Obesity Associated DisorderRespiratoryNCT05508997
Respiratory and Hemodynamics Parameters Response to Positive End-Expiratory Pressure
A study testing respiratory parameters on mechanical ventilator (PEEP) in people with Obesity Associated Disorder, run by Heidy F. Ahmed at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
In this study, the sixty mechanically ventilated class I obese patients were divided into two equal groups A and B. group A received RTP position + PEEP protocol, while group B underwent RTP position protocol only. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity Associated Disorder
- What is being tested?
- respiratory parameters on mechanical ventilator (PEEP)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to 30 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects included in this study had the following criteria:
- Mechanically ventilated obese patients in operation room undergoing upper abdominal surgeries (bariatric) and under general anesthesia.
- Obese patients with BMI (30-34.9).
- Age 40-50 years old.
- Both sexes.
- Non-smoker.
- No history of disease affecting the heart \& lungs.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with any of the following were excluded from the study:
- Severe head injury.
- Increase intracranial pressure and who are potentially liable to develop pathologically raised intracranial pressure.
- Acute pulmonary edema.
- Barotrauma/volutrauma.
- Un-drained Pneumothorax/Hemothorax.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Flail chest.
- Low blood pressure (systolic less than 80 mmHg).
- Oxygen saturation is less than 90%.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Response of Respiratory and Hemodynamic Parameters to Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration for Mechanically Ventilated Obese Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
In this study, the sixty mechanically ventilated class I obese patients were divided into two equal groups A and B. group A received RTP position + PEEP protocol, while group B underwent RTP position protocol only. The results showed that the group A protocol has positive effects on the improvement of respiratory mechanics by significant increase the arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) in mmHg to fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2), (PaO2/FiO2 ratio), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and static compliance (Cstat) parameters. Moreover, a significant decrease in hemodynamics of BP\& MAP was measured. While the results of the group B protocol demonstrated a non-significant increase in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PaCO2, and Cstat. Besides, non-significant decreases in hemodynamics of blood pressure (BP) \& mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were recorded.
Read the detailed description
Objective To investigate the effect of the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration maneuver with Reverse Trendelenburg Position (RTP) on the respiratory and hemodynamic parameters of mechanically ventilated obese patients.
Design Randomized, control trial. Participants Thirty mechanically ventilated obese patients were randomized equally as a group A to receive Reverse Trendelenburg Position (RTP) + Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration, and group (B): receive Reverse Trendelenburg Position (RTP).
Intervention After post-operative bariatric surgeries, the sixty mechanically ventilated obese patients immediately receive a PEEP and RTP once before the weaning through the ventilator of the operation to evaluate the response of arterial blood gases before admission to the intensive care unit ICU room.
Outcomes The primary outcomes included the respiratory parameters (PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PaCO2, Cstat), and the secondary outcomes included the hemodynamics parameters (systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)).
- Conditions
- Obesity Associated Disorder
- Being tested
- respiratory parameters on mechanical ventilator (PEEP)
- Keywords
- Positive end-expiratory pressure titration, Mechanical ventilator, respiratory and hemodynamics parameters, Obese patients, Reverse Trendelenburg Position.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
respiratory parameters on mechanical ventilator (PEEP)Device
The 3rd \& 4th phases of operation in the group (A) and (B): Each patient received one single session inside the Operation Room (OR) as one shot of the treatment procedure. Arterial Blood Gases (ABGs) were obtained to measure:
- Oxygenation by PaO2/FiO2 ratio with constant FiO2 = 100% (oxygen) through the procedure time as a primary outcome.
- Secondary outcome.
- Ventilation by PaCO2 value from ABGs.
- Static compliance (Cstat) was measured as the amount of recruitment of alveoli in the lung.
- Blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) one of the hemodynamics measurements was measured pre/post the procedure in the two groups.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Positive End Expiatory Pressure + Reverse Trendelenburg Position | Experimental | Group A received the procedures of the physiotherapy part by applying proper positioning for better oxygenation and ventilation (Reverse Trendelenburg Position), which is the patient laid supine with the head up 30 degrees higher than the feet \& received the recruitment maneuver (RM) by Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration Receives: Device: respiratory parameters on mechanical ventilator (PEEP) |
| Reverse Trendelenburg Position | Active comparator | Group B received only the procedures of the physiotherapy part at the 3rd phase of operation by applying proper positioning for better oxygenation and ventilation (Reverse Trendelenburg Position), in which the patient laid supine with the head at 15-30 degrees higher than the feet to unload the weight of intra-abdominal contents from the diaphragm, this position:
1. Increase pulmonary compliance, functional residual capacity (FRC), and oxygenation.
2. Allows easier ventilation.
3. This position called safe apnea time allows time to secure the airway before desaturation for a 20-minute positioning time. Receives: Device: respiratory parameters on mechanical ventilator (PEEP) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Respiratory parameters
The primary outcomes included the respiratory parameters partial oxygen pressure, partial carbon dioxide pressure, static compliance fractional oxygen pressure ratio
Measured: Immediately after the procedure is done in the operating room appears on the patient's monitor & patient arterial blood gases.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Hemodynamics parameters
The secondary outcomes included the hemodynamics parameters (SBP in mmHg, DBP in mmHg, and MAP in mmHg).
