Lung CancerNCT05491239
Optimal Postoperative Pain Management After Lung Surgery (OPtriAL)
A study testing Thoracic epidural analgesia, Continuous regional paravertebral block and Single shot intercostal nerve block in people with Lung Cancer and Pain, Postoperative, run by Maxima Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Adequate pain control after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung resection is important to improve postoperative mobilisation, recovery, and to prevent pulmonary complications. So far, no consensus exists on optimal postoperative pain management after VATS anatomic lung resection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer, Pain, Postoperative, VATS
- What is being tested?
- Thoracic epidural analgesia, Continuous regional paravertebral block and Single shot intercostal nerve block
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 1 Nov 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients (>18 years)
- Patients referred for anatomic lung resection (pneumonectomy, (bi)lobectomy or segmentectomy for either benign or malignant disease) with the intention of performing it by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS)
- Patients should be able to provide informed consent and fill out questionnaires in Dutch language.
Who cannot join
- Patients with contra-indications for TEA or PVB (infection at skin site, increased intracranial pressure, non-correctable coagulopathy, bridging indication for therapeutic anticoagulation (CHADS-VASc ≥ 8), sepsis and mechanical spine obstruction) or allergic reactions to local anaesthetics will be excluded.
- Patients chronically using opioids for reasons not related to the operation will be excluded from the study since postoperative baseline opioid requirement will be higher and TEA remains the preferred technique for these patients.
- In case the lung surgeon estimates the operation to be performed through a thoracotomy instead of VATS/RATS
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Optimal Postoperative Pain Management After Lung Surgery (OPtriAL): Multi-centre Randomised Trial
Adequate pain control after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung resection is important to improve postoperative mobilisation, recovery, and to prevent pulmonary complications. So far, no consensus exists on optimal postoperative pain management after VATS anatomic lung resection.
Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the reference standard for postoperative pain management following VATS. Although the analgesic effect of TEA is clear, it is associated with patient immobilisation, bladder dysfunction and hypotension which may result in delayed recovery and longer hospitalisation. These disadvantages of TEA initiated the development of unilateral regional techniques for pain management. The most frequently used techniques are continuous paravertebral block (PVB) and single-shot intercostal nerve block (ICNB).
The investigators hypothesize that using either PVB or ICNB is non-inferior to TEA regarding postoperative pain and superior regarding quality of recovery (QoR). Signifying faster postoperative mobilisation, reduced morbidity and shorter hospitalisation, these techniques may therefore reduce health care costs and improve patient satisfaction.
- Being tested
- Thoracic epidural analgesia, Continuous regional paravertebral block, Single shot intercostal nerve block
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Thoracic epidural analgesiaProcedure or surgery
After correct placement of the epidural catheter, a local anaesthetic (ropivacaine, levobupivacaine or bupivacaine) will be started and, according to in house protocols, an opioid will be added to the epidural solution. A provisional stop of the administration of the epidural infusion is planned after 48 hours (on the second postoperative day).
Continuous regional paravertebral blockProcedure or surgery
The PVB catheter is placed under general anaesthesia at the beginning of the VATS procedure under direct thoracoscopic vision. The level of the PVB catheter placement is chosen at the intercostal space of the largest incision (mostly thoracic level 4 or 5). Under direct thoracoscopic vision, the surgeon inserts a Touhy needle. The tip of the needle is observed beneath the pleural surface thoracoscopically. Injection of about 2 mL ropivacaine 7.5mg/mL will create subpleural hydrodissection to reach the adequate paravertebral plane for placement of the catheter. The PVB catheter is subsequently placed under direct thoracoscopic vision and left next to the sympathetic chain in the paravertebral space. Next, a bolus of ropivacaine (total amount 20 mL including the given amount for hydrodissection) is given through the catheter.
Postoperatively, a ropivacaine 2 mg/mL pump for continuous infusion is given with an infusion rate of 8-14 ml/hour.
