AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyNCT05498818

The Effects of Synaquell on Brain Function of Ice Hockey Players

A study testing Synaquell in people with Healthy, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This research is being done to investigate the dietary supplement, Synaquell (TM), for effects on brain function in youth ice hockey players. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 to 19 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
Synaquell
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
81 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
3 Nov 2022to 14 Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 to 19 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Fluent English speakers
  • Medically cleared to play ice hockey

Who cannot join

  • An allergy to the ingredients of SynaquellTM or the placebo
  • Clinically documented hearing issues,
  • In-ear hearing aid or cochlear implant
  • Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Metal or plastic implants in skull
  • Lack of verbal fluency in the English language
  • History of seizures
  • Allergy to rubbing alcohol or EEG gel

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Synaquell on Objective Brain Function Measures in Youth Ice Hockey Players

This research is being done to investigate the dietary supplement, Synaquell (TM), for effects on brain function in youth ice hockey players.

Read the detailed description

This randomized clinical trial will compare a brain health supplement (Synaquell) with placebo in both male and female ice hockey players over the course of an entire season. The repeated measure design will compare pre- and post-season objective brain health parameters, including quantitated EEG (Neurocatch), blood biomarkers and a rapid number naming test (King Devick).

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
Synaquell, Placebo
Keywords
Ice Hockey, Cognitive Function, Cognition, Brain, Supplement, Contact Sport Athletes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SynaquellDietary supplement

    7.9 grams (1 scoop) of Synaquell powder mixed with 12 ounces of water two times per day for the duration of the sport season. The daily amount taken by each participant is (15.8 grams).

  • PlaceboDietary supplement

    7.9 grams (1 scoop) of placebo powder mixed with 12 ounces of water two times per day for the duration of the sport season. The daily amount taken by each participant is (15.8 grams). The placebo looks, smells, and tastes like Synaquell but does not contain active ingredient.

Study groups in NCT05498818
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Synaquell Male GroupExperimentalMale youth hockey players will receive the dietary supplement Synaquell, twice-daily during the hockey season. Due to difference in game rules and playing styles, males and females will be treated as two separate arms of the research protocol.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Synaquell
Placebo Male GroupPlacebo comparatorMale youth hockey players will receive the placebo twice-daily, during the hockey season. Due to difference in game rules and playing styles, males and females will be treated as two separate arms of the research protocol.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo
Synaquell Female GroupExperimentalFemale youth hockey players will receive the dietary supplement Synaquell, twice-daily during the hockey season. Due to difference in game rules and playing styles, males and females will be treated as two separate arms of the research protocol.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Synaquell
Placebo Female GroupPlacebo comparatorFemale youth hockey players will receive the placebo twice-daily, during the hockey season. Due to difference in game rules and playing styles, males and females will be treated as two separate arms of the research protocol.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in N100 Amplitude

    Obtained by EEG recording of N100 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores. Changes in brain vital sign scores are depicted within a radar plot format, with the transformation process preserving the essential ERP results but enabling practical, simplified interpretation.

    Measured: Baseline, Postseason (approximately 6 months)

  2. Change in N100 Latency

    Obtained by EEG recording of N100 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. Obtained by EEG recording of N100 potential amplitude. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores. Changes in brain vital sign scores are depicted within a radar plot format, with the transformation process preserving the essential ERP results but enabling practical, simplified interpretation.

    Measured: Baseline, Postseason (approximately 6 months)

  3. Change in P300 Amplitude

    Obtained by EEG recording of P300 potential amplitude. Increased amplitudes are indicative of larger signals. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores. Changes in brain vital sign scores are depicted within a radar plot format, with the transformation process preserving the essential ERP results but enabling practical, simplified interpretation.

    Measured: Baseline, Postseason (approximately 6 months)

  4. Change in P300 Latency

    Obtained by EEG recording of P300 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses. This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores. Changes in brain vital sign scores are depicted within a radar plot format, with the transformation process preserving the essential ERP results but enabling practical, simplified interpretation.

    Measured: Baseline, Postseason (approximately 6 months)

  5. Change in N400 Amplitude

    Obtained by EEG recording of N400 potential amplitude. Increased amplitudes are indicative of larger signals.This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores. Changes in brain vital sign scores are depicted within a radar plot format, with the transformation process preserving the essential ERP results but enabling practical, simplified interpretation.

    Measured: Baseline, Postseason (approximately 6 months)

  6. Change in N400 Latency

    Obtained by EEG recording of N400 potential latency. Increased latencies are indicative of slower responses.This measures is subsequently linearly transformed to a standardized score on a 0-100 scale, with larger peak amplitudes and shorter peak latencies resulting in higher scores. Changes in brain vital sign scores are depicted within a radar plot format, with the transformation process preserving the essential ERP results but enabling practical, simplified interpretation.

    Measured: Baseline, Postseason (approximately 6 months)

  7. Change in blood biomarker

    Neurofilament light chain (NfL) blood serum levels

    Measured: Baseline, Postseason (approximately 6 months)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in King-Devick Test (KDT) scores

    A rapid number-naming test that requires individuals to read 3 numbered patters aloud as fast as possible, the resulting time if the KDT score. The post-season score is compared to the pre-season baseline. An increase in the number of seconds required to read the 3 number patterns is considered to be significant.

    Measured: Baseline, Postseason (approximately 6 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2022
  2. Study start3 Nov 2022
  3. Primary completion14 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion14 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
81 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05498818
Sponsor's protocol ID
22-003414
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
2 Aug 2022
Last updated
9 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Synaquell in people with Healthy, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in N100 Amplitude (time frame: Baseline, Postseason (approximately 6 months)). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in