Fat NecrosisPhase 3FAFINCT05507710
Indocyanine Green for Perfusion Assessment of DIEP Flaps
A Phase 3 study testing Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of perfusion in people with Fat Necrosis, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 2 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Currently during DIEP flap reconstruction, the perfusion of the flap is assessed by the clinical view of the surgeon. Identification of demarcated ischemic zones of the DIEP flap could be optimized by using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) in order to lower the rate of fat necrosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Fat Necrosis
- What is being tested?
- Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of perfusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 280 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 May 2019to 1 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female patients 18 years of age and older
- Who underwent a mastectomy for breast cancer or prophylactic due to genetic predisposition
- Patients scheduled for elective surgery for autologous breast reconstruction, uni- or bilateral, using DIEP or msTRAM flaps. In case of bilateral breast reconstruction the flaps should be bilateral anastomosed.
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Allergy to ICG, iodine or shellfish
- Any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigators could potentially jeopardize the safety of the patient
- Impaired renal function defined as eGFR< 50 mL/min/1.73m2 (this can be seen in the standard preoperative lab results)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, 2333ZA
Alexander L. Vahrmeijer, MD, PhD, +31 71 526 2309, a.l.vahrmeijer@lumc.nl
Pieter S. Verduijn, MD, +31715296212, p.s.verduijn@lumc.nl
- Recruiting
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, 3015GD
Marc A.M. Mureau, MD, PhD, +31 614390753, m.mureau@erasmusmc.nl
About this study
Official title: Indocyanine Green for Perfusion Assessment of DIEP Flaps: A Dutch Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Currently during DIEP flap reconstruction, the perfusion of the flap is assessed by the clinical view of the surgeon. Identification of demarcated ischemic zones of the DIEP flap could be optimized by using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) in order to lower the rate of fat necrosis. This study evaluates whether intraoperative perfusion assessment with ICG fluorescence imaging causes a lower rate of fat necrosis compared to conventional intraoperative clinical evaluation of DIEP flaps.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: Autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy due to cancer or prophylactically due to genetically increased risk is frequently performed. A complication that may occur after a deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEP) reconstruction is the occurrence of fat necrosis in the transplanted flap due to ischemia (reperfusion injury). Identification of deep inferior epigastric artery perforators and identification of demarcated ischemic zones of the DIEP flap can be optimized by using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG), as has been demonstrated in previous studies. This could result in less fat necrosis, less partial flap loss, and other complications. A randomized controlled trial would be the best study design to assess the value of ICG in determining the perfusion of DIEP flaps, thereby reducing the occurrence of fat necrosis and other complications.
Objective: To determine whether fluorescence imaging using ICG for the assessment of DIEP flap perfusion during surgery decreases the occurrence of fat necrosis compared to standard intraoperative clinical assessment of DIEP flap perfusion.
Study design: This is a two-armed randomized controlled trial:
- interventional arm: evaluation of flap perfusion based on 1) clinical parameters, and 2) fluorescence imaging using ICG
- conventional arm: evaluation of flap perfusion based on clinical parameters only
Study population: Patients scheduled for elective surgery for autologous breast reconstruction, uni- or bilateral, using DIEP or muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle (msTRAM) flaps. Female patients 18 years of age and older.
Intervention (if applicable): evaluation of flap perfusion based on 1) clinical parameters, and 2) fluorescence imaging using ICG
Main study parameters/endpoints: Difference in percentage of fat necrosis after autologous breast reconstruction using DIEP flaps between patients in whom fluorescence imaging was used and patients in whom flaps were clinically assessed.
- Conditions
- Fat Necrosis
- Being tested
- Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of perfusion
- Keywords
- Fat necrosis, Near-infrared fluorescence imaging, Indocyanine green, Free flap surgery, Breast reconstruction, Perfusion
- Medical subject headings
- Fat Necrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of perfusionDiagnostic test
Imaging with ICG near-infrared fluorescence is performed besides clinical judgement of the DIEP flap for perfusion evaluation. Based on fluorescence imaging, additional malperfused area(s) are resected.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional study arm | Active comparator | Surgery will be performed according to local protocol. Flap viability during adequate hemodynamic conditions is evaluated a standard of care. Then after anastomosis of the flap but before the inset, the second intervention is performed. Intervention: evaluation of the perfusion of the skin and fat with fluorescence imaging using ICG. The flap is marked according to the fluorescence imaging evaluation, and parts without perfusion are resected. The remaining flap is inset to the remaining breast skin. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of perfusion |
| Control arm | No intervention | Surgery will be performed according to local protocol.Flap viability during adequate hemodynamic conditions is evaluated as standard of care. Then after anastomosis of the flap but before the inset, the surgeon will leave the room, the researcher will make a recording of the flap and this will have no consequences for the procedure. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical relevant fat necrosis
Clinically relevant fat necrosis is defined as a palpable mass, either painful or not, and with or without aesthetic complaints, and developed within three months after surgery. The following grading system according to Lie et al. is used. Only grade III till IV is classified as clinical relevant fat necrosis.
