Cerebral PalsyNCT05463211
Exoskeleton-assisted Physiotherapy for Children With Mobility Impairments
A study testing Trexo Plus Pediatric Exoskeleton in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Non-ambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP) and similar childhood-onset neuromotor conditions face many challenges to fulsome participation in everyday life. Recent initial phase research suggests that physiotherapy paired with use of robotic exoskeletons, such as the Trexo exoskeleton ("The Trexo"; Trexo… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 7 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Palsy
- What is being tested?
- Trexo Plus Pediatric Exoskeleton
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Mar 2023to Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 7 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Weight of 50-100 lbs (23- 46 kgs), leg length (hip to floor): 40-56c
- GMFCS Level IV equivalent
- Knee and hip range of motion sufficient to allow exoskeleton fit (see exclusion criteria)
- Able to follow GMFM testing instructions, and able to participate in a minimum of 30 minutes of active PT
- Able to reliably signal pain, fear and discomfort
- At least 2 months after any lower limb Botulinum Toxin (BTX) injections
- Will be safe for BTX to be put on hold during their study participation (i.e., a period of 6 months which is equivalent to one BTX treatment cycle).
Who cannot join
- Any weightbearing restrictions
- Fixed knee contracture (passive) > 20 degrees, knee valgus >40 degrees such that orthosis will not be adaptable to lower limbs. Note: Fixed hip and ankle contractures in themselves are not a contraindication for Trexo
- Hip subluxation > 40% unless with orthopedic clearance for weight bearing with the Trexo
- Orthopaedic surgery within the last 9 months (if muscle) or 12 months (if bone)
- Severe spasticity may be a contraindication (still OK to consider)
- Seizure disorder that is not controlled by medication. For a child on seizure medication, must not have had a seizure in the last 12 months (as verified by the child's treating physician)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Open skin lesions or vascular disorder of lower extremities
- Osteogenesis imperfecta
- Not able to co-operate for positioning/adjustments within the Trexo
- Involved in another intervention study (any type). May be concurrently enrolled though in a single point assessment study (e.g., annual follow-up of status, measurement study)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M4G 1R8
About this study
Official title: Quantifying the User Experience, as Well as Neural, Muscular, and Functional Gait Changes Following Exoskeleton-powered Gait Rehabilitation in Children With Mobility Impairments
Non-ambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP) and similar childhood-onset neuromotor conditions face many challenges to fulsome participation in everyday life. Recent initial phase research suggests that physiotherapy paired with use of robotic exoskeletons, such as the Trexo exoskeleton ("The Trexo"; Trexo Robotics, Canada) provides a novel opportunity for children with severe mobility challenges to experience active walking that is individualized to their movement potential (guiding and powering leg movements) and upright support needs. This before-and-after study will assess the first-time experience of 10 non-ambulatory children (ages 4-7) using the Trexo for 6 weeks of twice weekly physiotherapy sessions, and evaluate associated brain, muscle and functional outcomes including accomplishment of individualized goals. To study clinical utility, we will simultaneously capture physiotherapists' (PTs) and PT assistants' (PTAs) training/learning/user experiences with the Trexo's first time use within our center's out-patient program and on-site affiliated school.
This project will contribute evidence-based knowledge to guide clinical decisions about introduction of the Trexo within pediatric rehabilitation settings (target demographic, potential goals, integration into physiotherapy) and be a foundation for a progressive program of multi-centre research. Overall, we hope that this research will lead to better opportunities for children's meaningful participation within the community, including family and peers.
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy
- Being tested
- Trexo Plus Pediatric Exoskeleton
- Keywords
- Pediatric exoskeleton, Robot assisted gait therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Palsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Trexo Plus Pediatric ExoskeletonDevice
Wearable pediatric robotic walker for the lower extremities
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Trexo Plus Pediatric Exoskeleton | Experimental | Experimental lower-limb wearable pediatric exoskeleton used biweekly in clinical and school settings. Receives: Device: Trexo Plus Pediatric Exoskeleton |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)-88 - changes from Baseline
Standard for measuring gross motor skills in children with CP and related neuromotor disorders
Measured: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Mechanomyography (MMG) - changes from Baseline
Non-invasive acoustic skeletal muscle recordings (frequency and amplitude)
Measured: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Structural Magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) - changes from Baseline
T1 anatomical scan - grey and white matter volumes
Measured: Baseline, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Diffusion Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - changes from Baseline
Multi shell diffusion imaging - kurtosis fractional anisotropy measures
Measured: Baseline, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Resting State Functional Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - changes from Baseline
Whole-brain analysis based on BOLD signal changes
Measured: Baseline, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) - changes from Baseline
Parent reported qualitative questionnaire for gait related goals
Measured: Weekly check-ins for 6 weeks
Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) - changes from Baseline
Physiotherapist reported qualitative questionnaire for gait related goals; scored -2 to +2
Measured: Weekly check-ins for 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Passive range of motion (ROM) - changes from Baseline
Range of motion with selected movements measured by the Tardieu Spasticity Scale
Measured: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Directional Mobility Assessment (DMA) - changes from Baseline
Simple 10-item functional walking course; scoring key from 0-4
Measured: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
The Sitting Assessment for Children with Neuromotor Dysfunction (SACND) - changes from Baseline
Evaluates postural tone, proximal stability, postural alignment and balance in sitting on a scale of 1-4
Measured: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
PEDI-CAT Questionnaire - changes from Baseline
Qualitative parent-report for child's physical and social communication function domains
Measured: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jul 2022
- Study startMar 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebral PalsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Toronto
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tom Chau, Principal investigator, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalVirginia Wright, Principal investigator, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05463211
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REB 0523
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 8 Jun 2022
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: At this time, IPD will remain anonymous unless a data sharing agreement is made.
