AzTrials
AzTrials

Lymphoma, B-CellMR-ICANSNCT05510596

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome

A study testing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with contrast injection, Blood withdrawal and Neuropsychological tests in people with Lymphoma, B-Cell and Neurotoxicity, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The treatment of large-cell B-cell lymphomas refractory to more than 2 lines of therapy has recently been revolutionized by the use of immunotherapies consisting of autologous genetically modified cells or CAR-T CELLS (chimeric antigen receptor-T cells), which very significantly increase progression-free survival and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lymphoma, B-Cell, Neurotoxicity
What is being tested?
Magnetic Resonance Imaging with contrast injection, Blood withdrawal and Neuropsychological tests
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
22 Sep 2022to 14 Sep 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject aged from 18 years old
  • Subject able to understand the nature, purpose and methodology of the study
  • Subject with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma to be treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel or brexucabtagene autoleucel for their lymphoma.

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to sign the informed consent
  • Subject presenting a cerebral localization of his lymphoma
  • Contraindication to the realization of an MRI (metallic foreign body, pace-maker, cochlear implants)
  • Claustrophobic subject
  • Subject with a neurodegenerative disease (Parkinson's, Alzheimer's...)
  • Subject with psychiatric disorders such as psychosis, except for anxiety-depressive episodes
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Subject with a systemic pathology with neurological manifestation
  • Subject with a previous or evolving neurological pathology
  • Subject with or with a history of severe head trauma (group 2 or 3 according to the Masters classification)
  • Contraindication to the use of gadoline contrast products (severe renal insufficiency, liver transplantation, known or suspected hypersensitivity to the product)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patient under tutelage
  • Patient under curatorship
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Not a beneficiary of a social security system

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Neurology department, Montpellier University Hospital

    Montpellier, Occitanie, 34295

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Contribution of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome

The treatment of large-cell B-cell lymphomas refractory to more than 2 lines of therapy has recently been revolutionized by the use of immunotherapies consisting of autologous genetically modified cells or CAR-T CELLS (chimeric antigen receptor-T cells), which very significantly increase progression-free survival and overall survival. Nevertheless, this therapy is frequently associated with cytokine release syndrome and in approximately 20% to 60% of patients with neurological complications that can sometimes be dramatic and are associated with a significant mortality rate.

The mechanisms behind this neurotoxicity are unclear.

Read more

Despite the frequent occurrence of neurological toxicity characterized in particular by headache, tremor, and encephalopathy that is most often transient, brain imaging by CT or, preferably, MRI are most often normal. The rare abnormalities that have been identified suggest the presence of cytotoxic edema associated with the existence of transient modifications of the blood-brain barrier.

To date, the management of neurotoxicity associated with CAR-T CELLS remains empirical. It combines early management of cytokine release syndrome (by administration of anti-IL6) and treatment with corticosteroids, the objective of which would be to control neurotoxicity more specifically. A better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with this neurotoxicity appears essential today in order to be able to propose adapted prevention and treatment methods.

Main objectives are to compare tissue permeability by quantitative MRI measurement of Ktrans to the theoretical peak of neurotoxicity between patients with CAR-T Cell-induced neurotoxicity and those without neurotoxicity and to Study, by MRI, the evolution of tissue microcirculatory parameters (from D-3 to D7) between groups of patients with or without the occurrence of neurotoxicity associated with CAR-T CELL treatment.

For this purpose, 25 subjects will be included (the investigators hypothesize 40% with treatment-induced neurological impairment).

Read the detailed description

The treatment of large-cell B-cell lymphomas refractory to more than 2 lines of therapy has recently been revolutionized by the use of immunotherapies consisting of autologous genetically modified cells or CAR-T CELLS (chimeric antigen receptor-T cells), which very significantly increase progression-free survival and overall survival. Nevertheless, this therapy is frequently associated with cytokine release syndrome and in approximately 20% to 60% of patients with neurological complications that can sometimes be dramatic and are associated with a significant mortality rate.

The mechanisms behind this neurotoxicity are unclear but may include :

  • A "systemic" toxicity associated with the cytokine release syndrome. This toxicity would thus be favoured by the associated inflammatory response syndrome manifested in particular by hyperthermia, changes in blood pressure, and an increase in CRP, ferritin and the number of white blood cells.
  • A breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, as evidenced by increased protein levels, cellularity and cytokine levels in the cerebrospinal fluid. Among other things, this rupture could be promoted by the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines (IL6, TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma) that would promote endothelial activation.
  • Direct toxicity to neurons and/or microglial cells.

Despite the frequent occurrence of neurological toxicity characterized in particular by headache, tremor, and encephalopathy that is most often transient, brain imaging by CT or, preferably, MRI are most often normal. The rare abnormalities that have been identified suggest the presence of cytotoxic edema associated with the existence of transient modifications of the blood-brain barrier.

