AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental Health Wellness 1NCT05490979

The Impact of Dyad Exercises on Well-being and Connection in Young Adults

A study testing Contemplative dyad meditation and Fast friends in people with Mental Health Wellness 1 and Loneliness, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Many people are experiencing low well-being and loneliness, particularly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As the world is opening back up, it is crucial to determine methods to help people grow closer again and boost subjective well-being. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Mental Health Wellness 1, Loneliness
What is being tested?
Contemplative dyad meditation and Fast friends
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Sep 2022to 3 Oct 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Current student, staff, or employee at the University of Pennsylvania (for safety reasons)

Who cannot join

  • none

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness and Physiological Mechanisms of Contemplative Dyad Meditation to Increase Social Connection in Young Adults in the Aftermath of the Pandemic

Many people are experiencing low well-being and loneliness, particularly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As the world is opening back up, it is crucial to determine methods to help people grow closer again and boost subjective well-being. One promising method is contemplative dyad meditation, which has hardly been studied. This is a method in which two people have a structured dialogue with each other while contemplating a prompt, as they alternate between listening and speaking. It is related to but different from other methods that have previously been shown to increase connection, such as the "fast friends" exercise. In "fast friends", two people answer a series of increasingly personal questions in a dialogue.

Here, 180 participants between 18-35 years will be randomly allocated to three conditions (stratified by gender): (a) contemplative dyad meditation training, (b) "fast friends", or (c) no-intervention. Participants in the dyad meditation group will receive professional meditation training followed by 2 weeks of regular meditation practice. Participants in the "fast friends" group will meet regularly during 2 weeks to practice "fast friends" exercises. The impact of the interventions on well-being, loneliness, mindfulness, and related measures will be investigated. After the interventions have finished, participants' physiology (heart rate) and brain waves (using electroencephalography [EEG]) during the respective exercises will also be measured to explore potential biological mechanisms. Of particular interest are heart rate variability (HRV, often linked with higher well-being), frontal alpha asymmetry in the EEG (linked with positive affect and approach), and biological synchrony in these variables between the two interacting individuals.

Read more

Both dyad meditations and "fast friends" exercises are predicted to improve closeness, thriving, loneliness, affect, depression, anxiety, and social interaction anxiety compared to no-intervention. Moreover, dyad meditation is predicted to have stronger effects than "fast friends" in terms of increasing mindfulness, self-compassion, and empathy. Dyad meditation and fast friends will show differential physiological signatures (e.g., lower heart rate and higher averaged alpha power for meditation).

This study may reveal effective methods to improve well-being and connection and provide insights into their biological mechanisms.

Being tested
Contemplative dyad meditation, Fast friends

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Contemplative dyad meditationBehavioural

    Participants take part in a 3-hour group meditation training led by a professional meditation teacher. They receive detailed instructions and also practice contemplative dyad meditation for at least 30 minutes with another participant. During the 2 weeks following the training, participants meet in supervised group settings to practice the meditation method with alternating partners for up to 6 times.

  • Fast friendsBehavioural

    During 2 weeks, participants meet in supervised group settings to practice the 'fast friends' exercise with alternating partners for up to 6 times.

Study groups in NCT05490979
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Contemplative dyad meditationExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Contemplative dyad meditation
Fast friendsActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Fast friends
No interventionNo interventionNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Brief Inventory of Thriving

    The Brief Inventory of Thriving (Su, Tay, \& Diener, 2014) is a questionnaire consisting of 10 items, measuring psychological well-being. Scores range from 1 to 5 with a higher score indicating more thriving (i.e., higher well-being).

    Measured: 3 weeks

  2. Loneliness Scores on the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving

    The Loneliness sub-scale from the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (Su, Tay, \& Diener, 2014) consists of 3 items. Scores range from 1 to 5 with a higher score indicating higher loneliness.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  3. Mindfulness Score on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire

    The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (Baer et al., 2006) consists of 39 items. Scores for mindfulness range between 1 and 5 with a higher score indicating more mindfulness.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  4. Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale

    The Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale (Aron, Aron, \& Smollan, 1992) consists of 7 response options measuring closeness to another person (here: the meditation or exercise partner). The response options each show two circles labeled as" "Self" and "Other", which vary in terms of overlap, from barely touching (1, i.e., not close at all) to almost completely overlapping (7, i.e., extremely close).

    Measured: Directly after each individual meditation or "fast friends" exercise

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Positive Affect Scores on the Negative And Positive Affect Scale

    The 10-item version of the Negative And Positive Affect Scale by Joshanloo (2017) contains 5 items measuring positive affect. Scores for positive affect from these 5 items range from 5 to 25 with 25 indicating higher positive affect. The scale is used here with the following adaptation: it asks about the previous 14 days rather than 30 days.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  2. Negative Affect Scores on the Negative And Positive Affect Scale

    The 10-item version of the Negative And Positive Affect Scale (NAPAS) by Joshanloo (2017) contains 5 items measuring negative affect. Scores for negative affect from these 5 items range from 5 to 25 with 25 indicating higher negative affect. The scale is used here with the following adaptation: it asks about the previous 14 days rather than 30 days.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  3. Depression Scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 consists of 9 items and measures the severity of depression. Scores range from 0 to 27 with a higher score indicating more severe depression.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  4. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item questionnaire screens for general anxiety disorder. Scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  5. Social Interaction Anxiety Scale-6

    The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale-6 (Peters et al., 2012) is a 6-item measure assessing social interaction anxiety. Scores range from 0 to 24 with 24 indicating more severe social anxiety.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  6. Self-Compassion Scale Short-Form

    The short form of the Self-Compassion Scale (Raes et al., 2011) includes 12 items. Scores range from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating more self-compassion. Change = (Week 3 Score - Baseline Score).

    Measured: 3 weeks

  7. Toronto Empathy Questionnaire

    The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire consists of 16 items. Scores range from 0 to 64 with higher scores indicating higher empathy.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  8. Positive Affect Scores on the Negative And Positive Affect Scale

    The 10-item version of the Negative And Positive Affect Scale by Joshanloo (2017) contains 5 items measuring positive affect. Scores for positive affect from these 5 items range from 5 to 25 with 25 indicating higher positive affect. The scale is used here with the following adaptation: it asks about the current moment rather than the past 30 days. Response options are adapted to vary from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).

    Measured: Directly after each individual meditation or "fast friends" exercise

  9. Negative Affect Scores on the Negative And Positive Affect Scale

    The 10-item version of the Negative And Positive Affect Scale (NAPAS) by Joshanloo (2017) contains 5 items measuring negative affect. Scores for negative affect from these 5 items range from 5 to 25 with 25 indicating higher negative affect. The scale is used here with the following adaptation: it asks about the current moment rather than the past 30 days. Response options are adapted to vary from 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).

    Measured: Directly after each individual meditation or "fast friends" exercise

  10. Emotional synchrony

    Average correlation between emotions of the 2 people doing the exercise together, as reported with regards to the last 5 minutes of the meditation or the "fast friends" exercise. The following emotions (taken from the short version of the Negative and Positive Affect scale by Joshanloo) will be rated by both participants: restless/fidgety, hopeless, that everything was an effort, in good spirits, calm and peaceful, full of life.

    Measured: Directly after each individual meditation or "fast friends" exercise

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Aug 2022
  2. Study start6 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion22 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion3 Oct 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05490979
Sponsor's protocol ID
#10085952
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
4 Aug 2022
Last updated
5 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Contemplative dyad meditation and Fast friends in people with Mental Health Wellness 1 and Loneliness, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Brief Inventory of Thriving (time frame: 3 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in