Sickle Cell DiseasePhase 1/2BEACONNCT05456880
BEACON: A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of BEAM-101 in Patients With Severe Sickle Cell Disease
A Phase 1/2 study testing BEAM-101 in people with Sickle Cell Disease, run by Beam Therapeutics Inc. at 19 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, Phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the administration of autologous base edited CD34+ HSPCs (BEAM-101) in patients with severe SCD Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 35 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sickle Cell Disease
- What is being tested?
- BEAM-101
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Aug 2022to Feb 2028
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 35 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥12 years to ≤35 years
- Documented diagnosis of sickle cell disease with βS/βS, βS/β0, or βS/β+ genotypes.
- Severe SCD defined by the occurrence of at least 4 severe VOCs in the 24 months prior to screening despite receiving hydroxyurea or other supportive care measures
Who cannot join
- HbF levels >20%, obtained at the time of screening on or off hydroxyurea therapy
- Previous receipt of an autologous or allogeneic HSCT or solid organ transplantation
- Available and willing matched sibling donor
- Definitive diagnosis of moyamoya syndrome based on screening brain MRA
- History of overt stroke
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 1 country.
19 sites in 1 country
United States19 sites
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta - Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center - Egleston Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30329
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Henry Ford Cancer Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Mayo Clinic Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
St Jude Children's Research Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136-1005
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
The Children's Hospital at TriStar Centennial
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Phoenix Children's Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
Official title: A Phase 1/2 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Single Dose of Autologous CD34+ Base Edited Hematopoietic Stem Cells (BEAM-101) in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and Severe Vaso-Occlusive Crises (Beacon Trial)
This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, Phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the administration of autologous base edited CD34+ HSPCs (BEAM-101) in patients with severe SCD
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Being tested
- BEAM-101
- Keywords
- Gene Editing, Sickle Cell, Severe Sickle Cell
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Sickle Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BEAM-101Biological
Single dose of BEAM-101 administered by IV following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BEAM-101 | Experimental | BEAM-101 manufactured with autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells collected by plerixafor mobilization and edited ex vivo. No maximum dose has been set for BEAM-101; all of the gene edited cells that pass release specifications will be administered to the patient. BEAM 101 will be administered as a single dose by IV infusion. Receives: Biological: BEAM-101 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in annualized number of severe VOCs (Vascular-occlusive Crisis) relative to baseline
Measured: 6 months to time of analysis as compared to baseline
Proportion of patients with successful neutrophil engraftment
Measured: BEAM-101 administration to month 24
Time to neutrophil engraftment
Measured: BEAM-101 administration to month 24
Time to platelet engraftment
Measured: BEAM-101 administration to month 24
Transplant-related mortality within 100 days after beam-101 treatment
Measured: BEAM-101 administration to day 100
Safety and tolerability assessments based on frequency, severity and seriousness of adverse events (AE's)
Measured: BEAM-101 administration through month 24
Secondary outcomes (12)
Proportion of patients experiencing at least 75% reduction in annualized rate of severe VOCs
Measured: Month 6 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Proportion of patients experiencing no severe VOCs
Measured: 6 months to time of analysis as compared to baseline
Change in annualized number of hospitalizations for VOCs
Measured: Month 6 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in annualized duration of hospitalizations for VOCs
Measured: Month 6 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in RBC transfusions per month and per year for SCD-related indications
Measured: Month 2 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in total Hgb (g/dL) concentration over time
Measured: Baseline to month 24
Proportion of patients with HbF ≥30%, for at least 3 months
Measured: Month 6 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) over time
Measured: Month 3 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in total bilirubin over time
Measured: Month 3 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in free Hgb over time
Measured: Month 3 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in haptoglobin over time
Measured: Month 3 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in reticulocyte count over time
Measured: Month 3 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2022
- Study start30 Aug 2022
- Primary completionFeb 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sickle Cell DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beam Therapeutics Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05456880
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BTX-AUT-001
- Acronym
- BEACON
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gupta AO, Sharma A, Frangoul H, Kanter J, Mapara MY, Dalal J, Alavi A, Jaroscak JJ, Ayala E, DiPersio JF, Ziga ED, Eapen M, Rifkin-Zenenberg S, Minella AC, Chen Y, Chesler S, Ambati S, Bowman TS, Habtemariam B, Joseney-Antoine M, Chockalingam PS, Lin L, Goyal S, Simon A, Thompson AA, Heeney MM; BEACON Investigators. Base Editing of HBG1 and HBG2 Promoters for Sickle Cell Disease. N Engl J Med. 2026 May 7;394(18):1824-1835. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2504835. Epub 2026 Apr 1.
