a registering investigator at more than one Recruitment Center, he/she must choose one Recruitment Center to identify with and enroll patients from.
- Physician participants must be board-eligible or board-certified in Medical Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology, or Neurology with certification or eligible for certification in Neuro-oncology.
- Physician participants must be willing to offer participation in the study to all eligible patients under their care for the duration of the study. A single physician may enroll multiple patients on the study.
- Physician participants must be willing to complete all study questionnaires and, as part of the implementation objective, participate in interviews if invited.
- Physician participants must complete all baseline questionnaires prior to registration.
- Physician participants at a Recruitment Center randomized to the intervention arm must be willing to participate in the educationally enhanced GTB (EGTB).
- PATIENT PARTICIPANT INCLUSION
- Patient participants must have either recurrent, relapsed, refractory, metastatic, or newly diagnosed advanced stage III or stage IV solid tumor malignancy.
- Patient participants must be under the care of a physician enrolled on the study.
- Patient participants may have started anti-cancer treatment for the current diagnosis. The treating physician anticipates that the patient will start a new anti-cancer treatment (either first or subsequent lines) within 6 months after registration.
- Patient participants are allowed to be co-enrolled on other clinical trials including non-treatment studies and studies that include investigational drugs. Patients may be enrolled on genome-informed therapeutic trials, such as LungMAP, MATCH, TAPUR, etc.
- Patient participants' genomic tumor test must have been ordered within 7 days prior to registration with results pending. The genomic testing may be a commercially available panel (such as FoundationOne, Caris, Tempus, etc.) or a non-commercial tumor panel performed at an academic medical center.
- NOTE: Qualifying GTTs are defined as Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act (CLIA)-certified next generation sequencing (NGS) tissue or liquid biopsy panels, including hotspot, whole gene, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) (including expression data) panels. Fluorescence-in-situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry test results assessing cancer-relevant proteins (e.g. Her2/neu, ALK, MET) and immune parameters (e.g. PD-L1 tests) are also permissible if performed in the context of a larger panel that includes NGS or expression profiling. These tests can come from any commercial or academic laboratory within the United States (US) and they should be ordered with the intent to influence genome-informed treatment decision. Oncotype DX and other panels used for making treatment decisions based on a prognostic read-out (e.g. liquid biopsy minimal residual disease [MRD]) are not permitted.
- Patient participants must be at least 18 years of age.
- Patient participants must have a Zubrod performance status of 0-2.
- Participants (patients and physicians) must sign and give written informed consent in accordance with institutional and federal guidelines. For patient participants with impaired decision-making capabilities, legally authorized representative may sign and give informed consent on behalf of study participants in accordance with applicable federal, local, and Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) regulations. Documentation of informed consent via remote consent is permissible.
Who cannot join
- RECRUITMENT CENTERS EXCLUSION
- Recruitment Centers must not have or utilize an existing Genomic Tumor Board (GTB). For the purposes of this study, a Genomic Tumor Board is defined as an interdisciplinary team of clinicians and scientists that reviews genomic testing results and provides guidance on treatment options based primarily on genomic data to the treating physician. The existence of a general multidisciplinary tumor board that addresses all aspects of patient care and treatment is not considered an exclusion criterion. A general multidisciplinary tumor board is defined as an interdisciplinary team of clinicians that primarily discusses all aspects of cancer care, including diagnostic aspects (pathology and radiology), therapeutic options (surgical, radiation and medical) as well as palliative and psychosocial support options.
- PATIENT PARTICIPANT EXCLUSION
- Patient participants must not be going on hospice care at the time of registration.
Trial locations and contacts
72 sites in 2 countries.