III: Major compromised reconstructive outcome, flap involvement:15-50%, clinical findings: Major contour defects (multiple), surgical management: Debridement/secondary procedure IV: Subtotal poor reconstructive outcome, flap involvement: >50%, clinical findings: Skin defects, inadequate volume, volume loss, surgical management: Second local flap/ re-intervention initial flap
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Quantify perfusion of flaps
Based on NIRF recordings and correlate these to the development of fat necrosis.
Measured: 3 months
Registration of re-interventions
necessary to treat fat necrosis, in numbers and percentages
Measured: 3 months
Registration of postoperative complications
in numbers and percentages
Measured: 3 months
Duration of surgery in minutes
Of all surgical procedures included
Measured: 1 day
Percentage extra resected tissue
of initial flap in grams based on perfusion assessment
Measured: 1 day
Personal experience/opinion of surgeon performing surgery with fluorescent imaging using ICG.
After every surgery the NASA TASK Load Index is taken by the surgeon.
Measured: 1 day
Patient satisfaction
using BREAST-Q questionnaire, this is an validated questionnaire that is used in multiple research for measuring patient satisfaction
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Aug 2022
- Study start1 May 2019
- Primary completion1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Fat NecrosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Leiden University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a two-armed randomized controlled trial: * interventional arm: evaluation of flap perfusion based on 1) clinical parameters, and 2) fluorescence imaging using ICG * conventional arm: evaluation of flap perfusion based on clinical parameters only
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alexander Vahrmeijer, Leiden University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05507710
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL 68623.058.18
- Acronym
- FAFI
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 17 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tange FP, Verduijn PS, Sibinga Mulder BG, van Capelle L, Koning S, Driessen C, Mureau MAM, Vahrmeijer AL, van der Vorst JR. Near-infrared fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green for perfusion assessment of DIEP and msTRAM flaps: A Dutch multicenter randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Apr 2;33:101128. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101128. eCollection 2023 Jun.
PubMed 37091505
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Indocyanine Green for Perfusion Assessment of DIEP Flaps: A Dutch Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05507710
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FAFI / NL 68623.058.18
- Conditions
- Fat Necrosis
- Keywords
- Fat necrosis, Near-infrared fluorescence imaging, Indocyanine green, Free flap surgery, Breast reconstruction, Perfusion
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Currently during DIEP flap reconstruction, the perfusion of the flap is assessed by the clinical view of the surgeon. Identification of demarcated ischemic zones of the DIEP flap could be optimized by using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) in order to lower the rate of fat necrosis. This study evaluates whether intraoperative perfusion assessment with ICG fluorescence imaging causes a lower rate of fat necrosis compared to conventional intraoperative clinical evaluation of DIEP flaps.
Detailed description
Rationale: Autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy due to cancer or prophylactically due to genetically increased risk is frequently performed. A complication that may occur after a deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEP) reconstruction is the occurrence of fat necrosis in the transplanted flap due to ischemia (reperfusion injury). Identification of deep inferior epigastric artery perforators and identification of demarcated ischemic zones of the DIEP flap can be optimized by using fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG), as has been demonstrated in previous studies. This could result in less fat necrosis, less partial flap loss, and other complications. A randomized controlled trial would be the best study design to assess the value of ICG in determining the perfusion of DIEP flaps, thereby reducing the occurrence of fat necrosis and other complications.
Objective: To determine whether fluorescence imaging using ICG for the assessment of DIEP flap perfusion during surgery decreases the occurrence of fat necrosis compared to standard intraoperative clinical assessment of DIEP flap perfusion.
Study design: This is a two-armed randomized controlled trial:
- interventional arm: evaluation of flap perfusion based on 1) clinical parameters, and 2) fluorescence imaging using ICG
- conventional arm: evaluation of flap perfusion based on clinical parameters only
Study population: Patients scheduled for elective surgery for autologous breast reconstruction, uni- or bilateral, using DIEP or muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis muscle (msTRAM) flaps. Female patients 18 years of age and older.
