AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3NCT05489224

A Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of CT-P47 and RoActemra in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase 3 study testing CT-P47 and EU-approved RoActemra in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Celltrion at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a phase 3 study to compare efficacy and safety of CT-P47 and RoActemra in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
CT-P47 and EU-approved RoActemra
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
471 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
14 Sep 2022to 23 Nov 2023
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient is male or female aged 18 to 75 years old, both inclusive.
  • Patient has had a diagnosis of RA according to the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for at least 24 weeks prior to the first administration of the study drug.

Who cannot join

  • Patient who has previously received investigational or licensed product; targeted synthetic DMARD(s) (e.g., tofacitinib, baricitinib) for the treatment of RA and/or an interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitor for any purposes.
  • Patient who has previously received more than 1 biologic agents approved for the treatment of RA.
  • Patient who has allergies to any of the excipients of study drug or any other murine and human proteins, or patient with a hypersensitivity to immunoglobulin products.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • INTER CLINIC Piotr Adrian Klimiuk

    Bialystok

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Active-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of Two Intravenous Infusion Formulations of Tocilizumab (CT-P47 and RoActemra) When Co-administered With Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

This is a phase 3 study to compare efficacy and safety of CT-P47 and RoActemra in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis.

Read the detailed description

CT-P47, containing the active ingredient tocilizumab, is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that is being developed as a similar biological medicinal product to RoActemra/Actemra. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety of CT-P47 and RoActemra in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis when co-administered with methotrexate.

Being tested
CT-P47, EU-approved RoActemra
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CT-P47Biological

    CT-P47, 8 mg/kg (not exceeding 800 mg/dose) by intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks (Q4W)

  • EU-approved RoActemraBiological

    EU-approved RoActemra, 8 mg/kg (not exceeding 800 mg/dose) by IV infusion Q4W

Study groups in NCT05489224
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CT-P47ExperimentalCT-P47(Tocilizumab)
Receives: Biological: CT-P47
EU-approved RoActemraActive comparatorEU-approved RoActemra(Tocilizumab)
Receives: Biological: CT-P47; Biological: EU-approved RoActemra

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 24

    The DAS28(ESR) score was derived using the following formulae:

    DAS28 (ESR)=(0.56 ×√TJC28)+(0.28 × √SJC28)+(0.70 × ln[ESR])+(0.014 ×GH)

    Where:

    • TJC28 = number of tender joints (0-28): tender joint count (TJC)
    • SJC28 = number of swollen joints (0-28): swollen joint count (SJC)
    • ESR = ESR measurement (mm/hour)
    • GH = patient's global disease activity measured on VAS (mm: 0-100)

    DAS28 (ESR) values could be ranged from 0 to 10 while higher values mean a higher disease activity.

    Measured: Week 24

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Mean Change From Baseline in DAS28 (ESR) at Week 32

    The DAS28(ESR) score was derived using the following formulae:

    DAS28 (ESR)=(0.56 ×√TJC28)+(0.28 × √SJC28)+(0.70 × ln[ESR])+(0.014 ×GH)

    Where:

    • TJC28 = number of tender joints (0-28): tender joint count (TJC)
    • SJC28 = number of swollen joints (0-28): swollen joint count (SJC)
    • ESR = ESR measurement (mm/hour)
    • GH = patient's global disease activity measured on VAS (mm: 0-100)

    DAS28 (ESR) values could be ranged from 0 to 10 while higher values mean a higher disease activity.

    Measured: Week 32

  2. ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Response Rate at Week 24

    ACR20 is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in the three of the following five criteria: 1) patient global assessment of disease activity, 2) physician global assessment of disease activity, 3) functional ability measure using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 4) visual analog pain scale, and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP). ACR50 and ACR70 are the same instruments with improvement levels defined as 50% and 70% respectively versus 20% for ACR20.

    Measured: Week 24

  3. ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 Response Rate at Week 32

    ACR20 is defined as both improvement of 20% in the number of tender and number of swollen joints, and a 20% improvement in the three of the following five criteria: 1) patient global assessment of disease activity, 2) physician global assessment of disease activity, 3) functional ability measure using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 4) visual analog pain scale, and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP). ACR50 and ACR70 are the same instruments with improvement levels defined as 50% and 70% respectively versus 20% for ACR20.

    Measured: Week 32

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2022
  2. Study start14 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion29 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion23 Nov 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
471 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05489224
Sponsor's protocol ID
CT-P47 3.1
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
24 Jul 2022
Last updated
8 Oct 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Burmester G, Trefler J, Racewicz A, Jaworski J, Zielinska A, Krogulec M, Jeka S, Wojciechowski R, Kolossa K, Dudek A, Krajewska-Wlodarczyk M, Hrycaj P, Klimiuk PA, Kim S, Suh J, Yang G, Kim Y, Jung Y, Park G, Smolen JS. Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar CT-P47 Versus Reference Tocilizumab: 1-Year Results of a Randomised, Active-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase III Study in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Drug Investig. 2025 Aug;45(8):551-563. doi: 10.1007/s40261-025-01453-8. Epub 2025 Jul 12.

    PubMed 40650731

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing CT-P47 and EU-approved RoActemra in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Celltrion at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Oct 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05489224, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in