AzTrials
AzTrials

Liver CirrhosisPhase 2ZEALNCT05516498

Zibotentan and Dapagliflozin Combination, EvAluated in Liver Cirrhosis (ZEAL Study)

A Phase 2 study testing Part A: zibotentan (dose B) + dapagliflozin and Part B: zibotentan (dose A) + dapagliflozin in people with Liver Cirrhosis, run by AstraZeneca at 50 sites in 15 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a two part Phase IIa/b multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group dose-ranging study to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the combination of zibotentan and dapagliflozin, and dapagliflozin monotherapy versus placebo in participants with cirrhosis with features of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Liver Cirrhosis
What is being tested?
Part A: zibotentan (dose B) + dapagliflozin and Part B: zibotentan (dose A) + dapagliflozin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
205 participants
Where
50 sitesin 15 countries
Study dates
31 Oct 2022to 17 Jul 2025
Phase
Phase 2

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study principal inclusion criteria For both Part A and Part B

  1. No current or prior (within 1 month of enrolment) medical treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor or ERAs.
  2. On no or a stable dose of beta blockers, with no major dose changes within 1 month prior to the first dose of study intervention.
  3. Provision of signed and dated, written ICF prior to any mandatory study-specific procedures, sampling, and analyses.
  4. Female participants of non-childbearing potential confirmed at screening by fulfilling one of the following criteria:
  5. Post-menopausal: defined as amenorrhoea for at least 12 months or more following cessation of all exogenous hormonal treatments; and also, FSH levels in the post-menopausal range by central laboratory.
  6. Documentation of irreversible surgical sterilisation by hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral salpingectomy but not tubal ligation.
  7. Female participants must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and must not be lactating

Part A participants who have the following:

  1. Clinical and/or histological diagnosis of cirrhosis with either (i) features of portal hypertension or (ii) liver stiffness ≥ 21 kPa.
  2. MELD score < 15.
  3. Child-Pugh score ≤ 6.
  4. No clinically evident ascites.
  5. No evidence of worsening of hepatic function (eg, no clinically significant change in signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters of hepatic disease status) within the last month prior to dosing, as determined by the investigator or usual practitioner.
  6. HVPG recording of good enough quality as judged by a central reader.

Part B participants who have the following:

  1. Clinical and/or histological diagnosis of cirrhosis and either history of decompensation or compensated cirrhosis with signs of clinically significant portal hypertension.
  2. HVPG recording of good enough quality and HVPG > 10 mmHg, as judged by a central reader.
  3. MELD score < 15.
  4. Child-Pugh score < 10.
  5. No ascites or ascites up to grade 2 without change in diuretic treatment within the last month prior to first dose and no paracentesis within the last month or planned paracentesis in the next 4 months at screening.
  6. No evidence of worsening of hepatic function (eg, no clinically significant change in signs, symptoms, or laboratory parameters of hepatic disease status) within the last month prior to dosing, as determined by the investigator or usual practitioner.

Study principal exclusion criteria:

  1. Any evidence of a clinically significant disease which in the investigator's opinion makes it undesirable for the participant to participate in the study.
  2. Liver cirrhosis caused by chronic cholestatic liver disease
  3. ALT or AST ≥ 150 U/L and/or total bilirubin ≥ 3 × ULN
  4. Acute liver injury caused by drug toxicity or by an infection.
  5. Any history of hepatocellular carcinoma.
  6. Liver transplant or expected liver transplantation within 6 months of screening.
  7. History of TIPS or a planned TIPS within 6 months from enrolment into the study.
  8. Active treatment for HCV within the last 1 year or HBV antiviral therapy for less than 1 year.
  9. Participants with T1DM.