Single shot intercostal nerve blockProcedure or surgery
At the end of the surgery a single shot ICNB will be placed at 9 levels (thoracic level 2 to 10) with 2-3mL local anaesthetics per intercostal space under direct thoracoscopic vision. The injection site will be chosen just lateral from the sympathetic trunk. This group will have no analgesic catheters for continuous analgesia. No mobility restrictions are instructed in this group.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Thoracic epidural analgesia | Active comparator | See intervention description Receives: Procedure: Thoracic epidural analgesia |
| Continuous regional paravertebral block | Experimental | See intervention description Receives: Procedure: Continuous regional paravertebral block |
| Single shot intercostal nerve block | Experimental | See intervention description Receives: Procedure: Single shot intercostal nerve block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain scores
Proportion of pain scores ≥4 as assessed by the numerical rating scale (NRS) (measured from 0 until 10; lowest value signifying no pain and highest value signifying worst pain)
Measured: Postoperative day 0-2
Quality of Recovery (QoR)
QoR measured with the QoR-15 questionnaire on postoperative 1 and 2 (maximum score of 150, the higher the score the better the outcome)
Measured: Postoperative day 1-2
Secondary outcomes (5)
cumulative use of opioids and analgesics
total opioid and non-opioid consumption as supplementary analgesic requirement
Measured: Postoperative day 0 until 3 as well as the use and dosage of opioid use at the follow-up period 2-3 weeks after the operation
postoperative complications
according to the Clavien-Dindo classification;
Measured: until 2-3 weeks of follow-up
hospitalisation
defined as the total number of days in hospital after the surgical intervention (including readmissions within the first 30 postoperative days), the following standardised discharge criteria after surgery will be applied in all participating hospitals: normal intake of nutrition, independent mobility, absence of fever (<38 °C), and no presence of chest tube;
Measured: 30 postoperative days
patient satisfaction
5-point Likert scale: not at all satisfied, slightly satisfied, neutral, very satisfied and extremely satisfied
Measured: Postoperative day 0 until 3
degree of mobility
4-point scale: on the bed (1), to the chair (2), to the toilet (3), outside the patient's hospital room(4)
Measured: Postoperative day 0 until 3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Aug 2022
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion1 Oct 2023
- Study completion1 Nov 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a multi-centre randomised three-arm trial comparing continuous PVB, single-shot ICNB and TEA in a 1:1:1 ratio in patients who will undergo a VATS anatomic lung resection. We use a non-inferiority design with respect to the outcome measure 'pain' and a concomitant superiority design regarding 'quality of recovery'.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maxima Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Amsterdam UMC, Radboud University Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Louisa Spaans, Maxima Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05491239
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL75375.041.20
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data will become available for non-commercial scientific research (open access) after a period of 12 months after the last data collection. Data request can be done by contacting the PI.
Publications
Spaans LN, Dijkgraaf MGW, Susa D, de Loos ER, Mourisse JMJ, Bouwman RA, Verhagen AFTM, van den Broek FJC; OPtriAL Study Group; Meijer P, Kuut M, Hanneman N, Bousema J, Franssen A, Brokx H, van Duyn E, Potters JW, van den Broek R, van Brakel T, Rijna H, Boom A, Noyez V, Hendriks JMH, Yogeswaran SK, Dickhoff C, van Dorp M. Intercostal or Paravertebral Block vs Thoracic Epidural in Lung Surgery: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. JAMA Surg. 2025 Aug 1;160(8):855-864. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1899.
PubMed 40560556Spaans LN, Dijkgraaf MGW, Meijer P, Mourisse J, Bouwman RA, Verhagen AFTM, van den Broek FJC; OPtriAL study group. Optimal postoperative pain management after VATS lung resection by thoracic epidural analgesia, continuous paravertebral block or single-shot intercostal nerve block (OPtriAL): study protocol of a three-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Surg. 2022 Sep 4;22(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01765-y.
PubMed 36058900
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimal Postoperative Pain Management After Lung Surgery (OPtriAL): Multi-centre Randomised Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05491239
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NL75375.041.20
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Maxima Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Amsterdam UMC, Radboud University Medical Center
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Adequate pain control after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung resection is important to improve postoperative mobilisation, recovery, and to prevent pulmonary complications. So far, no consensus exists on optimal postoperative pain management after VATS anatomic lung resection.
Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the reference standard for postoperative pain management following VATS. Although the analgesic effect of TEA is clear, it is associated with patient immobilisation, bladder dysfunction and hypotension which may result in delayed recovery and longer hospitalisation. These disadvantages of TEA initiated the development of unilateral regional techniques for pain management. The most frequently used techniques are continuous paravertebral block (PVB) and single-shot intercostal nerve block (ICNB).
The investigators hypothesize that using either PVB or ICNB is non-inferior to TEA regarding postoperative pain and superior regarding quality of recovery (QoR). Signifying faster postoperative mobilisation, reduced morbidity and shorter hospitalisation, these techniques may therefore reduce health care costs and improve patient satisfaction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This is a multi-centre randomised three-arm trial comparing continuous PVB, single-shot ICNB and TEA in a 1:1:1 ratio in patients who will undergo a VATS anatomic lung resection. We use a non-inferiority design with respect to the outcome measure 'pain' and a concomitant superiority design regarding 'quality of recovery'.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Thoracic epidural analgesia | Active comparator | Procedure: Thoracic epidural analgesiaSee intervention description |
| Continuous regional paravertebral block | Experimental | Procedure: Continuous regional paravertebral blockSee intervention description |
| Single shot intercostal nerve block | Experimental | Procedure: Single shot intercostal nerve blockSee intervention description |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patients (>18 years)
- Patients referred for anatomic lung resection (pneumonectomy, (bi)lobectomy or segmentectomy for either benign or malignant disease) with the intention of performing it by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS)
- Patients should be able to provide informed consent and fill out questionnaires in Dutch language.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with contra-indications for TEA or PVB (infection at skin site, increased intracranial pressure, non-correctable coagulopathy, bridging indication for therapeutic anticoagulation (CHADS-VASc ≥ 8), sepsis and mechanical spine obstruction) or allergic reactions to local anaesthetics will be excluded.
- Patients chronically using opioids for reasons not related to the operation will be excluded from the study since postoperative baseline opioid requirement will be higher and TEA remains the preferred technique for these patients.
