AnesthesiaNCT05482230
Application of Tracheal Intubation in Lateral Position in Thoracic Surgery
A study testing Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position in people with Anesthesia and Tracheal Intubation, run by xiangming fang at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study investigated the incidence of bronchial blocker malposition in the lateral versus supine position and evaluated the effectiveness of lateral placement. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia, Tracheal Intubation, Thoracic Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 306 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 12 Dec 2022to 30 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
The inclusion criteria :
- 80 Years<age ≥18 years;
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III;
- Undergo thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation.
The exclusion criteria were:
- Risk of difficult intubation based on preoperative assessment (maximum mouth opening <3 cm, body mass index >30 kg/m2, limited neck movement, Mallampati grade IV, or main airway stenosis);
- Right upper bronchus originating at or above the tracheal carina;
- Plan to undergo bronchial sleeve resection, right upper lobectomy, or non-intubated thoracic surgery;
- Evidence or symptoms of acute lung or airway infection;
- History of thoracic surgery;
- Prior thoracic radiotherapy or chemotherapy;
- Preoperative upper extremity pain;
- Severe mental illness or difficulty with communication.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Lung Isolation With a Bronchial Blocker Placed in the Lateral Position for Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: a Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial
This study investigated the incidence of bronchial blocker malposition in the lateral versus supine position and evaluated the effectiveness of lateral placement.
Read the detailed description
Routine thoracic surgery anesthesia requires that endotracheal intubation be performed with the patient in the supine position; the patient subsequently needs to be placed in a lateral position through the cooperation of the anesthetist, theatre nurse, and surgeon. Achieving this change in position is time-consuming and likely to result in adverse events, such as loss of the anesthetic airway and arteriovenous catheter, hemodynamic fluctuations, and malposition of the BB which adversely affect anesthesia management and postoperative recovery. For patients with hypertensive heart disease, the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents increases during the perioperative period .
Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the ease, efficacy, and safety of video laryngoscopy-guided intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position.
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Tracheal Intubation, Thoracic Surgery
- Being tested
- Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position
- Keywords
- Lateral Position, Bronchial occluder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral positionProcedure or surgery
In the lateral position group, patients were positioned laterally (as required for surgery) before anesthesia induction. After anesthesia induction, both endotracheal intubation and bronchial blocker placement were performed while the patient remained in the lateral position.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position | Experimental | In the lateral position group, patients were positioned laterally (as required for surgery) before anesthesia induction. After anesthesia induction, both endotracheal intubation and bronchial blocker placement were performed while the patient remained in the lateral position. Receives: Procedure: Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position |
| Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in supine position | No intervention | Intubation and the placement of a bronchial blocker are typically carried out with the patient in the supine position, which is a standard procedure in thoracic surgery. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The incidence of bronchial blocker malposition.
The incidence of bronchial blocker malposition in two groups S and L
Measured: During surgery
Secondary outcomes (9)
The times of bronchial blocker reposition
The times of bronchial blocker reposition in lateral group and supine group
Measured: During surgery
The duration of intubation
The duration of intubation, including the time for single-lumen tube intubation, the time for bronchial blocker placement, and the total intubation time (single-lumen tube intubation plus bronchial blocker placement)
Measured: During surgery
The pressure of ventilation
The pressure of ventilation during mask ventilation, two-lung ventilation (TLV) and one-lung ventilation(OLV)
Measured: During surgery
Intubation-related complications
Intubation-related complications, including airway injury, dental injury, sore throat, and hoarseness
Measured: During surgery, after the patient regained full consciousness and before discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, on the day after surgery, and 2 weeks postoperatively.
Postural injuries
Postural injuries were defined as new-onset injuries not present before surgery but occurring within the first 2 weeks postoperatively, including neuropathies, vasculopathies, and musculoskeletal injuries
Measured: These complications were assessed at three time points: after the patient regained full consciousness and before discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, on the day after surgery, and 2 weeks postoperatively.
Lung collapse grade
When the chest wall was opened, the lung collapse was graded as follows: fully collapsed lung, non-collapsed lung with no visible ventilation, or fully ventilated lung
Measured: During surgery
Perioperative vital signs
Perioperative vital signs, including mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and SpO2
Measured: Immediately after arrival at operating room; Before single lumen tube intubation; After single lumen tube intubation ; One-lung ventilation; Before single lumen tube extubating; 5 minutes after single lumen tube extubating.
Hypoxemia
Hypoxemia was defined as a drop in oxygen saturation (SpO2) below 92%
Measured: During surgery
The satisfaction scores
The satisfaction scores of patients, nurses and surgeons. Satisfaction scores were used a 0-10 scale (10 = very satisfied).
