AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative PainNCT05513196

Bilateral Erector Spinal Plan Block in Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

An observational study of Postoperative Pain, run by Kocaeli University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The importance of effective postoperative pain management is well known. Overall, for total abdominal hysterectomy operations are related with severe postoperative pain. The undesired effects of pain can be prevented with multimodal analgesia for the patient. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 70 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pain
What is being tested?
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
160 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Jan 2022to 1 Jul 2022
How long will I take part?
6 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: patients who undergo elective total abdominal hysterectomy surgery

Who may be able to join

  • ASA 1-2 patients
  • patients undergo elective total abdominal hysterectomy

Who cannot join

  • patient refusal
  • ASA 3-4
  • obesity (body mass index >35 kg/m2)
  • infection of the skin at the site of needle puncture area patients
  • with known allergies to any of the study drugs
  • coagulopathy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Kocaeli University

    Kocaeli, Izmit, 41350

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Bilateral Erector Spinal Plan Block in Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy: An Observational Study

The importance of effective postoperative pain management is well known. Overall, for total abdominal hysterectomy operations are related with severe postoperative pain. The undesired effects of pain can be prevented with multimodal analgesia for the patient. Many regional anesthesia techniques can be preferred for total abdominal hysterectomy. The aim of this study is to investigate postoperative analgesia effect of erector spina plane block for total abdominal hysterectomy.

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pain, which starts with tissue damage as a result of surgical procedures, gradually decreases with wound healing and ends. Pain due to tissue damage is an acute pain that varies in severity according to its size and region. It creates physiopathological changes in many organs and tissues and has negative effects on systems. This situation causes serious postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients. For these reasons, postoperative pain control is very important. Inadequate pain control can cause acute pain to turn into chronic pain. The occurrence of pain in the diseased area before the operation, the severity of surgical tissue damage, environmental, psychological and genetic factors increase the rate of development of chronic pain.

Multimodal analgesia in postoperative pain management is a strategy that combines different analgesic methods to provide more effective analgesia and to reduce side effects. Compared to monotherapy, less dose requirement and better pain management are targeted thanks to the additive and synergistic effect of different analgesic drugs. Thanks to this reduced dose, the incidence of drug-related side effects in patients is also reduced.

Erector spina plan block (ESPB) is a new regional anesthesia method used especially in abdominal and thoracic surgeries. It was first described by Forero et al. for the treatment of thoracic neuropathic pain. ESP block in 2017 and 2018; Many case reports for analgesic purposes in cervical, thoracic, abdominal and pelvic pain have been published, but detailed clinical studies have not been found. Since then, it has been considered that this interfascial plane block can be applied as an alternative to the neuraxial block for certain surgeries.

Under the guidance of ultrasonography, regional anesthesia applications can be performed more safely, easily and effectively than methods such as electrical stimulation and loss of resistance based on the determination of superficial landmarks. Uncertainty about the relationship of the needle with the surrounding tissue in peripheral nerve blocks performed with the traditional blind method causes a higher risk of failure and complication of the application. For this reason, Erector spina plan blocks made in our clinic are performed under ultrasound guidance. Complication due to erector spina plane block (pneumothorax) was reported in only two articles. There is also a report in the literature reporting that lower thoracic erector spina plane block causes involuntary motor block. However, it is stated that the possible complications associated with the block may be due to the failure of the technique.

The erector spina plane block technique consists of an injection of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, guided by USG, between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process below it. The procedure is performed after the patient is seated, in the prone position, or in the lateral decubitus position and the target vertebral level has been defined. A high frequency linear USG probe is placed 3 cm lateral to the spinous process. On the hyperechoic transverse process, hypoechoic M.latissimus dorsi and M.rector spina are defined. The needle is then advanced from cephal to caudal or from caudal to cephalad until it remains in the interfascial plane. The correct position of the needle is confirmed by observing intramuscular diffusion of the drug following bupivacaine injection.

In the studies, the effectiveness of the erector spina plan block was controlled with the Visual Pain Scale (VAS) in the postoperative period. Therefore, in our study, we evaluated the effectiveness of postoperative pain with VAS. In our study, the patients in the control group will be those who did not undergo the block procedure. There is a 10 cm long line drawn horizontally on the Visual Pain Scale. The left end of this line represents no pain (VAS 0), and the other end represents the most severe pain imaginable (VAS 10). The patient is asked to mark a point on this 10 cm line according to the severity of the pain at that moment.

In our clinic, the efficacy of erector spina plane block has been demonstrated in studies performed in various surgeries. These studies include cholecystectomy, thoracic surgery, breast surgery, etc. made in operations. It has been shown in the literature that erector spina plane block is also effective in total abdominal hysterectomy operation. In this study, we aimed to show the effectiveness of the erector spina plane block, which is routinely applied in our clinic to prevent postoperative pain after total abdominal hysterectomy operations.

Being tested
Erector spinae plane block (ESPB)
Keywords
postoperative pain, total abdominal hysterectomy, erector spinae plan block, morphine, visuel analog scale
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Erector spinae plane block (ESPB)Procedure or surgery

    Bilateral erector spinae plane block will be performed with 20 mL, 0.25% bupivacaine at T9 level preoperatively.

Study groups in NCT05513196
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ESPB GroupErector spinae plane block performed group.
Receives: Procedure: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB)
Control GroupControl group.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Morphine consumption

    Morphine consumption (mg) of patients with patient controlled analgesia device

    Measured: Postoperative 24th hour

  2. Visuel analog scale

    visuel analog scale of patients

    Measured: Postoperative 24th hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2022
  2. Study start1 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2022
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
160 participants (actual)
Target duration
6 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05513196
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021-ESP
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
23 Nov 2021
Last updated
10 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ivanusic J, Konishi Y, Barrington MJ. A Cadaveric Study Investigating the Mechanism of Action of Erector Spinae Blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Aug;43(6):567-571. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000789.

    PubMed 29746445
  • Hamed MA, Goda AS, Basiony MM, Fargaly OS, Abdelhady MA. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled study original study. J Pain Res. 2019 Apr 30;12:1393-1398. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S196501. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31118757
  • De Cassai A, Geraldini F, Carere A, Sergi M, Munari M. Complications Rate Estimation After Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Oct;35(10):3142-3143. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.02.043. Epub 2021 Feb 20. No abstract available.

    PubMed 33731296

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Postoperative Pain, run by Kocaeli University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Morphine consumption (time frame: Postoperative 24th hour). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05513196, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in