Viral InfectionURGENTNCT05467007
Urgent Care Management of Respiratory Illness Enabled With Novel Testing Pathway
A study testing BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZ in people with Viral Infection and Acute Respiratory Infection, run by Andrew Meltzer at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Rapid diagnosis and precise treatment have become possible with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels that can identify a variety of causative agents of acute respiratory illnesses such as bacterial and viral infections in one urgent care visit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Viral Infection, Acute Respiratory Infection, Upper Resp Tract Infection
- What is being tested?
- BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZ
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 360 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 Apr 2022to 1 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age >7
- Clinically stable
- Must present with one symptom of respiratory illness (e.g., cough, sneezing, runny or stuffy nose, sore throat, headaches, muscle aches, trouble breathing, shortness of breath, and/or fever).
Who cannot join
- Patient is unable to provide informed consent
- Chronic symptoms (>14 days) or asymptomatic
- Unstable (or "too sick" to consent)
- Prisoner or ward of state
- Non-English speaker
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
GW Immediate & Primary Care - McPherson Square
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20005
GW Immediate & Primary Care - Rhode Island Ave
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20018
About this study
Official title: Urgent Care Management of Respiratory Illness Enabled With Novel Testing Pathway (URGENT): A Randomized Control Trial of Respiratory PCR Versus Standard Care
Rapid diagnosis and precise treatment have become possible with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels that can identify a variety of causative agents of acute respiratory illnesses such as bacterial and viral infections in one urgent care visit. While real-time PCR is currently used as a standard for diagnosing acute respiratory illnesses such as influenza due to its high sensitivity and specificity, it typically takes several hours for results which is unfavorable in the urgent care setting. Highly sensitive and rapid random-access PCR tests provide the sensitivity and specificity needed to both rapidly and accurately diagnose acute respiratory illnesses. Similar PCR panels have been used in previous research for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal illnesses in the emergency department and point-of-care testing for hospitalized adults presenting with acute respiratory illness. In this study, the investigators aim to determine if a rapid multiplex PCR test for urgent care patients with symptomatic upper respiratory infections can improve patient and provider-reported outcomes. This study utilizes the Biofire® FilmArray Panel (RP2.1-EZ) which in previous studies has been shown to be highly effective in diagnosing acute respiratory illnesses.
Read the detailed description
Research assistants in the IPCs will screen for possible participants by searching the electronic health record for complaints and/or symptoms of respiratory illness. Patients who screen eligible will be approached about potential interest, review inclusion and exclusion criteria, and obtain informed consent. All consented patients will be given a study ID and recorded in enrollment log. Patients who consent will be randomized to one of the two groups: BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZ (RP2.1-EZ; EXP) versus standard care (SC). The RP2.1-EZ panel is designed to test for a variety of bacterial and/or viral causes for illness whereas standard care procedures are essentially yes/no to patient having SARS-COV-2. Both groups will receive a nasal swab, however, the EXP group will receive the BioFire RP2.1-EZ panel, and the SC group will receive the standard nasal swab used in the IPCs. As the RP2.1-EZ panel includes SARS-COV-2, patients in the EXP group need not receive two separate nasal swabs. Nasal swabs will be performed for both groups, ideally during triage, however, the sample may be collected any time during the visit, by staff trained by BioFire Diagnostics LLC. After the nasal swab is collected, it will be either sent to LabCorp (SC) or tested on site (EXP). On site testing of samples for EXP arm will occur in the same IPC room where rapid COVID-19 tests are tested. EXP panel results should be processed within 45 minutes to 1 hour but will be communicated to patient at COB (see below). Results will be communicated to both the patient and the health care provider as soon as possible, typically on the same day as enrollment. The research team will explain the results using a standarization script written by medical professionals. If patients have further questions, they will be referred to their healthcare provider. The usage of the RP EZ-2.1 Panel will guide the managemnet of providers in the following ways: more focused advice on time to isolate and/or quartine for patients, focused advice regarding infectivity, identifying the natural course of disease faster, guiding anti-biotic decisions for providers, and helping providers identify potential anti-viral therapy in a faster manner.
