AzTrials
AzTrials

PruritusPhase 2PACIFICNCT05525520

Study to Evaluate EP547 in Subjects With Cholestatic Pruritus Due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

A Phase 2 study testing EP547 in people with Pruritus, run by Escient Pharmaceuticals, Inc at 52 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This phase 2 trial will evaluate the effects of EP547 in subjects with cholestatic pruritus due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Pruritus
What is being tested?
EP547
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
62 participants
Where
52 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
6 Oct 2022to 5 Sep 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 to 80 years
  • Documented primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)
  • Presence of consistent moderate to severe pruritus
  • Use of anti-pruritic and anti-cholestatic (including UDCA and obeticholic acid) medication allowed if meeting additional criteria
  • Individuals with concomitant inflammatory bowel disease must meet additional relevant criteria

Who cannot join

  • Pruritus associated with an etiology other than PBC or PSC
  • Prior or planned liver transplantation
  • Evidence of compensated or decompensated cirrhosis
  • Alternative causes of liver disease
  • Presence of documented secondary sclerosing cholangitis
  • Current evidence of clinically significant high-grade strictures or presence of biliary stent
  • History of significant small bowel resection or short bowel syndrome
  • Has exclusionary laboratory or biochemical results at Screening

Trial locations and contacts

52 sites in 8 countries.

52 sites in 8 countries

United States21 sites
  • University of Alabama Birmingham Hospital

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Gastro Health Research

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45249

  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • Southern California Research Center

    Coronado, California, 92118

  • Science 37

    Culver City, California, 90230

  • The Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75203

  • Liver Associates of Texas, PA

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

  • Gastro Health & Nutrition

    Katy, Texas, 77494

  • University of Miami - Schiff Center for Liver Diseases

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • Tulane University Health Sciences Center

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112

  • Ochsner Medical Center

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121

  • NYU Grossman School of Medicine Gastroenterology and Hepatology

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Digestive & Liver Disease Specialists

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • California Liver Research Institute

    Pasadena, California, 91105

  • Dignity Health Center for Clinical Research at St. Joseph Hospital

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85013

  • UPMC Center for Liver Disease

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Bon Secours Liver Institute of Virginia

    Richmond, Virginia, 23226

  • Montefiore Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom7 sites
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

    Birmingham

  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary

    Glasgow

  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    London

  • Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University

    Newcastle

  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Norwich

  • University of Nottingham - Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre Biomedical Research Unit

    Nottingham

  • University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust - Derriford Hospital

    Plymouth

Other trials in United Kingdom

France6 sites
  • APHP Avicenne

    Bobigny

  • CHU Grenoble- Alpes- Site Nord

    Grenoble

  • CHU de Lille

    Lille

  • Saint Antoine Hospital

    Paris

  • Hospital Rangueil

    Toulouse

  • Paul Brousse Hospital

    Villejuif

Other trials in France

Spain6 sites
  • Hospital General Universitario Alicante

    Alicante

  • Hospital Clinic Barcelona

    Barcelona

  • Hospital de Montecelo

    Pontevedra

  • Campus Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

    Seville

  • La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital

    Valencia

  • Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet

    Zaragoza

Other trials in Spain

Canada4 sites
  • University of Alberta

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2X8

  • Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

    Montreal, Quebeck, H2X 0A9

  • Toronto Centre for Liver Disease Toronto General Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario

  • (G.I.R.I.) GI Research Institute

    Vancouver, British Columbia

Other trials in Canada

Israel4 sites
  • Carmel Medical Center

    Haifa

  • Rambam Medical Center- Keriat Eliezer Family Health Center

    Haifa

  • Hadassah Medical Center (Ein-Karem)

    Jerusalem

  • Chaim Sheba Medical Center

    Ramat Gan

Other trials in Israel

Belgium3 sites
  • UZ Antwerpen

    Antwerp

  • UZ Gent

    Ghent

  • UZ Leuven

    Leuven

Other trials in Belgium

Netherlands1 site
  • Academic Medical Center- University of Amsterdam

    Amsterdam

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of EP547 in Subjects With Cholestatic Pruritus Due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

This phase 2 trial will evaluate the effects of EP547 in subjects with cholestatic pruritus due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)

Conditions
Pruritus
Being tested
EP547, Placebo
Keywords
Pruritus, Itch, Primary Biliary Cholangitis, Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, PACIFIC, EP547
Medical subject headings
Pruritus, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Cholangitis, Sclerosing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EP547Drug

    Once daily

  • PlaceboDrug

    Once daily

Study groups in NCT05525520
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EP547 100 mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: EP547
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) Score up to Week 6

    Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline; up to Week 6

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Change From Baseline in the 5-D Itch Scale Total Score at Week 6

    The 5-D Itch Scale is a multidimensional (degree, duration, direction, disability, and distribution) questionnaire measuring changes in pruritis. The duration, degree, and direction domain scores range from 1 (no pruritus) to 5 (most severe pruritus). The disability domain includes 4 items assessing itching impact on daily activities: sleep, leisure/social activities, housework/errands, and work/school. Disability domain score=highest score on any of the 4 categories (1 [no pruritis] to 5 [most severe pruritis]). For the distribution domain, 16 body parts are listed to determine the distribution of itching over the last 2 weeks; the number of affected body parts is tallied (potential sum=0-16); the sum is sorted into 5 thresholds: 0-2 is assigned a score of 1; 3-5, a score of 2; 6-10, a score of 3; 11-13, a score of 4; 14-16, a score of 5. Higher scores indicate more severe pruritis. The 5 domain scores are summed to get a total 5-D score: 5 (no pruritus) to 25 (most severe pruritus).

