Breast Cancer FemaleTIDENCT05460780
First-in-human, Study of MATTISSE® Tissue Engineering Chamber in Adult Female Patients Undergoing Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Cancer
A study testing MATTISSE TEC in people with Breast Cancer Female and Breast Cancer Prevent, run by Quanta Medical at 3 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This study is a first in human, two-stage single arm non-comparative study of safety and performance. The aim of the study is to asses the safety and the clinical performance of a new device : the MATTISSE tissu engineering chamber. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer Female, Breast Cancer Prevent, Breast Reconstruction
- What is being tested?
- MATTISSE TEC
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2022to 31 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Criteria related to pathology:
- Female patient over 18 Years old
- Patient who required autologous breast reconstruction:
- Immediate unilateral reconstruction after total mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer
- Breast reconstruction after unilateral preventive total mastectomy
- or delayed unilateral reconstruction after total mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer with a tissue expander implantation
Show all 44Show fewer
- or conversion from implant-based to autologous reconstruction: Patient who had a breast implant during a previous reconstruction after total mastectomy for cancer, and who needs to change it.
- For patient with active cancer: Patient with early-stage cancer (stage 0, I or II, with tumor size < 50mm, without lymph-node involvement) needing oncological management that does not required radiotherapy after surgery on the breast area or on the flap donor site
- Patient who required Nipple sparing (NSM) or Skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) with a unique surgical approach (same for mastectomy and implant) insertion; or implant removal for patient undergoing autologous conversion, or expender removal for patient undergoing differed reconstruction.
- Autologous reconstruction using Lateral Intercostal Perforator (LICAP) flap or an intercostal thoracic artery perforation flap (LTAP) if oncological conditions do not allow for LICAP harvesting.
- Patient medically fit for surgery without significant comorbidities
- Breast cup-size less than D
- Body mass index >20 kg/m2 or patient for whom sufficient flap volume is expected according to surgeon's assessment
- Adequate hematopoietic functions
- Criteria related to population:
- Subjects who have given free, informed and written consent to participate in the study;
- Patient able to answer questionnaires, able to communicate in the language of the study country;
- Subjects affiliated to a social security schema or entitled to a social security scheme.
- Non-inclusion Criteria:
- Pathology related criteria:
- Patient undergoing bilateral reconstruction
- Patient undergoing bilateral preventive mastectomy
- Patient undergoing simultaneous contralateral breast reduction, mastopexy, and augmentation
- Previous history of radiotherapy on the breast area or on the flap donor site
- Previous history of breast or axillary surgery that does not allow fat flap dissection
- Presence of pacemaker or metallic prosthesis making patient unsuitable for MRI
- Body mass index >30 kg/m2
- Taking medication for weight loss at the time of inclusion visit
- Presence of major medical conditions that may compromise patient's health and healing
- Diabetes and a history of gestational diabetes
- Active smoking
- Microangiopathy, Vascular history and all systemic disease (systemic Raynaud's disease)
- Patient with intertrigo or infection or alteration of the surgical site confirmed pre-operatively by clinical examination
- Allergy to anesthetics or contrast media
- Immunocompromised patient (HIV) or patient used immunosuppressants
- Population related criteria
- Pregnant patient
- or breastfeeding patient or woman who has nursed a child three months within inclusion
- Participation in a clinical trial in the 3 months prior to the initial visit
- Predicted unavailability during study.
- Patient deprived of liberty or under guardianship.
- Patient unable to give consent
- Medical device related criteria
- Allergy to any of the components of the medical device.
Who cannot join
- Positive or suspicious extemporaneous sentinel node biopsy
- Non integrity of LICAP and LTAP vessels, showed by the pre-operative doppler
- Patient not yet implanted with MATTISSE®, whose cancer stage will finally require radiotherapy treatment
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
3 sites in 2 countries
France2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital of Lille
Lille, Nord, 59000
Pierre Guerreschi, Prof.
