Environmental Enteric DysfunctionPhase 2PROFE-SenNCT05501470
Probiotic For the Improvement of Environmental Enteropathy in Pregnant Women in Senegal
A Phase 2 study testing Probiotic and CapScan® in people with Environmental Enteric Dysfunction, run by Institut Pasteur de Dakar at 1 site in Senegal.
Trial summary
Stunting in young children refers to attenuated linear growth. In the year 2020, 149.2 million children under the age of 5 were stunted, accounting for 22% of stunting globally. Stunting has short- and long-term consequences of increased morbidity and mortality, impairment of neurocognitive development , impaired… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Environmental Enteric Dysfunction
- What is being tested?
- Probiotic and CapScan®
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSenegal
- Study dates
- 6 Jun 2024to 30 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women over the age of 18, living in Guediawaye district, Senegal
Who cannot join
- • have had diarrhea, defined as the passage of three or more loose stools per 24 hours, in the preceding 14 days
- have taken antibiotics or probiotics in the preceding 14 days
- have taken non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the preceding 14 days
- have any illness which in the opinion of the investigator will complicate assessment of safety or efficacy
- have any gastrointestinal contraindication to ingestion of a capsule (known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, stricture, fistula, gastroparesis, or any swallowing disorder.)
- have a plan to leave the study area within the follow-up period
- but may be enrolled if/when these disqualifiers have expired.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Ability of the Probiotic Vivomixx to Improve Environmental Enteropathy in Pregnant Women: a Proof of Concept Trial in Senegal
Stunting in young children refers to attenuated linear growth. In the year 2020, 149.2 million children under the age of 5 were stunted, accounting for 22% of stunting globally. Stunting has short- and long-term consequences of increased morbidity and mortality, impairment of neurocognitive development , impaired responses to oral vaccines, and increased risk of non-communicable diseases. Stunting is partly driven by Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), an enteropathic condition characterised by altered gut permeability, infiltration of immune cells and changes in villous architecture and cell differentiation. EED may help explain why nutritional supplementation either during pregnancy or early childhood has minimal value in correcting childhood stunting.
Probiotics may serve to overcome the problem of EED through all mechanisms of pathogenicity, by providing additional bacteria that may help in intestinal decolonization of pathogenic microorganisms (changing the microbiological niche), promoting epithelial healing, improving nutrient absorption, and restoration of an appropriate immune balance between tolerance and responsiveness.
This trial will explore the conceptual framework, that a well known probiotic, that can improve the composition of the gut microbiota, can reduce biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and gut health. This will restore healthy microbial signalling to the host epithelium, ameliorate barrier function through secretion of mucus and antimicrobial factors, and improve nutrient availability.
Read the detailed description
Stunting in young children refers to attenuated linear growth. In the year 2020, 149.2 million children under the age of 5 years of age were stunted, accounting for 22% of stunting globally. Stunting has short- and long-term consequences of increased morbidity and mortality, impairment of neurocognitive development5 , impaired responses to oral vaccines, and increased risk of non-communicable diseases. Stunting is partly driven by Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), an enteropathic condition characterised by altered gut permeability, infiltration of immune cells and changes in villous architecture and cell differentiation. EED may help explain why nutritional supplementation either during pregnancy or early childhood has minimal value in correcting childhood stunting. Indeed, EED is believed to be responsible for 40% of childhood stunting. Disruption in intestinal barrier function affects gut immune homeostasis, nutrient flows, and consequently dysbiosis in the gut microbiome. The gut microbiota consists of 100 trillion bacteria which interact with epithelial cells, the mucus layer and the mucosal immune system that balances tolerance and effector functions. Thus the gut microbiome has an important role in shaping the responsiveness of the gut immune system. The mucus barrier and the normal gut microbiota limit enteropathogen colonisation. Influx of bacteria from the lumen to the systemic circulation represents microbial translocation and initiation of systemic of inflammatory process through recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) present on Antigen Presenting Cells (APCs). Three fundamental processes drive the epithelial damage which is so important in EED: infection, undernutrition, and immune dysfunction. Multiple clinical trials show that efforts to correct malnutrition through conventional therapies and improving hygiene and sanitation do not overcome growth deficits by more than about 10%. There is increasing interest in the use of probiotics which may allow pathogen decolonization, improve barrier function and restore overall gut homeostasis. Such therapies are at early stage of trials but may have potential in addressing the global burden of EED, by improving barrier function and gut pathophysiology.
