Department of Anorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical UniversityNCT05503381
A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Noninferiority Clinical Study of Perioperative and Oncological Safety in Patients With Rectal Cancer
A study testing Laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with transanal specimens in people with Department of Anorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University, run by Changhai Hospital.
Trial summary
Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for low rectal cancer has a good minimally invasive effect. However, the NOSES prognosis studies are all small sample retrospective studies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University
- What is being tested?
- Laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with transanal specimens
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients were aged between 18 and 75 years;
- Pathologically confirmed as adenocarcinoma;
- Colonoscopy or imaging examination confirmed that the distance between the lower edge of the tumor and the anal margin was ≤ 5cm;
- Preoperative imaging diagnosis was ct1-3nxm0;
- Preoperative colonoscopy or imaging diagnosis confirmed that the maximum diameter of the tumor was not more than 5cm;
- Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 30kg / m2;
Show all 9Show fewer
- No local complications (no obstruction, incomplete obstruction, no massive active bleeding, no puncture Formation of pores and abscesses without invasion of adjacent organs);
- The hematopoietic functions of heart, lung, liver, kidney and bone marrow meet the requirements of surgery and anesthesia;
- Voluntary informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Preoperative evaluation of patients with lateral lymph node metastasis;
- Previous history of malignant tumor;
- Simultaneous multiple primary colorectal cancer was diagnosed;
- There are contraindications to laparoscopic surgery, such as severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency;
- Patients who had undergone abdominal and pelvic surgery for many times or had extensive abdominal adhesions;
- Patients with intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, intestinal hemorrhage and other emergency operations;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome associated rectal cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease in the active phase;
- Have a history of serious mental illness;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- Patients with uncontrolled infection before operation;
- The investigator considered that the patient should not participate in the trial.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Noninferiority Study of Perioperative and Oncological Safety of Transanal Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Low Rectal Cancer (NOSES I) Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Assisted Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer
Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for low rectal cancer has a good minimally invasive effect. However, the NOSES prognosis studies are all small sample retrospective studies. This study conducted a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of NOSES surgery for low rectal cancer to compare the difference in surgical outcomes between conventional laparoscopic surgery and NOSES surgery for low rectal cancer. A total of 500 patients were planned to be enrolled, including 250 in the control group and 250 in the experimental group. The primary end point was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary end points were surgical safety, postoperative pathology, postoperative defecation, urination, and sexual function. Through a large sample size study, this study aims to clarify the advantages of NOSE surgery for low rectal cancer, promote the promotion of low rectal cancer NOSES surgery in the country, standardize the way of low rectal cancer NOSES surgery, improve the surgical treatment of patients with low rectal cancer, improve the quality of life of patients, reduce the burden of patients, and increase the satisfaction. And improve the international influence of the project team in the field of minimally invasive surgical treatment of colorectal cancer.
Read the detailed description
Research Objectives:
- To compare the difference in the oncological effect between laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with anal specimens (NOSES I type) and laparoscopic assisted surgery for low rectal cancer;
- To compare the safety of laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with anal specimens (NOSES I type) and laparoscopic assisted surgery for low rectal cancer within 30 days of perioperative period;
- To explore the difference in the prophylactic stoma implementation and the positive rate of tumor cells in pelvic flushing fluid between laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with anal specimens (NOSES I) and laparoscopic assisted resection of lower rectal cancer.
Primary end Point: 2-year Disease-free survival (DFS) Secondary end points :(1) incidence of SSI; (2) Incidence of serious postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage, postoperative bleeding, etc.); (3) R0 removal rate; (4) Postoperative recovery (pain, exhaust and defecation time, eating time, postoperative hospital stay, etc.); (5) Postoperative pathological conditions (distance between upper and lower margins, number of lymph nodes, circumferential margins, etc.); (6) 2-year RFS and OS.
Exploratory end points :(1) prophylactic colostomy rate; (2) Positive rate of tumor cells in pelvic flushing fluid.
