Delayed Cord ClampingNCT05492214
The Effect of Time Window for Umbilical Cord Clamping During Cesareans on Offspring Hemoglobin and Maternal Blood Loss
A study testing Delayed cord clamping (30s), Delayed cord clamping (60s) and Delayed cord clamping (90s) in people with Delayed Cord Clamping and Hemoglobin, run by Peking University at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
This is a randomized controlled trial, aiming to evaluate the effects of time window for umbilical cord clamping during cesarean section on the health outcomes of offspring hemoglobin,maternal blood loss,and children's growth and development. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Delayed Cord Clamping, Hemoglobin, Blood Loss
- What is being tested?
- Delayed cord clamping (30s), Delayed cord clamping (60s) and Delayed cord clamping (90s)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 360 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 22 Sep 2022to Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- local resident in Liuyang city, Huantai county and their surrounding areas
- Singleton pregnancy
- Elective caesarean, or cesarean section after the start of labor but the cervix is less than 3 cm
- Term pregnancy (≥37 weeks of gestation), and the fetal weight was estimated ≥2500g by intrauterine ultrasound
- Written informed consent is obtained
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women with the following risk factors: severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥110mmHg), preeclampsia, chronic hypertension with preeclampsia, diabetes mellitus with severe microangiopathy, placenta previa, placenta implantation, placental abruption, intrauterine distress, prenatal infection, severe anemia (hemoglobin<7g/dL), coagulation disorders, thrombosis disease
- Plan to retain cord blood
- Rh-negative pregnant women
- Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormalities which may lead to difficulties in cesareans or adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as abnormal heart monitoring, fetal distress, malformation, anemia, and intrauterine growth restrictions
- Other conditions not suitable for intervention as judged by obstetricians
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
China2 sites
Liuyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital
Guankou, Hunan, 410399
Women and Children's Health Care Hospital of Huantai
Zibo, Shandong, 256499
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Time Window for Umbilical Cord Clamping During Cesarean Section on the Health Outcomes of Offspring Hemoglobin and Maternal Blood Loss
This is a randomized controlled trial, aiming to evaluate the effects of time window for umbilical cord clamping during cesarean section on the health outcomes of offspring hemoglobin,maternal blood loss,and children's growth and development. It will be conducted in Liuyang city and Huantai county of China, and the targeted sample size is 360 (180 in each site). All the eligible pregnant women will be randomly assigned to one of the four groups (three intervention groups and one control group), and their babies will be followed up to 18 months of age.
Read the detailed description
The World Health Organization and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have recommended a delay in umbilical cord clamping after birth, irrespective of delivery modes, which was based on studies from vaginal deliveries rather than cesareans. In cesareans, the optimal time window for umbilical cord clamping has not been determined, and the relevant safety data are limited. In this randomized study, the investigators aim to evaluate the impacts of time window for umbilical cord clamping during cesarean section on maternal and child health outcomes, and to evaluate the optimal timing of the clamping. The investigators are planning to enroll 360 pregnant women scheduled for cesareans, and to randomly allocate them into four groups: the umbilical cord will be clamped within 15 seconds (immediately), or delayed after deliveries for 30, 60, and 90 seconds, respectively. Babies will be followed up at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months of age. Maternal hemoglobin before and after cesareans, neonatal hemoglobin, children's hemoglobin at 6, 12, 18 months of age will be measured. At each follow-up visit, children's length and weight will be measured, their development will be assessed, and a questionnaire survey including information on feeding, sleep, and medication will be conducted. The primary outcomes are the neonatal hemoglobin and the change in maternal hemoglobin. The secondary outcomes include the incidence rate of neonatal anemia and jaundice, Apgar score, the incidence rate of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, placental weight, maternal hemoglobin after the cesarean, estimated maternal blood loss, and the incidence rate of maternal blood transfusion. In addition, the children's hemoglobin, anemia, growth and development are considered as the exploratory secondary outcomes.
- Conditions
- Delayed Cord Clamping, Hemoglobin, Blood Loss
- Being tested
- Delayed cord clamping (30s), Delayed cord clamping (60s), Delayed cord clamping (90s)
- Keywords
- Cesarean delivery, Time window for umbilical cord clamping, Maternal and neonatal health outcome, Anemia, Randomized controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Hemorrhage, Anemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Delayed cord clamping (30s)Procedure or surgery
The same as that stated in arm descriptions.
Delayed cord clamping (60s)Procedure or surgery
The same as that stated in arm descriptions.
