Type 1 DiabetesSMASHNCT05481034
Simplified Meal Approach Using Hybrid Closed-loop Insulin Delivery in Youth and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
A study testing SMA bolus option and Exactly estimated carbohydrate content bolus option in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Lia Bally at 2 sites in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to examine whether a simplified meal approach (as compared to exact carbohydrate counting) can alleviate the need of carbohydrate counting without worsening postprandial control in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes using hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery with the Cambridge… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 20 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- SMA bolus option and Exactly estimated carbohydrate content bolus option
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 11 Jan 2023to 29 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 20 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent
- Type 1 diabetes as defined by the World Health Organization for at least 6 months
- Age between 12 and 20 years (inclusive)
- Proficient use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) or flash glucose monitoring (FGM) for at least 5 days in the past
- Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≤12%
- The participant is willing to wear closed-loop devices
- The participant is willing to follow study specific instructions
- Negative urine-pregnancy test in sexually active female participants of childbearing potential at screening-visit
Who cannot join
- Any physical or psychological disease or condition likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results
- Known or suspected allergy against insulin
- Participant is pregnant or breast feeding or planning pregnancy within next 6.5 months
- Severe visual impairment
- Severe hearing impairment
- Lack of reliable telephone facility for contact
- Concomitant participation in another trial that interferes with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results
- Participant not proficient in German
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Switzerland2 sites
Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Bern, 3010
Department of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Children's Hospital Zurich
Zurich, 8032
About this study
Official title: Simplified Meal Approach Study Using Hybrid Closed-loop Insulin Delivery in Youth and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes - a Randomised Controlled Two-centre Crossover Trial
The purpose of the study is to examine whether a simplified meal approach (as compared to exact carbohydrate counting) can alleviate the need of carbohydrate counting without worsening postprandial control in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes using hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery with the Cambridge Artificial Pancreas FX System (CamAPS FX system).
Read the detailed description
Optimal glycaemic control is the aim of diabetes care and critical in the prevention of diabetes-related complications. Despite advances in diabetes technologies and medications, many current youth and young adults (YYA) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are not meeting desired glycaemic targets, representing a missed opportunity for improving lifetime outcomes.
A variety of factors including peer group influences, importance of body image, less parental oversight, greater risk-taking, and performance pressure challenge daily self-management in YYA with T1D. Disengagement from care and barriers for optimal glycaemic management in YYA have been mainly shown to be substantially influenced by perceived burden of daily tasks.
Although the recently introduced closed-loop systems, which link insulin delivery to sensor glucose levels, offer promising opportunities to improve glucose control in YYA with T1D, they still require the user to estimate carbohydrates. The perceived burden of exact carbohydrate counting (ECC), the limited evidence supporting its glycaemic benefit and corrective potential of algorithm-driven background insulin titration question its necessity during hybrid-closed loop insulin treatment. Instead, a simplified meal approach (SMA), which only requires the user to select the meal carbohydrate category (small/medium/large), has the potential to alleviate the burden of ECC during hybrid closed-loop insulin therapy whilst resulting in similar glycaemic benefits.
The investigators therefore hypothesize that a simplified meal approach (SMA) using the CamAPS FX system would achieve comparable glucose control compared with the use of the CamAPS FX system with ECC in YYA with T1D.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Being tested
- SMA bolus option, Exactly estimated carbohydrate content bolus option
- Keywords
- Type 1 Diabetes, Youth, Adolescents, Artificial pancreas system, Meal announcement
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SMA bolus optionDevice
Also called Simplified meal announcement bolus option
SMA comprises the selection of predefined carbohydrate quantities for meal insulin dosing. Meal carbohydrate contents will be set on an individual basis at the baseline visit.
Exactly estimated carbohydrate content bolus optionDevice
The carbohydrate content of meals is estimated in grams of carbohydrates prior to a meal bolus
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Simplified carbohydrate estimation first, exact carbohydrate estimation second | Experimental | In the first study period, participants will use the CamAPS FX system and adopt the "simplified meal announcement" (SMA) option to bolus for their meals. SMA comprises the selection of predefined carbohydrate quantities for meal insulin dosing. Meal carbohydrate contents will be set on an individual basis at the baseline visit. In the second study period, Participants will use the CamAPS FX system and insert the estimated grams of carbohydrates into the application as exactly as possible in order to bolus for their meals. Receives: Device: SMA bolus option; Device: Exactly estimated carbohydrate content bolus option |
| Exact carbohydrate estimation first, simplified carbohydrate estimation second. | Experimental | In the first study period, participants will use the CamAPS FX system and insert the estimated grams of carbohydrates into the application as exactly as possible in order to bolus for their meals. In the second study period, participants will use the CamAPS FX system and adopt the "simplified meal announcement" (SMA) option to bolus for their meals. SMA comprises the selection of predefined carbohydrate quantities for meal insulin dosing. Meal carbohydrate contents will be set on an individual basis at the baseline visit. Receives: Device: SMA bolus option; Device: Exactly estimated carbohydrate content bolus option |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of time with sensor glucose measurements between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L
The percentage of time with sensor glucose measurements between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L will be compared between both intervention arms. Primary analysis will be carried out according to a non-inferiority framework.
