AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain ManagementCOMPASS-NPNCT05492903

COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP)

A study testing COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP) in people with Pain Management and Ergonomics, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Home care workers (HCWs) are at-risk for chronic pain and associated problems, including emotional distress, opioid use and misuse, and work-related disability. To address these issues, the proposed study will adapt an established peer-led and supportive group program to address the needs of HCWs with chronic pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pain Management, Ergonomics, Wounds and Injuries
What is being tested?
COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
140 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
21 Aug 2023to Sep 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years (adults)
  • Employed as a home care worker
  • Has chronic pain (pain lasting 3+ months and > 4 average intensity)
  • The presence of pain interference with work (response of 'agree' or 'strongly agree' on single-item)
  • Currently working 4 hours or more per week
  • Access to the internet with a video capable device (e.g., smart phone, tablet, or computer)

Who cannot join

  • Prior exposure to the original COMPASS program
  • Experiencing a surgery in the prior 6 months
  • Current pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the study period.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Oregon Health & Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Translating an Intervention to Address Chronic Pain Among Home Care Workers

Home care workers (HCWs) are at-risk for chronic pain and associated problems, including emotional distress, opioid use and misuse, and work-related disability. To address these issues, the proposed study will adapt an established peer-led and supportive group program to address the needs of HCWs with chronic pain. The new program, named COMPASS for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP), will integrate work-based injury protections with pain education and cognitive-behavioral therapy strategies for pain self-management in order to reduce pain interference with HCWs' work and life, and advance their safety, health, and well-being.

Read the detailed description

Organizational intervention research can be all breakthrough with no follow-through. Few effective interventions developed by scientists are widely adopted in practice. To address this research-to-practice gap and address a socially important problem, the investigators will translate their established and disseminated COMPASS (COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support) intervention to address the needs of home care workers (HCWs) with chronic pain. The burden of injuries and pain is great among HCWs, which places them at-risk for emotional distress, opioid use/misuse, and work-related disability. Moreover, HCWs are predominantly low income, middle aged women. Between 1999 and 2015 middle-aged women experienced a 471% increase in prescription opioid-related overdoses. COMPASS is a peer-led and scripted group curriculum that produced many significant impacts on meaningful outcomes for HCWs in a randomized controlled trial (Cohen's d range = .45 to .84), including increased safety communication with clients and hazard correction in homes. COMPASS was subsequently adopted by the Oregon Home Care Commission, and is currently offered statewide as a paid training course to publicly funded HCWs. While these are exceptional research-to-practice impacts, the original curriculum did not directly address chronic pain, and resulted in only small non-significant reductions in pain severity. The investigators also found that HCWs with pain-related limitations at baseline made significant safety changes, but experienced less benefit from the intervention than workers without limitations. An added barrier is that protective low-tech ergonomic tools (e.g., slide boards, transfer belts) are typically not funded by insurance. The investigators' qualitative research revealed that low-wage HCWs are often forced to improvise or do without such tools. In the translation plan, existing COMPASS lessons will be adapted for HCWs with chronic pain, and new lessons from the Pain Survival Guide (co-authored by Dr. Turk, Co-I) will integrate pain education and proven cognitive-behavioral therapy pain self-management strategies. The investigators will also strengthen injury protections by including an online ergonomic assessment and voucher for HCWs to purchase tools. The translated COMPASS for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP) intervention will be evaluated with a cluster randomized waitlist control design. The primary hypothesis is that COMPASS-NP will reduce pain interference with work and life. Secondary outcomes include pain/injury prevention behaviors (e.g., ergonomic tool use), injuries, pain severity, risk for opioid misuse, and worker well-being. Regional implementation and evaluation with partners in Oregon (government), Washington (labor), and Idaho (private sector) will maximize dissemination knowledge and impact. The 5-year project will accomplish 4 aims: 1) Adapt and pilot COMPASS-NP in Oregon; 2) Determine effects of COMPASS-NP across Oregon, Washington, and Idaho; 3) Describe the translation and implementation of COMPASS-NP across partners and systems; and 4) Disseminate COMPASS-NP knowledge, tools, and toolkits.

Being tested
COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP)
Keywords
injury prevention, pain management, ergonomics, home care workers, total worker health, cognitive behavioral therapy
Medical subject headings
Agnosia, Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP)Behavioural

    A peer-led and supportive group program (10 weekly sessions) designed to address the needs of HCWs with chronic or elevated pain. The intervention will integrate work-based injury protections with pain education and cognitive-behavioral therapy strategies for pain self-management.