Delayed cord clamping (90s)Procedure or surgery
The same as that stated in arm descriptions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Delay 30s group | Experimental | Cord clamping will be delayed at 30 seconds after delivery. Receives: Procedure: Delayed cord clamping (30s) |
| Delay 60s group | Experimental | Cord clamping will be delayed at 60 seconds after delivery. Receives: Procedure: Delayed cord clamping (60s) |
| Delay 90s group | Experimental | Cord clamping will be delayed at 90 seconds after delivery. Receives: Procedure: Delayed cord clamping (90s) |
| Control group | No intervention | Cord clamping will be immediate (within 15 seconds) after delivery, in accordance with the standard practice in the study sites |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The neonatal hemoglobin
In the heel blood
Measured: Within 72 hours after birth
The change in maternal hemoglobin
Difference in maternal hemoglobin levels before and after the cesarean
Measured: Within 72 hours before the cesarean, and within 72 hours after the cesarean
Secondary outcomes (8)
The incidence rate of neonatal anemia
Defined as hemoglobin <145g/L
Measured: Within 72 hours after birth
The incidence rate of neonatal jaundice
The incidence rate of neonatal jaundice
Measured: Before discharging from hospitals, usually within 1 week after birth
Apgar score
An indicator for the activity, pulse, grimace, appearance, and respiration of neonates. It ranges from 0 to 10, the higher the better.
Measured: At 1 min, 5 min, and 10 min after birth
The incidence rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission
The incidence rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission
Measured: Before discharging from hospitals, usually within 1 week after birth
Placental weight
In grams
Measured: At birth
Maternal hemoglobin after the cesarean
In venous blood
Measured: Within 72 hours after the cesarean
Estimated maternal blood loss
By volume-method and area-method
Measured: During the cesarean
The incidence rate of maternal blood transfusion
The incidence rate of maternal blood transfusion
Measured: At delivery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Aug 2022
- Study start22 Sep 2022
- Primary completion8 May 2023
- Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Delayed Cord ClampingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Natural Science Foundation of China, Liuyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Women and Children's Health Care Hospital of Huantai
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jianmeng Liu, Principal investigator, Peking UniversityHongtian Li, Study director, Peking University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05492214
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NSFC.82173528
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 31 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The IPD will be shared upon the request of other researchers, and all the key variables that will be reported in the main paper are planned to be shared
Publications
Song Q, Li H, Mu Y, Xiong Y, Liu Y, Liu Y, Jin C, Huang X, Zhao L, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Liu J. Effects of Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping at Different Timings on Neonatal Hemoglobin and Maternal Blood Loss During Cesarean Delivery at Term: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr. 2025 Aug;283:114620. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114620. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
PubMed 40280473
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Time Window for Umbilical Cord Clamping During Cesarean Section on the Health Outcomes of Offspring Hemoglobin and Maternal Blood Loss
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05492214
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NSFC.82173528
- Conditions
- Delayed Cord Clamping, Hemoglobin, Blood Loss
- Keywords
- Cesarean delivery, Time window for umbilical cord clamping, Maternal and neonatal health outcome, Anemia, Randomized controlled trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Natural Science Foundation of China, Liuyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Women and Children's Health Care Hospital of Huantai
- Study start
- 22 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized controlled trial, aiming to evaluate the effects of time window for umbilical cord clamping during cesarean section on the health outcomes of offspring hemoglobin,maternal blood loss,and children's growth and development. It will be conducted in Liuyang city and Huantai county of China, and the targeted sample size is 360 (180 in each site). All the eligible pregnant women will be randomly assigned to one of the four groups (three intervention groups and one control group), and their babies will be followed up to 18 months of age.
