Ventilator LungNCT05490147
Effect of Low Tidal Ventilation on Intraoperative Bleeding in Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy
A study testing conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) group and low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volume in people with Ventilator Lung and Liver Cirrhosis, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
This randomized controlled study's objective is to find a safer mechanical ventilation strategy to reduce intraoperative bleeding in liver cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic major liver resection. The hypothesis is that low tidal volume ventilation in laparoscopic major hepatectomy results in less bleeding. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventilator Lung, Liver Cirrhosis, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) group and low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volume
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 8 Aug 2022to 8 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma scheduled for laparoscopic major hepatectomy, defined as resection of more than 30% of non-anatomical resection or more than 3 segments
Who cannot join
- ASA class >4
- patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- patients with Child-Pugh score C
- patients with arrythmia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Hye-Yeon Cho contact
About this study
Official title: Effect of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation Strategy Combined Goal -Directed Fluid Therapy on Intraoperative Bleeding Undergoing Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy in Liver Cancer Patients: a Surgeon Blinded Randomized Controlled Study
This randomized controlled study's objective is to find a safer mechanical ventilation strategy to reduce intraoperative bleeding in liver cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic major liver resection. The hypothesis is that low tidal volume ventilation in laparoscopic major hepatectomy results in less bleeding.
Read the detailed description
Patients are randomized into the conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) group and low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volume group and ventilated accordingly throughout the surgery. All patients undergo general anesthesia with propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium and are intubated with an endotracheal tube (ID 7.0 for females, ID 7.5 for males). Anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane, end tidal CO2 is targeted between 30-35mmHg. The radial artery is cannulated and connected to the Flotrac sensor and goal directed fluid therapy is done. The estimated blood loss is checked as the primary outcome. In addition postoperative complications, transfusion amounts, operation time, satisfaction of the surgeon and participants are also recorded.
- Being tested
- conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) group, low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volume
- Medical subject headings
- Liver Cirrhosis, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Blood Loss, Surgical
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) groupProcedure or surgery
In the conventional tidal volume group, patients are ventilated with a tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12.
low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volumeProcedure or surgery
In the low tidal volume group, patients are ventilated with a tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 6~8.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) group | Experimental | In the conventional tidal volume group, patients are ventilated with a tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12 throughout the surgery. Receives: Procedure: conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) group |
| low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volume | Experimental | In the low tidal volume group, patients are ventilated with a tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 6~8 throughout the surgery. Receives: Procedure: low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volume |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intraoperative blood loss
amount drained from peritoneal cavity - irrigation fluid
Measured: during surgery
Secondary outcomes (11)
postoperative lung complications
atelectasis, pneumonia
Measured: op end ~ postoperative 2 weeks
transfusion amount
RBC, FFP, platelet
Measured: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative hemoglobin level
postoperative hemoglobin
Measured: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative total bilirubin level
postoperative total bilirubin level
Measured: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative PT INR level
postoperative PT INR level
Measured: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative aspartate aminotransferase level
postoperative aspartate aminotransferase level
Measured: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative alanine aminotransferase level
postoperative alanine aminotransferase level
Measured: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative serum creatinine level
postoperative serum creatinine level
Measured: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
operation time
operation time
Measured: during surgery
amount of crystalloids infused
amount of crystalloids infused
Measured: during surgery
Satisfaction scale of the operator and participants
easy 0 - 10 difficult
Measured: during surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2022
- Study start8 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion8 Aug 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion8 Aug 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ventilator LungStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- a surgeon blinded randomized controlled study
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Seong Mi Yang, Principal investigator, Seoul National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05490147
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2206-069-1332
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 31 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Hendi M, Lv J, Cai XJ. Current status of laparoscopic hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 17;100(50):e27826. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027826.
PubMed 34918631Nomi T, Fuks D, Govindasamy M, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B. Risk factors for complications after laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg. 2015 Feb;102(3):254-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9726. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
PubMed 25522176Jones RM, Moulton CE, Hardy KJ. Central venous pressure and its effect on blood loss during liver resection. Br J Surg. 1998 Aug;85(8):1058-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00795.x.
