HealthyNCT05460754
Impact of Beef on Metabolites and Inflammation
A study testing Conventional-fed beef and Organic grass-fed beef in people with Healthy, run by Montana State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Western omnivore diets tend to use beef as a good source of protein. Studies have shown cattle who are fed different diets results in varying nutritional meat profiles in terms of amino acids, types and relative amounts of fat, and other nutrients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Conventional-fed beef and Organic grass-fed beef
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Sep 2022to 21 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults 18-45 years old; equal numbers male and female
- Body mass index between 18-27 kg/m^2.
Who cannot join
- Allergy to red meat
- Pregnant or Lactating
- Taking cholesterol, lipid-lowering, or anti-inflammatory medication(s)
- Antibiotic Use within the past 90 days.
- Existing gallbladder condition or gallbladder removal
- Other health concerns or conditions that may interfere with study participation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Nutrition Research Laboratory
Bozeman, Montana, 59717
About this study
Western omnivore diets tend to use beef as a good source of protein. Studies have shown cattle who are fed different diets results in varying nutritional meat profiles in terms of amino acids, types and relative amounts of fat, and other nutrients. While overlap between organic and conventionally raised beef is expected, dietary impacts on human health are potentially meaningful as small changes in diet may have large downstream effects on human metabolism. To date, no studies have been conducted in humans that evaluate the health effects of organic grass-fed beef consumption to conventionally-fed beef consumption. To fill this gap in research, the investigators propose to identify metabolic differences in response to consumption of organic grass-fed compared to conventional-fed beef on a wide array of blood borne nutrients including amino acids, lipids, bile acids, and hundreds of other metabolites. This comprehensive analysis is expected to differentiate nutritional and metabolic impacts relevant to human health and provide a foundation for future research.
The purpose of this study is to determine how a beef steak meal may affect bile acids in the gut, inflammation, and the metabolic health of healthy individuals. This research will investigate the following questions:
- How do specific foods affect bile acids in the blood?
- How do specific foods changes inflammation, metabolism, and other health measures? If researchers learn how food affects different health related markers in the blood and how that may influence health, then this information can be used to do more research to improve the health of people in a future study.
Read the detailed description
The approach for this study is to enroll a population of healthy individuals (n=10; 5 men and 5 women) in a double-blind, two-armed (Organic Grass-fed and Conventional-fed), randomized, crossover trial in which each individual participant serves as their own control to compare postprandial serum bile acid responses between steak meals, one which is organically grass-fed (OGF) and the other conventionally-fed (CONVF). Participants will consume a 6-oz steak meal grilled to 158°F, the recommended temperature by the USDA. The randomized crossover design with half of the participants starting in the OGF arm and the other half starting in the CONVF arm will eliminate potential order effects. Block randomization with 2 blocks (total of 5 per block) will be created. Having each person serve as their own control in a crossover trial will eliminate the influence of inter-individual variation. The MSU Nutrition Research team has extensive experience with postprandial testing protocols and dietary manipulation and will utilize this experience to perform the proposed protocol with appropriate pre-test standardization, uniformity of meal preparation, precise timing of blood collection, and established procedures for processing and analyzing blood samples. Bile acids, including all primary and secondary forms, will be analyzed from samples collected before the meal and at 30-minute intervals for 4 hours after the meal. Established methods in the MSU Proteomics, Metabolomics, and Mass Spectrometry Facility will be used to compare total and individual bile acids between OGF and CONVF conditions.
Procedures:
During Visit 1, participants will undergo informed consent, be asked to complete a series of written questionnaires and anthropometric measurements. There will be a minimum 72 run-in period just prior to Visit 2, during which participants will be asked to follow certain dietary guidelines, such as no red meat. The second (Visit 2) and third (Visit 3) visits will take approximately 5 hours each and will each include a total of 9 blood draws through a sampling catheter, with each blood draw collecting about 2-3 teaspoons of blood. Blood will be drawn before a provided steak meal then every thirty minutes for 4 hours after meal consumption. There are a minimum of 72-hours between visits 1 and 2, and 7 days between visits 2 and 3. During this minimum 72- hour and 7-day period, participants will be asked to follow provided dietary and physical activity instructions. In addition, participants will be asked to complete a one month diet history questionnaire and a 24-hour dietary recall.