72 sites in 2 countries
United States70 sites
Hawaii Cancer Care - Westridge
‘Aiea, Hawaii, 96701
Pali Momi Medical Center
‘Aiea, Hawaii, 96701
Lehigh Valley Hospital-Cedar Crest
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103
Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
Illinois CancerCare-Bloomington
Bloomington, Illinois, 61704
Saint Joseph's/Candler - Bluffton Campus
Bluffton, South Carolina, 29910
Essentia Health Saint Joseph's Medical Center
Brainerd, Minnesota, 56401
Saint Joseph Mercy Brighton
Brighton, Michigan, 48114
Ascension Southeast Wisconsin Hospital - Elmbrook Campus
Brookfield, Wisconsin, 53045
Minnesota Oncology - Burnsville
Burnsville, Minnesota, 55337
Illinois CancerCare-Canton
Canton, Illinois, 61520
Saint Joseph Mercy Chelsea
Chelsea, Michigan, 48118
Mercy Hospital
Coon Rapids, Minnesota, 55433
Carle at The Riverfront
Danville, Illinois, 61832
Iowa Methodist Medical Center
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309
Medical Oncology and Hematology Associates-Des Moines
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309
Ascension Saint John Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48236
Essentia Health Cancer Center
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
Essentia Health Cancer Center-South University Clinic
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
Parkland Health Center - Farmington
Farmington, Missouri, 63640
Ascension Saint Francis - Reiman Cancer Center
Franklin, Wisconsin, 53132
Unity Hospital
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432
Gibbs Cancer Center-Gaffney
Gaffney, South Carolina, 29341
Illinois CancerCare-Galesburg
Galesburg, Illinois, 61401
Gibbs Cancer Center-Pelham
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
HaysMed University of Kansas Health System
Hays, Kansas, 67601
Hawaii Cancer Care Inc - Waterfront Plaza
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Queen's Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Straub Clinic and Hospital
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
University of Hawaii Cancer Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96826
Truman Medical Centers
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108
University of Kansas Cancer Center - North
Kansas City, Missouri, 64154
Lawrence Memorial Hospital
Lawrence, Kansas, 66044
University of Kansas Cancer Center - Lee's Summit
Lee's Summit, Missouri, 64064
Saint Joseph Hospital East
Lexington, Kentucky, 40509
Trinity Health Saint Mary Mercy Livonia Hospital
Livonia, Michigan, 48154
Saint Joseph London
London, Kentucky, 40741
Saint John's Hospital - Healtheast
Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109
Carle Physician Group-Mattoon/Charleston
Mattoon, Illinois, 61938
Ascension Columbia Saint Mary's Hospital Ozaukee
Mequon, Wisconsin, 53097
New Ulm Medical Center
New Ulm, Minnesota, 56073
University of Kansas Cancer Center at North Kansas City Hospital
North Kansas City, Missouri, 64116
Olathe Health Cancer Center
Olathe, Kansas, 66061
Illinois CancerCare-Ottawa Clinic
Ottawa, Illinois, 61350
University of Kansas Cancer Center-Overland Park
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210
Illinois CancerCare-Peoria
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
Cancer Center at Saint Joseph's
Phoenix, Arizona, 85004
FirstHealth of the Carolinas-Moore Regional Hospital
Pinehurst, North Carolina, 28374
Saint Joseph Mercy Oakland
Pontiac, Michigan, 48341
Kootenai Clinic Cancer Services - Post Falls
Post Falls, Idaho, 83854
Delbert Day Cancer Institute at PCRMC
Rolla, Missouri, 65401
Park Nicollet Clinic - Saint Louis Park
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
Regions Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101
Sainte Genevieve County Memorial Hospital
Sainte Genevieve, Missouri, 63670
Salina Regional Health Center
Salina, Kansas, 67401
Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion at Saint Joseph's/Candler
Savannah, Georgia, 31405
Spartanburg Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
CoxHealth South Hospital
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
Missouri Baptist Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63131
Lakeview Hospital
Stillwater, Minnesota, 55082
Missouri Baptist Sullivan Hospital
Sullivan, Missouri, 63080
Missouri Baptist Outpatient Center-Sunset Hills
Sunset Hills, Missouri, 63127
University of Kansas Health System Saint Francis Campus
Topeka, Kansas, 66606
MGC Hematology Oncology-Union
Union, South Carolina, 29379
Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Ridgeview Medical Center
Waconia, Minnesota, 55387
Ascension Medical Group Southeast Wisconsin - Mayfair Road
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53226
Minnesota Oncology Hematology PA-Woodbury
Woodbury, Minnesota, 55125
Fairview Lakes Medical Center
Wyoming, Minnesota, 55092
Puerto Rico2 sites
Doctors Cancer Center
Manati, 00674
Centro Comprensivo de Cancer de UPR
San Juan, 00927
About this study
Official title: A Cluster Randomized Trial Comparing an Educationally Enhanced Genomic Tumor Board (EGTB) Intervention to Usual Practice to Increase Evidence-Based Genome-Informed Therapy
This clinical trial studies how well an educationally enhanced genomic tumor board (EGTB) intervention works to increase the number of patients with solid tumors that have come back (recurrent), do not respond to treatment (refractory), have spread to other parts of the body (metastatic), or are newly diagnosed and spread to other parts of the body (advanced) who receive genome-informed treatment. Genome-informed treatment refers to treatment based on the information found in genomic tumor test results. This study compares the usual approach to reviewing genomic tumor test results with the approach of having a genomic tumor board (GTB) review the test results. A GTB is team of doctors and scientists that have experience in understanding genomic changes and review genomic tumor test results. The tumor board helps to suggest whether there are other cancer treatment options based on patient genetic test results. The usual approach is to review genomic tumor test results without the GTB being involved. This study may help researchers learn if using a GTB enhances the treatment decision making process within 6 months of joining the study. This study may also help researchers learn if using the GTB increases doctors' understanding of genomic tumor test results and increases doctors' comfort level with genomic tumor tests.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
- To determine whether an EGTB intervention compared to usual practice increases the proportion of patients who receive evidence-based genome-informed therapy within 6 months after registration to the study.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To compare physician genomic confidence and physician experience with genomic tumor testing (GTT) between arms at baseline and end of study.
II. To compare clinical outcomes between arms by assessing patient survival and time to treatment discontinuation.
III. To compare physician assessment of evidence-based genome-informed therapy to the central study team determination of evidence-based genome-informed therapy, both overall and separately by arm.
IMPLEMENTATION OBJECTIVES:
- To assess the utilization of GTT and implementation of the EGTB intervention into clinic workflow in order to better understand barriers and facilitators at Recruitment Centers assigned to the active intervention arm using a mixed-methods approach.
II. To assess the evolution of GTT utilization within clinic workflows at recruitment centers assigned to the usual practice (control) arm using a mixed-methods approach.
OUTLINE: Study clinics are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. Participants receive interventions based on this randomization.
ARM 1: Participants receive usual care. This consists of physicians ordering GTT for patients and reviewing the results without the GTB being involved.
ARM 2: Patients and physicians receive the EGTB intervention. This is comprised of 2 components: the structured GTB and the supporting education. Physicians submit cases for discussion to the GTB within 2 weeks of GTT results. The GTB sessions are held weekly and conducted virtually over a video-conferencing platform. Each case presentation is 10 to 15 minutes long, and 4 to 6 cases are discussed during each 60 minute GTB session. GTT results and clinical data are presented and expert interpretation of genomic test results is provided to help prioritize potential treatment options and provide a framework for interpretation. Supporting education materials are also available online to participants to support GTT decision making.
Physicians are followed until the end of the study or through 6 months after their last patient was registered to the study, whichever is later. Patients are followed for 24 months after registration or until a criterion for removal from protocol participation is met, whichever comes first.