PubMed 41931046Ligon JA, Cupit-Link MC, Yu C, Levine J, Foley T, Rotz S, Sharma A, Gomez-Lobo V, Shah NN. Pediatric Cancer Immunotherapy and Potential for Impact on Fertility: A Need for Evidence-Based Guidance. Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Aug;30(8):737-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.06.006. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
PubMed 38866240Sharma A, Young A, Carroll Y, Darji H, Li Y, Mandrell BN, Nelson MN, Owens CL, Irvine M, Caples M, Jerkins LP, Unguru Y, Hankins JS, Johnson LM. Gene therapy in sickle cell disease: Attitudes and informational needs of patients and caregivers. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Jun;70(6):e30319. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30319. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
PubMed 36975201Persaud Y, Mandrell BN, Sharma A, Carroll Y, Irvine M, Olufadi Y, Kang G, Hijano DR, Rai P, Hankins JS, Johnson LM. Attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccine among pediatric patients with sickle cell disease and their caregivers. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 May;70(5):e30274. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30274. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
PubMed 36860093
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 1/2 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Single Dose of Autologous CD34+ Base Edited Hematopoietic Stem Cells (BEAM-101) in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and Severe Vaso-Occlusive Crises (Beacon Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05456880
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEACON / BTX-AUT-001
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Keywords
- Gene Editing, Sickle Cell, Severe Sickle Cell
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Beam Therapeutics Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, Phase 1/2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the administration of autologous base edited CD34+ HSPCs (BEAM-101) in patients with severe SCD
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BEAM-101 | Experimental | Biological: BEAM-101BEAM-101 manufactured with autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells collected by plerixafor mobilization and edited ex vivo. No maximum dose has been set for BEAM-101; all of the gene edited cells that pass release specifications will be administered to the patient. BEAM 101 will be administered as a single dose by IV infusion. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age ≥12 years to ≤35 years
- Documented diagnosis of sickle cell disease with βS/βS, βS/β0, or βS/β+ genotypes.
- Severe SCD defined by the occurrence of at least 4 severe VOCs in the 24 months prior to screening despite receiving hydroxyurea or other supportive care measures
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- HbF levels >20%, obtained at the time of screening on or off hydroxyurea therapy
- Previous receipt of an autologous or allogeneic HSCT or solid organ transplantation
- Available and willing matched sibling donor
- Definitive diagnosis of moyamoya syndrome based on screening brain MRA
- History of overt stroke
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BEAM-101Single dose of BEAM-101 administered by IV following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan | Biological | BEAM-101 |
Primary outcome
Change in annualized number of severe VOCs (Vascular-occlusive Crisis) relative to baseline
Time frame: 6 months to time of analysis as compared to baseline
Proportion of patients with successful neutrophil engraftment
Time frame: BEAM-101 administration to month 24
Time to neutrophil engraftment
Time frame: BEAM-101 administration to month 24
Time to platelet engraftment
Time frame: BEAM-101 administration to month 24
Transplant-related mortality within 100 days after beam-101 treatment
Time frame: BEAM-101 administration to day 100
Safety and tolerability assessments based on frequency, severity and seriousness of adverse events (AE's)
Time frame: BEAM-101 administration through month 24
12 secondary outcomes
Proportion of patients experiencing at least 75% reduction in annualized rate of severe VOCs
Time frame: Month 6 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Proportion of patients experiencing no severe VOCs
Time frame: 6 months to time of analysis as compared to baseline
Change in annualized number of hospitalizations for VOCs
Time frame: Month 6 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in annualized duration of hospitalizations for VOCs
Time frame: Month 6 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in RBC transfusions per month and per year for SCD-related indications
Time frame: Month 2 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in total Hgb (g/dL) concentration over time
Time frame: Baseline to month 24
Proportion of patients with HbF ≥30%, for at least 3 months
Time frame: Month 6 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) over time
Time frame: Month 3 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in total bilirubin over time
Time frame: Month 3 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in free Hgb over time
Time frame: Month 3 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in haptoglobin over time
Time frame: Month 3 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Change in reticulocyte count over time
Time frame: Month 3 post BEAM-101 treatment to month 24 as compared to baseline
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41931046Gupta AO, Sharma A, Frangoul H, Kanter J, Mapara MY, Dalal J, Alavi A, Jaroscak JJ, Ayala E, DiPersio JF, Ziga ED, Eapen M, Rifkin-Zenenberg S, Minella AC, Chen Y, Chesler S, Ambati S, Bowman TS, Habtemariam B, Joseney-Antoine M, Chockalingam PS, Lin L, Goyal S, Simon A, Thompson AA, Heeney MM; BEACON Investigators. Base Editing of HBG1 and HBG2 Promoters for Sickle Cell Disease. N Engl J Med. 2026 May 7;394(18):1824-1835. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2504835. Epub 2026 Apr 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38866240Ligon JA, Cupit-Link MC, Yu C, Levine J, Foley T, Rotz S, Sharma A, Gomez-Lobo V, Shah NN. Pediatric Cancer Immunotherapy and Potential for Impact on Fertility: A Need for Evidence-Based Guidance. Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Aug;30(8):737-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.06.006. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36975201Sharma A, Young A, Carroll Y, Darji H, Li Y, Mandrell BN, Nelson MN, Owens CL, Irvine M, Caples M, Jerkins LP, Unguru Y, Hankins JS, Johnson LM. Gene therapy in sickle cell disease: Attitudes and informational needs of patients and caregivers. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Jun;70(6):e30319. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30319. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36860093Persaud Y, Mandrell BN, Sharma A, Carroll Y, Irvine M, Olufadi Y, Kang G, Hijano DR, Rai P, Hankins JS, Johnson LM. Attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccine among pediatric patients with sickle cell disease and their caregivers. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 May;70(5):e30274. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30274. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sickle Cell Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Long-term Mitapivat Dosing in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease: An Extension of a Phase I Pilot Study of Mitapivat
Sickle Cell Disease, Hemolytic Anemia
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Doses of Fostamatinib in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disorders, Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical and Biomarker Effects of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Females With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Buprenorphine for the Management of Pain in Children With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
19 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing BEAM-101 in people with Sickle Cell Disease, run by Beam Therapeutics Inc. at 19 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in annualized number of severe VOCs (Vascular-occlusive Crisis) relative to baseline (time frame: 6 months to time of analysis as compared to baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05456880, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2025.