Publications
Bradley SS, de Holanda LJ, Chau T, Wright FV. Physiotherapy-assisted overground exoskeleton use: mixed methods feasibility study protocol quantifying the user experience, as well as functional, neural, and muscular outcomes in children with mobility impairments. Front Neurosci. 2024 Jul 31;18:1398459. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1398459. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39145294
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Quantifying the User Experience, as Well as Neural, Muscular, and Functional Gait Changes Following Exoskeleton-powered Gait Rehabilitation in Children With Mobility Impairments
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05463211
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REB 0523
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy
- Keywords
- Pediatric exoskeleton, Robot assisted gait therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Toronto
- Study start
- Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Non-ambulatory children with cerebral palsy (CP) and similar childhood-onset neuromotor conditions face many challenges to fulsome participation in everyday life. Recent initial phase research suggests that physiotherapy paired with use of robotic exoskeletons, such as the Trexo exoskeleton ("The Trexo"; Trexo Robotics, Canada) provides a novel opportunity for children with severe mobility challenges to experience active walking that is individualized to their movement potential (guiding and powering leg movements) and upright support needs. This before-and-after study will assess the first-time experience of 10 non-ambulatory children (ages 4-7) using the Trexo for 6 weeks of twice weekly physiotherapy sessions, and evaluate associated brain, muscle and functional outcomes including accomplishment of individualized goals. To study clinical utility, we will simultaneously capture physiotherapists' (PTs) and PT assistants' (PTAs) training/learning/user experiences with the Trexo's first time use within our center's out-patient program and on-site affiliated school.
This project will contribute evidence-based knowledge to guide clinical decisions about introduction of the Trexo within pediatric rehabilitation settings (target demographic, potential goals, integration into physiotherapy) and be a foundation for a progressive program of multi-centre research. Overall, we hope that this research will lead to better opportunities for children's meaningful participation within the community, including family and peers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Trexo Plus Pediatric Exoskeleton | Experimental | Device: Trexo Plus Pediatric ExoskeletonExperimental lower-limb wearable pediatric exoskeleton used biweekly in clinical and school settings. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 7 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Weight of 50-100 lbs (23- 46 kgs), leg length (hip to floor): 40-56c
- GMFCS Level IV equivalent
- Knee and hip range of motion sufficient to allow exoskeleton fit (see exclusion criteria)
- Able to follow GMFM testing instructions, and able to participate in a minimum of 30 minutes of active PT
- Able to reliably signal pain, fear and discomfort
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Any weightbearing restrictions
- Fixed knee contracture (passive) > 20 degrees, knee valgus >40 degrees such that orthosis will not be adaptable to lower limbs. Note: Fixed hip and ankle contractures in themselves are not a contraindication for Trexo
- Hip subluxation > 40% unless with orthopedic clearance for weight bearing with the Trexo
- Orthopaedic surgery within the last 9 months (if muscle) or 12 months (if bone)
- Severe spasticity may be a contraindication (still OK to consider)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Trexo Plus Pediatric ExoskeletonWearable pediatric robotic walker for the lower extremities | Device | Trexo Plus Pediatric Exoskeleton |
Primary outcome
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)-88 - changes from Baseline
Time frame: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Standard for measuring gross motor skills in children with CP and related neuromotor disorders
Mechanomyography (MMG) - changes from Baseline
Time frame: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Non-invasive acoustic skeletal muscle recordings (frequency and amplitude)
Structural Magnetic resonance Imaging (MRI) - changes from Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
T1 anatomical scan - grey and white matter volumes
Diffusion Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - changes from Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Multi shell diffusion imaging - kurtosis fractional anisotropy measures
Resting State Functional Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - changes from Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Whole-brain analysis based on BOLD signal changes
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) - changes from Baseline
Time frame: Weekly check-ins for 6 weeks
Parent reported qualitative questionnaire for gait related goals
Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) - changes from Baseline
Time frame: Weekly check-ins for 6 weeks
Physiotherapist reported qualitative questionnaire for gait related goals; scored -2 to +2
4 secondary outcomes
Passive range of motion (ROM) - changes from Baseline
Time frame: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Directional Mobility Assessment (DMA) - changes from Baseline
Time frame: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
The Sitting Assessment for Children with Neuromotor Dysfunction (SACND) - changes from Baseline
Time frame: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
PEDI-CAT Questionnaire - changes from Baseline
Time frame: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39145294Bradley SS, de Holanda LJ, Chau T, Wright FV. Physiotherapy-assisted overground exoskeleton use: mixed methods feasibility study protocol quantifying the user experience, as well as functional, neural, and muscular outcomes in children with mobility impairments. Front Neurosci. 2024 Jul 31;18:1398459. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1398459. eCollection 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. At this time, IPD will remain anonymous unless a data sharing agreement is made.
Related trials for Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Changes in Land-Based Motor Function After Routine Hydrotherapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
MindEx: A Novel, Multifocal, Cognitive Brain-Machine Interface System
Paralysis; Quadriplegic, Quadraplegia
Not yet recruiting
EFFECT OF ROBOTIC GLOVES TRAINING ON UPPER LIMB COORDINATION, SELECTIVE MOTOR CONTROL AND ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING IN CHILDREN WITH HEMIPARETIC CEREBRAL PALSY.
Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Complex Neurodegenerative Disorders Related to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia
Frontotemporal Dementia, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Recruiting
Combined Popliteal and Adductor Canal Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tom Chau principal investigator
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Virginia Wright principal investigator
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Trexo Plus Pediatric Exoskeleton in people with Cerebral Palsy, run by Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)-88 - changes from Baseline (time frame: Baselines, following 6 weeks of intervention, 1 month post-intervention). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05463211, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2023.