AzTrials
AzTrials

Myocardial InfarctionPHFMINCT05495516

Search for Methods to Predict the Development of Heart Failure After Myocardial Infarction

An observational study of Myocardial Infarction, run by Novosibirsk State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Introduction Despite significant progresses in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and the development of reperfusion treatment methods, heart failure still often complicates its course. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Myocardial Infarction
What is being tested?
without Intervention
How many people
186 participants
Where
1 siteRussia
Study dates
1 Jan 2019to 1 Feb 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Open prospective non-randomized cohort study by parallel-group method with additional retrospective analysis; 186 patients (mean age 63.5 years) who underwent myocardial infarction from January 2019 to January 2021 and were treated at the regional vascular center No 1 of Novosibirsk City Clinical Hospital No 1 were included. Novosibirsk. The main group included 86 people with signs of CHF above class 2 (NYHA) and the comparison group consisted of 100 people without signs of CHF or with class 1 (NYHA) CHF. The retrospective part of the study will include the period from 1 to 30 days after myocardial infarction, and the prospective part will include a year from the beginning of the myocardial infarction.

Who may be able to join

  • women and men aged 18-75 years;
  • hospitalization in the cardiology department for treatment of patients with myocardial infarction at City Clinical Hospital No. 1 with confirmed acute myocardial infarction, typical clinical picture, electrocardiography data, results of cardiospecific enzymes (troponin I, MB fraction of creatine phosphokinase (MB-CPK));
  • signing of voluntary informed consent to participate in the research work

Who cannot join

  • acute inflammatory diseases;
  • chronic diseases in the phase of exacerbation and/or incomplete remission;
  • diabetes mellitus type 1;
  • severe hepatic and renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate according to CKD-EPI formula <15 ml/min/1.73m2);
  • cardiomyopathy (obstructive, dilative and restrictive);
  • hemodynamically significant valvular heart defects;
Show all 10Show fewer
  • thyrotoxicosis, hypothyroidism;
  • malignant neoplasms;
  • chronic alcoholism, mental disorders;
  • absence of signed voluntary informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Russia1 site
  • Novosibirsk State Medical University

    Novosibirsk, Novosibirskaja Oblast' (oblast'), 630099

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Introduction Despite significant progresses in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and the development of reperfusion treatment methods, heart failure still often complicates its course. There are three types of postinfarction heart failure: occurring in the acute period, during hospital treatment and after discharge. Factors contributing to heart failure during hospitalization for MI and after discharge include comorbidity of the patient, worsening of pre-existing CHF and comorbidities. In the last decades we can observe higher level of myocardial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), improvement of pre-hospital care, which decreased mortality and HF; however, the proportion of HF patients with preserved ejection fraction increased. All these factors determine the urgency of the studied problem.

Purpose of the study To identify the most significant factors contributing to the development of acute and subacute heart failure after myocardial infarction Materials and methods Retrospective and prospective non-randomized parallel-group analysis of 186 suffered MI (mean age 63.5 y) during one year was performed in this work, and in the main group of patients (86 patients) at 30 days after MI, chronic heart failure over 2F by NYHA was confirmed, and in comparison group (100 patients) CHF was either absent or did not exceed 2F by NYHA. The diagnosis of MI and CHF was made according to national and European guidelines. Both groups received standard therapy for CHF: ACE inhibitors/angiotensin 2/angiotensin receptor antagonists and neprolysin inhibitor (ARNI), β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (AMCR), SGLT2-receptor inhibitors; anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, statins, diuretics if necessary were also used.

One year after discharge, clinical outcomes were assessed: cardiovascular mortality, repeated hospitalizations due to decompensation of CHF, death from other causes, stroke, repeated myocardial infarction, unscheduled coronary revascularization; telephone contacts were made every month, repeat visits to the clinic - one year later. The results were based on the information collected in the course of telephone contacts and via e-mail; hospitalizations were also monitored by querying the databases of medical institutions.

Read the detailed description

The patients were recruited on the basis of regional vascular center (RVC) of the 1st cardiology department for myocardial infarction patients of State Budget Institution of Health of Novosibirsk region "City Clinical Hospital" (SBUZ NSO GKB) № 1 of Novosibirsk. According to the design, there were three points in the study: zero point - the first day of hospitalization of the patient in the hospital; the first point - day 30 of MI development; the second point - 12 months from the time of AMI development. At all stages of the study we performed the examinations stipulated by the standard of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction, clinical guidelines and dissertation research protocol: clinical status of the patient (evaluation of complaints, objective examination), laboratory tests (total blood count (TBC), total urine analysis (UPE), biochemical blood analysis (BX), instrumental examinations (ECG, chest radiography (RGCT)). Coronarography followed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), EchoCG and determination of molecular genetic markers were also performed at stage 0. At any stage in the presence of cardiac rhythm and conduction abnormalities, Holter electrocardiography monitoring (HM-ECG) was performed; and a 6-minute walk test was performed at the 1st and 2nd points.

