AzTrials
AzTrials

Macular DiseaseNCT05497128

Standard Cut Rate 27-Gauge System Versus Ultrahigh-Speed 27-Gauge System in Macular Surgery

A study testing Ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge system and Standard cut rate 27-gauge system in people with Macular Disease, run by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency and safety of ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge system (27+®GA HYPERVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA)) and standard cut rate 27-gauge vitrectomy system (27+®GA Advanced ULTRAVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Macular Disease
What is being tested?
Ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge system and Standard cut rate 27-gauge system
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Sep 2022to Aug 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All consecutive eyes requiring macular surgery (i.e. epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular traction etc.) that underwent 27-gauge vitrectomy at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH) from September 2022 to August 2023. Patients will be randomized to receive 27-gauge vitrectomy with 20,000 cpm probes (20K group) or 27-gauge vitrectomy with 10,000 cpm probes (standard group).

Who cannot join

  • Previously vitrectomized eye
  • Trauma cases
  • Proliferative diabetic retinopathy with fibrovascular membranes
  • Retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy
  • Macular hole
  • Endophthalmitis
  • Inability to consent for procedure

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Kyu Hyung Park, M.D., Ph.D. contact

82-31-787-7373

jiani4@snu.ac.kr

Se Joon Woo, M.D. contact

82-31-787-7379

sejoon1@snu.ac.kr

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Seongnam, Gyunggi-do, 13620

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Standard Cut Rate 27-Gauge System Versus Ultrahigh-Speed 27-Gauge System in Macular Surgery : A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency and safety of ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge system (27+®GA HYPERVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA)) and standard cut rate 27-gauge vitrectomy system (27+®GA Advanced ULTRAVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA)).

Read the detailed description

During the last few decades, there have been dramatic changes in vitreoretinal surgery field with improvements in the performance of surgical retina equipment. As the innovation trend has been moving toward the smaller instrument calibers, the 27-gauge vitrectomy system has been developed. However, the vitrectomy system with the smaller calibers have limitations such as reduced instrument rigidity, limited availability of instrumentation, and decreased flow rate. To overcome these limitations, active developments have been ongoing to increase vitreous cutting speed, enlargement of the cutting port size, and enlargement of inner shaft to enable higher flow rates. Especially, the ultrahigh-speed cutter with improved cutting speed has the advantage of enabling safer vitrectomy because the faster cutting speed reduces retinal movement and minimizes the risk of iatrogenic retinal breaks. However, ultrahigh-speed cutting has a limitation in that it can reduce the flow rate through the vitreous cutter as it affects the duty cycle (percentage of time the cutter port is open relative to the complete cutting cycle). Therefore, the duty cycle of ultrahigh-speed cutter has also been improved so as not to delay the time for vitrectomy.

The investigators would like to evaluate the efficiency and safety of vitrectomy using a recently released ultra high-speed cut rate 27-gauge system (27+®GA HYPERVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA)) and a standard cut rate 27-gauge system (27+®GA Advanced ULTRAVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA)) by comparing the duration of vitrectomy and the rate of complications.

Conditions
Macular Disease
Being tested
Ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge system, Standard cut rate 27-gauge system
Keywords
Macular disease, Vitrectomy
Medical subject headings
Macular Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge systemDevice

    The ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge system (27+®GA HYPERVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA))

  • Standard cut rate 27-gauge systemDevice

    The current standard cut rate 27-gauge vitrectomy system (27+®GA Advanced ULTRAVIT® Vitrectomy Probe (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA))

Study groups in NCT05497128
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge systemExperimentalPatients will receive the pars plana vitrectomy in the macular disease with the 27-gauge vitrectomy systems with 20,000 cpm probes.
Receives: Device: Ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge system
Standard cut rate 27-gauge systemActive comparatorPatients will receive the pars plana vitrectomy in the macular disease with the 27-gauge vitrectomy systems with 10,000 cpm probes.
Receives: Device: Standard cut rate 27-gauge system

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficiency of core vitrectomy

    Time to completion of core vitrectomy

    Measured: During the vitrectomy

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Intraoperative complications

    i.e. iatrogenic retinal breaks, intraocular bleeding, retinal detachment, etc.

    Measured: During the vitrectomy

  2. Postoperative complications

    i.e. intraocular bleeding, retinal detachment, etc.

    Measured: Postoperative period within 4 months after the vitrectomy

  3. Efficiency of peripheral vitrectomy

    Time to completion of peripheral vitrectomy

    Measured: During the vitrectomy

  4. Efficiency of surgery

    Time to completion of the surgery

    Measured: During the surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2022
  2. Study startSep 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionAug 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
66 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05497128
Sponsor's protocol ID
B-2112-728-001
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
7 Aug 2022
Last updated
15 Aug 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Reibaldi M, Rizzo S, Avitabile T, Longo A, Toro MD, Viti F, Saitta A, Giovannini A, Mariotti C. Iatrogenic retinal breaks in 25-gauge vitrectomy under air compared with the standard 25-gauge system for macular diseases. Retina. 2014 Aug;34(8):1617-22. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000112.

    PubMed 24651259
  • Dugel PU, Abulon DJ, Dimalanta R. Comparison of attraction capabilities associated with high-speed, dual-pneumatic vitrectomy probes. Retina. 2015 May;35(5):915-20. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000411.

    PubMed 25621945
  • Mariotti C, Nicolai M, Saitta A, Orsini E, Viti F, Skrami E, Gesuita R, Reibaldi M, Giovannini A. STANDARD CUT RATE 25-GAUGE VITRECTOMY VERSUS ULTRAHIGH-SPEED 25-GAUGE SYSTEM IN CORE VITRECTOMY: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Retina. 2016 Jul;36(7):1271-4. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000924.

    PubMed 26702843

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrahigh-speed cut rate 27-gauge system and Standard cut rate 27-gauge system in people with Macular Disease, run by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kyu Hyung Park, M.D., Ph.D. (82-31-787-7373, jiani4@snu.ac.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficiency of core vitrectomy (time frame: During the vitrectomy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05497128, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in