- Recruiting
CHU de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, France, 67091
Frédéric BODIN, Pr
Georgia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Institute of Clinical Oncology
Tbilisi, 0159
Gia NEMSADZE, Pr
About this study
Official title: First-in-human Study of MATTISSE® Tissue Engineering Chamber in Adult Female After Total Mastectomy for Breast Cancer in Immediate or Delayed 2-stage Tissue Expander Reconstruction or Conversion From Implant-based to Autologous Reconstruction
This study is a first in human, two-stage single arm non-comparative study of safety and performance.
The aim of the study is to asses the safety and the clinical performance of a new device : the MATTISSE tissu engineering chamber.
- Being tested
- MATTISSE TEC
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MATTISSE TECDevice
Tissue engineering chamber MATTISSE
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MATTISSE TEC | Experimental | Patient included receive MATTISSE TEC Receives: Device: MATTISSE TEC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety objective: To assess the 6 months surgical complications rate of MATTISSE® TEC implant-based immediate breast reconstruction. Adverse events will be recorded.
Minor complications include:
- Superficial skin necrosis that requires only debridement
- Flap necrosis
- Subcutaneous hematoma: any hematoma requiring surgical exploration
- Inflammatory reaction
- Seroma: defined as that which requires echo-guided puncture at least once after drain removal.
- Pain
- Delayed wound healing/wound dehiscence: any wound healing problems, detected during clinical examination and not requiring an intervention
- Implant malposition
- Superficial Venous Thrombosis (Mondor disease)
- Capsular contracture
Major complications include:
- All complications that lead to MATTISSE® TEC removal:
- Skin necrosis leading to implant exposure
- Infection
- Implant malposition leading to implant exposure
- Device failure or defect: when the implant breaks or collapses, e.g., the base separates from the shell, failure at the time of surgical placement (fracture of the TEC before placement)
- Granuloma.
Measured: 6 months post-surgery
Performance objective: To assess the efficacy at 6 months post-operation of breast reconstruction using MATTISSE® breast implants in patients undergoing breast reconstitution after total mastectomy surgery for cancer.
Success is defined as:
- Tissue expansion (flap enlargement) from implantation up to 6 months post operation --> A 50% increase in the expanded size at 6 months compared to initial size flap is considered as a success. Indeed, the optimal growth of the flap is expected at 6 months,
- Tissue expansion will be assessed using MRI at discharge (after surgery) and 6 months post operative. The volume of flap at 6 months will be compared to the flap size initially implanted. All MRI imaging will be assessed by and independent expert radiologist.
Failure is defined as:
- less than 50% increase in the expanded size at 6 months compared to initial size flap MATTISSE® Prothesis removal
Measured: 6 months post-surgery
Secondary outcomes (15)
Evolution of tissue expansion (flap enlargement) from implantation up to 36 months post operation.
Tissue expansion will be assessed using MRI at discharge (after surgery), 12, 24 and 36 months post operative.
All MRI imaging will be assessed by and independent expert radiologist.
Measured: Surgery visit, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-intervention
Evolution of breast softness from inclusion to 36 months
- The breast softness will be assessed by investigator surgeon and patients themselves at discharge (after surgery), 3, 6 ,12, 24 and 36 months as:
- Stage 1: Breast is soft
- Stage 2: Breast is hard
- Stage 3: Breast is hard with distortion
- Stage 4: Breast is hard, painful with distortion
Measured: Surgery visit, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-intervention
Evolution of MATTISSE® TEC resorption until 36 months follow up: the resorption is active between 6 and 12 months after surgery.
MATTISSE® TEC resorption will be observed quantitatively on MRI achieved at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months associated with the touch of the surgeon and patients feeling. The TEC resorption will be classified as:
- Absent: no resorption at all.
- Small resorption: TEC has been reabsorbed a little bit compared to the initial
- Great resorption: TEC has been absorbed a lot but not totally
- Total: Shell and base are no longer visible on the MRI and not felt by the surgeon
Measured: Surgery visit, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-intervention
The volume of the reconstructed breast compared to the volume of the contralateral one at 12, 24 and 36 months
At 12, 24 and 36 months, we will assess during physical examinations, the volume of the reconstructed breast and the volume of the contralateral one.
Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
Aesthetic breast appearance before and after surgery using photo
Aesthetic breast appearance will be assessed before surgery, 6 at 12, 24 and 36 months post-surgery using standardized photographs. The assessment will be done by the surgeon and 2 independent external specialists who validated standardized photographs.
The following scoring points will be used:
- Excellent: Treated breast nearly identical to that before surgery
- Good: Treated breast slightly different to that before surgery
- Fair: Treated breast clearly different to that before surgery but not seriously distorted
- Poor: Treated breast seriously distorted compared to that before surgery
Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
The maintain of breast (i.e., flap) volume stability at 12, 24 and 36 months compared to that at 6 months
Flap volume at 12, 24 and 36 months is compared at that assessed at 6 months using MRI.
All MRI imaging will be assessed by and independent expert radiologist.
Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
The impact of the flap transfer on the donor site assessed at surgery, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36months post-surgery
Impact of the flap transfer on the donor site will be assessed at surgery, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-surgery using different parameters:
- Tissue necrosis (Yes/ No)
- Symmetry of the donor site area (comparing to the other side of the patient): Yes/ No
Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
Pain (VAS)
Pain score will be assessed at inclusion, discharge, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 month using a 10 Visual Analogue Scale [VAS, 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst possible pain)]
Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
The quality of life and the satisfaction of patients
Quality of life and patients' satisfaction will be done through the BREAST-Q© questionnaire (module of reconstruction pre and post-surgery version) at inclusion and at 3, 6 and 12 months post operative. The quality of life is evaluated through 2 scales (psychological well-being and physical well-being: breast).
The satisfaction is evaluated with 1 scale : (satisfaction with breast).
Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
Surgeon satisfaction regarding the use of MATTISSE® TEC and implantation procedure.
- Surgeons' satisfaction regarding the use of MATTISSE® TEC and implantation procedure will be assessed on: Global satisfaction of the surgeon (5 points Likert scale)
- Ease of use
- Material ergonomics
- Ease of insertion
- Ease of fixing
Measured: Visit 2, surgery
Evolution of biological parameters up to 6 months after surgery
Complete blood counts evolution will be assessed at inclusion, at discharge, and at 3 and 6 months post-implantation, by measuring Hemoglobin , leukocytes Lymphocyte rate Neutrophil rate and Thrombocytes
Units:
- Hemoglobin : g/L
- leukocytes :10⁹/L
- Lymphocyte rate : %
- Neutrophil rate : %
- Thrombocytes : 10⁹/L
Measured: Inclusion, Discharge, 3, 6 months post-intervention
Evolution of biological parameters up to 6 months after surgery
C-reactive protein evolution will be assessed at inclusion, at discharge, and at 3 and 6 months post-implantation, by measuring CRP
Unit:
- CRP : nmoL/L
Measured: Inclusion, Discharge, 3, 6 months post-intervention
Evolution of biological parameters up to 6 months after surgery
Total protein evolution will be assessed at inclusion, at discharge, and at 3 and 6 months post-implantation, by total protein assay
Unit:
Total protein: Normal or Not normal
Measured: Inclusion, Discharge, 3, 6 months post-intervention
Evolution of biological parameters up to 6 months after surgery
Protein electrophoresis will be assessed at inclusion, at discharge, and at 3 and 6 months post-implantation, by performing protein electrophoresis.
Unit :
Protein electrophoresis: Normal or Not normal
Measured: Inclusion, Discharge, 3, 6 months post-intervention
Safety up to 36 months post operation
Safety up to 36 months, will be assessed by measuring the complication rate after breast reconstruction using MATTISSE® TEC. Adverse events up to 36 months post operation will be recorded.