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Secondary outcomes (15)
Time spent with sensor glucose values above target (>10.0 mmol/L)
Percentage of time spent with sensor glucose values above target (>10.0 mmol/L)
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Time spent with sensor glucose values >13.9 mmol/L (%)
Percentage of time spent with sensor glucose values >13.9 mmol/L (%)
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Time spent with sensor glucose measurements < 3.9 mmol/L
The percentage of time with sensor glucose measurements < 3.9 mmol/L (%)
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Time spent with sensor glucose measurements < 3.0 mmol/L
The percentage of time with sensor glucose measurements < 3.0 mmol/L (%)
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Time spent with sensor glucose measurements between < 3.9 mmol/L and 7.8 mmol/L (%)
The percentage of time with sensor glucose between < 3.9 mmol/L and 7.8 mmol/L (%)
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Mean sensor glucose level (mmol/L)
Mean of all sensor glucose levels (mmol/L)
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
HbA1c
Glycated hemoglobin A1c (%)
Measured: At baseline and at the predefined study visits (3 months after the start of the respective periods)
Mean peak postprandial glucose
Mean peak postprandial glucose (mmol/L) assessed within 180min following main meals (defined as carbohydrate amounts >25g entered into the CamAPS app by the participants).
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Coefficient of sensor glucose variation (%)
Coefficient of sensor glucose variation (%)
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Standard deviation of sensor glucose variation (mmol/L)
Standard deviation of sensor glucose variation (mmol/L)
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Glucose Management Indicator (%)
Glucose Management Indicator (%)
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Number of clinically significant hypoglycaemia (number of events with sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L for at least 15min)
Number of events with sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L for at least 15min
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Extended hypoglycaemia event rate (number of events with sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L lasting at least 120min)
Number of events with sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L lasting at least 120min
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Extended hyperglycaemia event rate (number of events with sensor glucose >13.9 mmol/L lasting at least 120min)
Number of events with sensor glucose >13.9 mmol/L lasting at least 120min
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Proportion of participants with sensor glucose in the target range (3.9 - 10.0 mmol/L for >70% of the time.
Proportion of participants with sensor glucose in the target range (3.9 - 10.0 mmol/L for >70% of the time.
Measured: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jul 2022
- Study start11 Jan 2023
- Primary completion29 Sep 2023
- Study completion29 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lia Bally
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Zurich
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Lia Bally, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Investigators
- Lia Bally, MD PhD, Principal investigator, University of Bern
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05481034
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SMASH
- Acronym
- SMASH
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 28 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 18 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymised individual participant data will be shared after inquiry via a validated sharing platform (yet to be defined). Anonymised data packages will be available once the final study results are published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Publications
Laesser CI, Piazza C, Schorno N, Nick F, Kastrati L, Zueger T, Barnard-Kelly K, Wilinska ME, Nakas CT, Hovorka R, Herzig D, Konrad D, Bally L. Simplified meal announcement study (SMASH) using hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomised controlled two-centre crossover trial. Diabetologia. 2025 Feb;68(2):295-307. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06319-w. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
PubMed 39560745
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Simplified Meal Approach Study Using Hybrid Closed-loop Insulin Delivery in Youth and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes - a Randomised Controlled Two-centre Crossover Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05481034
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SMASH / SMASH
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Keywords
- Type 1 Diabetes, Youth, Adolescents, Artificial pancreas system, Meal announcement
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Lia BallyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Zurich
- Study start
- 11 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to examine whether a simplified meal approach (as compared to exact carbohydrate counting) can alleviate the need of carbohydrate counting without worsening postprandial control in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes using hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery with the Cambridge Artificial Pancreas FX System (CamAPS FX system).
Detailed description
Optimal glycaemic control is the aim of diabetes care and critical in the prevention of diabetes-related complications. Despite advances in diabetes technologies and medications, many current youth and young adults (YYA) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are not meeting desired glycaemic targets, representing a missed opportunity for improving lifetime outcomes.
A variety of factors including peer group influences, importance of body image, less parental oversight, greater risk-taking, and performance pressure challenge daily self-management in YYA with T1D. Disengagement from care and barriers for optimal glycaemic management in YYA have been mainly shown to be substantially influenced by perceived burden of daily tasks.
Although the recently introduced closed-loop systems, which link insulin delivery to sensor glucose levels, offer promising opportunities to improve glucose control in YYA with T1D, they still require the user to estimate carbohydrates. The perceived burden of exact carbohydrate counting (ECC), the limited evidence supporting its glycaemic benefit and corrective potential of algorithm-driven background insulin titration question its necessity during hybrid-closed loop insulin treatment. Instead, a simplified meal approach (SMA), which only requires the user to select the meal carbohydrate category (small/medium/large), has the potential to alleviate the burden of ECC during hybrid closed-loop insulin therapy whilst resulting in similar glycaemic benefits.
