AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT05469542

Everbeat Ring ECG Clinical Concordance Study

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Grektek Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted in patients referred for routine ECG, to compare output from the everbeat finger-worn ECG device to standard of care (SOC) 12-lead electrocardiography. No intervention is involved in this study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cardiovascular Diseases
What is being tested?
Everbeat Ring
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
65 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Aug 2022to 20 Sep 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients aged 18-90 presenting for a routine internal medicine or cardiology clinic visit

Who may be able to join

  • Males or females aged 18 to 90 years.
  • Under the care of a board-certified physician and referred for a routine electrocardiogram (ECG)
  • Resting heart rate between 50 to 120 beats per minute (BPM).

Who cannot join

  • Inability to wear the everbeat ring.
  • Prior history of movement disorders including Parkinson's or benign tremors.
  • Prior history of allergic skin reactions to metal including stainless steel.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • BKLYNCardio

    Brooklyn, New York, 11217

    Glenis Strachan, MD, 718-237-4067, gasb@gmail.com

    Charles Pollack, MD

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Correlation of Electrocardiographic Signals Acquired by a Finger-worn ECG Sensor With a Standard 12-Lead ECG

This study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted in patients referred for routine ECG, to compare output from the everbeat finger-worn ECG device to standard of care (SOC) 12-lead electrocardiography. No intervention is involved in this study. Patients visiting the study site during the study period will be assessed for eligibility on a convenience basis, and observational data will be recorded on those eligible.

Being tested
Everbeat Ring
Keywords
ECG, Wearables, Electrocardiography
Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Everbeat RingDevice

    The primary objective of this study is to assess the concordance of specific ECG parameters obtained in the everbeat nine-lead ECG waveform with those obtained in the comparable leads from a standard 12-lead ECG recorder.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. R-wave Amplitude

    R Peak Amplitude intraclass correlation coefficient between test and reference devices in mm

    Measured: 50 days

  2. ST-segment

    Concordance in ST-segment deviation from the TP segment if present in mm

    Measured: 50 Days

  3. Blinded Cardiologist Review

    Identify the first six consecutive distinct readable PQRST complexes without artifacts that match between the strips for evaluation. Each reviewer will assign a pass/fail to the strips by visually assessing all 6 PQRST complexes. A "pass" is given when the morphology of the PQRST complexes appears to overlay to the unaided eye. A measurement of the R amplitude from the isoelectric baseline to the nearest millimeter for the first two QRS complexes in both the reference strip and everbeat strip. The reviewers will be blinded to the identity of the reference strip and everbeat strip.

    Measured: 50 Days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. User acceptance survey

    To assess the ease of use of the everbeat ring in a random selection of users.

    Measured: 50 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jul 2022
  2. Study start1 Aug 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion20 Sep 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion20 Sep 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
65 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05469542
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00064656
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
4 Jul 2022
Last updated
21 Jul 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Grektek Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

R-wave Amplitude (time frame: 50 days). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in