- Conditions
- Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Recurrent Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Refractory Malignant Solid Neoplasm
- Being tested
- Best Practice, Chart Abstraction, Educational Intervention, Genomic Profile, Interview
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Best PracticeOther
Also called standard of care, standard therapy
Receive usual care
Chart AbstractionOther
Ancillary studies
Educational InterventionOther
Also called Education for Intervention, Intervention by Education, Intervention through Education, Intervention, Educational
Physicians access genomic testing education materials
Genomic ProfileProcedure or surgery
Also called genetic profile, Genome Profile, Genomic Profiling, Genomic Test
Patients undergo genomic testing
InterviewOther
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire AdministrationOther
Ancillary studies
Tumor Board ReviewOther
Also called multidisciplinary opinion
Patients undergo genomic tumor board review
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 (usual care) | Active comparator | Participants receive usual care. This consists of physicians ordering GTT for patients and reviewing the results without the GTB being involved. Receives: Other: Best Practice; Other: Chart Abstraction; Procedure: Genomic Profile; Other: Interview; Other: Questionnaire Administration |
| Arm 2 (EGTB) | Experimental | Patients and physicians receive the EGTB intervention. This is comprised of 2 components: the structured GTB and the supporting education. Physicians submit cases for discussion to the GTB within 2 weeks of GTT results. The GTB sessions are held weekly and conducted virtually over a video-conferencing platform. Each case presentation is 10 to 15 minutes long, and 4 to 6 cases are discussed during each 60 minute GTB session. GTT results and clinical data are presented and expert interpretation of genomic test results is provided to help prioritize potential treatment options and provide a framework for interpretation. Supporting education materials are also available online to participants to support GTT decision making. Receives: Other: Chart Abstraction; Other: Educational Intervention; Procedure: Genomic Profile; Other: Interview; Other: Questionnaire Administration; Other: Tumor Board Review |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of patients who receive a treatment that targets a genomic variant for which there is sufficient data to support actionability
Evidence-based genome-informed therapy is defined as the use of a treatment that targets a genomic variant for which there is sufficient data to support actionability. This is a patient-specific measure determined through blinded central review of patient data, following the schemas in the protocol. An independent panel of investigators blinded to the study arm assignment of the study participant will evaluate redacted data from each subject for determination of the primary endpoint. Data supporting the primary endpoint are obtained from the genomic tumor test results PDF, pathology report, primary tumor type, and the S2108CD Treatment Form as well as curated evidence plus evidence level (tier) designation from the Jackson Labs Clinical Knowledge Base.
Measured: Within 6 months of study completion
Secondary outcomes (6)
Physician genomic confidence
Measured by 3-item scale assessing physician confidence in genomic knowledge and ability to explain genomic concepts/make treatment recommendations. This assessment is on the S2108CD Genomic Testing Questionnaire.
Measured: Baseline and month 27 after study activation
Physician experience using genomic tumor testing (GTT) in practice
The physician experience using genomic tumor testing in practice will be assessed using selected items from the National Survey of Precision Medicine in Cancer Treatment, included on the S2108CD Genomic Testing Questionnaire.
Measured: Baseline and month 27 after study activation
Overall survival
Overall survival on study will be measured from registration until death due to any cause.
Measured: From registration until death due to any cause, assessed up to 24 months
Overall survival on new anticancer therapy
Overall survival on new anticancer therapy will be measured from the time new anticancer therapy is initiated on study until death due to any cause.
Measured: From the time new anticancer therapy is initiated on study until deathdue to any cause, assessed up to 24 months
Time to treatment discontinuation
Time to treatment discontinuation on study will be measured as the time from registration until the last dose recorded or death.
Measured: From registration until the last dose recorded or death, assessed up to 24 months
Time to treatment discontinuation on new anticancer therapy
time to treatment discontinuation on new anticancer therapy will be measured as the time from registration until the last dose recorded or death.
Measured: From registration until the last dose recorded or death, assessed up to 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2022
- Study start14 Oct 2022
- Primary completion15 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Advanced Malignant Solid NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SWOG Cancer Research NetworkThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,284 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- SWOG Cancer Research Network
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jens Rueter, Principal investigator, SWOG Cancer Research Network
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05455606
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S2108CD
- Other IDs
- NCI-2022-04626, S2108CD, SWOG-S2108CD, S2108CD, UG1CA189974
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Cluster Randomized Trial Comparing an Educationally Enhanced Genomic Tumor Board (EGTB) Intervention to Usual Practice to Increase Evidence-Based Genome-Informed Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05455606
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- S2108CD
- Conditions
- Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Recurrent Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Refractory Malignant Solid Neoplasm
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,284 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SWOG Cancer Research NetworkResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 14 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical trial studies how well an educationally enhanced genomic tumor board (EGTB) intervention works to increase the number of patients with solid tumors that have come back (recurrent), do not respond to treatment (refractory), have spread to other parts of the body (metastatic), or are newly diagnosed and spread to other parts of the body (advanced) who receive genome-informed treatment. Genome-informed treatment refers to treatment based on the information found in genomic tumor test results. This study compares the usual approach to reviewing genomic tumor test results with the approach of having a genomic tumor board (GTB) review the test results. A GTB is team of doctors and scientists that have experience in understanding genomic changes and review genomic tumor test results. The tumor board helps to suggest whether there are other cancer treatment options based on patient genetic test results. The usual approach is to review genomic tumor test results without the GTB being involved. This study may help researchers learn if using a GTB enhances the treatment decision making process within 6 months of joining the study. This study may also help researchers learn if using the GTB increases doctors' understanding of genomic tumor test results and increases doctors' comfort level with genomic tumor tests.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
- To determine whether an EGTB intervention compared to usual practice increases the proportion of patients who receive evidence-based genome-informed therapy within 6 months after registration to the study.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To compare physician genomic confidence and physician experience with genomic tumor testing (GTT) between arms at baseline and end of study.
