AzTrials
AzTrials

Communication Disorder, SocialNCT05517161

Roll for Intervention - TBI Group Treatment

An observational study of Communication Disorder, Social, run by Moravian University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Communication group intervention for individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury based on INSIGHT protocol (Keegan et al, 2020) with roll playing game focus Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Communication Disorder, Social
What is being tested?
INSIGHT
How many people
5 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
2 May 2022to 1 May 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Group 1: individuals who have received a brain injury at least 1 year prior to enrollment. Group 2: age, education and gender matched individuals who have no history of neurological difficulties

Who may be able to join

  • moderate to severe TBI more than 1 year ago

Who cannot join

  • other neurological diagnoses prior to TBI

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Moravian University

    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18018

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Roll for Intervention - a Critical Look at the Practicability of Table-top Roll Playing Games as Communication Intervention for Traumatic Brain Injury

Communication group intervention for individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury based on INSIGHT protocol (Keegan et al, 2020) with roll playing game focus

Read the detailed description

Individuals with TBI recruited to participate in a study about applying INSIGHT protocol to a virtual roll playing game environment. The game 'monsters of the week' will be used to administer the cognitive-communication ingredients outlined by INSIGHT (Keegan et al 2020) and progress towards social communication goals will be documented throughout the course of participating in the roll playing campaign (7-8 weeks - meeting 2 hours each week). The individuals without neurological disorders will follow the same protocol.

Being tested
INSIGHT
Medical subject headings
Social Communication Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • INSIGHTBehavioural

    See Keegan et al., 2020

Study groups in NCT05517161
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Individuals with TBINot described
Receives: Behavioral: INSIGHT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Goal Attainament Scaling - change over time

    Assessing change over time on five point scaled goals - goal rated each week for 8 weeks.

    Measured: Week 2, 3,4,5,6,7, 8 and 9 of the 10week study protocol

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update

    Randolf (2012) standardized norm referenced assessment measure of cognitive skills (memory and attention etc.)

    Measured: During week 1 and week 10 of the 10 week protocol

  2. Functional Assessment of Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies

    MacDonald (2005) standardized norm referenced assessment measure of problem solving and reasoning

    Measured: During week 1 and week 10 of the 10 week protocol

  3. Sydney psychosocial reintegration scale version 2 (SPRS-2)

    Tate (2012) standardized likert based questionnaire (12, 1-5 ratings, where higher scores = better performance)

    Measured: During week 1 and week 10 of the 10 week protocol

  4. Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS)

    Diener et al (1985), likert measurement scale questionnaire, 5 1-7 ratings, higher scores = better performance

    Measured: During week 1 and week 10 of the 10 week protocol

  5. Latrobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ)

    Douglas et al (2000), likert measurement scale questionnaire, 30 1-4 ratings, higher scores = better performance

    Measured: During week 1 and week 10 of the 10 week protocol

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Aug 2022
  2. Study start2 May 2022
  3. Primary completion20 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion1 May 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
5 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05517161
Sponsor's protocol ID
22-015
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
23 Aug 2022
Last updated
23 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Communication Disorder, Social, run by Moravian University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Goal Attainament Scaling - change over time (time frame: Week 2, 3,4,5,6,7, 8 and 9 of the 10week study protocol). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in