PubMed 9717995Kobayashi S, Honda G, Kurata M, Tadano S, Sakamoto K, Okuda Y, Abe K. An Experimental Study on the Relationship Among Airway Pressure, Pneumoperitoneum Pressure, and Central Venous Pressure in Pure Laparoscopic Hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2016 Jun;263(6):1159-63. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001482.
PubMed 26595124Gao X, Xiong Y, Huang J, Zhang N, Li J, Zheng S, Lu K, Ma D, Yang B, Ning J. The Effect of Mechanical Ventilation With Low Tidal Volume on Blood Loss During Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):1033-1041. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005242.
PubMed 33060490Katz SC, Shia J, Liau KH, Gonen M, Ruo L, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, D'Angelica MI, Blumgart LH, Dematteo RP. Operative blood loss independently predicts recurrence and survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):617-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ed22f.
PubMed 19300227Dunki-Jacobs EM, Philips P, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Martin RC 2nd. Stroke volume variation in hepatic resection: a replacement for standard central venous pressure monitoring. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(2):473-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3323-9. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
PubMed 24150192Correa-Gallego C, Tan KS, Arslan-Carlon V, Gonen M, Denis SC, Langdon-Embry L, Grant F, Kingham TP, DeMatteo RP, Allen PJ, D'Angelica MI, Jarnagin WR, Fischer M. Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Using Stroke Volume Variation for Resuscitation after Low Central Venous Pressure-Assisted Liver Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):591-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.050. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
PubMed 26206652Ratti F, Cipriani F, Reineke R, Catena M, Paganelli M, Comotti L, Beretta L, Aldrighetti L. Intraoperative monitoring of stroke volume variation versus central venous pressure in laparoscopic liver surgery: a randomized prospective comparative trial. HPB (Oxford). 2016 Feb;18(2):136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
PubMed 26902132Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, Marret E, Beaussier M, Gutton C, Lefrant JY, Allaouchiche B, Verzilli D, Leone M, De Jong A, Bazin JE, Pereira B, Jaber S; IMPROVE Study Group. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 1;369(5):428-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301082.
PubMed 23902482Serpa Neto A, Schultz MJ, Gama de Abreu M. Intraoperative ventilation strategies to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Sep;29(3):331-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
PubMed 26643098
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation Strategy Combined Goal -Directed Fluid Therapy on Intraoperative Bleeding Undergoing Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomy in Liver Cancer Patients: a Surgeon Blinded Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05490147
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2206-069-1332
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Aug 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 8 Aug 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 8 Aug 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized controlled study's objective is to find a safer mechanical ventilation strategy to reduce intraoperative bleeding in liver cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic major liver resection. The hypothesis is that low tidal volume ventilation in laparoscopic major hepatectomy results in less bleeding.
Detailed description
Patients are randomized into the conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) group and low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volume group and ventilated accordingly throughout the surgery. All patients undergo general anesthesia with propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium and are intubated with an endotracheal tube (ID 7.0 for females, ID 7.5 for males). Anesthesia is maintained with sevoflurane, end tidal CO2 is targeted between 30-35mmHg. The radial artery is cannulated and connected to the Flotrac sensor and goal directed fluid therapy is done. The estimated blood loss is checked as the primary outcome. In addition postoperative complications, transfusion amounts, operation time, satisfaction of the surgeon and participants are also recorded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- a surgeon blinded randomized controlled study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) group | Experimental | Procedure: conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) groupIn the conventional tidal volume group, patients are ventilated with a tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12 throughout the surgery. |
| low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volume | Experimental | Procedure: low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volumeIn the low tidal volume group, patients are ventilated with a tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 6~8 throughout the surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma scheduled for laparoscopic major hepatectomy, defined as resection of more than 30% of non-anatomical resection or more than 3 segments
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- ASA class >4
- patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- patients with Child-Pugh score C
- patients with arrythmia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) groupIn the conventional tidal volume group, patients are ventilated with a tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12. | Procedure or surgery | conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) group |
| low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volumeIn the low tidal volume group, patients are ventilated with a tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 6~8. | Procedure or surgery | low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volume |
Primary outcome
Intraoperative blood loss
Time frame: during surgery
amount drained from peritoneal cavity - irrigation fluid
11 secondary outcomes
postoperative lung complications
Time frame: op end ~ postoperative 2 weeks
transfusion amount
Time frame: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative hemoglobin level
Time frame: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative total bilirubin level
Time frame: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative PT INR level
Time frame: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative aspartate aminotransferase level
Time frame: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative alanine aminotransferase level
Time frame: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
postoperative serum creatinine level
Time frame: op. end ~ postoperative day 3
operation time
Time frame: during surgery
amount of crystalloids infused
Time frame: during surgery
Satisfaction scale of the operator and participants
Time frame: during surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2022.