Medical Conditions (Part A only)

  1. INR > 1.5.
  2. Serum/plasma levels of albumin ≤ 35 g/L.
  3. Platelet count < 75 × 109/L.
  4. History of ascites
  5. History of hepatic hydrothorax
  6. History of portopulmonary syndrome
  7. History of hepatic encephalopathy
  8. History of variceal haemorrhage
  9. History of acute kidney injury
  10. History of heart failure, including high output heart failure (eg, due to hyperthyroidism or Paget's disease)

Medical Conditions (Part B only)

  1. INR > 1.7.
  2. Serum/plasma levels of albumin ≤ 28 g/L.
  3. Platelet count < 50 × /109L.
  4. Acute kidney injury within 3 months of screening.
  5. History of encephalopathy of West Haven grade 2 or higher within 6 months prior to screening.
  6. History of variceal haemorrhage within 6 months prior to screening.
  7. NYHA functional heart failure class III or IV or with unstable heart failure requiring hospitalisation for optimisation of heart failure treatment and who are not yet stable on heart failure therapy within 6 months prior to screening.
  8. Heart failure due to cardiomyopathies that would primarily require specific other treatment: eg, cardiomyopathy due to pericardial disease, amyloidosis or other infiltrative diseases, cardiomyopathy related to congenital heart disease, primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiomyopathy related to toxic or infective conditions (ie, chemotherapy, infective myocarditis, septic cardiomyopathy).
  9. High output heart failure (eg, due to hyperthyroidism or Paget's disease).
  10. Heart failure due to primary cardiac valvular disease/dysfunction, severe functional mitral or tricuspid valve insufficiency, or planned cardiac valve repair/replacement.

Trial locations and contacts

50 sites in 15 countries.

50 sites in 15 countries

United States11 sites
  • Research Site

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Research Site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • Research Site

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903

  • Research Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Research Site

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • Research Site

    Pasadena, California, 91105

  • Research Site

    Richmond, Virginia, 23249

  • Research Site

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • Research Site

    San Francisco, California, 94115

  • Research Site

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

  • Research Site

    West Hollywood, California, 90048

Other trials in United States

Spain7 sites
  • Research Site

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Research Site

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Research Site

    Barcelona, 08041

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 28007

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 28034

  • Research Site

    Majadahonda, 28222

  • Research Site

    Santander, 39008

Other trials in Spain

Germany5 sites
  • Research Site

    Dresden, 01307

  • Research Site

    Landshut, 84034

  • Research Site

    Mainz, 55131

  • Research Site

    Münster, 48149

  • Research Site

    Wiesbaden, 65189

Other trials in Germany

China4 sites
  • Research Site

    Beijing, 100057

  • Research Site

    Chengdu, 610000

  • Research Site

    Guangzhou, 510515

  • Research Site

    Hangzhou, 310015

Other trials in China

Denmark4 sites
  • Research Site

    Aarhus N, 8200

  • Research Site

    Esbjerg, 6700

  • Research Site

    Hvidovre, 2650

  • Research Site

    Køge, 4600

Other trials in Denmark

France4 sites
  • Research Site

    Angers, 49933

  • Research Site

    Clichy, 92110

  • Research Site

    Paris, 75651

  • Research Site

    Toulouse, 31059

Other trials in France

Switzerland3 sites
  • Research Site

    Bern, 3010

  • Research Site

    Lucerne, 6000

  • Research Site

    Lugano, 6900

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Research Site

    Birmingham, B9 5SS

  • Research Site

    Cambridge, CB2 0XY

  • Research Site

    London, SE5 9RS

Other trials in United Kingdom

Czechia2 sites
  • Research Site

    Prague, 128 00

  • Research Site

    Prague, 169 02

Other trials in Czechia

Taiwan2 sites
  • Research Site

    Taipei, 10002

  • Research Site

    Taipei, 112

Other trials in Taiwan

Australia1 site
  • Research Site

    Heidelberg, 3084

Other trials in Australia

Austria1 site
  • Research Site

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Belgium1 site
  • Research Site

    Edegem, 2650

Other trials in Belgium

Netherlands1 site
  • Research Site

    Amsterdam, 1081 HV

Other trials in Netherlands

Romania1 site
  • Research Site

    Cluj-Napoca, 400162

Other trials in Romania

About this study

Official title: A Two Part Phase IIa/b Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Dose-ranging Study to Assess Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of the Combination of Zibotentan and Dapagliflozin, and Dapagliflozin Monotherapy Versus Placebo in Participants With Cirrhosis With Features of Portal Hypertension

This is a two part Phase IIa/b multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group dose-ranging study to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the combination of zibotentan and dapagliflozin, and dapagliflozin monotherapy versus placebo in participants with cirrhosis with features of portal hypertension.