Dietary intervention: A meat science specialist will select and prepare the steaks which will be given to participants. Participants will be asked to consume a 6-ounce beef steak meal, cooked to 158°F that is either OGF or CONVF, but will be coded and labeled to ensure blinding.
Kinetics (measures over time) and untargeted and targeted metabolomics (an advance analytical technique to measure 1000's of molecules in a single sample) will be used as a tool to differentiate potential health impacts of the separate meal tests to investigate the influence of organic grass-fed beef versus conventionally-fed beef consumption on fasting and postprandial responses in healthy adults. The investigators expect to identify an array of metabolic differences between beef samples and will identify known impacts of those differences on health to provide a substantive comparison and provide a foundation for future research.
Metabolomic and Lipidomic analysis: When all samples have been collected, the serum samples will be thawed, and a metabolite fraction will be extracted. After extraction, the samples will be explored using mass spectrometry analysis. An initial targeted analysis will focus on bile acids, lipids, and amino acids. Targeted analytes will be quantified using standard curves and the resulting concentrations will be compared using several statistical analysis tools. Metabolite samples will be analyzed using a Waters Synapt G2Si QTOF (Waters Corporation). This instrument has ion mobility capability and can differentiate closely related compounds, such as bile acids, in complex mixtures based on their cross-sectional area and mass. The high sensitivity and variety of scan modes make the Synapt QTOF the optimal choice for untargeted analysis of complex biological samples.
Dietary analysis: This study will use the most recent version (2018) of the web-based Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ III), a food frequency questionnaire designed for adults 19 and older, developed by staff at the Risk Factor Monitoring and Methods Branch (RFMMB) of the NIH National Cancer Institute. The outputs of the DHQ III include carbohydrate constituents, carotenoids and tocopherols, dietary constituents from supplements, fats, fatty acids and cholesterol, macronutrients and energy, minerals, protein constituents, and vitamins are dietary constituents and food groups available in the DHQ III output files. In addition, acute dietary consumption will be determined using the free, web-based Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24®) questionnaire.
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Conventional-fed beef, Organic grass-fed beef
- Keywords
- Organic grass-fed, Conventional-fed
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional-fed beefBehavioural
Participants in the conventional-fed treatment of the study will consume a conventional-fed steak meal for breakfast one morning.
Organic grass-fed beefBehavioural
Participants in the organic grass-fed treatment of the study will consume a organic grass-fed steak meal for breakfast one morning.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Organic grass-fed beef, then conventional-fed beef | Experimental | Participants receive an organic grass-fed steak meal in the morning. After a washout period of at least 7 days, they then receive the alternative meal, conventional-fed steak meal in the morning. Receives: Behavioral: Conventional-fed beef; Behavioral: Organic grass-fed beef |
| Conventional-fed beef, then organic grass-fed beef | Experimental | Participants receive a conventional-fed steak meal in the morning. After a washout period of at least 7 days, they then receive the alternative meal, an organic grass-fed steak meal in the morning. Receives: Behavioral: Conventional-fed beef; Behavioral: Organic grass-fed beef |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postprandial Serum Lipids
Concentration of postprandial serum triglycerides, high-density lipoproteins, cholesterol (mM)
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (3)
Postprandial Serum Inflammatory Cytokines
Concentration of postprandial serum inflammatory cytokine responses (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-(IL)1beta, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, IL-23, interferon-gamma, and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor; all in pg/ml)
Measured: 1 day
Postprandial Serum Glucose
Serum glucose concentration (mM)
Measured: 1 day
Postprandial Serum Insulin
Serum insulin concentration (microIU/mL)
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2022
- Study start19 Sep 2022
- Primary completion21 Mar 2023
- Study completion21 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- The design is 2 x 2 crossover design, where the healthy adults will be randomized into Organic grass-fed and conventional-fed conditions for the first round of data collection and then crossover to the other condition for the second round of data collection.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Montana State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Organic Advisory and Education Council
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mary Miles, PhD, Principal investigator, Montana State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05460754
