AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary Incontinence,StressNCT05527639

Kegel Exercises Prior to Strength Training to Improvestress Urinary Incontinence

A study testing strength training program in people with Urinary Incontinence,Stress, run by Charles Darwin University at 1 site in Australia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This comparative pre-post intervention study investigates the feasibility and benefits of Kegel exercises amongst incontinent women, prior to commencing resistance training, to reduce the risk of stress urinary incontinence compared to a group of women without prior Kegel exercises. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Urinary Incontinence,Stress
What is being tested?
strength training program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteAustralia
Study dates
18 May 2019to 18 Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • being female
  • over eighteen years of age
  • suffer from stress urinary incontinence
  • did not perform Kegel exercises
  • had no experience in regular resistance/strength training
  • completed a physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q) form.

Who cannot join

  • pregnancy, breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Australia1 site
  • Charles Darwin University

    Darwin, Northern Territory, 0909

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: Does a Kegel Exercise Program Prior to Resistance Training Reduce the Risk of Stress Urinary Incontinence?

This comparative pre-post intervention study investigates the feasibility and benefits of Kegel exercises amongst incontinent women, prior to commencing resistance training, to reduce the risk of stress urinary incontinence compared to a group of women without prior Kegel exercises.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the study is to determine whether a program of Kegel exercises prior to a resistance training program will result in reduction of stress urinary incontinence and whether this should be prescribed to incontinent women prior to performing resistance training. It is hypothesized that performing kegel exercises prior to resistance training would improve pelvic floor muscle strength and reduces the odds of experiencing SUI during resistance training.

Being tested
strength training program
Medical subject headings
Urinary Incontinence, Stress

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • strength training programBehavioural

    12-weeks of strength training consisting of warm ups, dead-lifts, squats and cool down exercises

Study groups in NCT05527639
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
intervention group during studyOtherall participants completed a 12 week strength training program consisting of warm up exercises, dead-lifts and squats. They had all completed a program of Kegel exercise prior.
Receives: Behavioral: strength training program
control group during studyOtherall participants completed a 12 week strength training program consisting of warm up exercises, dead-lifts and squats
Receives: Behavioral: strength training program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. incontinence severity index (ISI) tool

    questionnaire for self-reported frequency and severity of urinary incontinence. the higher the score, the higher the impact of incontinence

    Measured: Week 0

  2. incontinence severity index (ISI) tool

    questionnaire for self-reported frequency and severity of urinary incontinence. the higher the score, the higher the impact of incontinence

    Measured: Week 12

  3. pelvic floor muscle strength

    physiotherapist report from digital palpation and perineometry

    Measured: week 0

  4. pelvic floor muscle strength

    physiotherapist report from digital palpation and perineometry

    Measured: week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Sep 2022
  2. Study start18 May 2019
  3. Primary completion18 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion18 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
A comparative study using data from 2 separate studies. Data used for the resistance training (RT) group from a foundational single cohort that investigated impact of RT on stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in a group of women participating in a RT program who had not previously done Kegel exercises (KE). New data for the KE+RT group was from 2 consecutive studies where the women completed a program of supervised / unsupervised KE. These 19 women took part in 12 weeks of RT to compare against the KE group. The findings of two separate studies in which the effect of RT on SUI and pelvic floor muscle strength was compared between women who completed 12 weeks of RT with or without prior KE. The RT group consisted of 14 women who did not have an experience in RT or KE and completed 12 weeks of RT. Women in the KE plus RT group (n=19) completed 12 weeks of Kegel exercise under the supervision of a qualified pelvic floor specialist; then completed the identical RT program as the RT group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05527639
Sponsor's protocol ID
CharlesDarwinU
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
26 Aug 2022
Last updated
7 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing strength training program in people with Urinary Incontinence,Stress, run by Charles Darwin University at 1 site in Australia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

incontinence severity index (ISI) tool (time frame: Week 0). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in