Colonization of gut by enteropathogens is common in children with EED. These include ETEC, Campylobacter, Shigella and Salmonella species. Consistent data from Bangladesh and Zambia show that children with refractory stunting carry over four pathogens on average, whilst controls carry less than two. There is also clear evidence of altered composition of the microbiota in children with EED.
Probiotics may serve to overcome the problem of EED through all mechanisms of pathogenicity, by providing additional bacteria that may help in intestinal decolonization of pathogenic microorganisms (changing the microbiological niche), promoting epithelial healing, improving nutrient absorption, and restoration of an appropriate immune balance between tolerance and responsiveness.
To date the focus of research on childhood stunting has been on the young child. It is increasingly appreciated, however, that stunting often begins in utero and the focus has shifted to women's health and pregnancy. For example, the Lancet 2021 Series on maternal and child undernutrition states that "Investments to reduce undernutrition in women are important not only for women's own health but also for the health and nutrition of their children". Results from rural Bangladesh reveal poor gestational weight gain that ultimately leads to intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight and ultimately stunting and wasting. Furthermore, another study recently completed in slum settlements of Dhaka, Bangladesh demonstrated a high prevalence of EED among undernourished women. Intestinal histopathology was abnormal in more than 80% of women. We postulate that growth retardation in utero is a consequence of EED in the mother during pregnancy and lactation. This leads to systemic inflammation, which leads to disadvantageous partitioning of nutrients, and reduced nutrient availability.
This trial will explore the conceptual framework that a well known probiotic, that can improve the composition of the gut microbiota, can reduce biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and gut health. This will restore healthy microbial signalling to the host epithelium, ameliorate barrier function through secretion of mucus and antimicrobial factors, and improve nutrient availability.
The primary objective of this trial is to determine if a probiotic, Vivomixx, can reduce inflammation and epithelial damage in pregnant women with environmental enteropathy in the target countries.
The secondary objectives of this trial are:
To determine if Vivomixx can reduce enteropathogen colonisation To determine if Vivomixx can impact the structure and function of the microbiome To determine if Vivomixx can reduce permeability. To determine if Vivomixx can impact the host metabolome in pregnant woman To evaluate variability in endpoints across geographies and participating laboratories.
- Conditions
- Environmental Enteric Dysfunction
- Being tested
- Probiotic, Placebo, CapScan®
- Keywords
- Gut health, gut microbiota, Senegal, probiotics, Vivomixx, VSL3
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ProbioticDrug
Probiotic
PlaceboDrug
Placebo
CapScan®Device
The only non-standard sample collection instrument is the CapScan® device. The CapScan Collection Capsule ("Capsule") is a non-invasive device that collects gastrointestinal samples along the GI tract that are then analyzed outside the body. Samples collected by the Capsule will be expressed, then undergo DNA sequencing and mass spectrometric analysis to determine the identity and function of the bacterial and host cells in the different regions of the GI tract and compared to similar analyses conducted on concomitantly collected stool samples.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic | Experimental | Participant in the treatment arm will receive a daily dose of the probiotic for 8 weeks. Receives: Drug: Probiotic; Drug: Placebo |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participant in the control arm will receive a daily dose of a placebo for 8 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Device: CapScan® |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in inflammation and epithelial damage in pregnant women with environmental enteropathy
Percentage change (mean, unweighted) in a multiple panel of biomarkers between baseline and last sample collected after 56 days of treatment, compared to control group.