II. To compare clinical outcomes between arms by assessing patient survival and time to treatment discontinuation.
III. To compare physician assessment of evidence-based genome-informed therapy to the central study team determination of evidence-based genome-informed therapy, both overall and separately by arm.
IMPLEMENTATION OBJECTIVES:
- To assess the utilization of GTT and implementation of the EGTB intervention into clinic workflow in order to better understand barriers and facilitators at Recruitment Centers assigned to the active intervention arm using a mixed-methods approach.
II. To assess the evolution of GTT utilization within clinic workflows at recruitment centers assigned to the usual practice (control) arm using a mixed-methods approach.
OUTLINE: Study clinics are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. Participants receive interventions based on this randomization.
ARM 1: Participants receive usual care. This consists of physicians ordering GTT for patients and reviewing the results without the GTB being involved.
ARM 2: Patients and physicians receive the EGTB intervention. This is comprised of 2 components: the structured GTB and the supporting education. Physicians submit cases for discussion to the GTB within 2 weeks of GTT results. The GTB sessions are held weekly and conducted virtually over a video-conferencing platform. Each case presentation is 10 to 15 minutes long, and 4 to 6 cases are discussed during each 60 minute GTB session. GTT results and clinical data are presented and expert interpretation of genomic test results is provided to help prioritize potential treatment options and provide a framework for interpretation. Supporting education materials are also available online to participants to support GTT decision making.
Physicians are followed until the end of the study or through 6 months after their last patient was registered to the study, whichever is later. Patients are followed for 24 months after registration or until a criterion for removal from protocol participation is met, whichever comes first.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 (usual care) | Active comparator | Other: Best Practice, Other: Chart Abstraction, Procedure: Genomic Profile, Other: Interview, Other: Questionnaire AdministrationParticipants receive usual care. This consists of physicians ordering GTT for patients and reviewing the results without the GTB being involved. |
| Arm 2 (EGTB) | Experimental | Other: Chart Abstraction, Other: Educational Intervention, Procedure: Genomic Profile, Other: Interview, Other: Questionnaire Administration, Other: Tumor Board ReviewPatients and physicians receive the EGTB intervention. This is comprised of 2 components: the structured GTB and the supporting education. Physicians submit cases for discussion to the GTB within 2 weeks of GTT results. The GTB sessions are held weekly and conducted virtually over a video-conferencing platform. Each case presentation is 10 to 15 minutes long, and 4 to 6 cases are discussed during each 60 minute GTB session. GTT results and clinical data are presented and expert interpretation of genomic test results is provided to help prioritize potential treatment options and provide a framework for interpretation. Supporting education materials are also available online to participants to support GTT decision making. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (25 listed)
- RECRUITMENT CENTERS INCLUSION
- A Recruitment Center is defined as an outpatient clinic, or group of clinics, belonging to the same National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) or minority/underserved (MU)-NCORP, who will be contributing physicians and patient participants to the study
- Recruitment Centers must be part of an NCORP or MU-NCORP site with Cancer Care Delivery Research (CCDR) funding as this study is supported by CCDR funding. Each clinic included in the Recruitment Center must be associated with Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) site identification (ID).
- Recruitment Centers must send large panel next generation sequencing genomic tests on at least 10 unique patients per month.