- In case the lung surgeon estimates the operation to be performed through a thoracotomy instead of VATS/RATS
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Thoracic epidural analgesiaAfter correct placement of the epidural catheter, a local anaesthetic (ropivacaine, levobupivacaine or bupivacaine) will be started and, according to in house protocols, an opioid will be added to the epidural solution. A provisional stop of the administration of the epidural infusion is planned after 48 hours (on the second postoperative day). | Procedure or surgery | Thoracic epidural analgesia |
| Continuous regional paravertebral blockThe PVB catheter is placed under general anaesthesia at the beginning of the VATS procedure under direct thoracoscopic vision. The level of the PVB catheter placement is chosen at the intercostal space of the largest incision (mostly thoracic level 4 or 5). Under direct thoracoscopic vision, the surgeon inserts a Touhy needle. The tip of the needle is observed beneath the pleural surface thoracoscopically. Injection of about 2 mL ropivacaine 7.5mg/mL will create subpleural hydrodissection to reach the adequate paravertebral plane for placement of the catheter. The PVB catheter is subsequently placed under direct thoracoscopic vision and left next to the sympathetic chain in the paravertebral space. Next, a bolus of ropivacaine (total amount 20 mL including the given amount for hydrodissection) is given through the catheter. Postoperatively, a ropivacaine 2 mg/mL pump for continuous infusion is given with an infusion rate of 8-14 ml/hour. | Procedure or surgery | Continuous regional paravertebral block |
| Single shot intercostal nerve blockAt the end of the surgery a single shot ICNB will be placed at 9 levels (thoracic level 2 to 10) with 2-3mL local anaesthetics per intercostal space under direct thoracoscopic vision. The injection site will be chosen just lateral from the sympathetic trunk. This group will have no analgesic catheters for continuous analgesia. No mobility restrictions are instructed in this group. | Procedure or surgery | Single shot intercostal nerve block |
Primary outcome
Pain scores
Time frame: Postoperative day 0-2
Proportion of pain scores ≥4 as assessed by the numerical rating scale (NRS) (measured from 0 until 10; lowest value signifying no pain and highest value signifying worst pain)
Quality of Recovery (QoR)
Time frame: Postoperative day 1-2
QoR measured with the QoR-15 questionnaire on postoperative 1 and 2 (maximum score of 150, the higher the score the better the outcome)
5 secondary outcomes
cumulative use of opioids and analgesics
Time frame: Postoperative day 0 until 3 as well as the use and dosage of opioid use at the follow-up period 2-3 weeks after the operation
postoperative complications
Time frame: until 2-3 weeks of follow-up
hospitalisation
Time frame: 30 postoperative days
patient satisfaction
Time frame: Postoperative day 0 until 3
degree of mobility
Time frame: Postoperative day 0 until 3
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40560556Spaans LN, Dijkgraaf MGW, Susa D, de Loos ER, Mourisse JMJ, Bouwman RA, Verhagen AFTM, van den Broek FJC; OPtriAL Study Group; Meijer P, Kuut M, Hanneman N, Bousema J, Franssen A, Brokx H, van Duyn E, Potters JW, van den Broek R, van Brakel T, Rijna H, Boom A, Noyez V, Hendriks JMH, Yogeswaran SK, Dickhoff C, van Dorp M. Intercostal or Paravertebral Block vs Thoracic Epidural in Lung Surgery: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. JAMA Surg. 2025 Aug 1;160(8):855-864. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1899.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36058900Spaans LN, Dijkgraaf MGW, Meijer P, Mourisse J, Bouwman RA, Verhagen AFTM, van den Broek FJC; OPtriAL study group. Optimal postoperative pain management after VATS lung resection by thoracic epidural analgesia, continuous paravertebral block or single-shot intercostal nerve block (OPtriAL): study protocol of a three-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Surg. 2022 Sep 4;22(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01765-y.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data will become available for non-commercial scientific research (open access) after a period of 12 months after the last data collection. Data request can be done by contacting the PI.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Comparing TAK-928 With Docetaxel in Adults With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
IO Resistant Squamous and Nonsquamous NSCLC
RecruitingPhase 3
MK-3475A±Calderasib (MK-1084) in Completely Resected Stage IIA-IIIB (N2) KRAS G12Cm NSCLC (MK-1084-013)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Navlimetostat (BMS-986504) Monotherapy and in Combination With Other Agents in Participants With Advanced and/or Metastatic Solid Tumors With Homozygous MTAP Deletion (MountainTAP-5)
Solid Tumors
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Trial of KAN-001 With Pembrolizumab, With or Without Chemotherapy, in Participants With PD-L1-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
RNA Lipid Particles Targeting Pediatric Recurrent Intracranial Malignancies and Other systEmic Solid Tumors
Recurrent Pulmonary Osteosarcoma, Recurrent High-grade Glioma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Thoracic epidural analgesia, Continuous regional paravertebral block and Single shot intercostal nerve block in people with Lung Cancer and Pain, Postoperative, run by Maxima Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain scores (time frame: Postoperative day 0-2). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05491239, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2024.