AzTrials
AzTrials

Muscle DamageNCT05506514

Heat Therapy to Accelerate Muscle Recovery

A study testing Water immersion in people with Muscle Damage, run by Aspetar at 1 site in Qatar.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The use of cold on muscle (Ice, Cold Water Immersion - CWI or cryotherapy) is a widespread practice used by health professionals, athletes or non-athletic population in the treatment of muscle soreness and soft tissue injuries. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Muscle Damage
What is being tested?
Water immersion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteQatar
Study dates
14 Jul 2022to 27 Apr 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy
  • Adult (18 to 45 yrs)
  • Physically active

Who cannot join

  • Contraindication to physical activity as per the Par-Q questionnaire
  • Neural, skin or muscular pathology.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Qatar1 site
  • Aspetar sport medicine hospital

    Doha, Baladiyat ad Dawhah, 0000

Other trials in Qatar

About this study

The use of cold on muscle (Ice, Cold Water Immersion - CWI or cryotherapy) is a widespread practice used by health professionals, athletes or non-athletic population in the treatment of muscle soreness and soft tissue injuries. Application of cold on muscle is well known to decrease inflammation and reduce pain perception. However, some studies in humans and animals have reported contrasted effects of cold on muscle regeneration. On the other hand, recent studies in humans suggest that passive heat exposure can impact positively muscle protein synthesis, mitochondrial content and muscle torque in different types of populations. Rodent studies comparing heat and cold modalities following a muscle injury have reported that only repeated heat exposure enhances cross sectional area, accelerate macrophage infiltration in damaged fibers and enhances satellite cells activation which led to a faster muscle regeneration. As such heat therapy may be a promising tool to accelerate recovery after muscle injury. This study will investigate the effect of three distinct thermal interventions (Hot, Cold and Thermoneutral water immersion) on human skeletal muscle regeneration after an eccentric exercise. 36 participants will be distributed in a counterbalanced way into 3 groups being immersed for 15min to 1h per day in either HEAT or COLD or NEUTRAL water for 10 days following eccentric contractions.

Read the detailed description

Background information \& study rationale Cold exposure is a therapeutic modality supposed to enhance regeneration by alleviating pain, reducing tissue metabolism and restricting swelling and inflammation process. However, in light of some recent studies in animal models and in humans, cold application on injury might delay and impair muscle regeneration. At the same time, passive heat therapy emerges as a novel powerful strategy to enhance muscle recovery. Indeed, in healthy subjects it has been shown that 1H/day of passive heat exposure during 11 days enhances muscle torque through an improvement in contractile muscle function. In an immobilization context, it was recently reported that repeated passive heat exposure may reduce muscle atrophy and induce mitochondrial adaptations.

In rats, heat exposure following chemically-induced injury has been shown to enhance muscle regeneration by increasing muscle weight and cross-sectional area compared to non-heated or cold exposed rats. Macrophage infiltration were reported to migrate to injury site earlier in heated animals compared to non-heated and icing-treated groups. In the same way, heat exposure was associated with an increase in satellite cells number in injured muscle fibers. In addition, it has been shown that ice application immediately after injury has delayed the recovery of Myosin Heavy Chain (MyHC) profile and in contrast, repeated heat application has facilitated the recovery of an uninjured MyHC profile. Interestingly, collagen fibers area and TGF-β1 (a collagen precursors) were shown to be lower in heated groups than in control and iced groups suggesting less muscle fibrosis. Animal studies suggest that heat exposure may be a potent stimulus to enhance soft tissue regeneration after injury.

Very few human studies have examined the impact of local heat exposure on regeneration after muscle injury. A recent study focusing on muscle regeneration in humans, have investigated the effects of a heat therapy protocol composed of five daily 90 minutes sessions with heating garment performed after an exercise-based injury protocol composed of 300 maximal voluntary eccentric contractions. Compared to thermoneutral intervention, heated group presented a better recovery of strength in a fatigue resistance test consisting of 28 maximal isokinetic contractions at 180°/sec at 1 and 4 days after exercise session.

Study goals and objectives The goal of the present study is to determine the effect of multiple localized hot-water or cold-water immersions on muscle regeneration.

