AzTrials
AzTrials

Women's HealthNCT05509049

Precision Nudging Drives Wellness Visit Attendance at Scale

A study testing Precision nudging in people with Women's Health and Annual Visit, run by Lirio at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the present randomized controlled trial is to explore the effectiveness of a 12-month well woman digital health intervention leveraging Precision Nudging - the application of behavioral science and reinforcement learning to create individualized, tailored health messaging at scale that matches the right… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 65 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Women's Health, Annual Visit, Well Visit
What is being tested?
Precision nudging
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30,068 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
7 Sep 2022to 9 Jan 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient of health care system.
  • Visit with OBGYN office in the last 36 months.
  • OBGYN office provider is a Women's Wellness group approved provider.

Who cannot join

  • Completed a women's wellness within the last 366 days.
  • Upcoming women's wellness appointment.
  • Had a childbirth episode (e.g., C-section vaginal delivery, or other event, including stillbirth) within the last 3 months or has a pregnancy due date in the future.
  • Unsubscribed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Rochester Regional Health

    New York, New York, 14617

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Employing Machine Learning and Behavioral Science Solutions to Increase Women's Wellness Scheduling and Attendance: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of the present randomized controlled trial is to explore the effectiveness of a 12-month well woman digital health intervention leveraging Precision Nudging - the application of behavioral science and reinforcement learning to create individualized, tailored health messaging at scale that matches the right message to the right person at the right time - in promoting behavior change. Specifically, it is hypothesized that scaling behavioral science through reinforcement learning will be more effective at motivating participants to engage with well woman messages and to schedule and to attend a well woman visit compared to a standard of care message.

Being tested
Precision nudging, Standard of care
Keywords
Digital Health Intervention, Behavior Change, Reinforcement Learning, Artificial Intelligence
Medical subject headings
Health Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Precision nudgingOther

    Precision nudging (i.e., the application of behavioral science and reinforcement learning to create individualized, tailored health messaging at scale that matches the right message to the right person at the right time)

  • Standard of careOther

    Standard of care communication (e.g., personalized letters and patient portal notices)

Study groups in NCT05509049
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TreatmentExperimentalBehavioral science and reinforcement learning-driven hyper-personalized messages
Receives: Other: Precision nudging
ControlActive comparatorStandard of care message
Receives: Other: Standard of care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of participants who attended a well woman visit

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Proportion of participants who attended a well woman visit

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Proportion of participants who attended a well woman visit

    Measured: 9 months

  4. Proportion of participants who attended a well woman visit

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Proportion of participants who scheduled a well woman visit

    Measured: 3 months

  6. Proportion of participants who scheduled a well woman visit

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Proportion of participants who scheduled a well woman visit

    Measured: 9 months

  8. Proportion of participants who scheduled a well woman visit

    Measured: 12 months

  9. Proportion of participants who scheduled a well woman visit and did not attend (and did not Cancel and/or Reschedule)

    Measured: 3 months

  10. Proportion of participants who scheduled a well woman visit and did not attend (and did not Cancel and/or Reschedule)

    Measured: 6 months

  11. Proportion of participants who scheduled a well woman visit and did not attend (and did not Cancel and/or Reschedule)

    Measured: 9 months

  12. Proportion of participants who scheduled a well woman visit and did not attend (and did not Cancel and/or Reschedule)

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Proportion of participants who opened and/or clicked Call-to-Action, or otherwise engaged with the communication(s)

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Proportion of participants who opened and/or clicked Call-to-Action, or otherwise engaged with the communication(s)

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Proportion of participants who opened and/or clicked Call-to-Action, or otherwise engaged with the communication(s)

    Measured: 9 months

  4. Proportion of participants who opened and/or clicked Call-to-Action, or otherwise engaged with the communication(s)

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Aug 2022
  2. Study start7 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion9 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion9 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study is designed as a prospective, parallel, large simple superiority randomized controlled trial using simple randomization (no blocking, no stratification).
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
30,068 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05509049
Sponsor's protocol ID
LRRHWWRCT
Other IDs
IRB 2129
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
17 Aug 2022
Last updated
17 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Precision nudging in people with Women's Health and Annual Visit, run by Lirio at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of participants who attended a well woman visit (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in