AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung Transplant; ComplicationsNCT05505422

Routine Versus Selective Intraoperative ECMO in Lung Transplant

A study testing Routine ECMO and On demand ECMO in people with Lung Transplant; Complications and Extracorporeal Circulation; Complications, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Intraoperative hemodynamic management is vital in the success of lung transplantation. Significant intraoperative hemodynamic compromise and hypoxic episodes may contribute to an increase in severe postoperative complications related to hypoperfusion, including cerebrovascular accidents, acute kidney injury, and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Routine ECMO and On demand ECMO
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
28 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
15 Sep 2022to 15 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients undergoing lung transplant surgery during the study period (6 months)

Who cannot join

  • Inability to provide consent for the study or patient refusal
  • Retransplantation
  • Multi-organ transplantation
  • Lung transplant recipients where intraoperative support is mandatory and "off- pump" transplant would be unsafe:
  • Severe pulmonary hypertension (PH):
  • Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) ≥ 80 mm Hg on echocardiography, right heart catheterization, or pulmonary artery catheter measurement
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Mean PAP ≥ 55 mm Hg on echocardiography, right heart catheterization, or pulmonary artery catheter measurement
  • The ratio of mean pulmonary to systemic artery pressure of more than 0.66
  • Moderate to severe right ventricular (RV) hypokinesis or dysfunction
  • Left ventricular dysfunction: Defined as ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% on echocardiography, ventriculography, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Significant coronary artery disease (CAD)requiring stenting or surgical grafting

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X3E4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial of Routine Versus Selective Use of Intraoperative Extracorporeal Mechanical Support During Lung Transplantation : a Pilot Study

Intraoperative hemodynamic management is vital in the success of lung transplantation. Significant intraoperative hemodynamic compromise and hypoxic episodes may contribute to an increase in severe postoperative complications related to hypoperfusion, including cerebrovascular accidents, acute kidney injury, and mesenteric ischemia. In certain lung transplant recipients, intraoperative cardiopulmonary support is mandatory because certain factors would make "off-pump" transplants unsafe. These include severe pulmonary hypertension or severe ventricular dysfunction. In such patients, routine intraoperative support should be employed. However, it is possible to conduct the lung transplant without cardiopulmonary support in the remainder of patients who do not have severe pulmonary hypertension or right heart dysfunction. In such patients, the lung transplant may be started without cardiopulmonary support. However, cardiopulmonary support may be initiated "on-demand" if there is development or impending hemodynamic embarrassment or hypoxia. Conversely, the opposite approach would be to routinely conduct all lung transplant operations using cardiopulmonary support, which may also lead to specific ECMO-related complications.

The investigators question whether on demand intraoperative ECMO in patients with significant risk factors will produce severe postoperative complications in a rate similar to routine ECMO.

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis: In patients where cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) / ECMO is not mandatory, on-demand use of intra-operative ECMO is equivalent to routine use for patients undergoing lung transplant.

The study will be a prospective, randomized controlled trial. The investigators seek to compare outcomes of two different strategies of cardiopulmonary support during lung transplantation; routine support with ECMO versus selective (on-demand), indication- based support with ECMO. The allocation ratio will be 1:1. A multi-center trial is necessary to allow for a sufficient sample size. However, the investigators believe a pilot study is essential to determine feasibility before embarking on such a significant undertaking.

In this preliminary pilot study, recruitment will be limited to lung transplant patients at the Centre hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM). The primary purpose of the pilot study will be to define recruitment ability and assess the feasibility of conducting the study. Depending on the results of this pilot study, the next step would be to expand the study to multiple lung transplant centers to achieve an adequate sample size and power, allowing the investigators to answer the question of interest.

Being tested
Routine ECMO, On demand ECMO
Medical subject headings
Postoperative Complications

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Routine ECMODevice

    Routine ECMO during lung tansplant

  • On demand ECMODevice

    Selective, indication-based intraoperative cardiopulmonary support. In this group, the transplant will be planned without cardiopulmonary support. intraoperative ECMO will be used selectively based on hemodynamic and/or gas exchange abnormalities :

    1. Inability to maintain adequate hemodynamics and stable perfusion or oxygenation during surgery
    2. Prolonged high dose pressor required to maintain adequate perfusion
    3. A sustained drop in cerebral saturation > 25% of baseline despite initial attempts at optimization
    4. Inability to tolerate pulmonary artery clamping
    5. Inadequate gas exchange despite attempts at the optimization of ventilator parameters and treatments related to respiratory mechanics and ventilation/perfusion matching
    6. Inadequate exposure to the surgical field
Study groups in NCT05505422
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
On demand ECMO (study group)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: On demand ECMO
Routine ECMO (control group)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Routine ECMO

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Study recruitment rate

    Measured: 6 months after the onset of study

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Percentage of patients loss to follow-up

    Measured: 1 year

  2. The composite incidence of death, disabling stroke, grade 2 or 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours, major bleeding (BARC grade 3a, 3b or 5), vascular complications, or stage II or III acute kidney injury at 14 days.

    Measured: 14 days

  3. Incidence of all-cause mortality at 30 days, 90 days, and one year

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Incidence of postoperative stroke / cerebrovascular accident

    Measured: 14 days

  5. Incidence of an Early major postoperative neurologic complication (EMPNC): This includes stroke, severe encephalopathy, and severe seizures diagnosed within 14 days after surgery.

    Measured: 14 days

  6. Incidence of severe postoperative complications. This is defined as Clavien-Dindo grade III complication or greater

    Measured: 14 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Aug 2022
  2. Study start15 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion15 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05505422
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023-10663
Other IDs
2023
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
9 Aug 2022
Last updated
9 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Nasir BS, Weatherald J, Ramsay T, Cypel M, Donahoe L, Durkin C, Schisler T, Nagendran J, Liberman M, Landry C, Overbeek C, Moore A, Ferraro P. Randomized trial of routine versus on-demand intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation: A feasibility study. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Jun;43(6):1005-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.02.1454. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

    PubMed 38423414

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Routine ECMO and On demand ECMO in people with Lung Transplant; Complications and Extracorporeal Circulation; Complications, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Study recruitment rate (time frame: 6 months after the onset of study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05505422, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in