Read the detailed description

Part A will assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the combination of B mg zibotentan and 10 mg dapagliflozin versus placebo in participants with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis with features of portal hypertension and with no history of decompensation events.

If the safety profile is determined to be acceptable at the conclusion of Part A, Part B will investigate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of A mg, B mg, or C mg zibotentan combined with 10 mg dapagliflozin and of 10 mg dapagliflozin monotherapy versus placebo in participants with cirrhosis with features of portal hypertension. Part B will include a broader range of Child- Pugh A and Child-Pugh B cirrhosis participants, including those with more severe disease, a history of decompensation events, or current ascites.

The study will be conducted in approximately 30 to 45 study centres in North America, Asia, and Europe.

Conditions
Liver Cirrhosis
Being tested
Part A: Placebo (matching zibotentan capsule & matching dapagliflozin tablet), Part A: zibotentan (dose B) + dapagliflozin, Part B: Placebo (matching zibotentan capsule & matching dapagliflozin tablet), Part B: placebo (matching zibotentan capsule) + dapagliflozin, Part B: zibotentan (dose A) + dapagliflozin
Medical subject headings
Liver Cirrhosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Part A: Placebo (matching zibotentan capsule & matching dapagliflozin tablet)Drug

    placebo capsule (matching zibotentan capsule)

    placebo tablet (matching dapagliflozin tablet)

  • Part A: zibotentan (dose B) + dapagliflozinDrug

    zibotentan capsule

    dapagliflozin tablet

  • Part B: Placebo (matching zibotentan capsule & matching dapagliflozin tablet)Drug

    placebo capsule (matching zibotentan capsule)

    placebo tablet (matching dapagliflozin tablet)

  • Part B: placebo (matching zibotentan capsule) + dapagliflozinDrug

    placebo capsule (matching zibotentan capsule)

    dapagliflozin tablet

  • Part B: zibotentan (dose A) + dapagliflozinDrug

    zibotentan capsule

    dapagliflozin tablet

  • Part B: zibotentan (dose B) + dapagliflozinDrug

    zibotentan capsule

    dapagliflozin tablet

  • Part B: zibotentan (dose C) + dapagliflozinDrug

    zibotentan capsule

    dapagliflozin tablet

Study groups in NCT05516498
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Part A: Treatment Group 1ExperimentalParticipants will receive once daily dose of placebo matching zibotentan capsule + placebo matching dapagliflozin tablet for 6 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Part A: Placebo (matching zibotentan capsule & matching dapagliflozin tablet)
Part A: Treatment Group 2ExperimentalParticipants will receive once daily dose of zibotentan capsule + dapagliflozin tablet for 6 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Part A: zibotentan (dose B) + dapagliflozin
Part B: Treatment Group 1ExperimentalParticipants will receive once daily dose of placebo matching zibotentan capsule + placebo matching dapagliflozin tablet for 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Part B: Placebo (matching zibotentan capsule & matching dapagliflozin tablet)
Part B: Treatment Group 2ExperimentalParticipants will receive once daily dose of placebo matching zibotentan capsule + dapagliflozin tablet for 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Part B: placebo (matching zibotentan capsule) + dapagliflozin
Part B: Treatment Group 3ExperimentalParticipants will receive once daily dose of zibotentan capsule + dapagliflozin tablet for 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Part B: zibotentan (dose A) + dapagliflozin
Part B: Treatment Group 4ExperimentalParticipants will receive once daily dose of zibotentan capsule + dapagliflozin tablet for 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Part B: zibotentan (dose B) + dapagliflozin
Part B: Treatment Group 5ExperimentalParticipants will receive once daily dose of zibotentan capsule + dapagliflozin tablet for 16 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Part B: zibotentan (dose C) + dapagliflozin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Absolute Change in HVPG From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Absolute change in Hepatic venous pressure gradient from baseline to week 6.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6

