AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationNCT05464537

Efficacy Rate of Unipolar Polarity Switch for Lesion Assessment in Pulmonary Vein Isolation

A study testing Unipolar Polarity Switch Left and Unipolar Polarity Switch Right in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation at 2 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The technique of intraprocedural electrogram morphology as a measure of lesion effectiveness in an attempt to achieve durable PVI, clearly led to shortened procedural time, radiation exposure, and superiority in outcomes, with the implementation of a reproducible, readily available intraprocedural tool that can be… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
Unipolar Polarity Switch Left and Unipolar Polarity Switch Right
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
8 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
28 Aug 2023to 27 Nov 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All Patients ≥ 18 years of age
  • Undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for De-Novo Atrial Fibrillation.

Who cannot join

  • Patients unable to give consent
  • Who do not have De-novo AF.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66211

  • Overland Park Regional Medical Center

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66215

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: To Assess the Efficacy Rate of Unipolar Polarity Switch for Lesion Assessment in Pulmonary Vein Isolation

The technique of intraprocedural electrogram morphology as a measure of lesion effectiveness in an attempt to achieve durable PVI, clearly led to shortened procedural time, radiation exposure, and superiority in outcomes, with the implementation of a reproducible, readily available intraprocedural tool that can be applied universally.

Read the detailed description

One initial study reported that unipolar atrial EGM modification was a useful end point for RF energy delivery. They compared 2 groups of patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI facilitated by an electroanatomic mapping system, merged preprocedural LA computed tomographic scan, and a circular mapping catheter.

They were the first to use intraprocedural electrogram morphology as a measure of lesion effectiveness in an attempt to achieve durable PVI. The technique, clearly led to shortened procedural time, radiation exposure, and superiority in outcomes, with the implementation of a reproducible, readily available intraprocedural tool that can be applied universally.

As there is scant data is this area with lack of randomized human trials, planned on building and further validating evidence from Bortone et al in demonstrating that loss of unipolar negative component during PVI can serve a great adjuvant tool for achieving durability of PVI with overall lesser procedural time and no significant increase in adverse events.

Being tested
Unipolar Polarity Switch Left, Unipolar Polarity Switch Right
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Unipolar Polarity Switch LeftOther

    10-15 Left veins are randomized to Unipolar Polarity Shift, right veins are randomized to CAI-OPR-LAAP

  • Unipolar Polarity Switch RightOther

    10-15 cases randomized to CAI-OPR-LAAP on left veins, and Unipolar Polarity Switch on right veins

Study groups in NCT05464537
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Unipolar Polarity Switch Left and CAI-OPR-LAAP RightActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Unipolar Polarity Switch Left
CAI-OPR-LAAP Left and Unipolar Polarity Switch RightActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Unipolar Polarity Switch Right

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficacy rate of loss of unipolar negative component

    Observe the efficacy rate of loss of unipolar negative component in isolation of the Pulmonary Veins. Loss of unipolar negative component will be assessed during the Radiofrequency ablation procedure. The durability of Pulmonary vein isolation will be assessed at 12 month follow up, if there is recurrence of Atrial fibrillation.

    Measured: Procedure day and 12 month follow-up day

  2. Number of patients with Esophageal Injury

    Number of patients with intraprocedural and post procedure adverse events and serious adverse events - Esophageal Injury

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Number of patients with TIA/CVA

    Number of patients with intraprocedural and post procedure adverse events and serious adverse events - transient ischemic attack/Cerebrovascular accident (TIA/CVA)

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Number of patients with Bleeding/Hematoma

    Number of patients with intraprocedural and post procedure adverse events and serious adverse events - Bleeding/Hematoma

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Number of patients with Pericardial Effusion

    Number of patients with intraprocedural and post procedure adverse events and serious adverse events - Pericardial Effusion

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Number of patients with need for open heart surgery

    Number of patients with intraprocedural and post procedure adverse events and serious adverse events - need for open heart surgery

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Number of patients with phrenic nerve injury

    Number of patients with intraprocedural and post procedure adverse events and serious adverse events - phrenic nerve injury

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Number of patients with pulmonary vein stenosis

    Number of patients with intraprocedural and post procedure adverse events and serious adverse events - pulmonary vein stenosis

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Esophageal Temp max (existing protocol)

    Esophageal temp max (existing protocol)

    Measured: 1 day

  10. Esophageal "Time above threshold"

    Esophageal "Time above threshold"

    Measured: 1 day

  11. Esophageal "Time to return to baseline"

    Esophageal "Time to return to baseline"

    Measured: 1 day

  12. Images comparing PURE EP unipolar signals against Claris unipolar signals

    Observe if the quality of PURE EP's unipolar signals are acutely and better suited for lesion assessment? This outcome compares mapping images with site of activation to the PURE EP electrogram and compare if they correspond to each other.

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Compare 1st pass isolation

    Compare 1st pass isolation in the Unipolar polarity switch group to Carto's Ablation Index per Overland Park Regional's Left Atrial Ablation Protocol (CAI-OPR-LAAP)

    Measured: 1 day

  2. Total RF Time

    Total RF Time in pulmonary veins with Unipolar polarity switch as endpoint vs. CAI-OPR-LAAP

    Measured: 1 day

  3. Discrimination with High Frequency Algorithm as a confirmation tool

    In Left Superior Vein, Right Superior Vein, and Right Inferior Vein, validate Near Field and Far Field Discrimination with High Frequency Algorithm as a confirmation tool (Visitag #'s annotated into PURE EP)

    Measured: 1 day

  4. 6-month freedom from AF

    6-month freedom from AF

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Redo's within 1 year

    Redo's within 1 year which vein randomized group reconnected

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Location of Catheter tip

    Location of Catheter tip (LSPV, RSPV, RIPV, LIPV, LAA, Other) (carto image)

    Measured: 1 day

  7. Duration of HFA channel compared to Bipolar

    Duration of HFA channel compared to Bipolar, Was there both a near and far field component?

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jul 2022
  2. Study start28 Aug 2023
  3. Primary completion27 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion27 Nov 2024

Why it stopped: Company which provides funding is closed

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
8 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05464537
Sponsor's protocol ID
KCHRRF-UNIPOLAR SWITCH-0013
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
6 Jul 2022
Last updated
5 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Bortone A, Brault-Noble G, Appetiti A, Marijon E. Elimination of the negative component of the unipolar atrial electrogram as an in vivo marker of transmural lesion creation: acute study in canines. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Aug;8(4):905-11. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002894. Epub 2015 Jun 19.

    PubMed 26092576
  • Pambrun T, Durand C, Constantin M, Masse A, Marra C, Meillet V, Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Bortone A. High-Power (40-50 W) Radiofrequency Ablation Guided by Unipolar Signal Modification for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Experimental Findings and Clinical Results. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Jun;12(6):e007304. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007304. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

    PubMed 31164003
  • Bortone A, Appetiti A, Bouzeman A, Maupas E, Ciobotaru V, Boulenc JM, Pujadas-Berthault P, Rioux P. Unipolar signal modification as a guide for lesion creation during radiofrequency application in the left atrium: prospective study in humans in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec;6(6):1095-102. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000749. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

    PubMed 24097371

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Unipolar Polarity Switch Left and Unipolar Polarity Switch Right in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Company which provides funding is closed). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficacy rate of loss of unipolar negative component (time frame: Procedure day and 12 month follow-up day). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05464537, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in