Reduced HPHC Exposure in Cigarette Smokers Switching to P4M3 Gen. 2.0 Compared to Continuing Smoking, or Smoking Abstinence

Reduced HPHC Exposure in Cigarette Smokers Switching to P4M3 Generation 2.0 Compared to Continuing Smoking, or Smoking Abstinence

• Who carried out the research? This research was sponsored and funded by Philip Morris Products S.A.
• What public involvement there was in the study? Sixty-eight healthy, currently smoking, adults participated in this study.
• Where and when the study took place? The study was conducted at a clinical trial facility managed by a contract research organization in Belfast, Northern Ireland, from July 15th to August 31st 2022.
• Why was the research needed? The research was needed to understand the reductions in exposure to selected harmful and potentially harmful constituents of cigarette smoke in healthy smokers, who switched exclusively to an electronic nicotine delivery system for five days.
• What were the main questions studied? The study measured the reductions in exposure to selected harmful and potentially harmful constituents of cigarette smoke in healthy smokers switching exclusively to two flavour variants (CA35 and CM35) of P4M3, an Electronic Nicotine Delivery System, compared to continued smoking of cigarettes or abstaining from smoking.
• Who participated in the study? Sixty-eight healthy, male or female, adults aged between 21 and 65 years participated in this study. All participants were currently smoking. The participants did not plan to quit using tobacco and/or nicotine products within the next 3 months and had smoked continuously for at least the last 3 years prior to joining the study. Each participant was given full and adequate oral and written information about the nature, purpose, possible risks, and benefits of the study. All participants received information on the risks of smoking, smoking cessation advice and a briefing on the P4M3 Electronic Nicotine Delivery System, for example, that its use is not risk-free. Once each participant had received all the necessary information, and if they agreed to participate, this was documented in an Informed Consent Form with the date, time and signature of both the participant and the study doctor. Participants were informed that they were free to withdraw from the study at any time.
• What treatments or interventions did the participants take/receive? Participants were randomly assigned to one of four study groups: P4M3 CA35, P4M3 CM35, Cigarette, or smoking abstinence, for five days in a confinement setting. Participants assigned to one of the P4M3 arms or the Cigarette arm could use their assigned product at will and as often as they desired during the five-day confinement period. Participants assigned to the smoking abstinence arm had to abstain from cigarette smoking. Urine was collected from each participant for harmful and potentially harmful constituent analysis, for each 24 hours, from Day 1 (i.e., the start of the confinement period) to Day 5 (until discharge at the morning of Day 6). Participants were also asked to evaluate their experience of using their assigned products, using the Product Evaluation Scale (PES) questionnaire. The PES assessed the degree to which subjects experienced the 'reinforcing effects' of the use of P4M3 for both flavour variants in cigarette smokers switching to P4M3 compared to subjects continuing cigarette smoking. The PES is composed of five scales which address the degree to which participants experienced different effects (Product Satisfaction, Psychological Rewards, Aversion, Enjoyment of respiratory tract sensations, and Craving Reduction) as a result of using the P4M3 or the cigarette, rated on a 7 point scale from 1 = "not at all" to 7 = "extremely."
• What medical problems (adverse reactions) did the participants have? Overall, during the product use, 23 adverse reactions occurred in 17 participants, all of them being mild or moderate in severity. Only one adverse reaction (oropharyngeal pain) was considered related to an investigational product (P4M3 CM35) and occurred in just one participant. There were no clinically significant findings in the physical examination, clinical laboratory, vital signs, or ECG assessments in this study.
• What happened during the study? A presentation of P4M3 (without product use) was made to the participants during the Screening visit. All participants received information on the risks of smoking, smoking cessation advice, and a briefing that the use of P4M3 is not risk-free. Eligible participants, fulfilling all criteria for participation, returned to the investigational site for confirmation of eligibility at the Admission visit (Day -2). On Day -2 (Admission), after eligibility criteria had been verified, all eligible participants were enrolled and performed a product test using both P4M3 flavour variants for a duration of approximately 10 minutes use per variant. After the product test, subjects not willing to use P4M3 during the study were to be discontinued and be replaced. Participants willing to continue their participation in the study started their confinement period. On Day -1, participants were randomly assigned to one of four arms: P4M3 CA35 variant; P4M3 CM35 variant; Cigarettes; Smoking Abstinence. Participants were informed about their randomization arm by the study site staff on Day 1 prior to the start of product use. The Exposure period in confinement began on Day 1 and consisted of 5 days of at will use of the assigned product in the P4M3 and Cigarette arms. Use of any tobacco/nicotine containing product other than the assigned product was not allowed and, at the discretion of the study doctor, resulted in the participant's discontinuation from the study. Participants allocated to the Smoking Abstinence arm had to abstain from Cigarette smoking. Daily 24-hour urine was collected from Day 1 to Day 5 for harmful and potentially harmful constituent analysis. On Day 1, use of P4M3 or Cigarette smoking in the respective arms was not supposed to start before the end of 24-hour urine collection of Day -1. The 24 hour urine collection period for Day 5 ended in the morning of Day 6 prior to Discharge. On Day -1 and on Days 1 to 5, participants completed questionnaires about product evaluation, craving, and liking assessments. During the confinement period, site staff distributed assigned products to the participants and recorded all distributed products in the participants' files. Any participant who wanted to attempt to quit using any tobacco or nicotine-containing product at any time during the study (that is, to quit P4M3 use or Cigarette smoking) was encouraged to do so and was to be referred to appropriate medical services. This decision would not affect the participant's financial compensation, and the participant was to be considered as remaining in the study. The Exposure period to the assigned investigational product (P4M3 or Cigarette) ended at 11:00 PM on Day 5, followed by Discharge on Day 6 after completion of all study procedures. Participants were allowed to smoke Cigarettes or use other tobacco or nicotine-containing products, at their discretion, only after discharge from the study. After discharge at Day 6 or from the day of an early termination, subjects entered a 3-day Safety follow-up period during which any adverse reactions reported by the participants were collected. The follow-up of adverse reactions ongoing at discharge was conducted by the investigational site.
• What were the results of the study? The results of this study demonstrated that switching exclusively from cigarettes to the P4M3 electronic nicotine delivery system for five days resulted in substantial reductions in exposure to the harmful and potentially harmful constituents of cigarette smoke, while maintaining comparable levels of nicotine exposure. The harmful and potentially harmful constituents of cigarette smoke were examined by measuring their degradation products in participant's urine. These degradation products are called Biomarkers of Exposure. As another Biomarker of Exposure, the saturation of hemoglobin in the blood with carbon monoxide was measured. The magnitude of reduction in the levels of Biomarkers of Exposure were comparable between both variants of P4M3 (CA35 tobacco flavour and CM35 menthol flavour). The reductions observed for most of the Biomarker of Exposure levels in the P4M3 arms, in timing as well as in magnitude, approached those levels observed for smoking abstinence. Furthermore, no additional safety concerns were associated with P4M3 compared to cigarette smoking or smoking abstinence.
• How has this study helped patients and researchers? The participants in this study were healthy, current cigarette smokers. All participants were informed about the health risks associated with smoking and were given smoking cessation advice. Participants in this clinical study benefited from repeated and detailed general health check-ups. This clinical study may help doctors and scientists learn about electronic nicotine delivery systems. The exposure period in confinement provided information on the exposure reductions achievable for harmful and potentially harmful constituents in a well-controlled environment with full control over daily P4M3 and/or Cigarette consumption, compared to smoking abstinence.
• Details of any further research planned: There is currently no further research planned with P4M3 Generation 2.0.