PruritusPhase 2PACIFICNCT05525520
Study to Evaluate EP547 in Subjects With Cholestatic Pruritus Due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
A Phase 2 study testing EP547 in people with Pruritus, run by Escient Pharmaceuticals, Inc at 52 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
This phase 2 trial will evaluate the effects of EP547 in subjects with cholestatic pruritus due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pruritus
- What is being tested?
- EP547
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 62 participants
- Where
- 52 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- 6 Oct 2022to 5 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 to 80 years
- Documented primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)
- Presence of consistent moderate to severe pruritus
- Use of anti-pruritic and anti-cholestatic (including UDCA and obeticholic acid) medication allowed if meeting additional criteria
- Individuals with concomitant inflammatory bowel disease must meet additional relevant criteria
Who cannot join
- Pruritus associated with an etiology other than PBC or PSC
- Prior or planned liver transplantation
- Evidence of compensated or decompensated cirrhosis
- Alternative causes of liver disease
- Presence of documented secondary sclerosing cholangitis
- Current evidence of clinically significant high-grade strictures or presence of biliary stent
- History of significant small bowel resection or short bowel syndrome
- Has exclusionary laboratory or biochemical results at Screening
Trial locations and contacts
52 sites in 8 countries.
52 sites in 8 countries
United States21 sites
University of Alabama Birmingham Hospital
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Gastro Health Research
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45249
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Southern California Research Center
Coronado, California, 92118
Science 37
Culver City, California, 90230
The Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75203
Liver Associates of Texas, PA
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Gastro Health & Nutrition
Katy, Texas, 77494
University of Miami - Schiff Center for Liver Diseases
Miami, Florida, 33136
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Tulane University Health Sciences Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Ochsner Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
NYU Grossman School of Medicine Gastroenterology and Hepatology
New York, New York, 10016
Digestive & Liver Disease Specialists
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
California Liver Research Institute
Pasadena, California, 91105
Dignity Health Center for Clinical Research at St. Joseph Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
UPMC Center for Liver Disease
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Bon Secours Liver Institute of Virginia
Richmond, Virginia, 23226
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
United Kingdom7 sites
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Birmingham
Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London
Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University
Newcastle
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Norwich
University of Nottingham - Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre Biomedical Research Unit
Nottingham
University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust - Derriford Hospital
Plymouth
France6 sites
APHP Avicenne
Bobigny
CHU Grenoble- Alpes- Site Nord
Grenoble
CHU de Lille
Lille
Saint Antoine Hospital
Paris
Hospital Rangueil
Toulouse
Paul Brousse Hospital
Villejuif
Spain6 sites
Hospital General Universitario Alicante
Alicante
Hospital Clinic Barcelona
Barcelona
Hospital de Montecelo
Pontevedra
Campus Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville
La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital
Valencia
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
Zaragoza
Canada4 sites
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2X8
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebeck, H2X 0A9
Toronto Centre for Liver Disease Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario
(G.I.R.I.) GI Research Institute
Vancouver, British Columbia
Israel4 sites
Carmel Medical Center
Haifa
Rambam Medical Center- Keriat Eliezer Family Health Center
Haifa
Hadassah Medical Center (Ein-Karem)
Jerusalem
Chaim Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan
Netherlands1 site
Academic Medical Center- University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of EP547 in Subjects With Cholestatic Pruritus Due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
This phase 2 trial will evaluate the effects of EP547 in subjects with cholestatic pruritus due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)
- Conditions
- Pruritus
- Being tested
- EP547, Placebo
- Keywords
- Pruritus, Itch, Primary Biliary Cholangitis, Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, PACIFIC, EP547
- Medical subject headings
- Pruritus, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Cholangitis, Sclerosing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EP547Drug
Once daily
PlaceboDrug
Once daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EP547 100 mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: EP547 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) Score up to Week 6
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
Measured: Baseline; up to Week 6
Secondary outcomes (17)
Change From Baseline in the 5-D Itch Scale Total Score at Week 6
The 5-D Itch Scale is a multidimensional (degree, duration, direction, disability, and distribution) questionnaire measuring changes in pruritis. The duration, degree, and direction domain scores range from 1 (no pruritus) to 5 (most severe pruritus). The disability domain includes 4 items assessing itching impact on daily activities: sleep, leisure/social activities, housework/errands, and work/school. Disability domain score=highest score on any of the 4 categories (1 [no pruritis] to 5 [most severe pruritis]). For the distribution domain, 16 body parts are listed to determine the distribution of itching over the last 2 weeks; the number of affected body parts is tallied (potential sum=0-16); the sum is sorted into 5 thresholds: 0-2 is assigned a score of 1; 3-5, a score of 2; 6-10, a score of 3; 11-13, a score of 4; 14-16, a score of 5. Higher scores indicate more severe pruritis. The 5 domain scores are summed to get a total 5-D score: 5 (no pruritus) to 25 (most severe pruritus).