Verification of the diagnosis of AMI was performed according to the criteria of the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction, which summarizes the opinion of experts of the World Heart Federation (WHF), American Heart Association (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC) and European Society of Cardiology (EOC, ESC) (2018). The dissertation work included patients who met the criteria for acute type 1 MI, which included elevated cardiac troponin levels above the 99th percentile of the upper reference value, in combination with at least one additional feature: 1) a characteristic clinical picture of acute myocardial ischemia; 2) new ECG changes suggestive of ischemia; 3) a pathologic Q-wave on the ECG; 4) imaging findings confirming new areas of myocardial ischemia; and 5) presence of infarct-related artery thrombosis (ICA) on CAG. Verification of the diagnosis of acute and chronic heart failure (OSF, CHF) was performed on the basis of clinical recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology (EOC, ESC) (2016, 2021), combined recommendations of the Society of Heart Failure Specialists (SHF), Russian Society of Cardiology (RSC) and Russian Scientific Medical Society of Physicians (RSMOT) (2018). The classification of CHF according to the stages of the disease (Strazhesko-Vasilenko, 1935) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was used, also the heart failure classification of the New York Heart Association (NYHA, 1964) was used to assess the severity of symptoms. We used Killip classification of acute heart failure.

Instrumental methods of investigation ECG was recorded in 12 leads (6 standard and 6 thoracic leads) using "Megacart-400" (Siemens) in the first minutes of hospital admission, then once a day until subacute period of STEMI formed, and then once every three days. Echocardiography was performed on admission to the hospital, on the 30th day from the development of MI, and 1 year later on a Phillips ie33 device (Philips Ultrasound, USA) from the standard position, in the left side of the patient, using a 2-4 MHz ultrasound matrix transducer. The technique was performed in M- and B-modes, pulse-wave, continuous-wave Doppler, color Doppler mapping, tissue Doppler and color Doppler M-mode (Color M-mode). The following parameters were determined: PV - ejection fraction (Simpson, 1989. ), FV - end diastolic volume, CSV - end systolic volume, ESR - end systolic size, CDD - end diastolic size, FDi - end diastolic index, CSI - end systolic index, DLA - mean pulmonary artery pressure, FDD - end diastolic pressure, SW - stroke volume, MM - myocardial mass, IMM - myocardial mass index, LP - left atrium, RAP - right atrium, RV - right ventricle, VIR - isovolumic relaxation time, E - LV early diastolic filling rate, A - left ventricular late diastolic filling rate, E/A - ratio of early and late transmitral flow, DT - time of early diastolic filling slowdown, AT - time of early diastolic filling acceleration, ET - ejection period, Em - myocardial early diastolic motion rate, Am - velocity of late diastolic myocardial motion, Em/Am - ratio of velocities of early and late diastolic myocardial motion, E/e' - ratio of E-wave blood flow on mitral valve to E'-wave (ratio of early mitral valve ring motion), pulmonary vein S blood flow, pulmonary vein D blood flow, dE and dA - parameters of duration of early diastolic filling, IVCT - isovolumic time of RV contraction, Sfcmc - mitral valve fibrous ring velocity, VpvA - maximum diastolic retrograde flow velocity, SRMP - early mitral flow velocity, diastolic stiffness, Tei index - sum of isovolumetric contraction and isovolumetric relaxation times divided by ventricular ejection time, Em/SRMP - ratio of early diastolic transcuspidal flow velocity to its rate of spread. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated using the formula: LVEF = (QDO - QSO/QDO) 100% (according to Simpson's method). The presence and degree of dyskinesia of necrosis zone and scar changes, aneurysm, papillary muscle lesions and myocardial rupture zones were also determined by standard technique, in two-dimensional and one-dimensional modes and in pulse and continuous-wave Doppler Echo-CG modes. Selective CAG was performed within the first 24 hours after the patient's admission to the hospital on an INNOVA 3100 angiographic machine (USA) with access through the radial artery using standard Judkins left (Jl 4.0) and Judkins right (Jl 4.0) catheters, using X-ray contrast agents (ultravist, Gadovist). Transilluminal balloon angioplasty with stenting of the symptomatic artery was performed when hemodynamically significant stenosis exceeding 65% was diagnosed using the technique of direct stenting.