    Measured: Baseline; Week 6

  2. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Pruritus as Defined by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 6

    Participants were asked to rate their impression of overall change in pruritus in the past 7 days compared to before they started taking study drug using the PGI-C, a 7-point scale ranging from "much improved" to "much worse," with higher scores indicating less improvement in pruritus. Participants that reported a change in their itch of "minimally improved" or better were considered to be responders in terms of "improvement in pruritus."

    Measured: Baseline; Week 6

  3. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Pruritus Severity From Baseline as Defined by Change in Patient Global Impress of Severity (PGI-S) at Week 6

    Participants were asked to rate the severity of their pruritus in the past 7 days using the PGI-S, a 4-point scale ranging from "none" to "severe." Participants that reported a positive shift in their categorical assessment of itch compared to their Baseline level (e.g., "severe" at Visit 2 [Day 1] with a shift to "moderate" at Visit 6 [Week 6]) were considered to be responders in terms of "improvement in pruritus."

    Measured: Baseline; Week 6

  4. Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in WI-NRS Score ≥2 From Baseline at Week 6

    Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week.

    Measured: Baseline; Week 6

  5. Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in WI-NRS Score ≥3 From Baseline at Week 6

    Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week.

    Measured: Baseline; Week 6

  6. Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in WI-NRS Score ≥4 From Baseline at Week 6

    Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week.

    Measured: Baseline; Week 6

  7. Percentage of Participants With a WI-NRS Score <4 at Week 6

    Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week.

    Measured: Baseline; Week 6

  8. Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Any ≥Grade 3 TEAE, Any Related TEAE, and Any TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug.

    Measured: up to the end of Week 6

  9. Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Any TEAE, Any ≥Grade 3 TEAE, Any Related TEAE, and Any TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug.

    Measured: from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12

  10. Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Any Serious TEAE, Any ≥Grade 3 Serious TEAE, Any Related Serious TEAE, and Any Serious TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug

    TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. A serious TEAE is any untoward medical occurrence, that at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospital admission or prolongs hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or is a medically significant event that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previously listed outcomes. Serious TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the serious TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug.

    Measured: up to the end of Week 6

  11. Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Any Serious TEAE, Any ≥Grade 3 Serious TEAE, Any Related Serious TEAE, and Any Serious TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug

    TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. A serious TEAE is any untoward medical occurrence, that at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospital admission or prolongs hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or is a medically significant event that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previously listed outcomes. Serious TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the serious TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug.

    Measured: from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12

  12. Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent (TE) Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI), Any ≥Grade 3 TE AESI, Any Related TE AESI, and Any TE AESI That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. AESI were considered to be any clinically meaningful new, worsening from Baseline, or abnormal laboratory findings or symptoms suggestive of acute kidney injury (AKI) (e.g., "blood urea increased" or "protein urine present" AEs as identified by the Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] Query [SMQ] "Acute renal failure"). TE AESIs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the AE AESIs were related or unrelated to the study drug.

    Measured: up to the end of Week 6

  13. Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent (TE) AESI, Any ≥Grade 3 TE AESI, Any Related TE AESI, and Any TE AESI That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. AESI were considered to be any clinically meaningful new, worsening from Baseline, or abnormal laboratory findings or symptoms suggestive of acute kidney injury (AKI) (e.g., "blood urea increased" or "protein urine present" AEs as identified by the Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] Query [SMQ] "Acute renal failure"). TE AESIs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the AE AESIs were related or unrelated to the study drug.

    Measured: from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12

  14. Number of Participants With Any Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Clinically Meaningful in Clinical Laboratory Test Results

    Clinical laboratory test results included results for clinical hematology, chemistry, coagulation, and thyroid function parameters . The investigator determined if changes were clinically meaningful.

    Measured: up to the end of Week 12

  15. Number of Participants With Any Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Sign Measurements

    Vital sign measurements included measurements for blood pressure, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, body temperature, and respiratory rate. The investigator determined if changes were clinically meaningful.

    Measured: up to the end of Week 12

  16. Number of Participants With Any Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

    ECG parameters included heart rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS duration, or QT interval. The investigator determined if changes were clinically significant.

    Measured: up to the end of Week 12

  17. Plasma Concentration of EP547 and Metabolites

    The lower level of quantitation = 0.01 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL) for EP547 and 0.005 μg/mL for EP3583.

    Measured: 1, 2, and 3 hours postdose on Day 1 and Week 3; predose on Weeks 1, 2, and 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Sep 2022
  2. Study start6 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion17 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion5 Sep 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05525520
Sponsor's protocol ID
EP-547-201
Other IDs
2021-002526-25
Acronym
PACIFIC
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
30 Aug 2022
Last updated
31 Jul 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing EP547 in people with Pruritus, run by Escient Pharmaceuticals, Inc at 52 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 52 sites in United States, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Canada and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Jul 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) Score up to Week 6 (time frame: Baseline; up to Week 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in