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients aged 18-75 years;
- Adenocarcinoma confirmed by pathology;
- colonoscopy or imaging examination confirmed that the distance between the lower edge of the tumor and the anal edge was less than 5cm;
- Preoperative imaging diagnosis was CT1-3NXM0;
- Preoperative colonoscopy or imaging diagnosis confirmed that the maximum diameter of the tumor was not more than 5cm;
- Body Mass Index (BMI)≤30kg/m2;
- No local complications (no obstruction, incomplete obstruction, massive active bleeding, no perforation) Formation of pores and abscesses without invasion of adjacent organs);
- The hematopoietic functions of heart, lung, liver, kidney and bone marrow meet the requirements of surgery and anesthesia;
- Voluntarily sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria:
- Preoperative evaluation of lateral lymph node metastasis;
- Previous history of malignant tumor;
- Simultaneous multiple primary colorectal cancer;
- Patients with contraindications of laparoscopic surgery, such as severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency;
- Previous multiple abdominal and pelvic surgeries or extensive abdominal adhesions;
- Patients with intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, intestinal bleeding, etc., requiring emergency surgery;
- Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome associated rectal cancer, and active inflammatory bowel disease;
- have a history of serious mental illness;
- pregnant or lactating women;
- Patients with uncontrolled infection before operation;
- The investigator did not consider the patient to be eligible for the trial.
Exit Criteria:
- Patients with distant metastasis confirmed by intraoperative exploration or postoperative pathology, including liver, pelvic cavity, ovary, peritoneum, distant lymph node metastasis, etc.;
- Intraoperative exploration was necessary for combined organ resection;
- After enrollment in the study, patients requiring emergency surgical resection due to intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, intestinal bleeding, etc.
- Patients who requested to withdraw from the study cohort for various reasons after enrollment;
- Those who fail to complete the institute planning for various reasons after being enrolled in the study.
- Being tested
- Laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with transanal specimens
- Keywords
- Colorectal cancer;Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery;Disease-free survival
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with transanal specimensProcedure or surgery
According to the standard laparoscopic anterior rectum resection, the rectum was separated 2-3cm below the tumor, the rectum was severed 1-2cm from the lower edge of the tumor, the rectal stump was connected with the tumor through the anus, and the sigmoid colon was severed 10cm from the upper edge of the tumor. The stapler head was placed in the sigmoid colon stump, and then the sigmoid colon stump was closed with a linear cutting closure device. Then, the sigmoid colon stump is returned to the abdominal cavity through the anus, the distal rectal stump is closed with a suture purse or a linear cutting closure device, and the stapler body is inserted through the anus, and then the anastomosis is completed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Group | Experimental | The patient underwent laparoscopic lower rectal cancer surgery with transanal specimen collection Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with transanal specimens |
| Traditional laparoscopic surgery | No intervention | The patient underwent conventional laparoscopic lower rectal cancer surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
disease-free survival rate
After the postoperative review, the patient had no tumor recurrence and metastasis
Measured: 2-year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Aug 2022
- Study start1 Jan 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Department of Anorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical UniversityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Changhai HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized, controlled, multicenter, noninferiority clinical study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Changhai Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zhenglou, Changhai Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05503381
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CH-NOSES
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 14 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Noninferiority Study of Perioperative and Oncological Safety of Transanal Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Low Rectal Cancer (NOSES I) Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Assisted Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05503381
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CH-NOSES
- Keywords
- Colorectal cancer;Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery;Disease-free survival
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Changhai HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for low rectal cancer has a good minimally invasive effect. However, the NOSES prognosis studies are all small sample retrospective studies. This study conducted a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of NOSES surgery for low rectal cancer to compare the difference in surgical outcomes between conventional laparoscopic surgery and NOSES surgery for low rectal cancer. A total of 500 patients were planned to be enrolled, including 250 in the control group and 250 in the experimental group. The primary end point was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary end points were surgical safety, postoperative pathology, postoperative defecation, urination, and sexual function. Through a large sample size study, this study aims to clarify the advantages of NOSE surgery for low rectal cancer, promote the promotion of low rectal cancer NOSES surgery in the country, standardize the way of low rectal cancer NOSES surgery, improve the surgical treatment of patients with low rectal cancer, improve the quality of life of patients, reduce the burden of patients, and increase the satisfaction. And improve the international influence of the project team in the field of minimally invasive surgical treatment of colorectal cancer.
Detailed description
Research Objectives:
- To compare the difference in the oncological effect between laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with anal specimens (NOSES I type) and laparoscopic assisted surgery for low rectal cancer;
- To compare the safety of laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with anal specimens (NOSES I type) and laparoscopic assisted surgery for low rectal cancer within 30 days of perioperative period;
- To explore the difference in the prophylactic stoma implementation and the positive rate of tumor cells in pelvic flushing fluid between laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with anal specimens (NOSES I) and laparoscopic assisted resection of lower rectal cancer.