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OAEC Grant 2022
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Beef on Metabolites and Inflammation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05460754
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OAEC Grant 2022
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Keywords
- Organic grass-fed, Conventional-fed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Montana State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Organic Advisory and Education Council
- Study start
- 19 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Sep 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Western omnivore diets tend to use beef as a good source of protein. Studies have shown cattle who are fed different diets results in varying nutritional meat profiles in terms of amino acids, types and relative amounts of fat, and other nutrients. While overlap between organic and conventionally raised beef is expected, dietary impacts on human health are potentially meaningful as small changes in diet may have large downstream effects on human metabolism. To date, no studies have been conducted in humans that evaluate the health effects of organic grass-fed beef consumption to conventionally-fed beef consumption. To fill this gap in research, the investigators propose to identify metabolic differences in response to consumption of organic grass-fed compared to conventional-fed beef on a wide array of blood borne nutrients including amino acids, lipids, bile acids, and hundreds of other metabolites. This comprehensive analysis is expected to differentiate nutritional and metabolic impacts relevant to human health and provide a foundation for future research.
The purpose of this study is to determine how a beef steak meal may affect bile acids in the gut, inflammation, and the metabolic health of healthy individuals. This research will investigate the following questions:
- How do specific foods affect bile acids in the blood?
- How do specific foods changes inflammation, metabolism, and other health measures? If researchers learn how food affects different health related markers in the blood and how that may influence health, then this information can be used to do more research to improve the health of people in a future study.
Detailed description
The approach for this study is to enroll a population of healthy individuals (n=10; 5 men and 5 women) in a double-blind, two-armed (Organic Grass-fed and Conventional-fed), randomized, crossover trial in which each individual participant serves as their own control to compare postprandial serum bile acid responses between steak meals, one which is organically grass-fed (OGF) and the other conventionally-fed (CONVF). Participants will consume a 6-oz steak meal grilled to 158°F, the recommended temperature by the USDA. The randomized crossover design with half of the participants starting in the OGF arm and the other half starting in the CONVF arm will eliminate potential order effects. Block randomization with 2 blocks (total of 5 per block) will be created. Having each person serve as their own control in a crossover trial will eliminate the influence of inter-individual variation. The MSU Nutrition Research team has extensive experience with postprandial testing protocols and dietary manipulation and will utilize this experience to perform the proposed protocol with appropriate pre-test standardization, uniformity of meal preparation, precise timing of blood collection, and established procedures for processing and analyzing blood samples. Bile acids, including all primary and secondary forms, will be analyzed from samples collected before the meal and at 30-minute intervals for 4 hours after the meal. Established methods in the MSU Proteomics, Metabolomics, and Mass Spectrometry Facility will be used to compare total and individual bile acids between OGF and CONVF conditions.
Procedures:
During Visit 1, participants will undergo informed consent, be asked to complete a series of written questionnaires and anthropometric measurements. There will be a minimum 72 run-in period just prior to Visit 2, during which participants will be asked to follow certain dietary guidelines, such as no red meat. The second (Visit 2) and third (Visit 3) visits will take approximately 5 hours each and will each include a total of 9 blood draws through a sampling catheter, with each blood draw collecting about 2-3 teaspoons of blood. Blood will be drawn before a provided steak meal then every thirty minutes for 4 hours after meal consumption. There are a minimum of 72-hours between visits 1 and 2, and 7 days between visits 2 and 3. During this minimum 72- hour and 7-day period, participants will be asked to follow provided dietary and physical activity instructions. In addition, participants will be asked to complete a one month diet history questionnaire and a 24-hour dietary recall.
Dietary intervention: A meat science specialist will select and prepare the steaks which will be given to participants. Participants will be asked to consume a 6-ounce beef steak meal, cooked to 158°F that is either OGF or CONVF, but will be coded and labeled to ensure blinding.