Patient data will be collected regarding demographics (Form D), comorbidities (Form D), nature of current symptoms (Form D), vaccination status (Form D), quality of life measures (Form E), vital signs at triage (Form F), CPT and ICD-10 codes (Form D), and travel history (Form D). This will be collected after the nasal swab is collected before the patient leaves the clinic. Patients will complete this form on a password protected iPad through secure REDCAP survey in a private, patient room. Patients will receive their results at the end of the day via follow up phone call by the research assistants (RAs) if randomized to the EXP group. If randomized to the SC group, patients will receive their results within 24-72 hours, dependent on turn around time at LabCorp. RAs will be providing results to both patients and providers. Providers can opt to complete a brief questionnaire (i.e., five minutes or less) regarding how their course of treatment was affected by the results. RAs will call patients to complete a brief satisfaction survey (15 minutes) with their results (if available) and uploaded results can be found in patient's electronic health record. Standardized scripts written by medical professionals will be used to provide diagnostic feedback for both patient groups via phone. Research assistants will provide diagnostic feedback to the providers in person for the EXP group. Clinician ordered testing (if any) can occur at any time and will be reported per usual protocol. If testing comes back positive for a bacterial/viral pathogen for EXP arm or SARS-COV-2 for SC arm, participants be referred to their health care provider if they want to seek further treatment or have questions about results. This is not inconsistent with the standard practices now happening at the IPCs. The study coordinator or trained research assistants will follow up with all enrolled patients at 7 business days to evaluate the course of symptoms, assess patient satisfaction, and to assess other relevant medical information.
- Being tested
- BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZ
- Medical subject headings
- Virus Diseases, Respiratory Tract Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZDiagnostic test
BioFire RP2.1-EZ Panel uses a syndromic approach to quickly identify SARS-CoV-2, along with 18 additional viral and bacterial pathogens in patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2. This PCR test provides results in about 45 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZ | Experimental | EXP group will receive the BioFire RP2.1-EZ panel, designed to test for a variety of bacterial and/or viral causes for illness Receives: Diagnostic Test: BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZ |
| Standard of Care | No intervention | Standard care procedures are essentially yes/no to patient having SARS-COV-2, the SC group will receive the standard nasal swab used in the IPCs. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Satisfaction With Time to Receive Result
Based on any results you have received from today's tests, are you satisfied in the time it has taken to communicate the results?
Measured: Day of enrollment
Secondary outcomes (8)
Confidence in Testing
Based on testing today, do you feel confident that you know what is causing your illness?
Measured: Day of Enrollment
Intention to Self Isolate
Based on the testing you received today, are you planning to isolate from friends and family?
Measured: Day of enrollment
Plan to Seek Care From Another Doctor or Healthcare Facility
Will you seek out additional diagnostic testing or care from another doctor or healthcare facility?
Measured: Day of enrollment
Will Patient Plan for Work Absence
Based on test results received today, will you plan to miss work?
Measured: Day of enrollment
Did the Time to Receive Test Results Affect You and Prevent You From Doing Activities You Normally Would do?
Did the time to receive test results affect you and prevent you from doing activities you normally would do?
Measured: Day 7 after enrollment
I am Satisfied With the Time it Took to Receive the Test Results.
Measured: Day 7 after enrollment
Were Antibiotics Prescribed as Part of the IPC Visit for Respiratory Illness?
Practitioner-Centered Results
Measured: Day of Enrollment
Confidence in Patient's Cause of Illness
How confident are you that you know what is causing your patient's illness?
Measured: Day of Enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2022
- Study start4 Apr 2022
- Primary completion1 Jan 2023
- Study completion1 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Viral InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 1 to 1 RCT
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Andrew Meltzer
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- BioMérieux
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Andrew Meltzer, George Washington University
- Investigators
- Andrew Meltzer, MD, Principal investigator, Clinical Research Director, Department of Emergency Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05467007
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NCR213901
- Acronym
- URGENT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: We will consider per individual request, on case by case basis.
Publications
Dugas AF, Valsamakis A, Atreya MR, Thind K, Alarcon Manchego P, Faisal A, Gaydos CA, Rothman RE. Clinical diagnosis of influenza in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;33(6):770-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
PubMed 25827595Beard K, Brendish N, Malachira A, Mills S, Chan C, Poole S, Clark T. Pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of a routine molecular point-of-care 'test-and-treat' strategy for influenza in adults hospitalised with acute respiratory illness (FluPOC): trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e031674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031674.
PubMed 31852699Kim DK, Poudel B. Tools to detect influenza virus. Yonsei Med J. 2013 May 1;54(3):560-6. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.3.560.
PubMed 23549796Leber AL, Everhart K, Daly JA, Hopper A, Harrington A, Schreckenberger P, McKinley K, Jones M, Holmberg K, Kensinger B. Multicenter Evaluation of BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 for Detection of Viruses and Bacteria in Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2018 May 25;56(6):e01945-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01945-17. Print 2018 Jun.
PubMed 29593057Overview of influenza testing methods. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/diagnosis/overview-testing-methods.htm. Published August 31, 2020. Accessed October 12, 2021.