Detailed description
The World Health Organization and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have recommended a delay in umbilical cord clamping after birth, irrespective of delivery modes, which was based on studies from vaginal deliveries rather than cesareans. In cesareans, the optimal time window for umbilical cord clamping has not been determined, and the relevant safety data are limited. In this randomized study, the investigators aim to evaluate the impacts of time window for umbilical cord clamping during cesarean section on maternal and child health outcomes, and to evaluate the optimal timing of the clamping. The investigators are planning to enroll 360 pregnant women scheduled for cesareans, and to randomly allocate them into four groups: the umbilical cord will be clamped within 15 seconds (immediately), or delayed after deliveries for 30, 60, and 90 seconds, respectively. Babies will be followed up at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months of age. Maternal hemoglobin before and after cesareans, neonatal hemoglobin, children's hemoglobin at 6, 12, 18 months of age will be measured. At each follow-up visit, children's length and weight will be measured, their development will be assessed, and a questionnaire survey including information on feeding, sleep, and medication will be conducted. The primary outcomes are the neonatal hemoglobin and the change in maternal hemoglobin. The secondary outcomes include the incidence rate of neonatal anemia and jaundice, Apgar score, the incidence rate of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, placental weight, maternal hemoglobin after the cesarean, estimated maternal blood loss, and the incidence rate of maternal blood transfusion. In addition, the children's hemoglobin, anemia, growth and development are considered as the exploratory secondary outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Delay 30s group | Experimental | Procedure: Delayed cord clamping (30s)Cord clamping will be delayed at 30 seconds after delivery. |
| Delay 60s group | Experimental | Procedure: Delayed cord clamping (60s)Cord clamping will be delayed at 60 seconds after delivery. |
| Delay 90s group | Experimental | Procedure: Delayed cord clamping (90s)Cord clamping will be delayed at 90 seconds after delivery. |
| Control group | No intervention | –Cord clamping will be immediate (within 15 seconds) after delivery, in accordance with the standard practice in the study sites |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- local resident in Liuyang city, Huantai county and their surrounding areas
- Singleton pregnancy
- Elective caesarean, or cesarean section after the start of labor but the cervix is less than 3 cm
- Term pregnancy (≥37 weeks of gestation), and the fetal weight was estimated ≥2500g by intrauterine ultrasound
- Written informed consent is obtained
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant women with the following risk factors: severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥110mmHg), preeclampsia, chronic hypertension with preeclampsia, diabetes mellitus with severe microangiopathy, placenta previa, placenta implantation, placental abruption, intrauterine distress, prenatal infection, severe anemia (hemoglobin<7g/dL), coagulation disorders, thrombosis disease
- Plan to retain cord blood
- Rh-negative pregnant women
- Prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormalities which may lead to difficulties in cesareans or adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as abnormal heart monitoring, fetal distress, malformation, anemia, and intrauterine growth restrictions
- Other conditions not suitable for intervention as judged by obstetricians
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Delayed cord clamping (30s)The same as that stated in arm descriptions. | Procedure or surgery | Delay 30s group |
| Delayed cord clamping (60s)The same as that stated in arm descriptions. | Procedure or surgery | Delay 60s group |
| Delayed cord clamping (90s)The same as that stated in arm descriptions. | Procedure or surgery | Delay 90s group |
Primary outcome
The neonatal hemoglobin
Time frame: Within 72 hours after birth
In the heel blood
The change in maternal hemoglobin
Time frame: Within 72 hours before the cesarean, and within 72 hours after the cesarean
Difference in maternal hemoglobin levels before and after the cesarean
8 secondary outcomes
The incidence rate of neonatal anemia
Time frame: Within 72 hours after birth
The incidence rate of neonatal jaundice
Time frame: Before discharging from hospitals, usually within 1 week after birth
Apgar score
Time frame: At 1 min, 5 min, and 10 min after birth
The incidence rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission
Time frame: Before discharging from hospitals, usually within 1 week after birth
Placental weight
Time frame: At birth
Maternal hemoglobin after the cesarean
Time frame: Within 72 hours after the cesarean
Estimated maternal blood loss
Time frame: During the cesarean
The incidence rate of maternal blood transfusion
Time frame: At delivery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40280473Song Q, Li H, Mu Y, Xiong Y, Liu Y, Liu Y, Jin C, Huang X, Zhao L, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Liu J. Effects of Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping at Different Timings on Neonatal Hemoglobin and Maternal Blood Loss During Cesarean Delivery at Term: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr. 2025 Aug;283:114620. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114620. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The IPD will be shared upon the request of other researchers, and all the key variables that will be reported in the main paper are planned to be shared
Related trials for Delayed Cord Clamping
Active, not recruiting
Prone Positioning During Delayed Cord Clamping
Delayed Cord Clamping
Active, not recruiting
Delayed Cord Clamping With Oxygen In Extremely Low Gestation Infants
IVH- Intraventricular Hemorrhage, Extreme Prematurity
Not yet recruiting
30-Second Versus Pulsation-Based Delayed Cord Clamping in Term Newborns
Umbilical Cord Clamping
Recruiting
Cord Clamping Among Neonates With Congenital Heart Disease
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)
Enrolling by invitation
The Effect of Different Positions Given to the Newborn During Delayed Cord Clamping on Physiological Indicators and Comfort
Newborn Infant, Newborn Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jianmeng Liu principal investigator
Peking University
Hongtian Li study director
Peking University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Delayed cord clamping (30s), Delayed cord clamping (60s) and Delayed cord clamping (90s) in people with Delayed Cord Clamping and Hemoglobin, run by Peking University at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The neonatal hemoglobin (time frame: Within 72 hours after birth). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05492214, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2023.