Measured: Immediately after the procedure is done in the operating room appears on the patient's monitor.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Aug 2022
- Study start1 Dec 2021
- Primary completion17 Jun 2022
- Study completion30 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obesity Associated DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- group A receive Reverse Trendelenburg Position (RTP) + Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration, and group (B): receive Reverse Trendelenburg Position (RTP).
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Heidy F. Ahmed
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Heidy F. Ahmed, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Heidy F. Ahmed, Master, Principal investigator, Kasr al aini
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05508997
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P.T.REC/012/001827
- Acronym
- Respiratory
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All collected individual participant data (IPD), all IPD that underlie results in a publication.
Publications
Hibbert KA, Malhotra A. Obesity in Critically Ill Patients. In Cardiopulmonary Monitoring. 2021 (pp. 935-947). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73387-2
Wang QY, Ji YW, An LX, Cao L, Xue FS. Effects of individualized PEEP obtained by two different titration methods on postoperative atelectasis in obese patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 15;22(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05671-1.
PubMed 34654446Bluth T, Teichmann R, Kiss T, Bobek I, Canet J, Cinnella G, De Baerdemaeker L, Gregoretti C, Hedenstierna G, Hemmes SN, Hiesmayr M, Hollmann MW, Jaber S, Laffey JG, Licker MJ, Markstaller K, Matot I, Muller G, Mills GH, Mulier JP, Putensen C, Rossaint R, Schmitt J, Senturk M, Serpa Neto A, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Vidal Melo MF, Wrigge H, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M; PROBESE investigators; PROtective VEntilation Network (PROVEnet); Clinical Trial Network of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 28;18(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1929-0.
PubMed 28454590Ruszkai Z, Kiss E, Laszlo I, Bokretas GP, Vizseralek D, Vamossy I, Surany E, Buzogany I, Bajory Z, Molnar Z. Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 May;35(3):469-482. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00519-6. Epub 2020 May 9.
PubMed 32388650Silva PL, Pelosi P, Rocco PR. Ventilation in the Obese Patient. In Mechanical Ventilation from Pathophysiology to Clinical Evidence. 2022 (pp. 223-229). Springer, Cham. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93401-9
Bruins S, Sommerfield D, Powers N, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. Atelectasis and lung recruitment in pediatric anesthesia: An educational review. Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Feb;32(2):321-329. doi: 10.1111/pan.14335. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
PubMed 34797011Brodsky JB. Recent advances in anesthesia of the obese patient. F1000Res. 2018 Aug 6;7:F1000 Faculty Rev-1195. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15093.1. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30135720De Jong A, Wrigge H, Hedenstierna G, Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Frat JP, Ball L, Schetz M, Pickkers P, Jaber S. How to ventilate obese patients in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2423-2435. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06286-x. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
PubMed 33095284Severac M, Chiali W, Severac F, Perus O, Orban JC, Iannelli A, Debs T, Gugenheim J, Raucoules-Aime M. Alveolar recruitment manoeuvre results in improved pulmonary function in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a randomised trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Jun;40(3):100775. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
PubMed 33137453Boone MD, Jinadasa SP, Mueller A, Shaefi S, Kasper EM, Hanafy KA, O'Gara BP, Talmor DS. The Effect of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Hemodynamics. Neurocrit Care. 2017 Apr;26(2):174-181. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0328-9.
PubMed 27848125Fumagalli J, Santiago RRS, Teggia Droghi M, Zhang C, Fintelmann FJ, Troschel FM, Morais CCA, Amato MBP, Kacmarek RM, Berra L; Lung Rescue Team Investigators. Lung Recruitment in Obese Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2019 May;130(5):791-803. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002638.
PubMed 30844949Zhu C, Yao JW, An LX, Bai YF, Li WJ. Effects of intraoperative individualized PEEP on postoperative atelectasis in obese patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Jul 6;21(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04565-y.
PubMed 32631414Eichler L, Truskowska K, Dupree A, Busch P, Goetz AE, Zollner C. Intraoperative Ventilation of Morbidly Obese Patients Guided by Transpulmonary Pressure. Obes Surg. 2018 Jan;28(1):122-129. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2794-3.