Poon SJ, Schuur JD, Mehrotra A. Trends in Visits to Acute Care Venues for Treatment of Low-Acuity Conditions in the United States From 2008 to 2015. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1342-1349. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3205.
PubMed 30193357Weinick RM, Burns RM, Mehrotra A. Many emergency department visits could be managed at urgent care centers and retail clinics. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1630-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0748.
PubMed 20820018
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Urgent Care Management of Respiratory Illness Enabled With Novel Testing Pathway (URGENT): A Randomized Control Trial of Respiratory PCR Versus Standard Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05467007
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- URGENT / NCR213901
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Andrew MeltzerUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- BioMérieux
- Study start
- 4 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Mar 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rapid diagnosis and precise treatment have become possible with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panels that can identify a variety of causative agents of acute respiratory illnesses such as bacterial and viral infections in one urgent care visit. While real-time PCR is currently used as a standard for diagnosing acute respiratory illnesses such as influenza due to its high sensitivity and specificity, it typically takes several hours for results which is unfavorable in the urgent care setting. Highly sensitive and rapid random-access PCR tests provide the sensitivity and specificity needed to both rapidly and accurately diagnose acute respiratory illnesses. Similar PCR panels have been used in previous research for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal illnesses in the emergency department and point-of-care testing for hospitalized adults presenting with acute respiratory illness. In this study, the investigators aim to determine if a rapid multiplex PCR test for urgent care patients with symptomatic upper respiratory infections can improve patient and provider-reported outcomes. This study utilizes the Biofire® FilmArray Panel (RP2.1-EZ) which in previous studies has been shown to be highly effective in diagnosing acute respiratory illnesses.
Detailed description
Research assistants in the IPCs will screen for possible participants by searching the electronic health record for complaints and/or symptoms of respiratory illness. Patients who screen eligible will be approached about potential interest, review inclusion and exclusion criteria, and obtain informed consent. All consented patients will be given a study ID and recorded in enrollment log. Patients who consent will be randomized to one of the two groups: BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZ (RP2.1-EZ; EXP) versus standard care (SC). The RP2.1-EZ panel is designed to test for a variety of bacterial and/or viral causes for illness whereas standard care procedures are essentially yes/no to patient having SARS-COV-2. Both groups will receive a nasal swab, however, the EXP group will receive the BioFire RP2.1-EZ panel, and the SC group will receive the standard nasal swab used in the IPCs. As the RP2.1-EZ panel includes SARS-COV-2, patients in the EXP group need not receive two separate nasal swabs. Nasal swabs will be performed for both groups, ideally during triage, however, the sample may be collected any time during the visit, by staff trained by BioFire Diagnostics LLC. After the nasal swab is collected, it will be either sent to LabCorp (SC) or tested on site (EXP). On site testing of samples for EXP arm will occur in the same IPC room where rapid COVID-19 tests are tested. EXP panel results should be processed within 45 minutes to 1 hour but will be communicated to patient at COB (see below). Results will be communicated to both the patient and the health care provider as soon as possible, typically on the same day as enrollment. The research team will explain the results using a standarization script written by medical professionals. If patients have further questions, they will be referred to their healthcare provider. The usage of the RP EZ-2.1 Panel will guide the managemnet of providers in the following ways: more focused advice on time to isolate and/or quartine for patients, focused advice regarding infectivity, identifying the natural course of disease faster, guiding anti-biotic decisions for providers, and helping providers identify potential anti-viral therapy in a faster manner.
Patient data will be collected regarding demographics (Form D), comorbidities (Form D), nature of current symptoms (Form D), vaccination status (Form D), quality of life measures (Form E), vital signs at triage (Form F), CPT and ICD-10 codes (Form D), and travel history (Form D). This will be collected after the nasal swab is collected before the patient leaves the clinic. Patients will complete this form on a password protected iPad through secure REDCAP survey in a private, patient room. Patients will receive their results at the end of the day via follow up phone call by the research assistants (RAs) if randomized to the EXP group. If randomized to the SC group, patients will receive their results within 24-72 hours, dependent on turn around time at LabCorp. RAs will be providing results to both patients and providers. Providers can opt to complete a brief questionnaire (i.e., five minutes or less) regarding how their course of treatment was affected by the results. RAs will call patients to complete a brief satisfaction survey (15 minutes) with their results (if available) and uploaded results can be found in patient's electronic health record. Standardized scripts written by medical professionals will be used to provide diagnostic feedback for both patient groups via phone. Research assistants will provide diagnostic feedback to the providers in person for the EXP group. Clinician ordered testing (if any) can occur at any time and will be reported per usual protocol. If testing comes back positive for a bacterial/viral pathogen for EXP arm or SARS-COV-2 for SC arm, participants be referred to their health care provider if they want to seek further treatment or have questions about results. This is not inconsistent with the standard practices now happening at the IPCs. The study coordinator or trained research assistants will follow up with all enrolled patients at 7 business days to evaluate the course of symptoms, assess patient satisfaction, and to assess other relevant medical information.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- 1 to 1 RCT
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZ | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZEXP group will receive the BioFire RP2.1-EZ panel, designed to test for a variety of bacterial and/or viral causes for illness |
| Standard of Care | No intervention | –Standard care procedures are essentially yes/no to patient having SARS-COV-2, the SC group will receive the standard nasal swab used in the IPCs. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age >7
- Clinically stable
- Must present with one symptom of respiratory illness (e.g., cough, sneezing, runny or stuffy nose, sore throat, headaches, muscle aches, trouble breathing, shortness of breath, and/or fever).
