AzTrials
AzTrials

Tinea PedisPhase 2NCT05493488

A Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel, and Aqueous Gel in Subjects With Tinea Pedis

A Phase 2 study testing DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel and Aqueous Gel in people with Tinea Pedis, run by DermBiont, Inc. at 2 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, observer blinded, Aqueous Gel-controlled trial examining the effect of daily application for approximately 6-8 days of DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel, and Aqueous Gel on the subjects with interdigital tinea pedis based on Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Tinea Pedis
What is being tested?
DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel and Aqueous Gel
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
24 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
8 Sep 2022to 31 Dec 2023
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ability to understand, agree to, and sign the study Informed Consent
  • A signed Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization form which permits the use and disclosure of the subject's individually identifiable health information.
  • Male or Female Subjects of any race 18-65 years of age.
  • Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of interdigital T. pedis.
  • Investigator confirmed diagnosis by a positive T. rubrum potassium hydroxide (KOH) wet mount at Screening at the investigative site.
  • A quantifiable level of T. rubrum based on Sponsor laboratory qPCR from the sample obtained at the Screening visit.
  • The sum of the clinical signs and symptoms scores of at least one web space (Target web space) is at least 4 using the Grading of Signs and Symptoms of T. pedis including a minimum score of 2 for erythema AND a minimum score of 2 for either scaling/fissures or pruritus/burning (on a scale of 0-3, where 2 indicates moderate severity).
  • Target web space(s) should have an adequate amount of leading-edge scale to provide enough scale sampling for KOH.

Who cannot join

  • Women who are pregnant, planning a pregnancy, breastfeeding or have a positive pregnancy test at screening.
  • Any dermatological conditions that could interfere with clinical evaluations
  • The clinical diagnosis of moccasin T. pedis.
  • Subjects with gram negative interdigital tinea pedis based on a clinical diagnosis: Gram-negative athlete's foot - the interspace is foul smelling, whitish, painful, strongly macerated, and hyperkeratotic with erosions, exudation, and intense inflammation and often disabling.
  • Any underlying disease(s) or other dermatological condition that requires the use of interfering topical or systemic therapy.
  • Subjects with concurrent use of any of the following topical preparations who have not completed the specified washout period(s) for the following topical medications applied to the foot at the time of the Screening visit:
Show all 24Show fewer
  • Washout of 1 week prior to the screening visit for topical astringents and abrasives (e.g., Burrow's solution), Vicks VapoRub, tea tree oil)
  • Washout of 2 weeks prior to the screening visit for topical antibiotics and antifungal on the feet (e.g., Neomycin, Miconazole, Clotrimazole, Terbinafine)
  • Washout of 4 weeks prior to the screening visit for the topical Anti-inflammatories, corticosteroids, topical immunomodulators on the feet (e.g., Pimecrolimus, Tacrolimus)
  • Subjects with concurrent use of any of the following systemic medications who have not completed the specified washout period(s) for the following systemic medications at the time of the Screening visit:
  • Washout of 4 weeks prior to the screening visit for the systemic corticosteroids (including intramuscular injections) (e.g., Triamcinolone acetonide)
  • Washout of 4 weeks prior to the screening visit for the systemic antibiotics (e.g., Tetracycline, Cephalosporins, etc.) and/or Antifungal agents (e.g., Fluconazole, Itraconazole, Terbinafine, etc.)
  • Washout of 4 weeks prior to the screening visit for the systemic immunomodulators (e.g., Cyclophosphamide, Azathioprine, Biologicals-Monoclonal Antibodies)
  • Treatment of any type of cancer within the last 6 months except for superficial skin cancers such as basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
  • History of any significant internal disease which contraindicates use of a live microbiome (e.g., leukemia, liver failure, cardiovascular disease).
  • Subjects who are known to be allergic to any of the Test article(s) or any components in the test article(s) or history of hypersensitivity or allergic reactions to any of the study preparations as described in the Investigator's Brochure.
  • AIDS or AIDS related complex by medical history.
  • History of current street drug or alcohol abuse, or street drug or alcohol abuse within the past year.
  • Known or suspected immune suppressive medications or diseases.
  • Subjects with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus Type I or II requiring medical intervention/treatment.
  • Peripheral vascular disease based on medical history.
  • Any subject not able to meet the study attendance requirements.
  • Subjects who have participated in any other trial of an investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to enrollment or participation in a research study concurrent with this study.
  • Use of any orthopedic appliance (e.g., cast, soft cast, splint) on either foot or ankle, or surgery of either foot or ankle within 90 days of the Screening visit.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Oregon Dermatology and Research