  1. Principal research question/objective:
  • Determine if heat therapy can enhance and hasten muscle regeneration after an injury.
  1. Secondary research questions/objectives (if applicable):
  • Clarify the usefulness of cold modalities to enhance muscle regeneration after an injury.
  • Investigate how heat and cold modalities influence biochemical markers of muscle regeneration.

Methodology \& Project Duration The study will assess the effect of three distinct thermal therapies (Hot, Cold and Thermoneutral water immersion) on human skeletal muscle regeneration after a bout of electrically induced eccentric contractions. Participants will be assigned in a counterbalanced way to either HEAT or COLD or NEUTRAL group. Participants will be balanced after familiarization and baseline testing to ensure consistency between groups. Participants of all groups will complete a muscle injury protocol and will be treated with the assigned intervention immediately after injury and during the 10 following days.

Eccentric exercise protocol:

The eccentric exercise protocol will be inspired by the protocol conducted in several studies. This protocol (detailed below) is an exercise-based protocol that elicits substantially greater amounts of cytoskeletal damage compared with maximal voluntary contractions only. It allows us to better observe the impact of different therapies on the regeneration phases.

All participants will complete a familiarization week before the intervention. At the beginning of the intervention, baseline measurements will be tested for each participant involved in the study. The right leg will realize an electrically induced eccentric exercise protocol with the knee extensor muscles. The exercise protocol will consist of a total of 200 eccentric contractions: (i) 5 sets of 20 repetitions of eccentric leg extension at an angular velocity of 30°/second followed by (ii) 5 sets of 20 repetitions of eccentric leg extension at 180°/second using an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex System 3). A 30 s break between each set and a 5 min break between the slow and fast contractions will be given. All muscle contractions will be induced by electrical stimulations (ES) without any voluntary contribution. Impulse trains (200 μs single pulse duration; 40 Hz; maximal current, 100 mA) will be delivered under manual control over two stimulation electrodes placed across the vastus lateralis muscle of the assigned leg; 5 cm from the top of the patella and; 5 cm from the anterior superior iliac spine. The subjects will be carefully instructed not to produce any voluntary muscle contraction during this phase of the exercise protocol. Electrical stimulation will begin at the initiation of downward movement of the dynamometer lever arm, and it will be turned off at the end of this downward movement. Range of motion during the eccentric exercise measurement will be set from 90° to 10°.

Thermal interventions:

Local heating, local cooling and sham intervention will be applied by immersing the legs up to the waist in a water bath. Thermal interventions will be applied 11 times during the protocol. They will be initiated 1 hour (D0) after the completion of eccentric exercise protocol and every day for 10 days (D1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10). Heat intervention (HOT) will consist of immersing the legs for 60 minutes in a hot water bath maintained at a temperature of 42°C. Cold intervention (COLD) will consist of immersing the legs for 15 minutes in a cold-water bath maintained at a temperature of 15°C. For the sham intervention (NEUTRAL), participant legs will be immersed for 30 minutes in a thermoneutral water bath maintained at a temperature of 32°C. Thermal interventions from day 1 to day 10 will be performed each day immediately after the completion of daily testing measurement.

Quadriceps muscle temperature will be monitored (during day 3) using a needle thermo-sensor. This measure aims to identify the changes in muscle temperature induced by each bath temperature at different muscle depth. The needle will be inserted to a depth of 2.5cm into the vastus lateralis of the treated leg after local anesthesia of the skin (2 mL of Xylocaine without adrenaline). Core temperature will be monitored using ingestible pills thermometer (e-Celcius, Bodycap, France). Room temperature will be set at 24° and 40% humidity to not interfere with treatment effects.

Familiarization visit:

A familiarization visit will be completed during the month preceding the baseline measurements. It will be composed of an eccentric exercise initiation protocol with 4 electrically induced eccentric contractions of quadriceps muscle at 30°/second and 4 at 180°/second. Participants will also experience a lightened version of the neuromuscular tests (4 peak twitch contractions, 3 maximal voluntary contractions, 2 EMG measurements, 5 RFD contractions, 5 contractions at 120°/second) in order to accustomed them to the testing procedure. During the familiarization visit, a consent form and a Par-Q questionnaire will also be completed and an anthropometric analysis (ISAK) will be realised by participants.