PubMed 28707173Lutfi MF. The physiological basis and clinical significance of lung volume measurements. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2017 Feb 9;12:3. doi: 10.1186/s40248-017-0084-5. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28194273Moon TS, Tai K, Kim A, Gonzales MX, Lu R, Pak T, Smith K, Chen JL, Minhajuddin AT, Nnamani N, Fox PE, Ogunnaike B. Apneic Oxygenation During Prolonged Laryngoscopy in Obese Patients: a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial of Nasal Cannula Oxygen Administration. Obes Surg. 2019 Dec;29(12):3992-3999. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04077-y.
PubMed 31317460
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Response of Respiratory and Hemodynamic Parameters to Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration for Mechanically Ventilated Obese Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05508997
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Respiratory / P.T.REC/012/001827
- Conditions
- Obesity Associated Disorder
- Keywords
- Positive end-expiratory pressure titration, Mechanical ventilator, respiratory and hemodynamics parameters, Obese patients, Reverse Trendelenburg Position.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Heidy F. AhmedUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study, the sixty mechanically ventilated class I obese patients were divided into two equal groups A and B. group A received RTP position + PEEP protocol, while group B underwent RTP position protocol only. The results showed that the group A protocol has positive effects on the improvement of respiratory mechanics by significant increase the arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) in mmHg to fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2), (PaO2/FiO2 ratio), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and static compliance (Cstat) parameters. Moreover, a significant decrease in hemodynamics of BP\& MAP was measured. While the results of the group B protocol demonstrated a non-significant increase in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PaCO2, and Cstat. Besides, non-significant decreases in hemodynamics of blood pressure (BP) \& mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were recorded.
Detailed description
Objective To investigate the effect of the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration maneuver with Reverse Trendelenburg Position (RTP) on the respiratory and hemodynamic parameters of mechanically ventilated obese patients.
Design Randomized, control trial. Participants Thirty mechanically ventilated obese patients were randomized equally as a group A to receive Reverse Trendelenburg Position (RTP) + Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration, and group (B): receive Reverse Trendelenburg Position (RTP).
Intervention After post-operative bariatric surgeries, the sixty mechanically ventilated obese patients immediately receive a PEEP and RTP once before the weaning through the ventilator of the operation to evaluate the response of arterial blood gases before admission to the intensive care unit ICU room.
Outcomes The primary outcomes included the respiratory parameters (PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PaCO2, Cstat), and the secondary outcomes included the hemodynamics parameters (systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP)).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- group A receive Reverse Trendelenburg Position (RTP) + Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration, and group (B): receive Reverse Trendelenburg Position (RTP).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Positive End Expiatory Pressure + Reverse Trendelenburg Position | Experimental | Device: respiratory parameters on mechanical ventilator (PEEP)Group A received the procedures of the physiotherapy part by applying proper positioning for better oxygenation and ventilation (Reverse Trendelenburg Position), which is the patient laid supine with the head up 30 degrees higher than the feet \& received the recruitment maneuver (RM) by Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration |
| Reverse Trendelenburg Position | Active comparator | Device: respiratory parameters on mechanical ventilator (PEEP)Group B received only the procedures of the physiotherapy part at the 3rd phase of operation by applying proper positioning for better oxygenation and ventilation (Reverse Trendelenburg Position), in which the patient laid supine with the head at 15-30 degrees higher than the feet to unload the weight of intra-abdominal contents from the diaphragm, this position: 1. Increase pulmonary compliance, functional residual capacity (FRC), and oxygenation. 2. Allows easier ventilation. 3. This position called safe apnea time allows time to secure the airway before desaturation for a 20-minute positioning time. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subjects included in this study had the following criteria:
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Subjects with any of the following were excluded from the study:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| respiratory parameters on mechanical ventilator (PEEP)The 3rd \& 4th phases of operation in the group (A) and (B): Each patient received one single session inside the Operation Room (OR) as one shot of the treatment procedure. Arterial Blood Gases (ABGs) were obtained to measure: 1. Oxygenation by PaO2/FiO2 ratio with constant FiO2 = 100% (oxygen) through the procedure time as a primary outcome. 2. Secondary outcome. * Ventilation by PaCO2 value from ABGs. * Static compliance (Cstat) was measured as the amount of recruitment of alveoli in the lung. * Blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) one of the hemodynamics measurements was measured pre/post the procedure in the two groups. | Device | Positive End Expiatory Pressure + Reverse Trendelenburg Position, Reverse Trendelenburg Position |
Primary outcome
Respiratory parameters
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure is done in the operating room appears on the patient's monitor & patient arterial blood gases.
The primary outcomes included the respiratory parameters partial oxygen pressure, partial carbon dioxide pressure, static compliance fractional oxygen pressure ratio
1 secondary outcome
Hemodynamics parameters
Time frame: Immediately after the procedure is done in the operating room appears on the patient's monitor.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2023.