- Background: PubMed 34918631Hendi M, Lv J, Cai XJ. Current status of laparoscopic hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 17;100(50):e27826. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027826.
- Background: PubMed 25522176Nomi T, Fuks D, Govindasamy M, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B. Risk factors for complications after laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg. 2015 Feb;102(3):254-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9726. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
- Background: PubMed 9717995Jones RM, Moulton CE, Hardy KJ. Central venous pressure and its effect on blood loss during liver resection. Br J Surg. 1998 Aug;85(8):1058-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00795.x.
- Background: PubMed 26595124Kobayashi S, Honda G, Kurata M, Tadano S, Sakamoto K, Okuda Y, Abe K. An Experimental Study on the Relationship Among Airway Pressure, Pneumoperitoneum Pressure, and Central Venous Pressure in Pure Laparoscopic Hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2016 Jun;263(6):1159-63. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001482.
- Background: PubMed 33060490Gao X, Xiong Y, Huang J, Zhang N, Li J, Zheng S, Lu K, Ma D, Yang B, Ning J. The Effect of Mechanical Ventilation With Low Tidal Volume on Blood Loss During Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):1033-1041. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005242.
- Background: PubMed 19300227Katz SC, Shia J, Liau KH, Gonen M, Ruo L, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, D'Angelica MI, Blumgart LH, Dematteo RP. Operative blood loss independently predicts recurrence and survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):617-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ed22f.
- Background: PubMed 24150192Dunki-Jacobs EM, Philips P, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Martin RC 2nd. Stroke volume variation in hepatic resection: a replacement for standard central venous pressure monitoring. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Feb;21(2):473-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3323-9. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
- Background: PubMed 26206652Correa-Gallego C, Tan KS, Arslan-Carlon V, Gonen M, Denis SC, Langdon-Embry L, Grant F, Kingham TP, DeMatteo RP, Allen PJ, D'Angelica MI, Jarnagin WR, Fischer M. Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Using Stroke Volume Variation for Resuscitation after Low Central Venous Pressure-Assisted Liver Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):591-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.050. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
- Background: PubMed 26902132Ratti F, Cipriani F, Reineke R, Catena M, Paganelli M, Comotti L, Beretta L, Aldrighetti L. Intraoperative monitoring of stroke volume variation versus central venous pressure in laparoscopic liver surgery: a randomized prospective comparative trial. HPB (Oxford). 2016 Feb;18(2):136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
- Background: PubMed 23902482Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, Marret E, Beaussier M, Gutton C, Lefrant JY, Allaouchiche B, Verzilli D, Leone M, De Jong A, Bazin JE, Pereira B, Jaber S; IMPROVE Study Group. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 1;369(5):428-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301082.
- Background: PubMed 26643098Serpa Neto A, Schultz MJ, Gama de Abreu M. Intraoperative ventilation strategies to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Sep;29(3):331-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
Related trials for Ventilator Lung
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
Recruiting
Optimization of Saturation Targets And Resuscitation Trial (OptiSTART)
Premature Infants, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Recruiting
Controlled Remote Monitoring and Optimization of Oxygen Therapy in Preterm Infants
BPD - Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Pulmonary Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hye-Yeon Cho contact
Seong Mi Yang principal investigator
Seoul National University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing conventional tidal volume (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg]* 10~12) group and low tidal (tidal volume [ml]= ideal body weight [kg] * 6~8) volume in people with Ventilator Lung and Liver Cirrhosis, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Seong Mi Yang (+82-10-7300-6282, seongmi.yang@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intraoperative blood loss (time frame: during surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05490147, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2022.