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Premier Clinical Research

    Spokane, Washington, 99202

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Observer-Blinded, Randomized, Aqueous Gel Controlled Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel, and Aqueous Gel in Subjects With Interdigital Tinea Pedis

This is a randomized, observer blinded, Aqueous Gel-controlled trial examining the effect of daily application for approximately 6-8 days of DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel, and Aqueous Gel on the subjects with interdigital tinea pedis based on Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR), and comparison between Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) and Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) for the presence of Trichophyton rubrum (T.rubrum) as well as signs and symptoms and local tolerability and toxicity on treated sites in subjects.

Conditions
Tinea Pedis
Being tested
DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel, Aqueous Gel
Medical subject headings
Tinea Pedis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DBI-001 GelBiological

    Topical application of DBI-001 gel on foot/feet affected with tinea pedis

  • DBI-002 GelBiological

    Topical application of DBI-002 gel on foot/feet affected with tinea pedis

  • Aqueous GelBiological

    Topical application of Aqueous gel on foot/feet affected with tinea pedis

Study groups in NCT05493488
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DBI-001 GelActive comparatorTopical application of DBI-001 Gel on foot/feet affected with tinea pedis
Receives: Biological: DBI-001 Gel
DBI-002 GelActive comparatorTopical application of DBI-002 Gel on foot/feet affected with tinea pedis
Receives: Biological: DBI-002 Gel
Aqueous GelPlacebo comparatorTopical application of Aqueous Gel on foot/feet affected with tinea pedis
Receives: Biological: Aqueous Gel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in abundance of T. rubrum based on Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)

    Change in abundance of T. rubrum at baseline, day 7 and day 14

    Measured: 14 days of participation

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events

    Safety

    Measured: 14 days of participation

  2. Changes in signs and symptoms of T. Pedis

    Change from baseline in individual signs and symptoms of Tinea Pedis at days 7 and 14 of sites treated with DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel, or Aqueous Gel. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum value is 3 the subject's self reported observation on local tolerability.

    Measured: 14 days of participation

  3. Changes in the signs and symptoms and Investigators Static Global Assessment (ISGA) of Tinea Pedis

    Changes from Baseline in signs and symptoms and ISGA at Days 7 and 14

    Measured: 14 days of participation

  4. Change in abundance of T. rubrum based on qPCR and WGS

    Antimicrobial efficacy

    Measured: 14 days of participation

  5. Molecular diagnostic qPCR and WGS comparison of DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel and Aqueous Gel

    Antimicrobial efficacy and microbiome community analysis

    Measured: 14 days of participation

  6. Bacterial culture comparison of DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel and Aqueous Gel

    Antimicrobial efficacy and microbiome community analysis

    Measured: 14 days of participation

  7. Increase or decrease of colony forming units after DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel application

    Antimicrobial efficacy

    Measured: 14 days of participation

  8. Correlation between levels of DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel and abundance of T. rubrum based on qPCR

    Antimicrobial efficacy

    Measured: 14 days of participation

  9. Correlation between qPCR quantification and KOH for presence of T. rubrum at screening

    Compare sensitivity and specificity of qPCR analysis and KOH for presence of T. rubrum at Screening

    Measured: 28 days from screening

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2022
  2. Study start8 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
24 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05493488
Sponsor's protocol ID
CT-210
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
26 Jul 2022
Last updated
14 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing DBI-001 Gel, DBI-002 Gel and Aqueous Gel in people with Tinea Pedis, run by DermBiont, Inc. at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in abundance of T. rubrum based on Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) (time frame: 14 days of participation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in