Preparation of DNA preparations DNA extraction from blood was performedby phenol-chloroform extraction. Five to six volumes of buffer A (10 mMTris-HCl, pH=7.5; 10 mM NaCl; 3 mM MgCl2) were added to 1 volume of blood sample and clots were rubbed in a homogenizer. After centrifugation at 2500g for 15 min, the precipitates were washed three times with buffer A and resuspended in 1 ml of buffer B (10 mM EDTA; 100 mM NaCl; 50 mM Tris HCl, pH=8.5). After adding SDS to 0.5% and proteinase E to 200 μg/mL, the mixture was incubated for 12 hours at 56°C. Deproteinization was performed sequentially with phenol-chloroform mixture (1:1), water-saturated phenol,phenol-chloroform mixture (1:1), and chloroform. DNA was precipitated by adding NaCl solution to 1 M and 1 V isopropyl alcohol. After that, the solution was cooled for 1 h at -20 °C. The precipitate obtained by centrifugation on an Eppendorf microcentrifuge at 12000g for 15 min was washed three times with 75% ethanol followed by centrifugation for 5 min. 12000g and, after drying at 56 °C, dissolved in deinanilized water to a DNA concentration of 0.5 µg/μl.Genotyping of polymorphisms was performed using real-time PCR according to the manufacturer's protocol (TaqMan probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) on a StepOnePlus instrument. They were selected according to the results ofinternational full genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which confirmed the association of these SNPs with coronary heart disease (CHD),development of heart failure.

Statistical methods of material processing The influence of clinical, demographic, functional, biochemical, markers not and treatment methods on the development of acute, hospital and distant postinfarction chronic heart failure was assessed by odds ratio.

Statistical analysis of molecular genetic data was performed using SPSS 22.0 software package. the first step was to determine the frequencies of genotypes and alleles of the studied CHF in ACS patients with elevated cardiospecific markers and in the comparison group, where cardiospecific markers were within normal limits; then we assessed the compliance of genotype frequencies with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in control group (Chi-square criterion). Comparison of the level of quantitative indices in carriers of different genotypes was performed after checking the normality of the distribution of these traits by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. If the traits met the criteria of normal distribution, a single-factor analysis of variance was used. Significance of differences between the two genotypic classes was additionally checked using the t-test for two independent samples. The significance of differences between the two genotypic classes was additionally tested with the Mann-Whitney test for two independent samples if the investigated trait did not meet the criteria of normal distribution, comparison of the level of this trait among the carriers of different genotypes was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The association of SNPs with risk factors related to categorical variables was tested with conjugation tables using Pearson's chi-square test. In the case of four-field tables, we compared samples by genotype and allele frequencies using Fisher's exact two-sided criterion. The risk of disease outcome/risk factor for a particular allele or genotype was calculated as odds ratio.

Correlation, factor and regression analysis methods were used to develop mathematical models for predicting the risk of postinfarct CVD. The first two groups of methods were used to identify significant independent variables (attributes) that correlate well with the probability of an adverse outcome, but weakly correlate with each other (to exclude multicollinearity of the model). Regression analysis methods were used to choose the structure of the regression model and to estimate its coefficients. Two coefficients, which have a simple interpretation, were used to test the adequacy of the constructed model:

  • sensitivity coefficient;
  • specificity coefficient;
  • coefficient of accuracy.
Being tested
without Intervention
Keywords
heart failure, myocardial infarction
Medical subject headings
Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • without InterventionGenetic

    without Intervention

Study groups in NCT05495516
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
active groupThe study group consisted of 86 patients with signs of CHF above class 2 (NYHA) 30 days after myocardial infarction.
Receives: Genetic: without Intervention
comparison groupThis group consisted of 100 patients without signs of CHF or with CHF class 1 (NYHA) 30 days after myocardial infarction.
Receives: Genetic: without Intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke of any type, hospitalization due to decompensation of chronic heart failure

    The analysis will be performed using the SPSS REGRESSION module

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. total mortality

    Statistical analysis of the prospective part of the study: the 2 study groups will be compared by endpoints

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2022
  2. Study start1 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
186 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05495516
Sponsor's protocol ID
L-003
Acronym
PHFMI
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
7 Aug 2022
Last updated
10 Aug 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Myocardial Infarction, run by Novosibirsk State Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke of any type, hospitalization due to decompensation of chronic heart failure (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in