- BackgroundHibbert KA, Malhotra A. Obesity in Critically Ill Patients. In Cardiopulmonary Monitoring. 2021 (pp. 935-947). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73387-2
- Background: PubMed 34654446Wang QY, Ji YW, An LX, Cao L, Xue FS. Effects of individualized PEEP obtained by two different titration methods on postoperative atelectasis in obese patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 15;22(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05671-1.
- Background: PubMed 28454590Bluth T, Teichmann R, Kiss T, Bobek I, Canet J, Cinnella G, De Baerdemaeker L, Gregoretti C, Hedenstierna G, Hemmes SN, Hiesmayr M, Hollmann MW, Jaber S, Laffey JG, Licker MJ, Markstaller K, Matot I, Muller G, Mills GH, Mulier JP, Putensen C, Rossaint R, Schmitt J, Senturk M, Serpa Neto A, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Vidal Melo MF, Wrigge H, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M; PROBESE investigators; PROtective VEntilation Network (PROVEnet); Clinical Trial Network of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Apr 28;18(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1929-0.
- Background: PubMed 32388650Ruszkai Z, Kiss E, Laszlo I, Bokretas GP, Vizseralek D, Vamossy I, Surany E, Buzogany I, Bajory Z, Molnar Z. Effects of intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure optimization on respiratory mechanics and the inflammatory response: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 May;35(3):469-482. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00519-6. Epub 2020 May 9.
- BackgroundSilva PL, Pelosi P, Rocco PR. Ventilation in the Obese Patient. In Mechanical Ventilation from Pathophysiology to Clinical Evidence. 2022 (pp. 223-229). Springer, Cham. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93401-9
- Background: PubMed 34797011Bruins S, Sommerfield D, Powers N, von Ungern-Sternberg BS. Atelectasis and lung recruitment in pediatric anesthesia: An educational review. Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Feb;32(2):321-329. doi: 10.1111/pan.14335. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
- Background: PubMed 30135720Brodsky JB. Recent advances in anesthesia of the obese patient. F1000Res. 2018 Aug 6;7:F1000 Faculty Rev-1195. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15093.1. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 33095284De Jong A, Wrigge H, Hedenstierna G, Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Frat JP, Ball L, Schetz M, Pickkers P, Jaber S. How to ventilate obese patients in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2423-2435. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06286-x. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
- Background: PubMed 33137453Severac M, Chiali W, Severac F, Perus O, Orban JC, Iannelli A, Debs T, Gugenheim J, Raucoules-Aime M. Alveolar recruitment manoeuvre results in improved pulmonary function in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a randomised trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Jun;40(3):100775. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
- Background: PubMed 27848125Boone MD, Jinadasa SP, Mueller A, Shaefi S, Kasper EM, Hanafy KA, O'Gara BP, Talmor DS. The Effect of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Hemodynamics. Neurocrit Care. 2017 Apr;26(2):174-181. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0328-9.
- Background: PubMed 30844949Fumagalli J, Santiago RRS, Teggia Droghi M, Zhang C, Fintelmann FJ, Troschel FM, Morais CCA, Amato MBP, Kacmarek RM, Berra L; Lung Rescue Team Investigators. Lung Recruitment in Obese Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2019 May;130(5):791-803. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002638.
- Background: PubMed 32631414Zhu C, Yao JW, An LX, Bai YF, Li WJ. Effects of intraoperative individualized PEEP on postoperative atelectasis in obese patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 Jul 6;21(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04565-y.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All collected individual participant data (IPD), all IPD that underlie results in a publication.
Related trials for Obesity Associated Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial to Evaluate ALN-CIDEB in Adults With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, MASLD
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Biomarkers in EV Associated With Marrow Adiposity in Anorexia
Anorexia Nervosa Restricting Type, Anorexia Nervosa (DSM-IV Revised Criteria)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate ALN-CIDEB in Adult Participants With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease or With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASLD/MASH)
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Patients With Uncommon Presentations and/or Uncommon Diseases Associated With the Cardiovascular System
Metabolic Disease, Obesity
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
ELEVATE-LIVER: A Study to Test Whether Survodutide Helps Improve Heart Structure and Function in People With Overweight or Obesity and Fatty Liver Disease
Obesity, Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Heidy F. Ahmed, Master principal investigator
Kasr al aini
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing respiratory parameters on mechanical ventilator (PEEP) in people with Obesity Associated Disorder, run by Heidy F. Ahmed at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Respiratory parameters (time frame: Immediately after the procedure is done in the operating room appears on the patient's monitor & patient arterial blood gases.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05508997, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2023.