Measured: Surgery visit, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2022
- Study start1 Jul 2022
- Primary completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer FemaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Quanta Medical
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Lattice Medical
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05460780
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 3121_MATFIH22
- Acronym
- TIDE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Findlay MW, Dolderer JH, Trost N, Craft RO, Cao Y, Cooper-White J, Stevens G, Morrison WA. Tissue-engineered breast reconstruction: bridging the gap toward large-volume tissue engineering in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1206-1215. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c5b2.
PubMed 22094739Matsuda K, Falkenberg KJ, Woods AA, Choi YS, Morrison WA, Dilley RJ. Adipose-derived stem cells promote angiogenesis and tissue formation for in vivo tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013 Jun;19(11-12):1327-35. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0391. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
PubMed 23394225Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, Gnant M, Houssami N, Poortmans P, Ruddy K, Tsang J, Cardoso F. Breast cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Sep 23;5(1):66. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2.
PubMed 31548545Schmauss D, Machens HG, Harder Y. Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy. Front Surg. 2016 Jan 19;2:71. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00071. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26835456Tzafetta K, Ahmed O, Bahia H, Jerwood D, Ramakrishnan V. Evaluation of the factors related to postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jun;107(7):1694-701. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200106000-00009.
PubMed 11391187Vega S, Smartt JM Jr, Jiang S, Selber JC, Brooks CJM, Herrera HR, Serletti JM. 500 Consecutive patients with free TRAM flap breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Aug;122(2):329-339. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817f45cb.
PubMed 18626347Duggal CS, Grudziak J, Metcalfe DB, Carlson GW, Losken A. The effects of breast size in unilateral postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 May;70(5):506-12. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318263f1f8.
PubMed 23542837Noone RB. Thirty-five years of breast reconstruction: eleven lessons to share. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Dec;124(6):1820-1827. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf821a. No abstract available.
PubMed 19952638Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):514-524. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200a961.
PubMed 21285756Morrison WA, Marre D, Grinsell D, Batty A, Trost N, O'Connor AJ. Creation of a Large Adipose Tissue Construct in Humans Using a Tissue-engineering Chamber: A Step Forward in the Clinical Application of Soft Tissue Engineering. EBioMedicine. 2016 Apr;6:238-245. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
PubMed 27211566Petit JY, Rietjens M, Lohsiriwat V, Rey P, Garusi C, De Lorenzi F, Martella S, Manconi A, Barbieri B, Clough KB. Update on breast reconstruction techniques and indications. World J Surg. 2012 Jul;36(7):1486-97. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1486-3.
PubMed 22395342Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part I. A prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep 15;118(4):825-831. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000232362.82402.e8.
PubMed 16980842Martindale V, Menache A. The PIP scandal: an analysis of the process of quality control that failed to safeguard women from the health risks. J R Soc Med. 2013 May;106(5):173-7. doi: 10.1177/0141076813480994. No abstract available.
PubMed 23761525Mian R, Morrison WA, Hurley JV, Penington AJ, Romeo R, Tanaka Y, Knight KR. Formation of new tissue from an arteriovenous loop in the absence of added extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng. 2000 Dec;6(6):595-603. doi: 10.1089/10763270050199541.
PubMed 11103081Tanaka Y, Tsutsumi A, Crowe DM, Tajima S, Morrison WA. Generation of an autologous tissue (matrix) flap by combining an arteriovenous shunt loop with artificial skin in rats: preliminary report. Br J Plast Surg. 2000 Jan;53(1):51-7. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1999.3186.
PubMed 10657450
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- First-in-human Study of MATTISSE® Tissue Engineering Chamber in Adult Female After Total Mastectomy for Breast Cancer in Immediate or Delayed 2-stage Tissue Expander Reconstruction or Conversion From Implant-based to Autologous Reconstruction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05460780
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TIDE / 3121_MATFIH22
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Quanta MedicalIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Lattice Medical
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a first in human, two-stage single arm non-comparative study of safety and performance.
