AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial FibrillationNCT05466266

Comparison of Peri-procedural Complications of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

A study testing ICE and TEE in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Shanghai Chest Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. Worldwide, the incidence of atrial fibrillation in men and women is 596.2 per 100,000 and 373.1 per 100,000, respectively. [1] The prevalence of AF in China is 0.97%.[2] AF increases the risk of stroke, heart failure and death. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation
What is being tested?
ICE and TEE
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,200 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Aug 2022to 1 Aug 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18-80 years.
  • Willing to sign informed consent.
  • Patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation Paroxysmal AF and Persistent AF according to the latest clinical guidelines.

Who cannot join

  • End-stage disease with a mean life expectancy less than 1 year
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, or last known left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30%
  • Previous surgical or catheter ablation for AF
  • Bradycardia and presence of implanted ICD
  • Uncontrolled hypertension: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) >180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 110 mmHg
  • Patients with Cardiovascular events including acute myocardial infarction, any PCI, valvular cardiac surgical, or percutaneous procedure within the past 3 months
  • Women of childbearing potential who are, or plan to become, pregnant during the time of the study
  • Have been enrolled in an investigational study evaluating devices or drugs.

About this study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. Worldwide, the incidence of atrial fibrillation in men and women is 596.2 per 100,000 and 373.1 per 100,000, respectively. [1] The prevalence of AF in China is 0.97%.[2] AF increases the risk of stroke, heart failure and death. Ischemic stroke occurs in 25% of hospitalized patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation according to a single-center clinical study in China. [3,4] Complications associated with AF place a huge burden on the healthcare system, with an estimated 4.9 billion RMB for patients with AF in China, 89% of which are caused by AF-related strokes.[5]

According to the 2018 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline [6], catheter ablation was recommended for paroxysmal AF that is symptomatic and refractory or intolerable to at least one class I or III antiarrhythmic drug. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a necessary preoperative examination for catheter ablation of patients with AF in order to exclude thrombus in the left atrium and left atrial appendage (LAA) and to prevent thrombotic complications caused by thrombus shedding during the procedure. However, TEE detection, like gastroscopy, requires transpharyngeal insertion of the probe into the esophagus and should be fasted before it. The TEE probe is thicker than the gastroscope, which can increase the discomfort of the patient during the examination. At the same time, if the patient cooperates poorly during the delivery process, the probe may damage the oropharyngeal or esophageal mucosa, causing complications such as bleeding or perforation.

Read more

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is a new technique that can completely replace TEE in excluding thrombus in left atrium and left atrial appendage. The advantages are that the catheter is inserted from the femoral vein without the discomfort of stimulating the swallowing reflex caused by TEE examination; To avoid complications such as bleeding or perforation caused by injury to oropharynx or esophageal mucosa; It can be used in frail, elderly, pharyngeal or esophageal lesions (eg, ulcers, varices), or intolerable patients. Some studies have shown that ICE is an important test for the diagnosis of LAA thrombosis, especially when thrombus is described as a soft thrombus.

TEE is the gold standard for the detection of thrombi in the LAA before catheter ablation for AF. ICE is used to assist AF ablation; however, ICE is also accurate for LAA visualization and minimizes the complications during procedures[7].

The primary purpose of this study aimed at determining whether ICE could replace TEE by minimizing the procedural-related complications but not compromise the detection of thrombi in the LAA.

Being tested
ICE, TEE
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ICEDevice

    All patients received ICE examination.

  • TEEDevice

    All patients received TEE examination.

Study groups in NCT05466266
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ICE groupExperimentalICE group without TEE detection before procedure
Receives: Device: ICE
TEE groupActive comparatorTEE group with non-ICE usage at the entire procedure
Receives: Device: TEE

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procedure safety

    Procedural-related complications of ICE and TEE.

    Measured: 18 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Thrombus detection rate

    Left atrial appendage thrombus detected by ICE and TEE.

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2022
  2. Study start1 Aug 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05466266
Sponsor's protocol ID
ICE VS TEE 2021
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
15 Dec 2021
Last updated
20 Jul 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hu X, Jiang W, Wang X, Ye P, Li X, Wang Y, Zheng Q, Wang Y, Leng L, Zhang Z, Han B, Zhang Y, Qin M, Liu X, Hou X; ICE vs TEE Study Investigators. Intracardiac vs Transesophageal Echocardiography in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Dec 1;10(12):1249-1256. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.3687.

    PubMed 41060665

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ICE and TEE in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Shanghai Chest Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procedure safety (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05466266, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in