Measured: Day 0 (screening) - Day 56
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change in enteropathogen colonisation
Change in colonisation with specific enteropathogens (Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, ETEC, EPEC, EAEC, rotavirus, norovirus, Giardia and Cryptosporidium), by qPCR, between baseline and last sample collected after 56 days of treatment, in Vivomixx compared to placebo groups
Measured: Day 1 - Day 56
Impact on the structure and function of the microbiome
Change in microbiome at community and composition level (as measured by whole-genome shotgun metagenomic sequencing, post versus pre-intervention), in the intervention and placebo groups
Measured: Day 1 - Day 56
Change in permeability
Change in LR ratio in Vivomixx compared to placebo groups
Measured: Day 1 - Day 56
Impact of the host metabolome in pregnant woman
Change in metabolome, measured by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in faecal and CAPSCAN samples before and after intervention
Measured: Day 1 - Day 56
Rate of weight gain in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy
Weight gain velocity in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy
Measured: Day 0 (screening) - Day 56
Variability in endpoints across geographies and participating laboratories
Measurements of variability, including standard deviations and kappa values; Preliminary work across all sites using identical kits and harmonised SOPs
Measured: Beginning of recruitment in the first study site - end of recruitment in the last study site (approximately 12 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Aug 2022
- Study start6 Jun 2024
- Primary completion31 Jul 2024
- Study completion30 Jan 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Environmental Enteric DysfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institut Pasteur de Dakar
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Aga Khan University, University of Zambia, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yakhya Dieye, PhD, Principal investigator, Institut Pasteur de Dakar
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05501470
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022-01
- Acronym
- PROFE-Sen
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ability of the Probiotic Vivomixx to Improve Environmental Enteropathy in Pregnant Women: a Proof of Concept Trial in Senegal
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05501470
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROFE-Sen / 2022-01
- Conditions
- Environmental Enteric Dysfunction
- Keywords
- Gut health, gut microbiota, Senegal, probiotics, Vivomixx, VSL3
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut Pasteur de DakarUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Aga Khan University, University of Zambia, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
- Study start
- 6 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stunting in young children refers to attenuated linear growth. In the year 2020, 149.2 million children under the age of 5 were stunted, accounting for 22% of stunting globally. Stunting has short- and long-term consequences of increased morbidity and mortality, impairment of neurocognitive development , impaired responses to oral vaccines, and increased risk of non-communicable diseases. Stunting is partly driven by Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), an enteropathic condition characterised by altered gut permeability, infiltration of immune cells and changes in villous architecture and cell differentiation. EED may help explain why nutritional supplementation either during pregnancy or early childhood has minimal value in correcting childhood stunting.
Probiotics may serve to overcome the problem of EED through all mechanisms of pathogenicity, by providing additional bacteria that may help in intestinal decolonization of pathogenic microorganisms (changing the microbiological niche), promoting epithelial healing, improving nutrient absorption, and restoration of an appropriate immune balance between tolerance and responsiveness.
This trial will explore the conceptual framework, that a well known probiotic, that can improve the composition of the gut microbiota, can reduce biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and gut health. This will restore healthy microbial signalling to the host epithelium, ameliorate barrier function through secretion of mucus and antimicrobial factors, and improve nutrient availability.
Detailed description
Stunting in young children refers to attenuated linear growth. In the year 2020, 149.2 million children under the age of 5 years of age were stunted, accounting for 22% of stunting globally. Stunting has short- and long-term consequences of increased morbidity and mortality, impairment of neurocognitive development5 , impaired responses to oral vaccines, and increased risk of non-communicable diseases. Stunting is partly driven by Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), an enteropathic condition characterised by altered gut permeability, infiltration of immune cells and changes in villous architecture and cell differentiation. EED may help explain why nutritional supplementation either during pregnancy or early childhood has minimal value in correcting childhood stunting. Indeed, EED is believed to be responsible for 40% of childhood stunting. Disruption in intestinal barrier function affects gut immune homeostasis, nutrient flows, and consequently dysbiosis in the gut microbiome. The gut microbiota consists of 100 trillion bacteria which interact with epithelial cells, the mucus layer and the mucosal immune system that balances tolerance and effector functions. Thus the gut microbiome has an important role in shaping the responsiveness of the gut immune system. The mucus barrier and the normal gut microbiota limit enteropathogen colonisation. Influx of bacteria from the lumen to the systemic circulation represents microbial translocation and initiation of systemic of inflammatory process through recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) present on Antigen Presenting Cells (APCs). Three fundamental processes drive the epithelial damage which is so important in EED: infection, undernutrition, and immune dysfunction. Multiple clinical trials show that efforts to correct malnutrition through conventional therapies and improving hygiene and sanitation do not overcome growth deficits by more than about 10%. There is increasing interest in the use of probiotics which may allow pathogen decolonization, improve barrier function and restore overall gut homeostasis. Such therapies are at early stage of trials but may have potential in addressing the global burden of EED, by improving barrier function and gut pathophysiology.
Colonization of gut by enteropathogens is common in children with EED. These include ETEC, Campylobacter, Shigella and Salmonella species. Consistent data from Bangladesh and Zambia show that children with refractory stunting carry over four pathogens on average, whilst controls carry less than two. There is also clear evidence of altered composition of the microbiota in children with EED.
Probiotics may serve to overcome the problem of EED through all mechanisms of pathogenicity, by providing additional bacteria that may help in intestinal decolonization of pathogenic microorganisms (changing the microbiological niche), promoting epithelial healing, improving nutrient absorption, and restoration of an appropriate immune balance between tolerance and responsiveness.
