CompetenceNCT05467969
Teleteaching on Clinical Procedural Skills
An observational study of Competence and Educational Problems, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.
Trial summary
This study aims to develop a model of teleteaching and teleassessment for clinical procedural skills, consisted of teleteaching design making and teleteaching intervention was conducted in September 2020 - February 2021 at a tertiary center Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Competence, Educational Problems
- What is being tested?
- Teleteaching of procedural skills through the online multiscreen display teleconference platform
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndonesia
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2020to 28 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Medical doctors (General Practitioners or Residents in Plastic Surgery Training)
Who may be able to join
- Medical doctors (General Practitioners or Residents in Plastic Surgery Training) who volunteered to join the workhops
Who cannot join
- Participants who do not consent to join the workshops
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Online Teleteaching and Teleassessment on Clinical Procedural Skills Via Multiscreen Display Layout: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
This study aims to develop a model of teleteaching and teleassessment for clinical procedural skills, consisted of teleteaching design making and teleteaching intervention was conducted in September 2020 - February 2021 at a tertiary center Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia.
Read the detailed description
Six plastic surgery residents and 12 general practitioners voluntarily participated in 3 different workshops. Three workshops on different procedural skill sets were conducted by including surgical knotting skills, suturing techniques and basic laparoscopic hand-eye coordination skills. A group of participants learned the skills on site, while another group joined the workshop synchronously through the online multiscreen display teleconference platform. The teaching effectiveness was assessed using pre-post written test, OSATS, GRS and self-efficacy. Online skills teleassessment was also compared to the asynchronous assessment based on pre-recorded videos.
- Conditions
- Competence, Educational Problems
- Being tested
- Teleteaching of procedural skills through the online multiscreen display teleconference platform
- Keywords
- Clinical Competence, Education, Distance, Education, Medical, Motor Skills, Teaching
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Teleteaching of procedural skills through the online multiscreen display teleconference platformBehavioural
Teleteaching of procedural skills include three different techniques through three different workshops. Each of the workshops was delivered by a respected expert faculty and then accompanied by skills assessment subsequently. Three different group of learners joined the workshops on knotting skills, suturing skills and laparoscopic hand-eye coordination skills respectively.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional teaching | A group of participants learned the skills on site | |
| Teleteaching | A group of participant who joined the workshop synchronously through the online multiscreen display teleconference platform Receives: Behavioral: Teleteaching of procedural skills through the online multiscreen display teleconference platform |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Multiscreen display layouts created from multicamera configurations
A set of configuration of multiscreen display layout was arranged using 3 different cameras to represent 3 different point of views, which accommodated the 1st person view, and two different angles of the 3rd person view
Measured: 2 months
Pre-post written test scores
Pre-post written tests consisted of questions based on the teaching materials, used specifically to assess participants' knowledge
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) Score
Checklisted-points which assessed each participants' performance while doing each procedural skills, such as
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
Global Rating Scale (GRS)
Consisted of 8 points which assessed each participants' overall performance: professional attitude, timing and movement, correct use of the model, flow, appropriate aseptic techique, overall performance, and final outcome
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Self Efficacy Scale
Consisted of points in which the participants' rated their condifence and performance after doing the procedures
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2022
- Study start1 Sep 2020
- Primary completion28 Feb 2021
- Study completion28 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CompetenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitas Indonesia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Theddeus O. H. Prasetyono, Universitas Indonesia
- Investigators
- Theddeus Prasetyono, M.D, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Indonesian Clinical Training and Education Centre (ICTEC), Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05467969
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Teleteaching
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 4 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Online Teleteaching and Teleassessment on Clinical Procedural Skills Via Multiscreen Display Layout: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05467969
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Teleteaching
- Conditions
- Competence, Educational Problems
- Keywords
- Clinical Competence, Education, Distance, Education, Medical, Motor Skills, Teaching
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitas IndonesiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to develop a model of teleteaching and teleassessment for clinical procedural skills, consisted of teleteaching design making and teleteaching intervention was conducted in September 2020 - February 2021 at a tertiary center Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/ Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia.
Detailed description
Six plastic surgery residents and 12 general practitioners voluntarily participated in 3 different workshops. Three workshops on different procedural skill sets were conducted by including surgical knotting skills, suturing techniques and basic laparoscopic hand-eye coordination skills. A group of participants learned the skills on site, while another group joined the workshop synchronously through the online multiscreen display teleconference platform. The teaching effectiveness was assessed using pre-post written test, OSATS, GRS and self-efficacy. Online skills teleassessment was also compared to the asynchronous assessment based on pre-recorded videos.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional teaching | – | –A group of participants learned the skills on site |
| Teleteaching | – | Behavioral: Teleteaching of procedural skills through the online multiscreen display teleconference platformA group of participant who joined the workshop synchronously through the online multiscreen display teleconference platform |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Medical doctors (General Practitioners or Residents in Plastic Surgery Training)
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Medical doctors (General Practitioners or Residents in Plastic Surgery Training) who volunteered to join the workhops
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants who do not consent to join the workshops
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Teleteaching of procedural skills through the online multiscreen display teleconference platformTeleteaching of procedural skills include three different techniques through three different workshops. Each of the workshops was delivered by a respected expert faculty and then accompanied by skills assessment subsequently. Three different group of learners joined the workshops on knotting skills, suturing skills and laparoscopic hand-eye coordination skills respectively. | Behavioural | Teleteaching |
Primary outcome
Multiscreen display layouts created from multicamera configurations
Time frame: 2 months
A set of configuration of multiscreen display layout was arranged using 3 different cameras to represent 3 different point of views, which accommodated the 1st person view, and two different angles of the 3rd person view
Pre-post written test scores
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
Pre-post written tests consisted of questions based on the teaching materials, used specifically to assess participants' knowledge
Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) Score
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
Checklisted-points which assessed each participants' performance while doing each procedural skills, such as
Global Rating Scale (GRS)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
Consisted of 8 points which assessed each participants' overall performance: professional attitude, timing and movement, correct use of the model, flow, appropriate aseptic techique, overall performance, and final outcome
1 secondary outcome
Self Efficacy Scale
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Competence
Not yet recruiting
Culturally-Tailored AI Chatbot Simulation for Therapeutic Communication and Empathy in Psychiatric Nursing Students
Therapeutic Communication
Not yet recruiting
Generative AI and Gamified Simulation-Based Train-the-Trainer Basic Life Support Training for High School Teachers in Vietnam
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Active, not recruiting
Enhancing Male Nursing Students' Competence in Maternity Care: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Egypt
Maternity Nursing, Obstetric Nursing
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"The Relationship Between Nursing Students' Perceptions of the Clinical Learning Environment and Their Person-Centered Care Competency"
Education Nursing
Not yet recruiting
A Multidimensional Intervention to Improve Ethical Decision-Making Competence Among Nursing Student Interns: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ethical Decision-Making Competence in Nursing Student Interns
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Theddeus Prasetyono, M.D, Ph.D principal investigator
Indonesian Clinical Training and Education Centre (ICTEC), Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Competence and Educational Problems, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Indonesia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Multiscreen display layouts created from multicamera configurations (time frame: 2 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2022.