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient is unable to provide informed consent
- Chronic symptoms (>14 days) or asymptomatic
- Unstable (or "too sick" to consent)
- Prisoner or ward of state
- Non-English speaker
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZBioFire RP2.1-EZ Panel uses a syndromic approach to quickly identify SARS-CoV-2, along with 18 additional viral and bacterial pathogens in patients suspected of SARS-CoV-2. This PCR test provides results in about 45 minutes. | Diagnostic test | BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZ |
Primary outcome
Satisfaction With Time to Receive Result
Time frame: Day of enrollment
Based on any results you have received from today's tests, are you satisfied in the time it has taken to communicate the results?
8 secondary outcomes
Confidence in Testing
Time frame: Day of Enrollment
Intention to Self Isolate
Time frame: Day of enrollment
Plan to Seek Care From Another Doctor or Healthcare Facility
Time frame: Day of enrollment
Will Patient Plan for Work Absence
Time frame: Day of enrollment
Did the Time to Receive Test Results Affect You and Prevent You From Doing Activities You Normally Would do?
Time frame: Day 7 after enrollment
I am Satisfied With the Time it Took to Receive the Test Results.
Time frame: Day 7 after enrollment
Were Antibiotics Prescribed as Part of the IPC Visit for Respiratory Illness?
Time frame: Day of Enrollment
Confidence in Patient's Cause of Illness
Time frame: Day of Enrollment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 25827595Dugas AF, Valsamakis A, Atreya MR, Thind K, Alarcon Manchego P, Faisal A, Gaydos CA, Rothman RE. Clinical diagnosis of influenza in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;33(6):770-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
- Background: PubMed 31852699Beard K, Brendish N, Malachira A, Mills S, Chan C, Poole S, Clark T. Pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of a routine molecular point-of-care 'test-and-treat' strategy for influenza in adults hospitalised with acute respiratory illness (FluPOC): trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e031674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031674.
- Background: PubMed 23549796Kim DK, Poudel B. Tools to detect influenza virus. Yonsei Med J. 2013 May 1;54(3):560-6. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.3.560.
- Background: PubMed 29593057Leber AL, Everhart K, Daly JA, Hopper A, Harrington A, Schreckenberger P, McKinley K, Jones M, Holmberg K, Kensinger B. Multicenter Evaluation of BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2 for Detection of Viruses and Bacteria in Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2018 May 25;56(6):e01945-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01945-17. Print 2018 Jun.
- BackgroundOverview of influenza testing methods. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/diagnosis/overview-testing-methods.htm. Published August 31, 2020. Accessed October 12, 2021.
- Background: PubMed 30193357Poon SJ, Schuur JD, Mehrotra A. Trends in Visits to Acute Care Venues for Treatment of Low-Acuity Conditions in the United States From 2008 to 2015. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1342-1349. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3205.
- Background: PubMed 20820018Weinick RM, Burns RM, Mehrotra A. Many emergency department visits could be managed at urgent care centers and retail clinics. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1630-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0748.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. We will consider per individual request, on case by case basis.
Related trials for Viral Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Long-term Bulevirtide Monotherapy in Patients With HDV-related Compensated Cirrhosis
Hepatitis D
RecruitingObservational study
VIRal Pulmonary Infections in Older AGE
Viral Pulmonary Infections
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Learn About a Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine in Children at High Risk of RSV Disease
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrew Meltzer, MD principal investigator
Clinical Research Director, Department of Emergency Medicine
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1-EZ in people with Viral Infection and Acute Respiratory Infection, run by Andrew Meltzer at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Mar 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Satisfaction With Time to Receive Result (time frame: Day of enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05467007, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.