The aim of the study is to asses the safety and the clinical performance of a new device : the MATTISSE tissu engineering chamber.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MATTISSE TEC | Experimental | Device: MATTISSE TECPatient included receive MATTISSE TEC |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (44 listed)
- Female patient over 18 Years old
- Patient who required autologous breast reconstruction:
- For patient with active cancer: Patient with early-stage cancer (stage 0, I or II, with tumor size < 50mm, without lymph-node involvement) needing oncological management that does not required radiotherapy after surgery on the breast area or on the flap donor site
- Patient who required Nipple sparing (NSM) or Skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) with a unique surgical approach (same for mastectomy and implant) insertion; or implant removal for patient undergoing autologous conversion, or expender removal for patient undergoing differed reconstruction.
- Autologous reconstruction using Lateral Intercostal Perforator (LICAP) flap or an intercostal thoracic artery perforation flap (LTAP) if oncological conditions do not allow for LICAP harvesting.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Positive or suspicious extemporaneous sentinel node biopsy
- Non integrity of LICAP and LTAP vessels, showed by the pre-operative doppler
- Patient not yet implanted with MATTISSE®, whose cancer stage will finally require radiotherapy treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MATTISSE TECTissue engineering chamber MATTISSE | Device | MATTISSE TEC |
Primary outcome
Safety objective: To assess the 6 months surgical complications rate of MATTISSE® TEC implant-based immediate breast reconstruction. Adverse events will be recorded.
Time frame: 6 months post-surgery
Minor complications include: * Superficial skin necrosis that requires only debridement * Flap necrosis * Subcutaneous hematoma: any hematoma requiring surgical exploration * Inflammatory reaction * Seroma: defined as that which requires echo-guided puncture at least once after drain removal. * Pain * Delayed wound healing/wound dehiscence: any wound healing problems, detected during clinical examination and not requiring an intervention * Implant malposition * Superficial Venous Thrombosis (Mondor disease) * Capsular contracture Major complications include: * All complications that lead to MATTISSE® TEC removal: * Skin necrosis leading to implant exposure * Infection * Implant malposition leading to implant exposure * Device failure or defect: when the implant breaks or collapses, e.g., the base separates from the shell, failure at the time of surgical placement (fracture of the TEC before placement) * Granuloma.
Performance objective: To assess the efficacy at 6 months post-operation of breast reconstruction using MATTISSE® breast implants in patients undergoing breast reconstitution after total mastectomy surgery for cancer.
Time frame: 6 months post-surgery
Success is defined as: * Tissue expansion (flap enlargement) from implantation up to 6 months post operation --> A 50% increase in the expanded size at 6 months compared to initial size flap is considered as a success. Indeed, the optimal growth of the flap is expected at 6 months, * Tissue expansion will be assessed using MRI at discharge (after surgery) and 6 months post operative. The volume of flap at 6 months will be compared to the flap size initially implanted. All MRI imaging will be assessed by and independent expert radiologist. Failure is defined as: * less than 50% increase in the expanded size at 6 months compared to initial size flap MATTISSE® Prothesis removal
15 secondary outcomes
Evolution of tissue expansion (flap enlargement) from implantation up to 36 months post operation.
Time frame: Surgery visit, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-intervention
Evolution of breast softness from inclusion to 36 months
Time frame: Surgery visit, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-intervention
Evolution of MATTISSE® TEC resorption until 36 months follow up: the resorption is active between 6 and 12 months after surgery.
Time frame: Surgery visit, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-intervention
The volume of the reconstructed breast compared to the volume of the contralateral one at 12, 24 and 36 months
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
Aesthetic breast appearance before and after surgery using photo
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
The maintain of breast (i.e., flap) volume stability at 12, 24 and 36 months compared to that at 6 months
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
The impact of the flap transfer on the donor site assessed at surgery, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36months post-surgery
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
Pain (VAS)
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
The quality of life and the satisfaction of patients
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post surgery
Surgeon satisfaction regarding the use of MATTISSE® TEC and implantation procedure.