Primary end Point: 2-year Disease-free survival (DFS) Secondary end points :(1) incidence of SSI; (2) Incidence of serious postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage, postoperative bleeding, etc.); (3) R0 removal rate; (4) Postoperative recovery (pain, exhaust and defecation time, eating time, postoperative hospital stay, etc.); (5) Postoperative pathological conditions (distance between upper and lower margins, number of lymph nodes, circumferential margins, etc.); (6) 2-year RFS and OS.
Exploratory end points :(1) prophylactic colostomy rate; (2) Positive rate of tumor cells in pelvic flushing fluid.
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients aged 18-75 years;
- Adenocarcinoma confirmed by pathology;
- colonoscopy or imaging examination confirmed that the distance between the lower edge of the tumor and the anal edge was less than 5cm;
- Preoperative imaging diagnosis was CT1-3NXM0;
- Preoperative colonoscopy or imaging diagnosis confirmed that the maximum diameter of the tumor was not more than 5cm;
- Body Mass Index (BMI)≤30kg/m2;
- No local complications (no obstruction, incomplete obstruction, massive active bleeding, no perforation) Formation of pores and abscesses without invasion of adjacent organs);
- The hematopoietic functions of heart, lung, liver, kidney and bone marrow meet the requirements of surgery and anesthesia;
- Voluntarily sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria:
- Preoperative evaluation of lateral lymph node metastasis;
- Previous history of malignant tumor;
- Simultaneous multiple primary colorectal cancer;
- Patients with contraindications of laparoscopic surgery, such as severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency;
- Previous multiple abdominal and pelvic surgeries or extensive abdominal adhesions;
- Patients with intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, intestinal bleeding, etc., requiring emergency surgery;
- Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, Lynch syndrome associated rectal cancer, and active inflammatory bowel disease;
- have a history of serious mental illness;
- pregnant or lactating women;
- Patients with uncontrolled infection before operation;
- The investigator did not consider the patient to be eligible for the trial.
Exit Criteria:
- Patients with distant metastasis confirmed by intraoperative exploration or postoperative pathology, including liver, pelvic cavity, ovary, peritoneum, distant lymph node metastasis, etc.;
- Intraoperative exploration was necessary for combined organ resection;
- After enrollment in the study, patients requiring emergency surgical resection due to intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, intestinal bleeding, etc.
- Patients who requested to withdraw from the study cohort for various reasons after enrollment;
- Those who fail to complete the institute planning for various reasons after being enrolled in the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized, controlled, multicenter, noninferiority clinical study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Group | Experimental | Procedure: Laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with transanal specimensThe patient underwent laparoscopic lower rectal cancer surgery with transanal specimen collection |
| Traditional laparoscopic surgery | No intervention | –The patient underwent conventional laparoscopic lower rectal cancer surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients were aged between 18 and 75 years;
- Pathologically confirmed as adenocarcinoma;
- Colonoscopy or imaging examination confirmed that the distance between the lower edge of the tumor and the anal margin was ≤ 5cm;
- Preoperative imaging diagnosis was ct1-3nxm0;
- Preoperative colonoscopy or imaging diagnosis confirmed that the maximum diameter of the tumor was not more than 5cm;
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Preoperative evaluation of patients with lateral lymph node metastasis;
- Previous history of malignant tumor;
- Simultaneous multiple primary colorectal cancer was diagnosed;
- There are contraindications to laparoscopic surgery, such as severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency;
- Patients who had undergone abdominal and pelvic surgery for many times or had extensive abdominal adhesions;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with transanal specimensAccording to the standard laparoscopic anterior rectum resection, the rectum was separated 2-3cm below the tumor, the rectum was severed 1-2cm from the lower edge of the tumor, the rectal stump was connected with the tumor through the anus, and the sigmoid colon was severed 10cm from the upper edge of the tumor. The stapler head was placed in the sigmoid colon stump, and then the sigmoid colon stump was closed with a linear cutting closure device. Then, the sigmoid colon stump is returned to the abdominal cavity through the anus, the distal rectal stump is closed with a suture purse or a linear cutting closure device, and the stapler body is inserted through the anus, and then the anastomosis is completed. | Procedure or surgery | Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Group |
Primary outcome
disease-free survival rate
Time frame: 2-year
After the postoperative review, the patient had no tumor recurrence and metastasis
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2022.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal cancer with transanal specimens in people with Department of Anorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Naval Medical University, run by Changhai Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
disease-free survival rate (time frame: 2-year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2022.