Measured: Perioperative period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Aug 2022
- Study start12 Dec 2022
- Primary completion13 May 2024
- Study completion30 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 306 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- xiangming fang
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, China, The Central Hospital of Lishui City, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Lishui Country People's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, xiangming fang, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
- Investigators
- Xiangming Fang, Professor, Principal investigator, First Affilated Hospital of Zhejiang University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05482230
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2015299
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 16 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The patient's relevant vital signs and intubation parameters, etc
Publications
Lewis JW Jr, Serwin JP, Gabriel FS, Bastanfar M, Jacobsen G. The utility of a double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation in a variety of noncardiac thoracic surgical procedures. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1992 Dec;6(6):705-10. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(92)90056-d.
PubMed 1472668Komatsu R, Nagata O, Sessler DI, Ozaki M. The intubating laryngeal mask airway facilitates tracheal intubation in the lateral position. Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):858-61, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000100741.46539.6b.
PubMed 14980953Goh SY, Thong SY, Chen Y, Kong AS. Efficacy of intubation performed by trainees on patients in the lateral position. Singapore Med J. 2016 Sep;57(9):503-6. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015165. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
PubMed 26768062Dimitriou V, Voyagis GS, Iatrou C, Brimacombe J. Flexible lightwand-guided intubation using the intubating laryngeal mask airway in the supine, right, and left lateral positions in healthy patients by experienced users. Anesth Analg. 2003 Mar;96(3):896-898. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000048839.12552.50.
PubMed 12598281Biswas BK, Agarwal B, Bhattacharyya P, Badhani UK, Bhattarai B. Intubating laryngeal mask for airway management in lateral decubitus state: comparative study of right and left lateral positions. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):715-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei226. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
PubMed 16143578Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Iwagaki T, Kadoya T. Efficacy of the Airway Scope on tracheal intubation in the lateral position: comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Mar;28(3):164-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328340c368.
PubMed 20962657Jin Y, Ying J, Zhang K, Fang X. Endotracheal intubation under video laryngoscopic guidance during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic surgery in the left lateral position: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(52):e9461. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009461.
PubMed 29384933Li H, Wang W, Lu YP, Wang Y, Chen LH, Lei LP, Fang XM. Evaluation of Endotracheal Intubation with a Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in Lateral Patient Positioning: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Sep 5;129(17):2045-9. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.189069.
PubMed 27569229Lai HC, Wu ZF. Easier double-lumen tube placement using real-time video laryngoscopy and wireless video fiberoptic bronchoscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Aug;55:132-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Jan 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 30658325Birring SS, Brew J, Kilbourn A, Edwards V, Wilson R, Morice AH. Rococo study: a real-world evaluation of an over-the-counter medicine in acute cough (a multicentre, randomised, controlled study). BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 16;7(1):e014112. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014112.
PubMed 28093442Saini S, Bhanot A, Kamal K, Bansal T. An improvised head support to facilitate endotracheal intubation in the lateral position. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2015 Sep;53(3):109-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 24. No abstract available.
PubMed 25987271Almeida C, Freitas MJ, Brandao D, Assuncao JP. [Use of bronchial blocker in emergent thoracotomy in presence of upper airway hemorrhage, and cervical spine fracture: a difficult decision]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;68(4):408-411. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.09.004. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
PubMed 29342420Li H, Chu L, Ye H, Zhang Y, Li M, Hua Y, Zhang J, Hu H, Wen T, Zhao J, Wan H, Huang L, Lou Y, Tang J, Yan Z, Duan G, Wu J, Wang C, Lu Y, Shen X, Huang C, Song C, Wang Y, Zeng C, Xie G, Fang X. Lung isolation with a bronchial blocker placed in the lateral position for patients undergoing thoracic surgery: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2025 Jun;104:111869. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111869. Epub 2025 May 13.
PubMed 40367865
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lung Isolation With a Bronchial Blocker Placed in the Lateral Position for Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery: a Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05482230
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2015299
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Tracheal Intubation, Thoracic Surgery
- Keywords
- Lateral Position, Bronchial occluder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 306 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- xiangming fangUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, China, The Central Hospital of Lishui City, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Affiliated Hospital of Shaoxing University, Lishui Country People's Hospital
- Study start
- 12 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study investigated the incidence of bronchial blocker malposition in the lateral versus supine position and evaluated the effectiveness of lateral placement.
Detailed description
Routine thoracic surgery anesthesia requires that endotracheal intubation be performed with the patient in the supine position; the patient subsequently needs to be placed in a lateral position through the cooperation of the anesthetist, theatre nurse, and surgeon. Achieving this change in position is time-consuming and likely to result in adverse events, such as loss of the anesthetic airway and arteriovenous catheter, hemodynamic fluctuations, and malposition of the BB which adversely affect anesthesia management and postoperative recovery. For patients with hypertensive heart disease, the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular accidents increases during the perioperative period .
Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the ease, efficacy, and safety of video laryngoscopy-guided intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position | Experimental | Procedure: Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral positionIn the lateral position group, patients were positioned laterally (as required for surgery) before anesthesia induction. After anesthesia induction, both endotracheal intubation and bronchial blocker placement were performed while the patient remained in the lateral position. |
| Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in supine position | No intervention | –Intubation and the placement of a bronchial blocker are typically carried out with the patient in the supine position, which is a standard procedure in thoracic surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral positionIn the lateral position group, patients were positioned laterally (as required for surgery) before anesthesia induction. After anesthesia induction, both endotracheal intubation and bronchial blocker placement were performed while the patient remained in the lateral position. | Procedure or surgery | Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position |
Primary outcome
The incidence of bronchial blocker malposition.
Time frame: During surgery
The incidence of bronchial blocker malposition in two groups S and L
9 secondary outcomes
The times of bronchial blocker reposition
Time frame: During surgery
The duration of intubation
Time frame: During surgery
The pressure of ventilation
Time frame: During surgery
Intubation-related complications
Time frame: During surgery, after the patient regained full consciousness and before discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, on the day after surgery, and 2 weeks postoperatively.
Postural injuries
Time frame: These complications were assessed at three time points: after the patient regained full consciousness and before discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit, on the day after surgery, and 2 weeks postoperatively.
Lung collapse grade
Time frame: During surgery
Perioperative vital signs
Time frame: Immediately after arrival at operating room; Before single lumen tube intubation; After single lumen tube intubation ; One-lung ventilation; Before single lumen tube extubating; 5 minutes after single lumen tube extubating.
Hypoxemia
Time frame: During surgery
The satisfaction scores
Time frame: Perioperative period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 1472668Lewis JW Jr, Serwin JP, Gabriel FS, Bastanfar M, Jacobsen G. The utility of a double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation in a variety of noncardiac thoracic surgical procedures. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1992 Dec;6(6):705-10. doi: 10.1016/1053-0770(92)90056-d.
- Background: PubMed 14980953Komatsu R, Nagata O, Sessler DI, Ozaki M. The intubating laryngeal mask airway facilitates tracheal intubation in the lateral position. Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):858-61, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000100741.46539.6b.
- Background: PubMed 26768062Goh SY, Thong SY, Chen Y, Kong AS. Efficacy of intubation performed by trainees on patients in the lateral position. Singapore Med J. 2016 Sep;57(9):503-6. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015165. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
- Background: PubMed 12598281Dimitriou V, Voyagis GS, Iatrou C, Brimacombe J. Flexible lightwand-guided intubation using the intubating laryngeal mask airway in the supine, right, and left lateral positions in healthy patients by experienced users. Anesth Analg. 2003 Mar;96(3):896-898. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000048839.12552.50.
- Background: PubMed 16143578Biswas BK, Agarwal B, Bhattacharyya P, Badhani UK, Bhattarai B. Intubating laryngeal mask for airway management in lateral decubitus state: comparative study of right and left lateral positions. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):715-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei226. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
- Background: PubMed 20962657Takenaka I, Aoyama K, Iwagaki T, Kadoya T. Efficacy of the Airway Scope on tracheal intubation in the lateral position: comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Mar;28(3):164-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328340c368.
- Background: PubMed 29384933Jin Y, Ying J, Zhang K, Fang X. Endotracheal intubation under video laryngoscopic guidance during upper gastrointestinal endoscopic surgery in the left lateral position: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(52):e9461. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009461.
- Background: PubMed 27569229Li H, Wang W, Lu YP, Wang Y, Chen LH, Lei LP, Fang XM. Evaluation of Endotracheal Intubation with a Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscope in Lateral Patient Positioning: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Sep 5;129(17):2045-9. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.189069.
- Background: PubMed 30658325Lai HC, Wu ZF. Easier double-lumen tube placement using real-time video laryngoscopy and wireless video fiberoptic bronchoscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Aug;55:132-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Jan 15. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28093442Birring SS, Brew J, Kilbourn A, Edwards V, Wilson R, Morice AH. Rococo study: a real-world evaluation of an over-the-counter medicine in acute cough (a multicentre, randomised, controlled study). BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 16;7(1):e014112. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014112.
- Background: PubMed 25987271Saini S, Bhanot A, Kamal K, Bansal T. An improvised head support to facilitate endotracheal intubation in the lateral position. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2015 Sep;53(3):109-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 24. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 29342420Almeida C, Freitas MJ, Brandao D, Assuncao JP. [Use of bronchial blocker in emergent thoracotomy in presence of upper airway hemorrhage, and cervical spine fracture: a difficult decision]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;68(4):408-411. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.09.004. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The patient's relevant vital signs and intubation parameters, etc
Related trials for Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Xiangming Fang, Professor principal investigator
First Affilated Hospital of Zhejiang University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intubation and bronchial blocker placement performed in lateral position in people with Anesthesia and Tracheal Intubation, run by xiangming fang at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The incidence of bronchial blocker malposition. (time frame: During surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05482230, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2025.