Measured: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Pruritus as Defined by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 6
Participants were asked to rate their impression of overall change in pruritus in the past 7 days compared to before they started taking study drug using the PGI-C, a 7-point scale ranging from "much improved" to "much worse," with higher scores indicating less improvement in pruritus. Participants that reported a change in their itch of "minimally improved" or better were considered to be responders in terms of "improvement in pruritus."
Measured: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Pruritus Severity From Baseline as Defined by Change in Patient Global Impress of Severity (PGI-S) at Week 6
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their pruritus in the past 7 days using the PGI-S, a 4-point scale ranging from "none" to "severe." Participants that reported a positive shift in their categorical assessment of itch compared to their Baseline level (e.g., "severe" at Visit 2 [Day 1] with a shift to "moderate" at Visit 6 [Week 6]) were considered to be responders in terms of "improvement in pruritus."
Measured: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in WI-NRS Score ≥2 From Baseline at Week 6
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week.
Measured: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in WI-NRS Score ≥3 From Baseline at Week 6
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week.
Measured: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in WI-NRS Score ≥4 From Baseline at Week 6
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week.
Measured: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With a WI-NRS Score <4 at Week 6
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week.
Measured: Baseline; Week 6
Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Any ≥Grade 3 TEAE, Any Related TEAE, and Any TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug.
Measured: up to the end of Week 6
Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Any TEAE, Any ≥Grade 3 TEAE, Any Related TEAE, and Any TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug.
Measured: from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Any Serious TEAE, Any ≥Grade 3 Serious TEAE, Any Related Serious TEAE, and Any Serious TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. A serious TEAE is any untoward medical occurrence, that at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospital admission or prolongs hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or is a medically significant event that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previously listed outcomes. Serious TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the serious TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug.
Measured: up to the end of Week 6
Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Any Serious TEAE, Any ≥Grade 3 Serious TEAE, Any Related Serious TEAE, and Any Serious TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. A serious TEAE is any untoward medical occurrence, that at any dose: results in death; is life threatening; requires hospital admission or prolongs hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or is a medically significant event that, based on appropriate medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previously listed outcomes. Serious TEAEs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the serious TEAEs were related or unrelated to the study drug.
Measured: from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent (TE) Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI), Any ≥Grade 3 TE AESI, Any Related TE AESI, and Any TE AESI That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. AESI were considered to be any clinically meaningful new, worsening from Baseline, or abnormal laboratory findings or symptoms suggestive of acute kidney injury (AKI) (e.g., "blood urea increased" or "protein urine present" AEs as identified by the Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] Query [SMQ] "Acute renal failure"). TE AESIs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the AE AESIs were related or unrelated to the study drug.
Measured: up to the end of Week 6
Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent (TE) AESI, Any ≥Grade 3 TE AESI, Any Related TE AESI, and Any TE AESI That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs are AEs with an onset after the first dose of study drug or existing events that worsened after the first dose during the study. AESI were considered to be any clinically meaningful new, worsening from Baseline, or abnormal laboratory findings or symptoms suggestive of acute kidney injury (AKI) (e.g., "blood urea increased" or "protein urine present" AEs as identified by the Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities [MedDRA] Query [SMQ] "Acute renal failure"). TE AESIs were graded for severity (mild [Grade 1], moderate [Grade 2], severe [Grade 3], life threatening [Grade 4], death [Grade 5]) using CTCAE, version 5.0. The investigator assessed whether the AE AESIs were related or unrelated to the study drug.
Measured: from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Any Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Clinically Meaningful in Clinical Laboratory Test Results
Clinical laboratory test results included results for clinical hematology, chemistry, coagulation, and thyroid function parameters . The investigator determined if changes were clinically meaningful.
Measured: up to the end of Week 12
Number of Participants With Any Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Sign Measurements
Vital sign measurements included measurements for blood pressure, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, body temperature, and respiratory rate. The investigator determined if changes were clinically meaningful.
Measured: up to the end of Week 12
Number of Participants With Any Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
ECG parameters included heart rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS duration, or QT interval. The investigator determined if changes were clinically significant.
Measured: up to the end of Week 12
Plasma Concentration of EP547 and Metabolites
The lower level of quantitation = 0.01 micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL) for EP547 and 0.005 μg/mL for EP3583.