To date the focus of research on childhood stunting has been on the young child. It is increasingly appreciated, however, that stunting often begins in utero and the focus has shifted to women's health and pregnancy. For example, the Lancet 2021 Series on maternal and child undernutrition states that "Investments to reduce undernutrition in women are important not only for women's own health but also for the health and nutrition of their children". Results from rural Bangladesh reveal poor gestational weight gain that ultimately leads to intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight and ultimately stunting and wasting. Furthermore, another study recently completed in slum settlements of Dhaka, Bangladesh demonstrated a high prevalence of EED among undernourished women. Intestinal histopathology was abnormal in more than 80% of women. We postulate that growth retardation in utero is a consequence of EED in the mother during pregnancy and lactation. This leads to systemic inflammation, which leads to disadvantageous partitioning of nutrients, and reduced nutrient availability.
This trial will explore the conceptual framework that a well known probiotic, that can improve the composition of the gut microbiota, can reduce biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and gut health. This will restore healthy microbial signalling to the host epithelium, ameliorate barrier function through secretion of mucus and antimicrobial factors, and improve nutrient availability.
The primary objective of this trial is to determine if a probiotic, Vivomixx, can reduce inflammation and epithelial damage in pregnant women with environmental enteropathy in the target countries.
The secondary objectives of this trial are:
To determine if Vivomixx can reduce enteropathogen colonisation To determine if Vivomixx can impact the structure and function of the microbiome To determine if Vivomixx can reduce permeability. To determine if Vivomixx can impact the host metabolome in pregnant woman To evaluate variability in endpoints across geographies and participating laboratories.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic | Experimental | Drug: Probiotic, Drug: PlaceboParticipant in the treatment arm will receive a daily dose of the probiotic for 8 weeks. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Device: CapScan®Participant in the control arm will receive a daily dose of a placebo for 8 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women over the age of 18, living in Guediawaye district, Senegal
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- • have had diarrhea, defined as the passage of three or more loose stools per 24 hours, in the preceding 14 days
- but may be enrolled if/when these disqualifiers have expired.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ProbioticProbiotic | Drug | Probiotic |
| PlaceboPlacebo | Drug | Placebo, Probiotic |
| CapScan®The only non-standard sample collection instrument is the CapScan® device. The CapScan Collection Capsule ("Capsule") is a non-invasive device that collects gastrointestinal samples along the GI tract that are then analyzed outside the body. Samples collected by the Capsule will be expressed, then undergo DNA sequencing and mass spectrometric analysis to determine the identity and function of the bacterial and host cells in the different regions of the GI tract and compared to similar analyses conducted on concomitantly collected stool samples. | Device | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in inflammation and epithelial damage in pregnant women with environmental enteropathy
Time frame: Day 0 (screening) - Day 56
Percentage change (mean, unweighted) in a multiple panel of biomarkers between baseline and last sample collected after 56 days of treatment, compared to control group.
6 secondary outcomes
Change in enteropathogen colonisation
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 56
Impact on the structure and function of the microbiome
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 56
Change in permeability
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 56
Impact of the host metabolome in pregnant woman
Time frame: Day 1 - Day 56
Rate of weight gain in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy
Time frame: Day 0 (screening) - Day 56
Variability in endpoints across geographies and participating laboratories
Time frame: Beginning of recruitment in the first study site - end of recruitment in the last study site (approximately 12 months)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual data for all primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available.
Related trials for Environmental Enteric Dysfunction
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Maternal Probiotic Intervention to Improve Gut Health-Trial II-Pakistan
Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), Stunting
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Comparative Efficacy of Antibiotics for Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth in Bangladeshi Children
Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study of a Modified Therapeutic Food Compared With a Standard Nutrient Supplement in Young Children in Rural Guatemala
Stunting of Growth, Chronic Malnutrition
Enrolling by invitation
Effect of Hygiene and Menstrual Hygiene Interventions on Learning and Psychosocial Wellbeing in Madagascar
Urinary Tract Infections, Malnutrition
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Glucagon-like Peptide 2 (GLP-2) in Undernourished Women Improving From Histology-Confirmed Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED)
Environmental Enteric Dysfunction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yakhya Dieye, PhD principal investigator
Institut Pasteur de Dakar
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Probiotic and CapScan® in people with Environmental Enteric Dysfunction, run by Institut Pasteur de Dakar at 1 site in Senegal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Senegal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in inflammation and epithelial damage in pregnant women with environmental enteropathy (time frame: Day 0 (screening) - Day 56). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2026.