Time frame: Visit 2, surgery
Evolution of biological parameters up to 6 months after surgery
Time frame: Inclusion, Discharge, 3, 6 months post-intervention
Evolution of biological parameters up to 6 months after surgery
Time frame: Inclusion, Discharge, 3, 6 months post-intervention
Evolution of biological parameters up to 6 months after surgery
Time frame: Inclusion, Discharge, 3, 6 months post-intervention
Evolution of biological parameters up to 6 months after surgery
Time frame: Inclusion, Discharge, 3, 6 months post-intervention
Safety up to 36 months post operation
Time frame: Surgery visit, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-intervention
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 22094739Findlay MW, Dolderer JH, Trost N, Craft RO, Cao Y, Cooper-White J, Stevens G, Morrison WA. Tissue-engineered breast reconstruction: bridging the gap toward large-volume tissue engineering in humans. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1206-1215. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c5b2.
- Background: PubMed 23394225Matsuda K, Falkenberg KJ, Woods AA, Choi YS, Morrison WA, Dilley RJ. Adipose-derived stem cells promote angiogenesis and tissue formation for in vivo tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013 Jun;19(11-12):1327-35. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0391. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 31548545Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, Gnant M, Houssami N, Poortmans P, Ruddy K, Tsang J, Cardoso F. Breast cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Sep 23;5(1):66. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2.
- Results publication: PubMed 26835456Schmauss D, Machens HG, Harder Y. Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy. Front Surg. 2016 Jan 19;2:71. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00071. eCollection 2015.
- Results publication: PubMed 11391187Tzafetta K, Ahmed O, Bahia H, Jerwood D, Ramakrishnan V. Evaluation of the factors related to postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jun;107(7):1694-701. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200106000-00009.
- Results publication: PubMed 18626347Vega S, Smartt JM Jr, Jiang S, Selber JC, Brooks CJM, Herrera HR, Serletti JM. 500 Consecutive patients with free TRAM flap breast reconstruction: a single surgeon's experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Aug;122(2):329-339. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817f45cb.
- Results publication: PubMed 23542837Duggal CS, Grudziak J, Metcalfe DB, Carlson GW, Losken A. The effects of breast size in unilateral postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2013 May;70(5):506-12. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318263f1f8.
- Results publication: PubMed 19952638Noone RB. Thirty-five years of breast reconstruction: eleven lessons to share. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Dec;124(6):1820-1827. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181bf821a. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 21285756Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):514-524. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200a961.
- Results publication: PubMed 27211566Morrison WA, Marre D, Grinsell D, Batty A, Trost N, O'Connor AJ. Creation of a Large Adipose Tissue Construct in Humans Using a Tissue-engineering Chamber: A Step Forward in the Clinical Application of Soft Tissue Engineering. EBioMedicine. 2016 Apr;6:238-245. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 22395342Petit JY, Rietjens M, Lohsiriwat V, Rey P, Garusi C, De Lorenzi F, Martella S, Manconi A, Barbieri B, Clough KB. Update on breast reconstruction techniques and indications. World J Surg. 2012 Jul;36(7):1486-97. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1486-3.
- Results publication: PubMed 16980842Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part I. A prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep 15;118(4):825-831. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000232362.82402.e8.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer Female
Recruiting
Decision Support for Chemoprevention
Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Geriatric Oncology Assessment and Coping Skills Training for Older Women on Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
Breast Cancer, Hormone Receptor Positive, Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of XL309 (ISM3091) Alone and in Combination in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of CG-7321 Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
3 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MATTISSE TEC in people with Breast Cancer Female and Breast Cancer Prevent, run by Quanta Medical at 3 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 44 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in France, Georgia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Pierre GUERRESCHI, Pr (03.20.44.56.59, clinic@lattice-medical.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety objective: To assess the 6 months surgical complications rate of MATTISSE® TEC implant-based immediate breast reconstruction. Adverse events will be recorded. (time frame: 6 months post-surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05460780, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2025.