Study groups in NCT05492903
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalIntervention during weeks 0-10 (10 weekly group sessions). Follow-up with no treatment during weeks 11-20.
Receives: Behavioral: COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP)
Waitlist ControlOtherUsual practice during weeks 0-10. Intervention during weeks 11-20 (10 weekly group sessions).
Receives: Behavioral: COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Ratings of Pain Interference with Work

    Work Limitations Questionnaire (1-5; 5=worst [limited all the time]). Assesses limitations related to time, physical, mental-interpersonal, and outputs.

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

  2. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Ratings of Pain Interference with Life

    Brief Pain Inventory Subscale on pain interference (0-10; 10=worst [completely interferes]). Interference related to general activity, walking, work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Reported Number of Pain/Injury Prevention Actions

    Assessment questions developed by authors addressing total number of safety actions taken during the prior 10 weeks (0 to 5 or more; 0=worst [no actions taken]). Sum of counts for five items that address new ergonomic tool use or techniques for moving objects or assisting client mobility; new ergonomic tools or techniques for housekeeping; correcting slip, trip, and fall hazards in homes; correcting "other" hazards in homes; and talking with client about improving safety.

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

  2. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Reported Number of Minor Injuries

    Question developed by authors addressing the number of minor injuries (minor cuts, bruises, back/neck pain or sprains) during the previous 10 weeks (5 or more=worst [highest possible number of reported minor injuries).

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

  3. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Reported Number of Lost Work Time Injuries

    Question developed by authors addressing the number of injuries resulting in one or more days off of work during the prior 10 weeks (0-5 or more lost work time injuries; 5 or more=worst [highest possible reported number of injuries).

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

  4. Between Groups Difference in Changes in the Rating of Average Pain Severity

    Brief Pain Inventory item addressing average pain severity, with author-selected time anchor of during the past week (0-10; 10=worst [worst pain possible]).

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

  5. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Ratings of Well-being

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-Mental Health Subscale (items 2,4, and 5 are rated 5-1; 1=worst [poor]; item 10 is rated 1-5 and reverse coded; before reverse coding 5=worst [always bothered]). Items assess quality of life, mental health and mood/thinking, satisfaction with social relationships, and emotional problems.

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

  6. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Daily Minutes of Physical Activity

    Actigraphy sample of seven days (hip-worn) will be collected to calculate average daily minutes of physical activity (focused on combined light and moderate intensity minutes).

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

  7. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Average Nightly Sleep Duration

    Actigraphy sample of seven days (wrist-worn) will be collected to calculate average hours and minutes of sleep duration for the main sleep period each night.

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

  8. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Average Nightly Sleep Efficiency

    Actigraphy sample of seven days (wrist-worn) will be collected to calculate average sleep efficiency (percent of time in bed spent asleep) for the main sleep period.

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

  9. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Pain Medication Use

    Brief Pain Inventory item assessing frequency of pain medication use per 24 hours. Five frequency interval options range from "not every day" to "more than 6 times per day" (more than 6 is worst [highest daily frequency]).

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

  10. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Risk of Future Opioid Misuse

    Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised (SOAPP-R; for workers not currently using opioids). Item ratings of 0-4 (4=worst [very often]) with a total sum of 18 indicating positive for being at-risk for future opioid misuse.

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

  11. Between Groups Difference in Changes in Current Opioid Misuse

    Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM; for workers currently using opioid medications). Ratings of 0-4 (4=worst [very often]) with a score of 9 or greater indicating a positive for current opioid misuse.

    Measured: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2022
  2. Study start21 Aug 2023
  3. Primary completion11 Apr 2025
  4. Study completionSep 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
cluster-randomized waitlist control design
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
140 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05492903
Sponsor's protocol ID
e20412
Acronym
COMPASS-NP
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
18 Feb 2022
Last updated
28 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Olson R, Hess JA, Turk D, Marino M, Greenspan L, Alley L, Donovan C, Rice SPM. COMMunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial with home care workers. Trials. 2023 Apr 10;24(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07149-8.

    PubMed 37038235

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing COMmunity of Practice And Safety Support for Navigating Pain (COMPASS-NP) in people with Pain Management and Ergonomics, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Between Groups Difference in Changes in Ratings of Pain Interference with Work (time frame: Changes between 0 weeks and 10 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05492903, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in