Colorectal NeoplasmsNCT05457244
Safety and Performance of the da Vinci SP® Surgical System in Colorectal Procedures
A study testing single-port robotic surgery in people with Colorectal Neoplasms, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The study is a prospective, single-center, single-arm unblinded clinical investigation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance and safety of da Vinci SP system. This study will entail a collection of demographics, preoperative, perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the patients into a database to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- single-port robotic surgery
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2023to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years
- Pathological confirm of colon or rectal cancer
- Clinical stage I-III
- Patient is a candidate for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy or anterior resection.
- ASA ≤3
- Performance status: ECOG 0-1
Who cannot join
- Emergency surgery
- Patient has metastatic disease
- Patient has a bleeding or clotting disorder
- Uncontrolled illness, including active infection, symptomatic heart failure, unstable angina or cardiac arrhythmias, or psychiatric illness that would limit compliance with study requirements
- Previous laparotomy history
- Patient unable to provide informed consent
- Patient is pregnant
- BMI 35.0 or higher
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Single-Center Investigation of the Safety and Performance of the da Vinci SP® Surgical System in Colorectal Procedures
The study is a prospective, single-center, single-arm unblinded clinical investigation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance and safety of da Vinci SP system. This study will entail a collection of demographics, preoperative, perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the patients into a database to follow this report on the outcomes, and notably answer questions to demonstrate the performance and safety of this surgical option.
All patients being considered for minimally invasive colorectal surgery will be evaluated for participation in the above study. All of these patients will undergo a standard minimally invasive resection in the same fashion as would be carried out with multiport laparoscopic or robotic surgery
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Being tested
- single-port robotic surgery
- Keywords
- Colorectal Cancer, Robotic Surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
single-port robotic surgeryDevice
Also called da Vinci SP System
Colorectal surgery using the da Vinci SP System will be performed via the umbilicus, McBurney's site or the reverse McBurney's site depending on the sites of lesion. All of these patients will undergo a standard minimally invasive resection in the same fashion as would be carried out with multiport laparoscopic or robotic surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Participant arm | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: single-port robotic surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Success rate (%)
Calculating the percentage of cases successfully performed using the da Vinci SP system via the SP access port with or without an additional 12mm assistant port. Conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy will be considered as failure.
Measured: immediately after the surgery
Secondary outcomes (16)
Perioperative Parameters:Incision length
Incision length
Measured: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters:Time of surgery
Time of surgery
Measured: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters:Total operative time
Total operative time
Measured: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters:Robotic console time
Robotic console time
Measured: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters: Blood transfusions
Blood transfusion amount
Measured: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters: Estimated blood loss
Estimated blood loss
Measured: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters: Intra-operative Complications
Satava System
Measured: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters: Urine output
Urine output
Measured: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters: Type of anastomosis
How the anastomosis was performed and method of construction
Measured: immediately after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:pain requirements
type, frequency, total amount of narcotics used postoperatively per day
Measured: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Pain score
NRS
Measured: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Time to tolerate diets
time to tolerate clear liquids and solid food
Measured: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Time to flatus
Time to flatus
Measured: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Time to discharge
Time to discharge
Measured: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Complications
Clavien-Dindo Classification
Measured: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Readmission and reoperation rate
Readmission and reoperation rate
Measured: Within 30days after the surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2022
- Study start1 Sep 2023
- Primary completion19 Jun 2024
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chang Gung Memorial HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Intuitive Surgical
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Chien-Chang Lu, MD, Principal investigator, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05457244
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CGMH-SP2021-4
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Marks J, Ng S, Mak T. Robotic transanal surgery (RTAS) with utilization of a next-generation single-port system: a cadaveric feasibility study. Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Jul;21(7):541-545. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1655-3. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
PubMed 28707106Kneist W, Stein H, Rheinwald M. Da Vinci Single-Port robot-assisted transanal mesorectal excision: a promising preclinical experience. Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3232-3235. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07444-4. Epub 2020 May 11.
PubMed 32394173Lin YM, Chen HH, Chen YJ, Chen PH, Lu CC. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy using self-made glove port for benign colon diseases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Nov;23(11):932-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0383. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
PubMed 24117036Lu CC, Lin SE, Chung KC, Rau KM. Comparison of clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):e171-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02825.x.