Kinetics (measures over time) and untargeted and targeted metabolomics (an advance analytical technique to measure 1000's of molecules in a single sample) will be used as a tool to differentiate potential health impacts of the separate meal tests to investigate the influence of organic grass-fed beef versus conventionally-fed beef consumption on fasting and postprandial responses in healthy adults. The investigators expect to identify an array of metabolic differences between beef samples and will identify known impacts of those differences on health to provide a substantive comparison and provide a foundation for future research.
Metabolomic and Lipidomic analysis: When all samples have been collected, the serum samples will be thawed, and a metabolite fraction will be extracted. After extraction, the samples will be explored using mass spectrometry analysis. An initial targeted analysis will focus on bile acids, lipids, and amino acids. Targeted analytes will be quantified using standard curves and the resulting concentrations will be compared using several statistical analysis tools. Metabolite samples will be analyzed using a Waters Synapt G2Si QTOF (Waters Corporation). This instrument has ion mobility capability and can differentiate closely related compounds, such as bile acids, in complex mixtures based on their cross-sectional area and mass. The high sensitivity and variety of scan modes make the Synapt QTOF the optimal choice for untargeted analysis of complex biological samples.
Dietary analysis: This study will use the most recent version (2018) of the web-based Diet History Questionnaire (DHQ III), a food frequency questionnaire designed for adults 19 and older, developed by staff at the Risk Factor Monitoring and Methods Branch (RFMMB) of the NIH National Cancer Institute. The outputs of the DHQ III include carbohydrate constituents, carotenoids and tocopherols, dietary constituents from supplements, fats, fatty acids and cholesterol, macronutrients and energy, minerals, protein constituents, and vitamins are dietary constituents and food groups available in the DHQ III output files. In addition, acute dietary consumption will be determined using the free, web-based Automated Self-Administered 24-hour (ASA24®) questionnaire.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The design is 2 x 2 crossover design, where the healthy adults will be randomized into Organic grass-fed and conventional-fed conditions for the first round of data collection and then crossover to the other condition for the second round of data collection.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Organic grass-fed beef, then conventional-fed beef | Experimental | Behavioral: Conventional-fed beef, Behavioral: Organic grass-fed beefParticipants receive an organic grass-fed steak meal in the morning. After a washout period of at least 7 days, they then receive the alternative meal, conventional-fed steak meal in the morning. |
| Conventional-fed beef, then organic grass-fed beef | Experimental | Behavioral: Conventional-fed beef, Behavioral: Organic grass-fed beefParticipants receive a conventional-fed steak meal in the morning. After a washout period of at least 7 days, they then receive the alternative meal, an organic grass-fed steak meal in the morning. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adults 18-45 years old; equal numbers male and female
- Body mass index between 18-27 kg/m^2.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Allergy to red meat
- Pregnant or Lactating
- Taking cholesterol, lipid-lowering, or anti-inflammatory medication(s)
- Antibiotic Use within the past 90 days.
- Existing gallbladder condition or gallbladder removal
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional-fed beefParticipants in the conventional-fed treatment of the study will consume a conventional-fed steak meal for breakfast one morning. | Behavioural | Conventional-fed beef, then organic grass-fed beef, Organic grass-fed beef, then conventional-fed beef |
| Organic grass-fed beefParticipants in the organic grass-fed treatment of the study will consume a organic grass-fed steak meal for breakfast one morning. | Behavioural | Conventional-fed beef, then organic grass-fed beef, Organic grass-fed beef, then conventional-fed beef |
Primary outcome
Postprandial Serum Lipids
Time frame: 1 day
Concentration of postprandial serum triglycerides, high-density lipoproteins, cholesterol (mM)
3 secondary outcomes
Postprandial Serum Inflammatory Cytokines
Time frame: 1 day
Postprandial Serum Glucose
Time frame: 1 day
Postprandial Serum Insulin
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Healthy
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mary Miles, PhD principal investigator
Montana State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventional-fed beef and Organic grass-fed beef in people with Healthy, run by Montana State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Sep 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postprandial Serum Lipids (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.