To date, the management of neurotoxicity associated with CAR-T CELLS remains empirical. It combines early management of cytokine release syndrome (by administration of anti-IL6) and treatment with corticosteroids, the objective of which would be to control neurotoxicity more specifically. A better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with this neurotoxicity appears essential today in order to be able to propose adapted prevention and treatment methods.

Objectives:

Main:

  • To Compare tissue permeability by quantitative MRI measurement of Ktrans to the theoretical peak of neurotoxicity between patients with CAR-T Cell-induced neurotoxicity and those without neurotoxicity.

Secondary:

  • To Study, by MRI, the evolution of tissue microcirculatory parameters (from D-3 to D7) between groups of patients with or without the occurrence of neurotoxicity associated with CAR-T CELL treatment.
  • To Correlate the values of the MRI parameters with the usual clinical and biological parameters known to be associated with the occurrence of neurotoxicity (at D0 and theoretical peak).
  • To Correlate the values of the MRI parameters with the values (at D0 and at NADIR) of a panel of cytokines of interest (V-PLEX Neuroinflammation Panel Human 1 Kit, Meso Scale Discovery®).
Being tested
Magnetic Resonance Imaging with contrast injection, Blood withdrawal, Neuropsychological tests
Keywords
Neurotoxicity, CAR-T CELLS, Immune cells associated neurotoxicity syndrome, Cytokine release syndrome
Medical subject headings
Lymphoma, B-Cell, Neurotoxicity Syndromes, Cytokine Release Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging with contrast injectionOther

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging with contrast injection

  • Blood withdrawalOther

    Blood withdrawal : serum, plasma, cytokine assay

  • Neuropsychological testsOther

    Neuropsychological tests

Study groups in NCT05510596
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with CAR-T Cell treatmentOtherSingle arm All patient will undergo an MRI with contrast injection, a blood withdrawal and a neurological consultation with neuropsychological tests
Receives: Other: Magnetic Resonance Imaging with contrast injection; Other: Blood withdrawal; Other: Neuropsychological tests

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Study of tissue permeability evolution

    Quantitative measurement of KTRANS (rate of contrast agent transfer from plasma to the extravascular extracellular space, reflecting capillary permeability).

    (Time in second)

    Measured: 10 days

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Qualitative analysis of tissue signals

    FLAIR hypersignals analysis by MRI (signal of a tissue superior to the signal of the surrounding tissues) (visual assessment)

    Measured: 10 days

  2. Qualitative analysis

    Microbleeding analysis (3DEPI T2*)

    Measured: 10 days

  3. Qualitative analysis

    Analysis of contrast on injected 3DT1 MRI

    Measured: 10 days

  4. Semi-quantitative analysis of parameters associated with permeability

    Wash-in, Wash-out (Time in second)

    Measured: 10 days

  5. Semi-quantitative analysis of parameters associated with permeability

    Time to peak (TPP) (Time in second)

    Measured: 10 days

  6. Semi-quantitative analysis of parameters associated with permeability

    AUC (area under the curve shows blood volume) (SI x Time)

    Measured: 10 days

  7. Quantitative analysis of parameters associated with permeability

    Kep: rate of return transfer of the contrast agent from the extravascular extracellular space to the plasma (Volume/Time/Volume)

    Measured: 10 days

  8. Quantitative analysis of parameters associated with permeability

    Ve: volume fraction of the extravascular space (Percentage %)

    Measured: 10 days

  9. Quantitative analysis of parameters associated with permeability

    Vp: volume fraction of the plasma space. (Percentage %)

    Measured: 10 days

  10. Quantitative analysis

    Cerebral blood flow analysis (3DPCASL) (L/min)

    Measured: 10 days

  11. Quantitative analysis

    Cerebral volumetric analysis (3DT1) (cm3)

    Measured: 10 days

  12. Quantitative analysis

    Diffusion coefficient (ADC) (mm²/s)

    Measured: 10 days

  13. Quantitative analysis

    Perfusion factors (perfusion fraction f) (Percentage %)

    Measured: 10 days

  14. Quantitative analysis

    Perfusion factors (pseudo-diffusion D* at the microvascular compartment) (x10^-3 mm²/s)

    Measured: 10 days

  15. Qualitative analysis : comparison with clinical data

    Presence, absence of neurotoxicity and inflammation

    Measured: 10 days

  16. Comparison with biological data from standard care and "Neuroinflammation Panel Human 1 Kit"

    Comparison of MRI data with biological markers (such as CRP, ferritin, white blood cell count, LDH, procalcitonin, fibrinogen) and cytokine profile of neuroinflammation by multiplex immunoassay kit. An ultrasensitive multiplex using electrochemiluminescence.

    Measured: 10 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Aug 2022
  2. Study start22 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion13 Sep 2023
  4. Study completion14 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05510596
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHMPL20_0424
Acronym
MR-ICANS
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
3 Jun 2022
Last updated
9 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with contrast injection, Blood withdrawal and Neuropsychological tests in people with Lymphoma, B-Cell and Neurotoxicity, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Study of tissue permeability evolution (time frame: 10 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in