Data collection procedure:

All the tests from day 1 to day 10 will be realized before the thermal intervention to avoid any acute effect.

Complete neuromuscular testing:

A complete neuromuscular test battery will be performed at baseline (i.e. the week preceding the beginning of the intervention) and post-injury at day 10. It will be composed of an electrically evoked twitch measure, 3 maximal voluntary contractions in isometric mode, 5 contractions to assess rate of force development, an electromyographic analysis, a shear wave elastography analysis, a fatigue test and a muscle soreness evaluation of the vastus lateralis.

Intermediate neuromuscular testing:

An Intermediate neuromuscular testing will be performed at day 2 and day 4 after the eccentric exercise. The intermediate test battery will only include the electrically evoked twitch measure, 3 maximal voluntary contractions in isometric mode, 5 contractions to assess RFD, an electromyographic analysis, a shear wave elastography analysis and a muscle soreness evaluation of the vastus lateralis.

Simplified neuromuscular testing:

A simplified neuromuscular testing will be performed at day 1, 2, 3 and then every day from day 5 to day 9. It will only be composed of an electrically evoked twitch measure and a muscle soreness evaluation of the vastus lateralis.

Muscle biopsy sampling:

Biopsies of the vastus lateralis will be taken at baseline (i.e. the week preceding the beginning of the intervention) and on day 5 and 11. The biopsy taken the baseline measurement will be sampled on the contralateral leg.

Thermal imaging:

Thermal imaging of the legs will be recorded each day from day 1 to day 10 before the completion of any neuromuscular tests or biopsy.

Conditions
Muscle Damage
Being tested
Water immersion

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Water immersionOther

    Comparison of 3 different water temperatures

Study groups in NCT05506514
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HotExperimental1h per day of water immersion at 42ºC for 11 days
Receives: Other: Water immersion
TemperateSham comparator30min per day of water immersion at 32ºC for 11 days
Receives: Other: Water immersion
ColdExperimental15min per day of water immersion at 15ºC for 11 days
Receives: Other: Water immersion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in muscle strength after 2 days

    Change in maximal knee extensor isometric voluntary force (kg) 2 days after the exercise as compared to baseline

    Measured: 2 days post exercise

  2. Change in muscle strength after 4 days

    Change in maximal knee extensor isometric voluntary force (kg) 4 days after the exercise as compared to baseline

    Measured: 4 days post exercise

  3. Change in muscle strength after 10 days

    Change in maximal knee extensor isometric voluntary force (kg) 10 days after the exercise as compared to baseline

    Measured: 10 days post exercise

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in muscle fiber

    Change in the proportion of centrally nucleated muscle fiber (%) in a muscle biopsy of the vastus lateralis at 5 days post exercise as compared to baseline

    Measured: 5 days post exercise

  2. Change in muscle fiber

    Change in the proportion of centrally nucleated muscle fiber (%) in a muscle biopsy of the vastus lateralis at 11 days post exercise as compared to baseline

    Measured: 11 days post exercise

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Aug 2022
  2. Study start14 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion27 Apr 2024
  4. Study completion27 Apr 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05506514
Sponsor's protocol ID
F202202032
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
24 Apr 2022
Last updated
15 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No personal identifier will be shared. All data will be anonymous

Publications

  • Dablainville V, Mornas A, Normand-Gravier T, Al-Mulla M, Papakostas E, Olory B, Fermin TM, Zampeli F, Nader N, Alhammoud M, Bayne F, Sanchez AMJ, Cardinale M, Candau R, Bernardi H, Racinais S. Muscle regeneration is improved by hot water immersion but unchanged by cold following a simulated musculoskeletal injury in humans. J Physiol. 2025 Dec;603(23):7603-7625. doi: 10.1113/JP287777. Epub 2025 May 28.

    PubMed 40437768

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Water immersion in people with Muscle Damage, run by Aspetar at 1 site in Qatar.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Qatar. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in muscle strength after 2 days (time frame: 2 days post exercise). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05506514, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in