  2. Absolute Change in HVPG From Baseline to Week 6, Part B

    Absolute change in Hepatic venous pressure gradient from baseline to week 6.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. HVPG Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Hepatic venous pressure gradient percentage change from baseline to week 6, Part A.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6

  2. HVPG Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 6, Part B

    Hepatic venous pressure gradient percentage change from baseline to week 6, Part B.

    Measured: From baseline to week 6

  3. Number of Participants With HVPG Response at Week 6, Part A

    A HVPG responder is defined as a subject having <10 mmHg at week 6 if baseline HVPG >=10 or a reduction of >=1.5 mmHg from baseline to week 6. n: Number of subjects in analysis. N: Number of subjects per treatment group.

    Measured: From baseline to week 6

  4. Number of Participants With HVPG Response at Week 6, Part B

    A HVPG responder in Part B is defined as a subject having at least 20% decrease or a reduction to or below 12 mmHg if baseline HVPG > 12 mmHG from baseline to Week 6.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 6

  5. Change in Body Weight (kg) Over Time Course of Study, Part A

    The analysis is performed using MMRM. The model includes the continuous covariate of the Baseline measurements as the fixed effect covariate and fixed categorical effects of treatment group, visit, and treatmentby-visit interaction.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 6

  6. Change in Body Weight (kg) Over Time Course of Study, Part B

    The analysis is performed using MMRM. The model includes the continuous covariate of the Baseline measurements as the fixed effect covariate and fixed categorical effects of treatment group, visit, and treatmentby-visit interaction.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

  7. Change in Total Dosage of Loop-diuretic Equivalents Use From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Change in total dosage of loop-diuretic equivalents use from baseline to Week 6, Part A. A loop-diuretic equivalent is based on 40 mg furosemide = 1 mg bumetanide = 20 mg torsemide = 50 mg ethacrynic acid.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 6

  8. Change in Total Dosage of Loop-diuretic Equivalents Use From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Change in total dosage of loop-diuretic equivalents use from baseline to Week 6, Part B. A loop-diuretic equivalent is based on 40 mg furosemide = 1 mg bumetanide = 20 mg torsemide = 50 mg ethacrynic acid.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

  9. Change in Total Body Water From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Change in total body water from baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6

  10. Change in Total Body Water From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Change in total body water from baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

  11. Change in Extracellular Water From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Change in extracellular water from baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 6

  12. Change in Extracellular Water From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Change in extracellular water from baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6 and to Week 16

  13. Change in Intracellular Water From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Change in intracellular water from Baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6

  14. Change in Intracellular Water From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Change in intracellular water from Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

  15. Change in Total Body Fat Mass From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Change in total body fat mass from Baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 6

  16. Change in Total Body Fat Mass From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Change in total body fat mass from Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) was performed at the study centre to monitor body water volumes and body fat mass.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

  17. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6

  18. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

  19. Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 6, Part A

    Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 6, Part A. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 6

  20. Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B

    Change in diastolic blood pressure from baseline to Week 6 and Week 16, Part B. The analysis is performed using MMRM.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 6 and Week 16

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Aug 2022
  2. Study start31 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion22 May 2025
  4. Study completion17 Jul 2025

Why it stopped: The study was ended earlier than planned due to a sponsor decision.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
205 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05516498
Sponsor's protocol ID
D4326C00003
Other IDs
2021-006577-30
Acronym
ZEAL
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
24 Aug 2022
Last updated
25 Sep 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in