The investigators therefore hypothesize that a simplified meal approach (SMA) using the CamAPS FX system would achieve comparable glucose control compared with the use of the CamAPS FX system with ECC in YYA with T1D.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Simplified carbohydrate estimation first, exact carbohydrate estimation second | Experimental | Device: SMA bolus option, Device: Exactly estimated carbohydrate content bolus optionIn the first study period, participants will use the CamAPS FX system and adopt the "simplified meal announcement" (SMA) option to bolus for their meals. SMA comprises the selection of predefined carbohydrate quantities for meal insulin dosing. Meal carbohydrate contents will be set on an individual basis at the baseline visit. In the second study period, Participants will use the CamAPS FX system and insert the estimated grams of carbohydrates into the application as exactly as possible in order to bolus for their meals. |
| Exact carbohydrate estimation first, simplified carbohydrate estimation second. | Experimental | Device: SMA bolus option, Device: Exactly estimated carbohydrate content bolus optionIn the first study period, participants will use the CamAPS FX system and insert the estimated grams of carbohydrates into the application as exactly as possible in order to bolus for their meals. In the second study period, participants will use the CamAPS FX system and adopt the "simplified meal announcement" (SMA) option to bolus for their meals. SMA comprises the selection of predefined carbohydrate quantities for meal insulin dosing. Meal carbohydrate contents will be set on an individual basis at the baseline visit. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 20 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Written informed consent
- Type 1 diabetes as defined by the World Health Organization for at least 6 months
- Age between 12 and 20 years (inclusive)
- Proficient use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) or flash glucose monitoring (FGM) for at least 5 days in the past
- Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≤12%
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Any physical or psychological disease or condition likely to interfere with the normal conduct of the study and interpretation of the study results
- Known or suspected allergy against insulin
- Participant is pregnant or breast feeding or planning pregnancy within next 6.5 months
- Severe visual impairment
- Severe hearing impairment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SMA bolus optionAlso: Simplified meal announcement bolus optionSMA comprises the selection of predefined carbohydrate quantities for meal insulin dosing. Meal carbohydrate contents will be set on an individual basis at the baseline visit. | Device | Exact carbohydrate estimation first, simplified carbohydrate estimation second., Simplified carbohydrate estimation first, exact carbohydrate estimation second |
| Exactly estimated carbohydrate content bolus optionThe carbohydrate content of meals is estimated in grams of carbohydrates prior to a meal bolus | Device | Exact carbohydrate estimation first, simplified carbohydrate estimation second., Simplified carbohydrate estimation first, exact carbohydrate estimation second |
Primary outcome
Percentage of time with sensor glucose measurements between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
The percentage of time with sensor glucose measurements between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L will be compared between both intervention arms. Primary analysis will be carried out according to a non-inferiority framework.
15 secondary outcomes
Time spent with sensor glucose values above target (>10.0 mmol/L)
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Time spent with sensor glucose values >13.9 mmol/L (%)
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Time spent with sensor glucose measurements < 3.9 mmol/L
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Time spent with sensor glucose measurements < 3.0 mmol/L
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Time spent with sensor glucose measurements between < 3.9 mmol/L and 7.8 mmol/L (%)
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Mean sensor glucose level (mmol/L)
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
HbA1c
Time frame: At baseline and at the predefined study visits (3 months after the start of the respective periods)
Mean peak postprandial glucose
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Coefficient of sensor glucose variation (%)
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Standard deviation of sensor glucose variation (mmol/L)
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Glucose Management Indicator (%)
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Number of clinically significant hypoglycaemia (number of events with sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L for at least 15min)
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Extended hypoglycaemia event rate (number of events with sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L lasting at least 120min)
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Extended hyperglycaemia event rate (number of events with sensor glucose >13.9 mmol/L lasting at least 120min)
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Proportion of participants with sensor glucose in the target range (3.9 - 10.0 mmol/L for >70% of the time.
Time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Oct 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39560745Laesser CI, Piazza C, Schorno N, Nick F, Kastrati L, Zueger T, Barnard-Kelly K, Wilinska ME, Nakas CT, Hovorka R, Herzig D, Konrad D, Bally L. Simplified meal announcement study (SMASH) using hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomised controlled two-centre crossover trial. Diabetologia. 2025 Feb;68(2):295-307. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06319-w. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymised individual participant data will be shared after inquiry via a validated sharing platform (yet to be defined). Anonymised data packages will be available once the final study results are published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Adapting FAMS to Optimize CGM Use Among Emerging Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes
Not yet recruiting
Outpatient Pramlintide Study
Type 1 Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Frexalimab in Preservation of Endogenous Insulin Secretion Compared to Placebo in Adults and Adolescents on Top of Insulin Therapy (FABULINUS)
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Probiotics in Newly Diagnosed T1D
Type 1 Diabetes, Type1diabetes
Recruiting
Differentiating Heart Disease Between Adult-onset Autoimmune and Type 2 Diabetes
Diabete Mellitus, Autoimmune Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lia Bally, MD PhD principal investigator
University of Bern
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SMA bolus option and Exactly estimated carbohydrate content bolus option in people with Type 1 Diabetes, run by Lia Bally at 2 sites in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of time with sensor glucose measurements between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L (time frame: From the first day of the respective study period to 3 months thereafter). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05481034, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2023.