PubMed 21914101Lai WH, Lin YM, Lee KC, Chen HH, Chen YJ, Lu CC. The application of McBurney's single-incision laparoscopic colectomy alleviates the response of patients to postoperative wound pain. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Sep;24(9):606-11. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0167. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
PubMed 25079975Kim SJ, Choi BJ, Lee SC. Comparative analysis of outcomes after multiport and single-port laparoscopic colectomy in emergency situations: Is single-port laparoscopic colectomy safe and feasible? Asian J Surg. 2018 Jan;41(1):20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
PubMed 27592126
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Single-Center Investigation of the Safety and Performance of the da Vinci SP® Surgical System in Colorectal Procedures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05457244
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CGMH-SP2021-4
- Conditions
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Colorectal Cancer, Robotic Surgery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Intuitive Surgical
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is a prospective, single-center, single-arm unblinded clinical investigation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance and safety of da Vinci SP system. This study will entail a collection of demographics, preoperative, perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the patients into a database to follow this report on the outcomes, and notably answer questions to demonstrate the performance and safety of this surgical option.
All patients being considered for minimally invasive colorectal surgery will be evaluated for participation in the above study. All of these patients will undergo a standard minimally invasive resection in the same fashion as would be carried out with multiport laparoscopic or robotic surgery
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Participant arm | Experimental | Device: single-port robotic surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age ≥18 years
- Pathological confirm of colon or rectal cancer
- Clinical stage I-III
- Patient is a candidate for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy or anterior resection.
- ASA ≤3
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Emergency surgery
- Patient has metastatic disease
- Patient has a bleeding or clotting disorder
- Uncontrolled illness, including active infection, symptomatic heart failure, unstable angina or cardiac arrhythmias, or psychiatric illness that would limit compliance with study requirements
- Previous laparotomy history
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| single-port robotic surgeryAlso: da Vinci SP SystemColorectal surgery using the da Vinci SP System will be performed via the umbilicus, McBurney's site or the reverse McBurney's site depending on the sites of lesion. All of these patients will undergo a standard minimally invasive resection in the same fashion as would be carried out with multiport laparoscopic or robotic surgery. | Device | Participant arm |
Primary outcome
Success rate (%)
Time frame: immediately after the surgery
Calculating the percentage of cases successfully performed using the da Vinci SP system via the SP access port with or without an additional 12mm assistant port. Conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy will be considered as failure.
16 secondary outcomes
Perioperative Parameters:Incision length
Time frame: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters:Time of surgery
Time frame: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters:Total operative time
Time frame: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters:Robotic console time
Time frame: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters: Blood transfusions
Time frame: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters: Estimated blood loss
Time frame: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters: Intra-operative Complications
Time frame: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters: Urine output
Time frame: immediately after the surgery
Perioperative Parameters: Type of anastomosis
Time frame: immediately after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:pain requirements
Time frame: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Pain score
Time frame: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Time to tolerate diets
Time frame: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Time to flatus
Time frame: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Time to discharge
Time frame: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Complications
Time frame: Within 30days after the surgery
Postoperative Parameters:Readmission and reoperation rate
Time frame: Within 30days after the surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 28707106Marks J, Ng S, Mak T. Robotic transanal surgery (RTAS) with utilization of a next-generation single-port system: a cadaveric feasibility study. Tech Coloproctol. 2017 Jul;21(7):541-545. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1655-3. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 32394173Kneist W, Stein H, Rheinwald M. Da Vinci Single-Port robot-assisted transanal mesorectal excision: a promising preclinical experience. Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3232-3235. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07444-4. Epub 2020 May 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 24117036Lin YM, Chen HH, Chen YJ, Chen PH, Lu CC. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy using self-made glove port for benign colon diseases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Nov;23(11):932-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0383. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 21914101Lu CC, Lin SE, Chung KC, Rau KM. Comparison of clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):e171-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02825.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 25079975Lai WH, Lin YM, Lee KC, Chen HH, Chen YJ, Lu CC. The application of McBurney's single-incision laparoscopic colectomy alleviates the response of patients to postoperative wound pain. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Sep;24(9):606-11. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0167. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
- Results publication: PubMed 27592126Kim SJ, Choi BJ, Lee SC. Comparative analysis of outcomes after multiport and single-port laparoscopic colectomy in emergency situations: Is single-port laparoscopic colectomy safe and feasible? Asian J Surg. 2018 Jan;41(1):20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colorectal Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chien-Chang Lu, MD principal investigator
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing single-port robotic surgery in people with Colorectal Neoplasms, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Success rate (%) (time frame: immediately after the surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05457244, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2024.