Intervention (if applicable): evaluation of flap perfusion based on 1) clinical parameters, and 2) fluorescence imaging using ICG
Main study parameters/endpoints: Difference in percentage of fat necrosis after autologous breast reconstruction using DIEP flaps between patients in whom fluorescence imaging was used and patients in whom flaps were clinically assessed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a two-armed randomized controlled trial: * interventional arm: evaluation of flap perfusion based on 1) clinical parameters, and 2) fluorescence imaging using ICG * conventional arm: evaluation of flap perfusion based on clinical parameters only
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Interventional study arm | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of perfusionSurgery will be performed according to local protocol. Flap viability during adequate hemodynamic conditions is evaluated a standard of care. Then after anastomosis of the flap but before the inset, the second intervention is performed. Intervention: evaluation of the perfusion of the skin and fat with fluorescence imaging using ICG. The flap is marked according to the fluorescence imaging evaluation, and parts without perfusion are resected. The remaining flap is inset to the remaining breast skin. |
| Control arm | No intervention | –Surgery will be performed according to local protocol.Flap viability during adequate hemodynamic conditions is evaluated as standard of care. Then after anastomosis of the flap but before the inset, the surgeon will leave the room, the researcher will make a recording of the flap and this will have no consequences for the procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Female patients 18 years of age and older
- Who underwent a mastectomy for breast cancer or prophylactic due to genetic predisposition
- Patients scheduled for elective surgery for autologous breast reconstruction, uni- or bilateral, using DIEP or msTRAM flaps. In case of bilateral breast reconstruction the flaps should be bilateral anastomosed.
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Allergy to ICG, iodine or shellfish
- Any medical condition that in the opinion of the investigators could potentially jeopardize the safety of the patient
- Impaired renal function defined as eGFR< 50 mL/min/1.73m2 (this can be seen in the standard preoperative lab results)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of perfusionImaging with ICG near-infrared fluorescence is performed besides clinical judgement of the DIEP flap for perfusion evaluation. Based on fluorescence imaging, additional malperfused area(s) are resected. | Diagnostic test | Interventional study arm |
Primary outcome
Clinical relevant fat necrosis
Time frame: 3 months
Clinically relevant fat necrosis is defined as a palpable mass, either painful or not, and with or without aesthetic complaints, and developed within three months after surgery. The following grading system according to Lie et al. is used. Only grade III till IV is classified as clinical relevant fat necrosis. III: Major compromised reconstructive outcome, flap involvement:15-50%, clinical findings: Major contour defects (multiple), surgical management: Debridement/secondary procedure IV: Subtotal poor reconstructive outcome, flap involvement: >50%, clinical findings: Skin defects, inadequate volume, volume loss, surgical management: Second local flap/ re-intervention initial flap
7 secondary outcomes
Quantify perfusion of flaps
Time frame: 3 months
Registration of re-interventions
Time frame: 3 months
Registration of postoperative complications
Time frame: 3 months
Duration of surgery in minutes
Time frame: 1 day
Percentage extra resected tissue
Time frame: 1 day
Personal experience/opinion of surgeon performing surgery with fluorescent imaging using ICG.
Time frame: 1 day
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37091505Tange FP, Verduijn PS, Sibinga Mulder BG, van Capelle L, Koning S, Driessen C, Mureau MAM, Vahrmeijer AL, van der Vorst JR. Near-infrared fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green for perfusion assessment of DIEP and msTRAM flaps: A Dutch multicenter randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Apr 2;33:101128. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101128. eCollection 2023 Jun.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fat Necrosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prospective Stage-Stratified Histopathologic Study and Proposed Disease-Evolution Model of Gluteal Permanent Synthetic Filler Complications
Foreign-Body Reaction, Granulomatous Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Coronary Imaging and Metabolic Indicators-Based Risk Prediction Model for Coronary Artery Disease(CMI-RiskCAD)
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) (E.G., Angina, Myocardial Infarction, and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (ASHD))
RecruitingPhase 3
Epicardial Cardiac Fat-CT (EPIC-CT)
STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Epicardial Fat
RecruitingObservational study
Risk Characterization of Non-culprit Vessels in Patients Undergoing Primary PCI for ST-elevation MI in Multivessel Disease
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Efficacy of Epicardial Implantation of Collagen Membranes With Allogeneic Adipose Derived Stem Cells
CABG-patients, Heart Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Near-infrared fluorescence imaging of perfusion in people with Fat Necrosis, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 2 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alexander L. Vahrmeijer, MD, PhD (+31 71 526 2309, a.l.vahrmeijer@lumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical relevant fat necrosis (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05507710, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2022.