- Recruitment Centers must have at least 4 practicing oncologists (including medical, gynecologic, or neuro-oncologists) at the site willing to participate in the study and register within three months of study activation.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- RECRUITMENT CENTERS EXCLUSION
- Recruitment Centers must not have or utilize an existing Genomic Tumor Board (GTB). For the purposes of this study, a Genomic Tumor Board is defined as an interdisciplinary team of clinicians and scientists that reviews genomic testing results and provides guidance on treatment options based primarily on genomic data to the treating physician. The existence of a general multidisciplinary tumor board that addresses all aspects of patient care and treatment is not considered an exclusion criterion. A general multidisciplinary tumor board is defined as an interdisciplinary team of clinicians that primarily discusses all aspects of cancer care, including diagnostic aspects (pathology and radiology), therapeutic options (surgical, radiation and medical) as well as palliative and psychosocial support options.
- PATIENT PARTICIPANT EXCLUSION
- Patient participants must not be going on hospice care at the time of registration.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Best PracticeAlso: standard of care, standard therapyReceive usual care | Other | Arm 1 (usual care) |
| Chart AbstractionAncillary studies | Other | Arm 1 (usual care), Arm 2 (EGTB) |
| Educational InterventionAlso: Education for Intervention, Intervention by Education, Intervention through Education, Intervention, EducationalPhysicians access genomic testing education materials | Other | Arm 2 (EGTB) |
| Genomic ProfileAlso: genetic profile, Genome Profile, Genomic Profiling, Genomic TestPatients undergo genomic testing | Procedure or surgery | Arm 1 (usual care), Arm 2 (EGTB) |
| InterviewAncillary studies | Other | Arm 1 (usual care), Arm 2 (EGTB) |
| Questionnaire AdministrationAncillary studies | Other | Arm 1 (usual care), Arm 2 (EGTB) |
| Tumor Board ReviewAlso: multidisciplinary opinionPatients undergo genomic tumor board review | Other | Arm 2 (EGTB) |
Primary outcome
Percent of patients who receive a treatment that targets a genomic variant for which there is sufficient data to support actionability
Time frame: Within 6 months of study completion
Evidence-based genome-informed therapy is defined as the use of a treatment that targets a genomic variant for which there is sufficient data to support actionability. This is a patient-specific measure determined through blinded central review of patient data, following the schemas in the protocol. An independent panel of investigators blinded to the study arm assignment of the study participant will evaluate redacted data from each subject for determination of the primary endpoint. Data supporting the primary endpoint are obtained from the genomic tumor test results PDF, pathology report, primary tumor type, and the S2108CD Treatment Form as well as curated evidence plus evidence level (tier) designation from the Jackson Labs Clinical Knowledge Base.
6 secondary outcomes
Physician genomic confidence
Time frame: Baseline and month 27 after study activation
Physician experience using genomic tumor testing (GTT) in practice
Time frame: Baseline and month 27 after study activation
Overall survival
Time frame: From registration until death due to any cause, assessed up to 24 months
Overall survival on new anticancer therapy
Time frame: From the time new anticancer therapy is initiated on study until deathdue to any cause, assessed up to 24 months
Time to treatment discontinuation
Time frame: From registration until the last dose recorded or death, assessed up to 24 months
Time to treatment discontinuation on new anticancer therapy
Time frame: From registration until the last dose recorded or death, assessed up to 24 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2026.
Related trials for Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ABSK043 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor
Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Neladalkib (NVL-655) in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Other Solid Tumors Harboring ALK Rearrangement or Activating ALK Mutation (ALKOVE-1)
Locally Advanced Solid Tumor, Metastatic Solid Tumor
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical Experience and Real-world Safety and Effectiveness of Envafolimab: Patient Access Program
Advanced Solid Tumor
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing GDC-0032 (Taselisib) as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With PIK3CA Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol I)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jens Rueter principal investigator
SWOG Cancer Research Network
72 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Best Practice, Chart Abstraction and Educational Intervention in people with Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm and Metastatic Malignant Solid Neoplasm, run by SWOG Cancer Research Network at 72 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 25 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 72 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of patients who receive a treatment that targets a genomic variant for which there is sufficient data to support actionability (time frame: Within 6 months of study completion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2026.