Measured: 1, 2, and 3 hours postdose on Day 1 and Week 3; predose on Weeks 1, 2, and 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Sep 2022
- Study start6 Oct 2022
- Primary completion17 Jul 2024
- Study completion5 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PruritusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Escient Pharmaceuticals, Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05525520
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EP-547-201
- Other IDs
- 2021-002526-25
- Acronym
- PACIFIC
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 31 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of EP547 in Subjects With Cholestatic Pruritus Due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05525520
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PACIFIC / EP-547-201
- Conditions
- Pruritus
- Keywords
- Pruritus, Itch, Primary Biliary Cholangitis, Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis, PACIFIC, EP547
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Escient Pharmaceuticals, IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 6 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 31 Jul 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This phase 2 trial will evaluate the effects of EP547 in subjects with cholestatic pruritus due to Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) or Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EP547 100 mg | Experimental | Drug: EP547 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 18 to 80 years
- Documented primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)
- Presence of consistent moderate to severe pruritus
- Use of anti-pruritic and anti-cholestatic (including UDCA and obeticholic acid) medication allowed if meeting additional criteria
- Individuals with concomitant inflammatory bowel disease must meet additional relevant criteria
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pruritus associated with an etiology other than PBC or PSC
- Prior or planned liver transplantation
- Evidence of compensated or decompensated cirrhosis
- Alternative causes of liver disease
- Presence of documented secondary sclerosing cholangitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EP547Once daily | Drug | EP547 100 mg |
| PlaceboOnce daily | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) Score up to Week 6
Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 6
Participants were asked to rate the severity of their worst level of itching in the past 24 hours using the daily WI-NRS, an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itching) to 10 (worst itching imaginable). Itching severity scores collected via the WI-NRS have been categorized in the as mild (<4), moderate (≥4 to <7), or severe (≥7). The average WI-NRS score using the daily values from the week before the first dose of study drug (including the WI-NRS score captured on Study Day 1 of dosing) served as the Baseline score. A weekly score was determined based on the average of all available daily scores of the week. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
17 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in the 5-D Itch Scale Total Score at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Pruritus as Defined by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Pruritus Severity From Baseline as Defined by Change in Patient Global Impress of Severity (PGI-S) at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in WI-NRS Score ≥2 From Baseline at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in WI-NRS Score ≥3 From Baseline at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in WI-NRS Score ≥4 From Baseline at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline; Week 6
Percentage of Participants With a WI-NRS Score <4 at Week 6
Time frame: Baseline; Week 6
Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE), Any ≥Grade 3 TEAE, Any Related TEAE, and Any TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
Time frame: up to the end of Week 6
Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Any TEAE, Any ≥Grade 3 TEAE, Any Related TEAE, and Any TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
Time frame: from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Any Serious TEAE, Any ≥Grade 3 Serious TEAE, Any Related Serious TEAE, and Any Serious TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
Time frame: up to the end of Week 6
Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Any Serious TEAE, Any ≥Grade 3 Serious TEAE, Any Related Serious TEAE, and Any Serious TEAE That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
Time frame: from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent (TE) Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI), Any ≥Grade 3 TE AESI, Any Related TE AESI, and Any TE AESI That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
Time frame: up to the end of Week 6
Open-label Extension Period: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent (TE) AESI, Any ≥Grade 3 TE AESI, Any Related TE AESI, and Any TE AESI That Led to Discontinuation of Study Drug
Time frame: from the beginning of Week 7 up to Week 12
Number of Participants With Any Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Clinically Meaningful in Clinical Laboratory Test Results
Time frame: up to the end of Week 12
Number of Participants With Any Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Sign Measurements
Time frame: up to the end of Week 12
Number of Participants With Any Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
Time frame: up to the end of Week 12
Plasma Concentration of EP547 and Metabolites
Time frame: 1, 2, and 3 hours postdose on Day 1 and Week 3; predose on Weeks 1, 2, and 6
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jul 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pruritus
Not yet recruiting
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of the NeuEve Dryness Treatment Kit on Vaginal Health, Comfort, and Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women
Relieves Vaginal Dryness / Improves Self-Lubrication, Improves Strength & Elasticity of Vagina (Aka Collagen and Elastin)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About Ritlecitinib for the Potential Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Adults.
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety and Tolerability of Difelikefalin in Adolescents on Haemodialysis With Moderate-to-Severe Pruritus
Pruritus, Chronic Kidney Diseases
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Topical Minocycline for CARP
Confluent and Reticulated Papillomatosis (CARP)
Active, not recruiting
Pain Sensitivity and Pruritus of Peripheral Nerves
ITCH
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
52 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing EP547 in people with Pruritus, run by Escient Pharmaceuticals, Inc at 52 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 52 sites in United States, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Canada and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Jul 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) Score up to Week 6 (time frame: Baseline; up to Week 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2025.